1
|
Shaw WM, Khalil AS, Ellis T. A Multiplex MoClo Toolkit for Extensive and Flexible Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol 2023; 12:3393-3405. [PMID: 37930278 PMCID: PMC10661031 DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Synthetic biology toolkits are one of the core foundations on which the field has been built, facilitating and accelerating efforts to reprogram cells and organisms for diverse biotechnological applications. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, an important model and industrial organism, has benefited from a wide range of toolkits. In particular, the MoClo Yeast Toolkit (YTK) enables the fast and straightforward construction of multigene plasmids from a library of highly characterized parts for programming new cellular behavior in a more predictable manner. While YTK has cultivated a strong parts ecosystem and excels in plasmid construction, it is limited in the extent and flexibility with which it can create new strains of yeast. Here, we describe a new and improved toolkit, the Multiplex Yeast Toolkit (MYT), that extends the capabilities of YTK and addresses strain engineering limitations. MYT provides a set of new integration vectors and selectable markers usable across common laboratory strains, as well as additional assembly cassettes to increase the number of transcriptional units in multigene constructs, CRISPR-Cas9 tools for highly efficient multiplexed vector integration, and three orthogonal and inducible promoter systems for conditional programming of gene expression. With these tools, we provide yeast synthetic biologists with a powerful platform to take their engineering ambitions to exciting new levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William M. Shaw
- Biological
Design Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
- Department
of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
- Department
of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.
- Imperial
College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial
College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.
| | - Ahmad S. Khalil
- Biological
Design Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
- Department
of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
- Wyss
Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
| | - Tom Ellis
- Department
of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.
- Imperial
College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial
College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wierenga RP, Golas S, Ho W, Coley C, Esvelt KM. PyLabRobot: An Open-Source, Hardware Agnostic Interface for Liquid-Handling Robots and Accessories. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.07.10.547733. [PMID: 37502883 PMCID: PMC10369895 DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.10.547733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Liquid handling robots are often limited by proprietary programming interfaces that are only compatible with a single type of robot and operating system, restricting method sharing and slowing development. Here we present PyLabRobot, an open-source, cross-platform Python interface capable of programming diverse liquid-handling robots, including Hamilton STARs, Tecan EVOs, and Opentron OT-2s. PyLabRobot provides a universal set of commands and representations for deck layout and labware, enabling the control of diverse accessory devices. The interface is extensible and can work with any robot that manipulates liquids within a Cartesian coordinate system. We validated the system through unit tests and several application demonstrations, including a browser-based simulator, a position calibration tool, and a path-teaching tool for complex movements. PyLabRobot provides a flexible, open, and collaborative programming environment for laboratory automation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rick P. Wierenga
- Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Media Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Stefan Golas
- Media Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Wilson Ho
- Media Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Connor Coley
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Kevin M. Esvelt
- Media Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
PlasmidMaker is a versatile, automated, and high throughput end-to-end platform for plasmid construction. Nat Commun 2022; 13:2697. [PMID: 35577775 PMCID: PMC9110713 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30355-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Plasmids are used extensively in basic and applied biology. However, design and construction of plasmids, specifically the ones carrying complex genetic information, remains one of the most time-consuming, labor-intensive, and rate-limiting steps in performing sophisticated biological experiments. Here, we report the development of a versatile, robust, automated end-to-end platform named PlasmidMaker that allows error-free construction of plasmids with virtually any sequences in a high throughput manner. This platform consists of a most versatile DNA assembly method using Pyrococcus furiosus Argonaute (PfAgo)-based artificial restriction enzymes, a user-friendly frontend for plasmid design, and a backend that streamlines the workflow and integration with a robotic system. As a proof of concept, we used this platform to generate 101 plasmids from six different species ranging from 5 to 18 kb in size from up to 11 DNA fragments. PlasmidMaker should greatly expand the potential of synthetic biology. Despite their broad utility, design and construction of plasmids remains laborious and time-consuming. Here the authors report a robust, versatile, and automated end-to-end platform that enables scarless construction of virtually any plasmid.
