An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers

Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Clinically Uterine-Confined High-Grade Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare oncologic and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopy (RA) and conventional laparoscopy (LSC) in apparent clinically uterine-confined, high-grade adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted to identify patients with newly diagnosed high-grade uterine adenocarcinoma treated at our institution between 1 January 2009 and 30 June 2021. Exclusion criteria included bulky extrauterine disease, no lymph node assessment, or synchronous tumors. Clinicopathologic details were obtained from medical records. Postoperative complications were classified using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Surgical Secondary Events system, and statistical analysis was performed using appropriate tests.

RESULTS

Of 901 patients identified, 748 (83%) underwent RA and 153 (17%) underwent LSC. Median age was 65 years (range 25-92) and median body mass index was 30 kg/m2 (range 15-60). Overall, 650 patients (72%) had 2009 International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) stage I disease. Forty-one patients (4.6%) converted to laparotomy-26 (3.5%) from RA versus 15 (9.8%) from LSC (p = 0.02). Postoperative complications occurred in 81 patients (9.0%), with no significant differences in type or rate between groups. Median operative time was 192 mins (range 88-936) for RA versus 168 mins (range 90-372) for LSC (p = 0.002). Median follow-up was 52 months (range 1-163) for RA and 66 months (range 7-165) for LSC. Four-year progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were similar between groups. Multivariate analysis showed stage, histology, peritoneal cytology, and lymphovascular invasion predicated a decrease in PFS and DSS.

CONCLUSIONS

RA demonstrated comparable oncologic outcomes to LSC in patients with high-grade endometrial carcinoma, with no significant difference in postoperative complications or long-term survival.

Adjuvant therapy and recurrence risk in non-myoinvasive high-grade (stage IC) endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To summarize practice patterns and outcomes among patients with non-myoinvasive high-grade (formerly stage IA, now stage IC) endometrial cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to May 8, 2024 to identify studies reporting on treatment and outcomes of non-myoinvasive high-grade endometrial cancer. We included full-text English reports of patients undergoing adjuvant therapy or surveillance for polyp- or endometrium-confined high-grade endometrial cancer without myometrial invasion containing data on recurrence or survival outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened studies; a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Data were extracted using a standardized form. The primary outcome was recurrence risk. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to summarize binomial proportions and to compare outcomes by adjuvant treatment strategy.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies were included, representing 2770 unique patients. Overall, 49.0 % of patients were managed with observation and 37.9 % with chemotherapy. Most patients (92.5 %) had serous histology. Of 23 studies with data on recurrence, 13.7 % of patients recurred, with a meta-analysis estimate recurrence risk of 11 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 8-15 %). Across 13 studies reporting on recurrence by receipt of chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy, comparative meta-analysis showed similar likelihood of recurrence (8.0 % versus 13.2 %; odds ratio 0.73, 95 % CI: 0.38-1.42). Comparative meta-analyses for (1) adjuvant therapy versus observation and (2) observation or vaginal brachytherapy versus chemotherapy and/or external beam radiation therapy demonstrated no statistically significant difference in recurrence risk. Sensitivity analyses results, including those limiting to studies of patients with serous histology (12 studies) or complete surgical staging (10 studies), were overall consistent with the primary analysis. Survival data was inconsistently reported and not amenable to meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with non-myoinvasive high-grade endometrial cancer, recurrence risk was 11 % and use of adjuvant therapy was not associated with reduced recurrence risk. Prospective study of this population is warranted.

Prognostic nomogram for predicting the overall survival rate of patients with uterine clear-cell carcinoma: Based on SEER database

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk factors for uterine clear-cell carcinoma (UCCC) and construct nomograms predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of patients with UCCC.

