[Influencing factors and antenatal assessment of the vaginal birth after cesarean section]

Predictors of Uterine Rupture After One Previous Cesarean Section: An Unmatched Case-Control Study

Background

Uterine rupture is a rare occurrence but has catastrophic complications during pregnancy. The incidence is relatively higher in scarred uteri because there is a promotion of labor after cesarean section. There is a scarcity of evidence from low-income countries regarding the predictors of uterine rupture after trial labor.

Objective

To assess factors determining uterine rupture during labor after the previous cesarean section among mothers delivered at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from September 2017 to September 2022.

Methods

A facility-based unmatched case-control study was done by reviewing 105 patients, which included 35 cases and 70 controls in a 1:2 case-to-control ratio. The association between dependent and independent variables was sought with running binary and multivariate analyses by using the cut point of a p value < 0.05 and 95% CI.

Results

The prevalence of uterine rupture is 1.6%. The factors significantly associated with uterine rupture after trial of labor are fetal weight >3.8 kg (AOR: 5.21), antenatal care 4 (AOR: 3.6), labor duration >15 hours (AOR: 10.7), and previous successful vaginal delivery (AOR: 3.4). Poor fetal-maternal outcomes like 91.4% fetal death, 29 hysterectomies, 22 blood transfusions, and 1 death.

Conclusion

The prevalence is relatively higher than in developed countries. The number of antenatal care, labor duration, and lower fetal weight are not common findings associated with uterine rupture after trial of labor across the literature, so large-scale studies are needed to develop guidelines for the Ethiopian setup. Improving the quality of obstetrics care given in each level of health system.

Laparoscopic repair of uterine rupture following successful second vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: A case report

BACKGROUND

With the increasing trend of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery (VBAC), evaluation of the feasibility and safety of a second VBAC with grand multiparity is worth considering. Intrapartum uterine rupture is diagnosed in approximately one-fifth of all VBAC cases following successful vaginal delivery. To our knowledge, no report is available on the application of laparoscopy to repair postpartum uterine rupture after a successful second VBAC in China.

CASE SUMMARY

A 31-year-old woman (gravida 5, para 2) at 39 wk and 5 d of gestation was admitted to the hospital in labour. After a successful VBAC and observation for approximately 13 h, the patient complained of progressive abdominal pain. Given the symptoms, signs, and auxiliary examination results, intraperitoneal bleeding was considered. Because the patient was stable and ultrasound imaging was the only method available to assess the possibility of rupture, we recommended laparoscopy to clarify the diagnosis and for prompt laparoscopic uterine repair or exploratory laparotomy if necessary. Operative findings included transverse uterine scar rupture at the lower uterine segment of approximately 5.0 cm in length and 800 mL of intraoperative pelvic haemoperitoneum. Finally, she successfully underwent laparoscopic repair of uterine rupture and recovered very well according to three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at 42 d postpartum.

CONCLUSION

Routine postpartum intrauterine exploration is not beneficial to the mother and may even increase the risk of rupture. This case highlights a laparoscopic approach for repairing uterine rupture in the immediate postpartum period.

Indicators for mode of delivery in pregnant women with uteruses scarred by prior caesarean section: a retrospective study of 679 pregnant women

Background

The delivery mode for pregnant women with uteruses scarred by prior caesarean section (CS) is a controversial issue, even though the CS rate has risen in the past 20 years. We performed this retrospective study to identify the factors associated with preference for CS or vaginal birth after CS (VBAC).

Methods

Pregnant women (n = 679) with scarred uteruses from Moulay Ali Cherif Provincial Hospital, Rashidiya, Morocco, were enrolled. Gestational age, comorbidity, fetal position, gravidity and parity, abnormal amniotic fluid, macrosomia, placenta previa or abruptio, abnormal fetal presentation, premature rupture of fetal membrane with labor failure, poor progression in delivery, and fetal outcomes were recorded.

Results

Out of 679 pregnant women ≥28 gestational weeks, 351 (51.69%) had a preference for CS. Pregnant women showed preference for CS if they were older (95% CI 1.010–1.097), had higher gestational age (95% CI 1.024–1.286), and a shorter period had passed since the last CS (95% CI 0.842–0.992). Prior gravidity (95% CI 0.638–1.166), parity (95% CI 0.453–1.235), vaginal delivery history (95% CI 0.717–1.818), and birth weight (95% CI 1.000–1.001) did not influence CS preference. In comparison with fetal preference, maternal preference was the prior indicator for CS. Correlation analysis showed that pregnant women with longer intervals since the last CS and history of gravidity, parity, and vaginal delivery showed good progress in the first and second stages of vaginal delivery.

Conclusions

We concluded that maternal and gestational age and interval since the last CS promoted CS preference among pregnant women with scarred uteruses.