[Exploration of Postoperative Follow-up Strategies for Early Staged NSCLC Patients on the Basis of Follow-up Result of 416 Stage I NSCLC Patients after Lobectomy]

Tumor immune microenvironment analysis of non-small cell lung cancer development through multiplex immunofluorescence

Background

Emerging evidence has underscored the crucial role of infiltrating immune cells in the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) development and progression. With the implementation of screening programs, the incidence of early-stage NSCLC is rising. However, the high risk of recurrence and poor survival rates associated with this disease necessitate a deeper understanding of the TIME and its relationship with driver alterations. The aim of this study was to provide an in-depth analysis of immune changes in early-stage NSCLC, highlighting the significant transitions in immune response during disease progression.

Methods

Tumor tissues were collected from 105 patients with precancerous lesions or stage I-III NSCLC. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to detect cancer driver alterations. Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) was performed to evaluate immune cell density, percentage, and spatial proximity to cancer cells in the TIME. Next Among these patients, 64 had NGS results, including three with adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), 10 with minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and 51 with stage I invasive cancers. Additionally, three patients underwent neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy and tumor tissue specimens before and after treatment were obtained.

Results

Patients with stage I invasive cancer had significantly higher density (P=0.01) and percentage (P=0.02) of CD8+ T cells and higher percentages of M1 macrophages (P=0.04) and immature natural killer (NK) cells (P=0.041) in the tumor parenchyma compared to those with AIS/MIA. Patients with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene exhibited decreased NK cell infiltration, increased M2 macrophage infiltration, and decreased aggregation of CD4+ T cells near tumor cells compared to EGFR wild-type patients. As NSCLC progressed from stage I to III, CD8+ T cell density and proportion increased, while PD-L1+ tumor cells were in closer proximity to PD-1+CD8+ T cells, potentially inhibiting CD8+ T cell function. Furthermore, M1 macrophages decreased in density and proportion, and the number of NK cells, macrophages, and B cells around tumor cells decreased. Additionally, patients with tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) had significantly higher proportion of M1 macrophages and lymphocytes near tumor cells, whereas those without TLS had PD-L1+ tumor cells more densely clustered around PD-1+CD8+ T cells. Notably, neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy induced the development of TLS.

Conclusions

This study offers an in-depth analysis of immune changes in NSCLC, demonstrating that the transition from AIS/MIA to invasive stage I NSCLC leads to immune activation, while the advancement from stage I to stage III cancer results in immune suppression. These findings contribute to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying early-stage NSCLC progression and pave the way for the identification of potential treatment options.

Prognosis of lung cancer with simple brain metastasis patients and establishment of survival prediction models: a study based on real events

Objectives

The aim of this study was to explore risk factors for the prognosis of lung cancer with simple brain metastasis (LCSBM) patients and to establish a prognostic predictive nomogram for LCSBM patients.

Materials and methods

Three thousand eight hundred and six cases of LCSBM were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015 using SEER Stat 8.3.5. Lung cancer patients only had brain metastasis with no other organ metastasis were defined as LCSBM patients. Prognostic factors of LCSBM were analyzed with log-rank method and Cox proportional hazards model. Independent risk and protective prognostic factors were used to construct nomogram with accelerated failure time model. C-index was used to evaluate the prediction effect of nomogram.

Results and conclusion

The younger patients (18–65 years old) accounted for 54.41%, while patients aged over 65 accounted for 45.59%.The ratio of male: female was 1:1. Lung cancer in the main bronchus, upper lobe, middle lobe and lower lobe were accounted for 4.91%, 62.80%, 4.47% and 27.82% respectively; and adenocarcinoma accounted for 57.83% of all lung cancer types. The overall median survival time was 12.2 months. Survival rates for 1-, 3- and 5-years were 28.2%, 8.7% and 4.7% respectively. We found female (HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.75–0.87), the married (HR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.75–0.86), the White (HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.84–0.95) and primary site (HR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.39–0.52) were independent protective factors while higher age (HR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.40–1.62), advanced grade (HR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.12–1.25) and advanced T stage (HR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.05–1.13) were independent risk prognostic factors affecting the survival of LCSBM patients. We constructed the nomogram with above independent factors, and the C-index value was 0.634 (95% CI 0.622–0.646). We developed a nomogram with seven significant LCSBM independent prognostic factors to provide prognosis prediction.

Efficacy of repeated surgery is superior to that of non-surgery for recurrent/second primary lung cancer after initial operation for primary lung cancer

Background

The current study aimed to determine the oncological efficacy and surgical safety of multiple pulmonary resections (MPRs) after prior curative surgery for local regional recurrent or second primary lung cancers.

Methods

All cases of lung cancer included in our prospective database between January 2000 and July 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The oncological efficacy endpoints for synchronous and metachronous MPR were five‐year overall survival (OS), disease‐free survival (DFS), and progression‐free survival (PFS) rates after the second surgery. The surgical safety endpoints were postoperative mortality and complications (Clavien‐Dindo classification) within 30 days.

Results

In total, 67 MPR cases were identified. There were no significant differences in the five‐year OS and DFS between the synchronous MPR group (n = 50) and the propensity score‐matched solitary major pulmonary resection group (n = 250) (5‐year OS 84.5% vs. 69.0%, log rank P = 0.112; DFS 64.4% vs. 58.0%, log rank P = 0.278). The five‐year OS and PFS of the metachronous MPR group (n = 17) were significantly better than those in the non‐surgical control group (n = 19) (5‐year OS 94.1% vs. 50.7%, log rank P = 0.005; 5‐year PFS 53.9% vs. 10.5%, log rank P = 0.020). No postoperative mortality or severe complications occurred in the MPR group.

Conclusion

The oncological efficacy of MPR is superior to the non‐surgical approach for the management of local regional recurrent or second primary lung cancer, with comparable postoperative mortality and complications.