[Meta analysis of association between Ser326Cys polymorphism of hOGG1 gene and risk of lung cancer]

Ethnic background and genetic variation in the evaluation of cancer risk: a systematic review

The clinical use of genetic variation in the evaluation of cancer risk is expanding, and thus understanding how determinants of cancer susceptibility identified in one population can be applied to another is of growing importance. However there is considerable debate on the relevance of ethnic background in clinical genetics, reflecting both the significance and complexity of genetic heritage. We address this via a systematic review of reported associations with cancer risk for 82 markers in 68 studies across six different cancer types, comparing association results between ethnic groups and examining linkage disequilibrium between risk alleles and nearby genetic loci. We find that the relevance of ethnic background depends on the question. If asked whether the association of variants with disease risk is conserved across ethnic boundaries, we find that the answer is yes, the majority of markers show insignificant variability in association with cancer risk across ethnic groups. However if the question is whether a significant association between a variant and cancer risk is likely to reproduce, the answer is no, most markers do not validate in an ethnic group other than the discovery cohort's ancestry. This lack of reproducibility is not attributable to studies being inadequately populated due to low allele frequency in other ethnic groups. Instead, differences in local genomic structure between ethnic groups are associated with the strength of association with cancer risk and therefore confound interpretation of the implied physiologic association tracked by the disease allele. This suggest that a biological association for cancer risk alleles may be broadly consistent across ethnic boundaries, but reproduction of a clinical study in another ethnic group is uncommon, in part due to confounding genomic architecture. As clinical studies are increasingly performed globally this has important implications for how cancer risk stratifiers should be studied and employed.

hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and lung cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

The Ser326Cys polymorphism in the human 8-oxogunaine glycosylase (hOGG1) gene with lung cancer susceptibility had been investigated by the approaches of PCR-RFLP, PCR-SSCP and ASA. Due to limited specimen and different approaches the conclusion was drawn toughly. To evaluate this correlation comprehensively, a meta-analysis was performed based on 30 case-control studies, including 10,327 cases and 12,148 controls. The random-effects model was used to estimate the odds ratios and 95 % confidence interval for various contrasts of this polymorphism. The combined results suggested that the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism was not associated with lung cancer susceptibility in different genetic models. Similarly, in the stratified analyses by ethnicity and source of control, no risk was observed between all the genetic models and lung cancer risk. Our meta-analysis revealed that there was little correlation between the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and the risk of lung cancer.

Smoking and hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism contribute to lung cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis

The human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (hOGG1) gene plays an important role in the repair of oxidatively damaged DNA base lesions and its functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may alter DNA repair capacity and thus contributes to cancer susceptibility. Numerous studies have investigated the association between hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and lung cancer susceptibility; however, the conclusions are still inconclusive. We searched eligible publications from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CBM and performed a meta-analysis to assess the associations between hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and lung cancer risk. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate risk associations, and false-positive report probability (FPRP) analysis was also carried out to evaluate significant findings. A total of 31 investigations with 10,220 cases and 12,284 controls were identified. When all studies were pooled, a significantly increased overall lung cancer risk was found (Cys/Cys vs. Ser/Ser: OR = 1.24, 95 % CI = 1.05-1.47, P = 0.013; recessive model: OR = 1.22, 95 % CI = 1.05-1.41, P = 0.008, and Cys vs. Ser: OR = 1.11, 95 % CI = 1.02-1.21, P = 0.022), and further stratification analysis showed that the association was stronger in Asians, never smokers, and more-cigarette takers. These results were confirmed by FPRP analysis. Despite some limitations, this meta-analysis provides solid evidence that hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism may contribute to lung cancer risk, particularly for Asian populations, never smokers, and more-cigarette takers. Nevertheless, these findings warrant further validation in single large investigations.

Association between the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and lung cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis based on 22,475 subjects

Objectives

The Ser326Cys polymorphism in the human 8-oxogunaine glycosylase (hOGG1) gene with lung cancer susceptibility had been investigated, but results were inconsistent and underpowered. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis assessing the association of hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism with risk of lung cancer.

Materials and methods

Relevant studies were identified through a search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM) using terms “lung cancer”, “hOGG1” or “OGG1”, “polymorphism” or “variation” and the last search updated on May 1, 2013. In this meta-analysis, we assessed 30 published studies involving 22,475 subjects that investigated the association between the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and lung cancer susceptibility.