METHODS

The demographic and clinical information of 1674 patients diagnosed with UCCC between 2004 and 2015, including age, race, marital status, tumor size, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, and details of surgery and radiotherapy/chemotherapy, was collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. After excluding patients with unknown AJCC stage, race, marital status, or lymph node information, 1469 patients remained. Risk factors were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses, and nomograms were developed to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival of UCCC. Various indicators were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram, such as the C-index, net classification improvement (NRI) and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Age, log odds of positive lymph nodes, AJCC stage, surgery status, and chemotherapy status were independent risk factors for UCCC. The C-indexes of the training group and AJCC stage groups were 0.771 and 0.697, respectively. The results for the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, NRI, and calibration curves indicated that the nomogram had good predictive ability. DCA revealed that the nomogram had greater clinical applicability than AJCC stage alone. Internal validation using the validation cohort also demonstrated that this nomogram had good predictive performance.

CONCLUSION

A new nomogram comprising a combination of demographic and clinical characteristics provided better survival predictions than the AJCC staging system alone, which will facilitate prognostic assessments and clinical decision-making.

The comparison of pure uterine serous carcinoma and mixed tumor with serous component: a single-institution review of 91 cases

BACKGROUND

Pure uterine serous carcinoma (p-USC) and mixed tumors with serous component (m-USC) are aggressive subtypes of endometrial cancer associated with high mortality rates. This retrospective study aimed to compare clinicopathologic features and outcomes of p-USC and m-USC in a single center.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with USC at Peking University People's Hospital between 2008 and 2022. T-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare clinicopathological characteristics between p-USC and m-USC. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox regression analysis were used to analyze the impact of clinical and pathological variables on OS and PFS.

RESULTS

Among the 91 patients who underwent surgery, 65.9% (n = 60) were p-USC, and 34.1% (n = 31) were m-USC. Patients with p-USC had earlier menopause (P = 0.0217), a lower rate of progesterone receptor(PR) expression (P < 0.001), and were more likely to have positive peritoneal cytology (P = 0.0464). After a median follow-up time of 40 months, 28 (46.7%) p-USC and 9 (29%) m-USC patients had progression disease, 18 (30%) and 8 (25.8%) patients died of their disease. 5-year PFSR were 51.2% and 75.3%, respectively, and 5-year OS rates were 66% and 67.4%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that p-USC was more likely to relapse than m-USC (P = 0.034), but there was no significant difference in OS. Cox regression analysis showed that lymph node metastasis and surgical approach were risk factors for OS, and myoinvasion depth ≥ 1/2 was an independent risk factor for PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

p-USC was more likely to relapse than m-USC, but there was no significant difference in OS between the two subtypes.

Stage I Clear Cell and Serous Uterine Carcinoma: What Is the Right Adjuvant Therapy?

This single-center study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the survival outcomes of patients with FIGO stage I clear cell and serous uterine carcinoma according to the type of adjuvant treatment received. The data were collected between 2003 and 2020 and only patients with stage I clear cell or serous uterine carcinoma treated with primary surgery were included. These were classified into three groups: No treatment or brachytherapy only (G1), radiotherapy +/- brachytherapy (G2), chemotherapy +/- radiotherapy +/- brachytherapy (G3). In total, we included 52 patients: 18 patients in G1, 16 in G2, and 18 in G3. Patients in the G3 group presented with poorer prognostic factors: 83.3% had serous histology, 27.8% LVSI, and 27.8% were FIGO stage IB. Patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy showed an improved 5-year overall survival (OS) (p = 0.02) and a trend towards an enhanced 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.056). In contrast, OS (p = 0.97) and PFS (p = 0.84) in the chemotherapy group with poorer prognostic factors, were similar with increased toxicity (83.3%). Radiotherapy is associated with improved 5-year OS and tends to improve 5-year PFS in women with stage I clear cell and serous uterine carcinoma. Additional chemotherapy should be cautiously considered in serous carcinoma cases presenting poor histological prognostic factors.

Minimally Invasive Compared With Open Surgery in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and open surgery in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer.

