Exploring the retention properties of CaF2 nanoparticles as possible additives for dental care application with tapping-mode atomic force microscope in liquid

Healing Assessment of Osseous Defects after Surgical Removal of Periapical Lesions in the Presence of Hydroxyapatite, Nanohydroxyapatite, and a Combination of Nanohydroxyapatite and Platelet-rich Fibrin: A Clinical Study

Abstract: Aim: to evaluate the bone healing in failed endodontically treated teeth after surgical removal of periapical lesions and placement of hydroxyapatite (HA), nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) and a combination of nanohydroxyapatite with platelet rich fibrin (PRF) periapically. Subjects and methods: the study was conducted on twenty-four patients having periapical radiolucency in single rooted teeth. The selected teeth were divided into three groups: Group A, Group B, and Group C; of 8 teeth each. All the teeth were retreated in two visits. In the first visit the old filling was removed using Protaper retreatment files (Dentsply Sirona®) then irrigation with sodium hypochlorite 2.5% was done. All canals were dried and filled with Di-antibiotic paste (metronidazole and ciprofloxacin). In the second visit the canals were obturated with Pro Taper gutta-percha points and root canal sealer (Adseal resin sealer) followed by surgical intervention in the same day. A periapical curettage along with apicoectomy were established. In all the groups, root end cavity was prepared and filled with MTA (ProRoot MTA; DENTSPLY Tulsa Dental Specialties). In Group A, hydroxyapatite powder was packed in the curetted periapical defect. In Group B, nanohydroxyapatite powder was packed in the curetted periapical defect. In Group C, nanohydroxyapatite with PRF were mixed and packed in the curetted periapical defect. In all groups, patients recall visits were scheduled at 1, 3, and 6 months’ time intervals for clinical and radiological evaluation. Results: after one month; there was a statistically significant difference between the median percentage changes in lesions size in the three groups. Pair-wise comparisons between groups revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between group B (nHA) and group C (PRF and nHA) groups. Both showed statistically significantly higher median percentage reduction in lesions size than group A (HA group). After three as well as six months; there was no statistically significant difference between the median percentage decreases in lesions size in the three groups. Conclusion: It was concluded that nHA combination with PRF produced faster periapical healing (bone regeneration) in the first three months than nHA alone. However, HA produce periapical healing (bone regeneration) after six months.

Nanomaterials in dentistry: a cornerstone or a black box?

Aim: The studies on tooth structure provided basis for nanotechnology-based dental treatment approaches known as nanodentistry which aims at detection and treatment of oral pathologies, such as dental caries and periodontal diseases, insufficiently being treated by conventional materials or drugs. This review aims at defining the role of nanodentistry in the medical area, its potential and hazards. Materials & methods: To validate these issues, current literature on nanomaterials for dental applications was critically reviewed. Results: Nanomaterials for teeth restoration, bone regeneration and oral implantology exhibit better mechanical properties and provide more efficient esthetic outcome. However, still little is known about influence of long-term function of such biomaterials in the living organism. Conclusion: As application of nanomaterials in industry and medical-related sciences is still expanding, more information is needed on how such nano-dental materials may interfere with oral cavity, GI tract and general health.