Results

Overall, the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism was not associated with lung cancer susceptibility in different genetic models (dominant model comparison: OR = 0.133; 95% CI = 0.111–0.161; P_{heterogeneity} = 0.000), and recessive model: OR = 0.543; 95% CI = 0.399–0.739; P_{heterogeneity} = 0.000). Similarly, in the stratified analyses by ethnicity, significantly increased risks were found among Asians for homozygote comparison (OR = 0.850; 95% CI = 0.732 0.986; P_{heterogeneity} = 0.064), and dominant model (OR = 0.160; 95% CI = 0.137–0.187; P_{heterogeneity} = 0.001), and Caucasians for dominant model (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.03–1.77; P_{heterogeneity} = 0.015), and recessive model (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.03–1.77; P_{heterogeneity} = 0.015). In population-based populations, marginally significant increased risks were found in dominant model (OR = 0.143; 95% CI = 0.111 0.184; P_{heterogeneity} = 0.000) and recessive model (OR = 0.429; 95% CI = 0.261–0.705; P_{heterogeneity} = 0.000). We also found a significant difference between hOGG1 Ser326Cys genotype and lung cancer susceptibility in studies with hospital-based controls for homozygote model (OR = 0.798; 95% CI = 0.649–0.982; P_{heterogeneity} = 0.007),dominant model (OR = 0.122; 95% CI = 0.091–0.163; P_{heterogeneity} = 0.000).

Conclusion

Our data showed that the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism contributed to the risk of lung cancer.

Virtual slides

The virtual slides for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/3842531131031605

DNA repair genes polymorphism and lung cancer risk with the emphasis to sex differences

Polymorphisms in nucleotide and base excision repair genes are associated with the variability in the risk of developing lung cancer. In the present study, we investigated the polymorphisms of following selected DNA repair genes: XPC (Lys939Gln), XPD (Lys751Gln), hOGG1 (Ser326Cys) and XRCC1 (Arg399Gln), and the risks they present towards the development of lung cancer with the emphasis to gender differences within the Slovak population. We analyzed 761 individuals comprising 382 patients with diagnosed lung cancer and 379 healthy controls. Genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction/restriction fragment length polymorphism method. We found out statistically significant increased risk for lung cancer development between genders. Female carrying XPC Gln/Gln, XPC Lys/Gln+Gln/Gln and XRCC1 Arg/Gln, XRCC1 Arg/Gln+Gln/Gln genotypes had significantly increased risk of lung cancer corresponding to OR = 2.06; p = 0.04, OR = 1.66; p = 0.04 and OR = 1.62; p = 0.04, OR = 1.69; p = 0.02 respectively. In total, significantly increased risk of developing lung cancer was found in the following combinations of genotypes: XPD Lys/Gln+XPC Lys/Lys (OR = 1.62; p = 0.04), XRCC1 Gln/Gln+hOGG1 Ser/Ser (OR = 2.14; p = 0.02). After stratification for genders, the following combinations of genotype were found to be significant in male: XPD Lys/Gln+XPC Lys/Lys (OR = 1.87; p = 0.03), XRCC1 Arg/Gln+XPC Lys/Lys (OR = 4.52; p = 0.0007), XRCC1 Arg/Gln+XPC Lys/Gln (OR = 5.44; p < 0.0001). In female, different combinations of the following genotypes were found to be significant: XRCC1 Arg/Gln+hOGG1 Ser/Ser (OR = 1.98; p = 0.04), XRCC1 Gln/Gln+hOGG1 Ser/Ser (OR = 3.75; p = 0.02), XRCC1 Arg/Gln+XPC Lys/Gln (OR = 2.40; p = 0.04), XRCC1 Arg/Gln+XPC Gln/Gln (OR = 3.03; p = 0.04). We found out decreased cancer risk in genotype combinations between female patients and healthy controls: XPD Lys/Lys+XPC Lys/Gln (OR = 0.45; p = 0.02), XPD Lys/Gln+XPC Lys/Lys (OR = 0.32; p = 0.005), XPD Lys/Gln+XPC Lys/Gln (OR = 0.48; p = 0.02). Our results did not show any difference between pooled smokers and non-smokers in observed gene polymorphisms in the association to the lung cancer risk. However, gender stratification indicated the possible effect of heterozygous constitution of hOGG1 gene (Ser/Cys) on lung cancer risk in female non-smokers (OR = 0.20; p = 0.01) and heterozygous constitution of XPC gene (Lys/Gln) in male smokers (OR = 2.70; p = 0.01).