DATA SOURCES

A cohort study of all patients who underwent surgery for high-risk endometrial cancer between 1999 and 2016 at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) and a literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus of all published studies until December 2020.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

The systematic review identified 2,332 patients (14 studies, all retrospective except a subanalysis of a randomized comparison) and the cohort study identified 542 additional patients. Articles were included if reporting original data on overall survival and disease-free survival among patients with high-risk endometrial cancer, defined as International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell, mixed histology, or uterine carcinosarcoma. Studies that did not report at least one of the main outcomes, those in which one surgical technique (robotic or laparoscopic surgery) was missing in the comparison analysis with open surgery, and case reports were excluded. Additional data were extracted from a retrospective cohort of patients from Mayo. A random-effect model was used for meta-analysis.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO. Literature search and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers, as well as quality assessment using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. Meta-analysis showed that disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer who underwent minimally invasive surgery were not statistically different from those of patients who underwent open abdominal surgery (relative risk [RR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.82-1.05, I2 20%, P=.23; and RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77-1.11, I2 31%, P=.12, respectively). Subgroup analysis by stage (early vs advanced) did not identify a difference between surgical approaches.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive surgery and open surgery had similar disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42021275535.

Effects of Adjuvant Radiation Plus Chemotherapy on Survival Outcomes in Stage III C Endometrial Cancer According to Histology: Analysis of Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database

Purpose: To evaluate the survival benefit of radiation plus chemotherapy in adult females with stage IIIC endometrial cancer and to investigate whether the benefit varies according to histology. Methods: Data from adult females with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC endometrial cancer, who underwent at least total hysterectomy between 2010 and 2015, were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Adjuvant treatments were categorized as chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), chemotherapy with vaginal brachytherapy (VBT), or chemotherapy with EBRT+VBT. Multivariate Cox regression models, Kaplan-Meier curves, and log-rank tests were used to assess the association between treatment modality and overall survival (OS). Results: In total, 2138 cases were identified: stage IIIC1 (n = 1299 [60.8%]) and stage IIIC2 (n = 839 [39.2%]). Median OS for all patients was 48 (interquartile range [IQR] 28-70) months. Regarding adjuvant treatment, 40.5% of patients underwent chemotherapy only, followed by chemotherapy with EBRT (35.5%). Stage IIIC patients treated with chemotherapy plus radiation exhibited a significantly reduced risk for death from endometrial cancer in both univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.001). However, when stratified according to histology, OS also differed according to treatment modality when analyzing each histological type; combination therapy was no longer significantly different from chemotherapy alone for any histology (clear cell and carcinosarcoma). Combination therapy was associated with improved OS in patients with IIIC1 and IIIC2 disease. Similar associations were observed in patients with high-grade stage IIIC endometrioids. However, for low-grade tumors, combination therapy was no longer associated with reduced risk for death compared with chemotherapy alone. Conclusion: For patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer, combined treatment with radiation and chemotherapy was associated with improved OS compared with chemotherapy alone. However, no survival benefit was found, and radiotherapy may be unnecessary in patients with low-grade endometrioids.

Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in high-risk histologic endometrial cancer patients: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery (OPS) on the risk of recurrence and mortality in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) of high-risk histology (grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, papillary serous carcinoma [PS], clear cell carcinoma [CC], and carcinosarcoma) using meta-analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We systematically reviewed published studies comparing MIS and OPS in EC patients with high-risk histology until January 2022. The endpoints were recurrence and mortality rate. Study design features that may have affected participant selection, recurrence/death detection, and manuscript publication were assessed. For pooled estimates of the effect of MIS on recurrence/mortality, the random- or fixed-effects meta-analytical models were used after assessing the cross-study heterogeneity.

RESULT

Nine observational studies (eight retrospective and one prospective) fulfilled our search criteria (MIS, 8877 patients; OPS, 5751 patients). The fixed-effects model-based meta-analysis indicated that MIS did not significantly increase the risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-1.05; p = 0.13) and mortality (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.93; p < 0.001) when compared with OPS. This pattern was also observed in the subgroup analyses based on the stage (early stage vs. all stage), histology (PS and CC), and MIS type (laparoscopy vs. robotic). There was no evidence of publication bias.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis of observational studies revealed that MIS did not compromise the prognosis of EC patients with high-risk histology. Well-designed randomized controlled trials could verify the results of this uncommon but deadly tumor.