Collapse
|
4
|
James JS, Jones S, Martella A, Luo Y, Fisher DI, Cai Y. Automation and Expansion of EMMA Assembly for Fast-Tracking Mammalian System Engineering. ACS Synth Biol 2022; 11:587-595. [PMID: 35061373 DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.1c00330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
With applications from functional genomics to the production of therapeutic biologics, libraries of mammalian expression vectors have become a cornerstone of modern biological investigation and engineering. Multiple modular vector platforms facilitate the rapid design and assembly of vectors. However, such systems approach a technical bottleneck when a library of bespoke vectors is required. Utilizing the flexibility and robustness of the Extensible Mammalian Modular Assembly (EMMA) toolkit, we present an automated workflow for the library-scale design, assembly, and verification of mammalian expression vectors. Vector design is simplified using our EMMA computer-aided design tool (EMMA-CAD), while the precision and speed of acoustic droplet ejection technology are applied in vector assembly. Our pipeline facilitates significant reductions in both reagent usage and researcher hands-on time compared with manual assembly, as shown by system Q-metrics. To demonstrate automated EMMA performance, we compiled a library of 48 distinct plasmid vectors encoding either CRISPR interference or activation modalities. Characterization of the workflow parameters shows that high assembly efficiency is maintained across vectors of various sizes and design complexities. Our system also performs strongly compared with manual assembly efficiency benchmarks. Alongside our automated pipeline, we present a straightforward strategy for integrating gRNA and Cas modules into the EMMA platform, enabling the design and manufacture of valuable genome editing resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua S James
- Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, U.K
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 138672, Singapore
| | - Sally Jones
- John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UH, U.K
| | - Andrea Martella
- Discovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge CB4 0WG, U.K
| | - Yisha Luo
- Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, U.K
| | - David I Fisher
- Discovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge CB4 0WG, U.K
| | - Yizhi Cai
- Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, U.K
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Synthetic Genomics, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Genomics, CAS Key Laboratory of Quantitative Engineering Biology, Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yáñez Feliú G, Earle Gómez B, Codoceo Berrocal V, Muñoz Silva M, Nuñez IN, Matute TF, Arce Medina A, Vidal G, Vitalis C, Dahlin J, Federici F, Rudge TJ. Flapjack: Data Management and Analysis for Genetic Circuit Characterization. ACS Synth Biol 2021; 10:183-191. [PMID: 33382586 DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Characterization is fundamental to the design, build, test, learn (DBTL) cycle for engineering synthetic genetic circuits. Components must be described in such a way as to account for their behavior in a range of contexts. Measurements and associated metadata, including part composition, constitute the test phase of the DBTL cycle. These data may consist of measurements of thousands of circuits, measured in hundreds of conditions, in multiple assays potentially performed in different laboratories and using different techniques. In order to inform the learn phase this large volume of data must be filtered, collated, and analyzed. Characterization consists of using this data to parametrize models of component function in different contexts, and combining them to predict behaviors of novel circuits. Tools to store, organize, share, and analyze large volumes of measurement and metadata are therefore essential to linking the test phase to the build and learn phases, closing the loop of the DBTL cycle. Here we present such a system, implemented as a web app with a backend data registry and analysis engine. An interactive frontend provides powerful querying, plotting, and analysis tools, and we provide a REST API and Python package for full integration with external build and learn software. All measurements are associated with circuit part composition via SBOL (Synthetic Biology Open Language). We demonstrate our tool by characterizing a range of genetic components and circuits according to composition and context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillermo Yáñez Feliú
- Department of Chemical and Bioprocess Engineering, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820244, Chile
| | - Benjamín Earle Gómez
- Institute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Schools of Engineering, Biology and Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820244, Chile
| | - Verner Codoceo Berrocal
- Institute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Schools of Engineering, Biology and Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820244, Chile
| | - Macarena Muñoz Silva
- Institute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Schools of Engineering, Biology and Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820244, Chile
| | - Isaac N Nuñez
- Department of Chemical and Bioprocess Engineering, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820244, Chile
- Institute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Schools of Engineering, Biology and Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820244, Chile
- ANID - Millennium Science Initiative Program - Millennium Institute for Integrative Biology (iBio), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8330005, Chile
| | - Tamara F Matute
- Department of Chemical and Bioprocess Engineering, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820244, Chile
- Institute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Schools of Engineering, Biology and Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820244, Chile
- ANID - Millennium Science Initiative Program - Millennium Institute for Integrative Biology (iBio), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8330005, Chile
| | - Anibal Arce Medina
- ANID - Millennium Science Initiative Program - Millennium Institute for Integrative Biology (iBio), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8330005, Chile
- Departamento de Genética Molecular y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8330005, Chile
| | - Gonzalo Vidal
- Institute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Schools of Engineering, Biology and Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820244, Chile
| | - Carlos Vitalis
- Institute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Schools of Engineering, Biology and Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820244, Chile