Association between the OGG1 Ser326Cys and APEX1 Asp148Glu polymorphisms and lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis

The previous published data on the association between the 8-oxo-guanine glycosylase-1 (OGG1) and apurinic/apyrimidinic-endonuclease-1 (APEX1/APE1) polymorphisms and lung cancer risk remained controversial. Several polymorphisms in the OGG1 and APEX1 gene have been described, including the commonly occurring Ser326Cys in OGG1 and Asp148Glu in APEX1. This meta-analysis of literatures was performed to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship. A total of 37 studies were identified to the meta-analysis, including 9,203 cases and 10,994 controls for OGG1 Ser326Cys (from 25 studies) and 3,491 cases and 4,708 controls for APEX1 Asp148Glu (from 12 studies). When all the eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis of OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism, significantly increased lung cancer risk was observed in recessive model (OR = 1.17, 95 % CI = 1.03-1.33) and in additive model (OR = 1.21, 95 % CI = 1.03-1.42). In the stratified analysis, significantly increased risk of lung cancer was also observed on the population-based studies (recessive model: OR = 1.26, 95 % CI = 1.08-1.46, additive model: OR = 1.42, 95 % CI = 1.06-1.73) and non-smokers (dominant model: OR = 1.20, 95 % CI = 1.02-1.42, recessive model: OR = 1.20, 95 % CI = 1.02-1.40, additive model: OR = 1.35, 95 % CI = 1.08-1.68). Additionally, when one study was deleted in the sensitive analysis, the results of OGG1 Ser326Cys were changed in Asians (recessive model: OR = 1.16, 95 % CI = 1.06-1.27, additive model: OR = 1.23, 95 % CI = 1.09-1.38). When all the eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis of APEX1 Asp148Glu polymorphism, there was no evidence of significant association between lung cancer risk and APEX1 Asp148Glu polymorphism in any genetic model. In the stratified analysis, significantly decreased lung adenocarcinoma risk was observed in recessive model (OR = 0.68, 95 % CI = 0.48-0.97, P (h) = 0.475, I(2) = 0.0 %). Additionally, when one study was deleted in the sensitive analysis, the results of APEX1 Asp148Glu were changed in Asians (recessive model: OR = 1.21, 95 % CI = 1.03-1.43) and smokers (dominant model: OR = 1.62, 95 % CI = 1.08-2.44, additive model: OR = 1.37, 95 % CI = 1.02-1.84). In summary, this meta-analysis indicates that OGG1 Ser326Cys show an increased lung cancer risk in Asians and non-smokers, APEX1 Asp148Glu polymorphism may be associated with decreased lung adenocarcinoma risk, and APEX1 Asp148Glu polymorphism show an increased lung cancer risk in Asians and smokers. However, a study with the larger sample size is needed to further evaluated gene-environment interaction on OGG1 Ser326Cys and APEX1 Asp148Glu polymorphisms and lung cancer risk.

The role of leptin receptor gene polymorphisms in determining the susceptibility and prognosis of NSCLC in Chinese patients

AIM

Although the role of genetic polymorphisms of leptin receptor (LEPR) gene in several cancers has been documented, the association between polymorphisms of LEPR gene and lung cancer remains unknown.

METHOD

We recruited 744 patients histologically diagnosed as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 832 controls in this study. Polymorphism analysis of LEPR gene was performed by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphisms.

RESULTS

The Arg/Arg genotype and Arg allele frequency of the Gln223Arg in LEPR gene were significantly prevalent in NSCLC subjects than in controls (P < 0.05). The odd ratio (OR) for NSCLC in Arg/Arg genotype carriers was 3.12 (95% CI: 2.25-4.56, P = 0.0023, with Gln/Gln as reference). There were no significant differences in the genotype distributions and allele frequencies of Lys109Arg and Lys656Asn in LEPR gene between NSCLC cases and controls (All P > 0.05). The Arg/Arg carriers had higher cancer grade and higher TNM stage. Kaplan-Mier curve showed the Arg/Arg carriers had a poor prognosis than those with Gln/Arg and Gln/Gln genotype carriers. Cox proportional hazards regression models showed the hazard ratio (HR) for death associated with Arg/Arg genotype was 3.43 (95% CI: 2.45-5.92, compared with Gln/Gln carriers, P = 0.002). The other two SNPs of LEPR gene did not show this trend in the evaluation of their role in determining the prognosis of NSCLC subjects.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest the polymorphisms of Gln223Arg, rather than Lys109Arg and Lys656Asn, may be used as a molecular marker for progression and prognosis of NSCLC.