[Long-term stability of periodontal root coverage procedures for gingival recession]

Root coverage of a maxillary lateral incisor with gingival recession, gingival stillman's cleft, bony exostosis, and denture stomatitis: a case report with 3-year follow-up

Background

Coronally advanced flap combined with connective tissue graft is considered as the golden standard of root coverage. Although Miller class I recession is considered to get complete root coverage, there are some uncommon conditions in different cases. This case reported a maxillary lateral incisor with a gingival recession, a stillman’s cleft, a bony exostosis and a denture stomatitis.

Case presentation

A 27-year-old female with a gingival recession, a stillman’s cleft and a bony exostosis was treated by coronally advanced flap combined with connective tissue graft technique, and the complete coverage was achieved. Later a denture stomatitis occurred when an acrylic removable partial denture was used, however the gingival margin was not affected. The denture stomatitis disappeared when a new denture with casting palatal plane was produced. In this case of 3-year follow-up, the gingival contour remained stable and the outcome was satisfactory.

Conclusion

Coronally advanced flap combined with connective tissue graft technique is a classic manner to treat gingival recession especially for a long term stability, even when there is a gingival stillman’s cleft, a bony exostosis and a denture stomatitis.

[Efficacy of tunnel technique for treatment of gingival recession of upper adjacent teeth with noncarious cervical defect]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of tunnel technique (TUN) in treatment of teeth with adjacent gingival regression (GR) combined with noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL).

METHODS

We collected data from 21 patients (79 teeth) undergoing TUN surgery for GR combined with NCCL. According to GR depth (GRD) and lesion depth (LD) of NCCL, the teeth were divided into group 1 with GRD≤3 mm and LD≤1 mm; group 2 with GRD≤3 mm and LD>1mm; group 3 with GRD>3 mm and LD≤1 mm; and group 4 with GRD>3 mm and LD>1 mm. The mean root coverage (MRC) rate, complete root coverage (CRC) rate, keratinized gingival width, and keratinized gingival thickness were compared among the 4 groups after TUN surgery.

RESULTS

The keratinized gingival width and thickness were significantly improved after the surgery in the 4 groups. When the GRD was below 3 mm, the MRC was not significantly different between group 1 and group 2 (8.55% vs 95.45%, P>0.05); When the GRD was beyond 3 mm, the MRC and CRC rates were both decreased in group 3 and group 4, especially in group 4, where the CRC rate (25%) was significantly lower than those in the other 3 groups (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In patients with GR combined with NCCL, TUN surgery can obviously improve keratinized gingival width and thickness. GRD has a greater effect on the outcome of root coverage than LD, suggesting that NCCL restoration before TUN surgery may not be necessary. Both GRD and LD should be considered in the evaluation of the clinical efficacy of TUN surgery.