| | - Jonathan Dahlin
- The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Fernán Federici
- Institute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Schools of Engineering, Biology and Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820244, Chile
- ANID - Millennium Science Initiative Program - Millennium Institute for Integrative Biology (iBio), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8330005, Chile
- FONDAP, Center for Genome Regulation, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8330005, Chile
| | - Timothy J Rudge
- Department of Chemical and Bioprocess Engineering, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820244, Chile
- Institute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Schools of Engineering, Biology and Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820244, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Setting Up an Automated Biomanufacturing Laboratory. Methods Mol Biol 2021; 2229:137-155. [PMID: 33405219 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1032-9_5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Laboratory automation is a key enabling technology for genetic engineering that can lead to higher throughput, more efficient and accurate experiments, better data management and analysis, decrease in the DBT (Design, Build, and Test) cycle turnaround, increase of reproducibility, and savings in lab resources. Choosing the correct framework among so many options available in terms of software, hardware, and skills needed to operate them is crucial for the success of any automation project. This chapter explores the multiple aspects to be considered for the solid development of a biofoundry project including available software and hardware tools, resources, strategies, partnerships, and collaborations in the field needed to speed up the translation of research results to solve important society problems.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lashkaripour A, Rodriguez C, Mehdipour N, Mardian R, McIntyre D, Ortiz L, Campbell J, Densmore D. Machine learning enables design automation of microfluidic flow-focusing droplet generation. Nat Commun 2021; 12:25. [PMID: 33397940 PMCID: PMC7782806 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20284-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Droplet-based microfluidic devices hold immense potential in becoming inexpensive alternatives to existing screening platforms across life science applications, such as enzyme discovery and early cancer detection. However, the lack of a predictive understanding of droplet generation makes engineering a droplet-based platform an iterative and resource-intensive process. We present a web-based tool, DAFD, that predicts the performance and enables design automation of flow-focusing droplet generators. We capitalize on machine learning algorithms to predict the droplet diameter and rate with a mean absolute error of less than 10 μm and 20 Hz. This tool delivers a user-specified performance within 4.2% and 11.5% of the desired diameter and rate. We demonstrate that DAFD can be extended by the community to support additional fluid combinations, without requiring extensive machine learning knowledge or large-scale data-sets. This tool will reduce the need for microfluidic expertise and design iterations and facilitate adoption of microfluidics in life sciences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Lashkaripour
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Biological Design Center, 610 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher Rodriguez
- Computational and Systems Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Noushin Mehdipour
- Biological Design Center, 610 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Systems Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rizki Mardian
- Biological Design Center, 610 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Biological Design Center, 610 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Luis Ortiz
- Biological Design Center, 610 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology & Biochemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Douglas Densmore
- Biological Design Center, 610 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Young R, Haines M, Storch M, Freemont PS. Combinatorial metabolic pathway assembly approaches and toolkits for modular assembly. Metab Eng 2020; 63:81-101. [PMID: 33301873 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2020.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Synthetic Biology is a rapidly growing interdisciplinary field that is primarily built upon foundational advances in molecular biology combined with engineering design principles such as modularity and interoperability. The field considers living systems as programmable at the genetic level and has been defined by the development of new platform technologies and methodological advances. A key concept driving the field is the Design-Build-Test-Learn cycle which provides a systematic framework for building new biological systems. One major application area for synthetic biology is biosynthetic pathway engineering that requires the modular assembly of different genetic regulatory elements and biosynthetic enzymes. In this review we provide an overview of modular DNA assembly and describe and compare the plethora of in vitro and in vivo assembly methods for combinatorial pathway engineering. Considerations for part design and methods for enzyme balancing are also presented, and we briefly discuss alternatives to intracellular pathway assembly including microbial consortia and cell-free systems for biosynthesis. Finally, we describe computational tools and automation for pathway design and assembly and argue that a deeper understanding of the many different variables of genetic design, pathway regulation and cellular metabolism will allow more predictive pathway design and engineering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanna Young
- Department of Infectious Disease, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Matthew Haines
- Department of Infectious Disease, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Marko Storch
- Department of Infectious Disease, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK; London Biofoundry, Imperial College Translation & Innovation Hub, London, W12 0BZ, UK
| | - Paul S Freemont