Endometriosis and gynaecological cancers: molecular insights behind a complex machinery

Endometriosis is described as the presence of both endometrial glandular and stromal cells outside the uterine cavity. A major characterization of this disease is ectopic implantation of endometrial cells with increased migration. It is one of the leading causes of morbidity among premenopausal women, with a prevalence of 10-16% of women of reproductive age. Despite over century of intensive research, none of the current treatment options represents a real cure. Based on the current knowledge, endometriosis, particularly its atypical version, is considered to be a transitional form from benign disease to tumour. However, the exact mechanisms of this conversion are still not fully established.

Minimally Invasive Compared With Open Hysterectomy in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare disease-free survival between minimally invasive surgery and open surgery in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentric, propensity-matched study of patients with high-risk endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and staging between January 1999 and June 2016 at two centers. High-risk endometrial cancer included grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell, undifferentiated carcinoma or carcinosarcoma with any myometrial invasion. Patients were categorized a priori into two groups based on surgical approach, propensity scores were calculated based on potential confounders and groups were matched 1:1 using nearest neighbor technique. Cox hazard regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves evaluated the association of surgical technique with survival.

RESULTS

Of 626 eligible patients, 263 (42%) underwent minimally invasive surgery and 363 (58%) underwent open surgery. In the matched cohort, there were no differences in disease-free survival rates at 5 years between open (53.4% [95% CI 45.6-60.5%]) and minimally invasive surgery (54.6% [95% CI 46.6-61.8]; P=.82). Minimally invasive surgery was not associated with worse disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.63-1.16; P=.30), overall survival (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.73-1.48, P=.81), or recurrence rate (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.69-1.44; P=.99) compared with open surgery. Use of uterine manipulator was not associated with worse disease-free survival (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.65-1.58, P=.96), overall survival (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.71-1.96, P=.53), or recurrence rate (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.67-1.87; P=.66).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in oncologic outcomes comparing minimally invasive and open surgery among patients with high-risk endometrial cancer.

The effect of surgical approach on the outcomes and prognosis of high-risk histologic endometrioid carcinomas

Background

High-risk histologic endometrioid carcinomas include poorly differentiated endometrial carcinoma (PDEC), uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC), uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), and uterine papillary serous carcinomas (UPCS). The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the effect of open surgery and minimally invasive surgery on the prognosis of patients with high-risk endometrial cancer tissue types.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted to investigate 57 UCS or UPCS, 53 UCCC, and 110 PDEC patients receiving initial treatment at the Department of Gynecology in Shaanxi Provincial Tumor hospital and the Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Xi'an Jiaotong University between February 2010 and January 2015. Prognostic factors were determined using univariate/multivariate analysis, and survival rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox regression model was adopted to assess the independent prognostic factors.

Results

Two hundred and twenty patients who met the criteria were included in this study. At the end of follow-up period, 94 patients were still alive. Univariate analysis found that the survival time of the patients was related to staging, adjuvant therapy, and surgical approach. Multivariate analysis revealed that surgical approach, staging, pathology, and adjuvant therapy were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions

Minimally invasive surgery has a shorter survival time compared to open surgery in women with PDEC, UCCC, UCS, and UPCS. Multivariate analysis confirmed that staging, pathological type, surgical approach, and postoperative adjuvant therapy are independent risk factors for prognosis and affect the survival of women with PDEC, UCCC, UCS, and UPCS.

Endometrial cancer-is our knowledge changing?

