Electrochemical behavior of dye-linked L-proline dehydrogenase on glassy carbon electrodes modified by multi-walled carbon nanotubes

Comparative analysis of the catalytic components in the archaeal dye-linked L-proline dehydrogenase complexes

Two types of hetero-oligomeric dye-linked L-proline dehydrogenases (α4β4 and αβγδ types) are expressed in the hyperthermophilic archaea belonging to Thermococcales. In both enzymes, the β subunit (PDHβ) is responsible for catalyzing L-proline dehydrogenation. The genes encoding the two enzyme types form respective clusters that are completely conserved among Pyrococcus and Thermococcus strains. To compare the enzymatic properties of PDHβs from α4β4- and αβγδ-type enzyme complexes, eight PDHβs (four of each type) from Pyrococcus furiosus DSM3638, Pyrococcus horikoshii OT-3, Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1 JCM12380 and Thermococcus profundus DSM9503 were expressed in Escherichia coli cells and purified to homogeneity using one-step Ni-chelating chromatography. The α4β4-type PDHβs showed greater thermostability than most of the αβγδ-type PDHβs: the former retained more than 80 % of their activity after heating at 70 °C for 20 min, while the latter showed different thermostabilities under the same conditions. In addition, the α4β4-type PDHβs utilized ferricyanide as the most preferable electron acceptor, whereas αβγδ-type PDHβs preferred 2, 6-dichloroindophenol, with one exception. These results indicate that the differences in the enzymatic properties of the PDHβs likely reflect whether they were from an αβγδ- or α4β4-type complex, though the wider divergence observed within αβγδ-type PDHβs based on the phylogenetic analysis may also be responsible for their inconsistent enzymatic properties. By contrast, differences in the kinetic parameters among the PDHβs did not reflect the complex type. Interestingly, the k cat value for free α4β4-type PDHβ from P. horikoshii was much larger than the value for the same subunit within the α4β4-complex. This indicates that the isolated PDHβ could be a useful element for an electrochemical system for detection of L-proline.

Recent advances in polymeric materials used as electron mediators and immobilizing matrices in developing enzyme electrodes

Different classes of polymeric materials such as nanomaterials, sol-gel materials, conducting polymers, functional polymers and biomaterials have been used in the design of sensors and biosensors. Various methods have been used, for example from direct adsorption, covalent bonding, crossing-linking with glutaraldehyde on composites to mixing the enzymes or use of functionalized beads for the design of sensors and biosensors using these polymeric materials in recent years. It is widely acknowledged that analytical sensing at electrodes modified with polymeric materials results in low detection limits, high sensitivities, lower applied potential, good stability, efficient electron transfer and easier immobilization of enzymes on electrodes such that sensing and biosensing of environmental pollutants is made easier. However, there are a number of challenges to be addressed in order to fulfill the applications of polymeric based polymers such as cost and shortening the long laboratory synthetic pathways involved in sensor preparation. Furthermore, the toxicological effects on flora and fauna of some of these polymeric materials have not been well studied. Given these disadvantages, efforts are now geared towards introducing low cost biomaterials that can serve as alternatives for the development of novel electrochemical sensors and biosensors. This review highlights recent contributions in the development of the electrochemical sensors and biosensors based on different polymeric material. The synergistic action of some of these polymeric materials and nanocomposites imposed when combined on electrode during sensing is discussed.