- Department of Infectious Disease, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK; London Biofoundry, Imperial College Translation & Innovation Hub, London, W12 0BZ, UK; UK DRI Care Research and Technology Centre, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Storch M, Haines MC, Baldwin GS. DNA-BOT: a low-cost, automated DNA assembly platform for synthetic biology. Synth Biol (Oxf) 2020; 5:ysaa010. [PMID: 32995552 PMCID: PMC7476404 DOI: 10.1093/synbio/ysaa010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Multi-part DNA assembly is the physical starting point for many projects in Synthetic and Molecular Biology. The ability to explore a genetic design space by building extensive libraries of DNA constructs is essential for creating programmed biological systems. With multiple DNA assembly methods and standards adopted in the Synthetic Biology community, automation of the DNA assembly process is now receiving serious attention. Automation will enable larger builds using less researcher time, while increasing the accessible design space. However, these benefits currently incur high costs for both equipment and consumables. Here, we address this limitation by introducing low-cost DNA assembly with BASIC on OpenTrons (DNA-BOT). For this purpose, we developed an open-source software package and demonstrated the performance of DNA-BOT by simultaneously assembling 88 constructs composed of 10 genetic parts, evaluating the promoter, ribosome binding site and gene order design space for a three-gene operon. All 88 constructs were assembled with high accuracy, at a consumables cost of $1.50–$5.50 per construct. This illustrates the efficiency, accuracy and affordability of DNA-BOT, making it accessible for most labs and democratizing automated DNA assembly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marko Storch
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.,Imperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.,London Biofoundry, Imperial College Translation & Innovation Hub, London, W12 0BZ, UK
| | - Matthew C Haines
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.,Imperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Geoff S Baldwin
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.,Imperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
EvoBot: An Open-Source, Modular, Liquid Handling Robot for Scientific Experiments. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/app10030814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Commercial liquid handling robots are rarely appropriate when tasks change often, which is the case in the early stages of biochemical research. In order to address it, we have developed EvoBot, a liquid handling robot, which is open-source and employs a modular design. The combination of an open-source and a modular design is particularly powerful because functionality is divided into modules with simple, well-defined interfaces, hence customisation of modules is possible without detailed knowledge of the entire system. Furthermore, the modular design allows end-users to only produce and assemble the modules that are relevant for their specific application. Hence, time and money are not wasted on functionality that is not needed. Finally, modules can easily be reused. In this paper, we describe the EvoBot modular design and through scientific experiments such as basic liquid handling, nurturing of microbial fuel cells, and droplet chemotaxis experiments document how functionality is increased one module at a time with a significant amount of reuse. In addition to providing wet-labs with an extendible, open-source liquid handling robot, we also think that modularity is a key concept that is likely to be useful in other robots developed for scientific purposes.
Collapse
|
11
|
Walsh DI, Pavan M, Ortiz L, Wick S, Bobrow J, Guido NJ, Leinicke S, Fu D, Pandit S, Qin L, Carr PA, Densmore D. Standardizing Automated DNA Assembly: Best Practices, Metrics, and Protocols Using Robots. SLAS Technol 2019; 24:282-290. [PMID: 30768372 PMCID: PMC6819997 DOI: 10.1177/2472630318825335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The advancement of synthetic biology requires the ability to create new DNA sequences to produce unique behaviors in biological systems. Automation is increasingly employed to carry out well-established assembly methods of DNA fragments in a multiplexed, high-throughput fashion, allowing many different configurations to be tested simultaneously. However, metrics are required to determine when automation is warranted based on factors such as assembly methodology, protocol details, and number of samples. The goal of our synthetic biology automation work is to develop and test protocols, hardware, and software to investigate and optimize DNA assembly through quantifiable metrics. We performed a parameter analysis of DNA assembly to develop a standardized, highly efficient, and reproducible MoClo protocol, suitable to be used both manually and with liquid-handling robots. We created a key DNA assembly metric (Q-metric) to characterize a given automation method's advantages over conventional manual manipulations with regard to researchers' highest-priority parameters: output, cost, and time. A software tool called Puppeteer was developed to formally capture these metrics, help define the assembly design, and provide human and robotic liquid-handling instructions. Altogether, we contribute to a growing foundation of standardizing practices, metrics, and protocols for automating DNA assembly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David I. Walsh
- Bioengineering Systems and Technologies, MIT-Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, MA, USA
- Synthetic Biology Center at MIT, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Marilene Pavan
- Biological Design Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Luis Ortiz
- Biological Design Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Molecular Biology, Cell Biology & Biochemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Scott Wick
- Bioengineering Systems and Technologies, MIT-Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, MA, USA
- Synthetic Biology Center at MIT, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Johanna Bobrow
- Bioengineering Systems and Technologies, MIT-Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, MA, USA
- Synthetic Biology Center at MIT, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Nicholas J. Guido
- Bioengineering Systems and Technologies, MIT-Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, MA, USA
- Synthetic Biology Center at MIT, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Leinicke
- Hariri Institute for Computing, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dany Fu
- Hariri Institute for Computing, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shreya Pandit
- Hariri Institute for Computing, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lucy Qin
- Hariri Institute for Computing, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter A. Carr
- Bioengineering Systems and Technologies, MIT-Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, MA, USA
- Synthetic Biology Center at MIT, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Douglas Densmore
- Biological Design Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|