In developed countries, endometrial cancer (EC) is the most frequent gynecologic malignancy in postmenopausal women. At the same time, EC has become one of the most common cancers in numerous developing countries, probably influenced by global epidemic of obesity. The majority of patients have low-grade endometrioid cancer with a high 5-year survival rate, but with high-risk EC, the survival rates are still rather low. However, despite intensive research in last decades, our knowledge of the mechanisms, risk factors, diagnosis and treatment have not significantly improved. The standard treatment of all types of EC is still a traditional combination of surgery, irradiation and/or chemotherapy, despite the fact that each of these options is not without having some negative side effects. Despite the fact that on the molecular level, EC is relatively well-studied, but the efforts to transform these findings into either diagnosis or therapies of EC remain elusive. In addition, some research into risk factors involved in the development or progression of EC seems to be more a fishing expedition than a well thought-out approach. The purpose of this review is to summarize the most recent developments in the search for biomarkers and prognostic markers and to discuss the progress in EC treatment.

Uterine serous carcinoma: Molecular features, clinical management, and new and future therapies

Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is an aggressive subtype of endometrial cancer. Multimodality treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy is commonly used, given its propensity for extrauterine spread, distant recurrences, and poor prognosis. However, the use of molecularly-based therapy is expanding. Here, we review key molecular features of USC, discuss current management, and assess the landscape of novel therapies and combinations.

Oncologic outcomes for patients with endometrial cancer who received minimally invasive surgery: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic hysterectomy has been performed for patients with endometrial cancer as minimally invasive surgery; however, the long-term outcomes of high-risk disease compared to open surgery remain unclear.

METHODS

Eight hundred and eighty-three patients with endometrial cancer who underwent laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy were categorized into three groups. Low-risk disease was defined as stage IA disease with endometrioid carcinoma of grade 1 or 2. Uterine-confined disease was defined as stage IA disease with high-grade tumors or stage IB and II disease. Advanced disease was defined as stage III or IV disease. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared between laparoscopic and laparotomic hysterectomy.

RESULTS

Among 478 patients with low-risk disease, including 226 with laparoscopy and 252 with laparotomy, the prognosis was not significantly different between the groups (3-year PFS rate, 97.4% vs. 97.1%, p = 0.8; 3-year OS rate, 98.6% vs. 98.3%, p = 0.9). Among the 229 patients with uterine-confined disease, including 51 with laparoscopy and 178 with laparotomy, the prognosis was not significantly different between the groups (3-year PFS rate, 90.5% vs. 85.5%, p = 0.7; 3-year OS rate, 91.3% vs. 92.5%, p = 0.8). Among the 176 patients with advanced disease, including 24 with laparoscopy and 152 with laparotomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy had a higher PFS rate and OS rate than laparotomic hysterectomy (3-year PFS rate, 74.5% vs. 51.5%, p = 0.01; 3-year OS rate, 92.3% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic procedures are not associated with a poorer outcome than laparotomy in patients with advanced endometrial cancer or uterine-confined endometrial cancer.

Pten and Dicer1 loss in the mouse uterus causes poorly differentiated endometrial adenocarcinoma

Endometrial cancer remains the most common gynecological malignancy in the United States. While the loss of the tumor suppressor, PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog), is well studied in endometrial cancer, recent studies suggest that DICER1, the endoribonuclease responsible for miRNA genesis, also plays a significant role in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Conditional uterine deletion of Dicer1 and Pten in mice resulted in poorly differentiated endometrial adenocarcinomas, which expressed Napsin A and HNF1B (hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 homeobox B), markers of clear-cell adenocarcinoma. Adenocarcinomas were hormone-independent. Treatment with progesterone did not mitigate poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, nor did it affect adnexal metastasis. Transcriptomic analyses of DICER1 deleted uteri or Ishikawa cells revealed unique transcriptomic profiles and global miRNA downregulation. Computational integration of miRNA with mRNA targets revealed deregulated let-7 and miR-16 target genes, similar to published human DICER1-mutant endometrial cancers from TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas). Similar to human endometrial cancers, tumors exhibited dysregulation of ephrin-receptor signaling and transforming growth factor-beta signaling pathways. LIM kinase 2 (LIMK2), an essential molecule in p21 signal transduction, was significantly upregulated and represents a novel mechanism for hormone-independent pathogenesis of endometrial adenocarcinoma. This preclinical mouse model represents the first genetically engineered mouse model of poorly differentiated endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Surgical and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for stage I high-grade endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence and outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for stage I high grade endometrial cancer. We hypothesized that route of surgery is not associated with survival.

MATERIALS

Patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2014, with stage I grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell and carcinosarcoma endometrial carcinoma, who underwent hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy were drawn from the National Cancer Database. Patients converted to open surgery were excluded. Overall survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to control for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 12852 patients were identified. The rate of minimally invasive surgery was 62.2%. An increase in the use between 2010 and 2014 was noted (p < 0.001). Open surgery was associated with longer hospital stay (median 3 vs 1 day, p < 0.001), higher 30-day unplanned re-admission rate (4.5% vs 2.4%, p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (0.6% vs 0.3%, p = 0.008). There was no difference in overall survival between patients who had open or minimally invasive surgery, p = 0.22; 3-yr overall survival rates were 83.7% and 84.4% respectively. After controlling for patient age, tumor histology, substage, type of insurance, type of reporting facility, receipt of radiation therapy and chemotherapy, extent of lymphadenectomy, the presence of comorbidities and personal history of another tumor, minimally invasive surgery was not associated with a worse survival (hazard ratio: 1.06, 95% confidence interval: 0.97, 1.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive surgery for patients with stage I high grade endometrial cancer, was associated with superior short-term outcomes with no difference in overall survival noted.

Effect of Lymphadenectomy on Survival in Early-Stage Type II Endometrial Carcinoma and Carcinosarcoma

Purpose

We aimed to investigate whether systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection delivers any survival advantage in a subgroup of patients with type II endometrial carcinoma and carcinosarcoma.

Methods

We evaluated 135 patients with clinically early-stage (Stage I-II) type II endometrial carcinoma and carcinosarcoma who underwent systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection or who did not undergo any lymph node dissection.

Results

Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survivals (RFS) were significantly longer in the systematic lymph node dissection group (hazard ratio 0.28, 95% CI 0.13–0.62 p=0.002 for OS and hazard ratio 0.31, 95% CI 0.14–0.69 p=0.004 for RFS). Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node dissection, age, lymph node metastasis, and adjuvant therapy were independent prognostic variables of OS and RFS.

Conclusions

Systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection independently and significantly prolongs the survival of patients with early-stage type II endometrial carcinoma and carcinosarcoma.

High-Grade Endometrial Cancer-Behaviour and Outcomes at a Tertiary Cancer Centre

High-grade endometrial carcinomas are a heterogeneous group of clinically aggressive tumours. They include FIGO grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC), clear cell carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma and carcinosarcomas or malignant mixed Mullerian tumour (MMMT). The aim of this study is to look at clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of high-grade endometrial cancers of the uterus in our centre. A tertiary care centre in India. The study design is retrospective with survival analysis. We did a retrospective analysis of all patients admitted with a diagnosis of high-grade uterine carcinoma. Data regarding baseline characteristics, disease profiles, surgical outcomes, complications, extent of surgical staging, duration of surgery, blood loss, length of hospital stay, drain output, wound infection, surgico-pathological stage and grade, tumour size and location, myometrium and lymphovascular invasion, node positivity, adjuvant treatment, overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Survival analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier method. We had 115 females diagnosed with endometrial cancer. Of these, 40 patients had high-grade endometrial cancer. Mean age at presentation was 64.7 years (range 33-80 years). Of this, endometrioid adenocarcinoma grade III was the commonest (37.5%), followed by UPSC in 32.5% and MMMT in 22.5% patients. Clear cell variant and mixed dedifferentiated variant were reported in 5% and 2.5%, respectively. Over 48 months of follow-up, recurrence was detected in eight patients (20%) and median time to recurrence was 11 months. Mean recurrence-free survival was 32.8 months and mean overall survival was 38.6 months High-grade endometrial cancers are aggressive tumours of postmenopausal women. Surgical staging and combination chemotherapy along with radiation therapy are the mainstay of treatment. In spite of adequate debulking followed by adjuvant therapy, survival remains poor.

Clinical calculator predictive of chemotherapy benefit in stage 1A uterine papillary serous cancers

OBJECTIVE

Determine the utility of a clinical calculator to predict the benefit of chemotherapy in stage IA uterine papillary serous cancer (UPSC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were collected from NCDB from years 2010-2014. Based on demographic and surgical characteristics, a clinical score was developed using the random survival forest machine learning algorithm.

RESULTS

Of 1,751 patients with stage IA UPSC, 1,012 (58%) received chemotherapy and 739 (42%) did not. Older age (HR 1.06), comorbidities (HR 1.31), larger tumor size (HR 1.27), lymphovascular invasion (HR 1.86), positive peritoneal cytology (HR 2.62), no pelvic lymph node dissection (HR 1.51), and no chemotherapy (HR 2.16) were associated with poorer prognosis. Compared to no chemotherapy, patients who underwent chemotherapy had a 5-year overall survival of 80% vs. 67%. To better delineate those who may derive more benefit from chemotherapy, we designed a clinical calculator capable of dividing patients into low, moderate, and high-risk groups with associated 5-year OS of 86%, 73%, and 53%, respectively. Using the calculator to assess the relative benefit of chemotherapy in each risk group, chemotherapy improved the 5-year OS in the high (42% to 64%; p < 0.001) and moderate risk group (66% to 79%; p < 0.001) but did not benefit the low risk group (84% to 87%; p = 0.29).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest a clinical calculator is useful for counseling and personalizing chemotherapy for stage IA UPSC.

Unique Molecular Features in High-Risk Histology Endometrial Cancers

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States and the sixth most common cancer in women worldwide. Fortunately, most women who develop endometrial cancer have low-grade early-stage endometrioid carcinomas, and simple hysterectomy is curative. Unfortunately, 15% of women with endometrial cancer will develop high-risk histologic tumors including uterine carcinosarcoma or high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, or serous carcinomas. These high-risk histologic tumors account for more than 50% of deaths from this disease. In this review, we will highlight the biologic differences between low- and high-risk carcinomas with a focus on the cell of origin, early precursor lesions including atrophic and proliferative endometrium, and the potential role of stem cells. We will discuss treatment, including standard of care therapy, hormonal therapy, and precision medicine-based or targeted molecular therapies. We will also discuss the impact and need for model systems. The molecular underpinnings behind this high death to incidence ratio are important to understand and improve outcomes.

Contemporary management of uterine clear cell carcinoma: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) review and recommendation

Uterine clear cell cancer (UCCC) is a rare but aggressive disease. Due to its rarity, large, prospective studies focused on UCCC are exceedingly difficult therefore available data are generally from small, retrospective studies. There is also pertinent information from subsection analysis of larger studies that include UCCC and other histotypes. In 2009, the clinical practice committee of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) published a review on UCCC aimed at guiding management. Since that publication, there have been developments which are relevant to UCCC, these include availability of data from landmark trials regarding adjuvant therapy, increasing utilization of sentinel lymph node approach and availability of immunotherapy as a treatment option. This SGO review is updated with all relevant, published information since 2009 considered clinically important for management of UCCC. In addition, it follows the new SGO's style for this type of publication which includes utilization of the question and answer format.

Prognostic Factors of Uterine Serous Carcinoma-A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic factors of uterine serous carcinoma (USC) vary among studies, and there is no report of Chinese USC patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors in Chinese patients with USC.

METHODS

Patients with USC from 13 authoritative university hospitals in China and treated between 2004 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Three-year disease-free survival rate (DFSR), cumulative recurrence, and cumulative mortality were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to model the association of potential prognostic factors with clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Data of a total of 241 patients were reviewed. The median follow-up was 26 months (range, 1-128 months). Median age was 60 years (range, 39-84 years), and 58.0% had stages I-II disease. The 3-year DFSR and cumulative recurrence were 46.8% and 27.7%. Advanced stage (III and IV) (P = 0.004), myometrial invasion (P = 0.001), adnexal involvement (P < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.025), and positive peritoneal cytology (P = 0.007) were independently associated with 3-year DFSR. Advanced stage (P = 0.017), myometrial invasion (P = 0.008), adnexal involvement (odds ratio, 2.987; P = 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.031), and positive peritoneal cytology (P = 0.001) were independently associated with the cumulative recurrence. Myometrial invasion (P = 0.004) and positive peritoneal cytology (P = 0.025) were independently associated with 3-year cumulative mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal cytology and myometrial invasion could be independent prognostic factors for 3-year DFSR, cumulative recurrence, and cumulative mortality of patients with USC. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

National patterns of care and cancer-specific outcomes of adjuvant treatment in patients with serous and clear cell endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To investigate outcomes of adjuvant therapy for serous and clear cell endometrial carcinoma, as prior studies are limited by sample size and/or patient heterogeneity. National guidelines permit substantial variations in treatment, suggesting the need for additional data.

METHODS

Patients with FIGO stages I-III serous or clear cell uterine carcinoma who underwent at least total hysterectomy were identified in SEER-Medicare. Adjuvant external beam radiation, brachytherapy, and chemotherapy were determined using SEER fields and Medicare claims. The primary outcome was death from endometrial cancer (cancer-specific mortality [CSM]) evaluated using Gray's test (univariable analysis, UVA) and Fine-Gray regression (multivariable analysis, MVA).

RESULTS

A total of 1789 patients (1437 serous, 352 clear cell) were identified. In stages I-II patients (n = 1188), brachytherapy was significant for survival in UVA (P = 0.03) and MVA (P = 0.02). Additionally, in the subset with serous histology (n = 947), chemotherapy was also significant in UVA (P = 0.002) and approached significance in MVA (P = 0.05). The 4-year CSM for stages I-II serous cancers was 25% without brachytherapy or chemotherapy, 15% with one, and 9% with both (P ≤ 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons). In stage III patients (n = 601), chemotherapy was significant in UVA (P = 0.002) and MVA (P = 0.006). Most (81%) patients underwent lymph node dissection, which predicted lower CSM in stage III (P = 0.001) but not stages I-II patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest brachytherapy benefits stages I-II serous/clear cell cancers, chemotherapy benefits stage III serous/clear cell cancers, and both chemotherapy and brachytherapy benefit stages I-II serous cancers.

Comparison of outcomes in early-stage uterine clear cell carcinoma and serous carcinoma

PURPOSE

The treatment paradigm for uterine clear cell carcinoma is often linked to serous carcinoma. This study compares oncologic outcomes between women with uterine clear cell and serous carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed 114 women with stage I-II uterine clear cell carcinoma (n = 17, 15%) or serous carcinoma (n = 97, 85%) who underwent hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy at our institution from April 1992 to December 2011; 86 (76%) had stage IA, 14 (12%) had stage IB, and 14 (12%) had stage II disease. Median followup was 57 months.

RESULTS

Patients with uterine clear cell and serous carcinoma did not differ significantly by age ≥60 years, stage, or rate of lymphovascular invasion. There was no difference in the number of patients with clear cell or serous histology who received adjuvant radiotherapy (71% vs. 84%, respectively; p = 0.31); however, significantly fewer patients with clear cell histology received adjuvant chemotherapy (35% vs. 67%, respectively; p = 0.02). At 5 years, there were no significant differences in disease-free survival (94% vs. 84%, respectively; p = 0.27), disease-specific survival (100% vs. 92%, respectively; p = 0.20), or overall survival (100% vs. 89%, respectively; p = 0.34). The differences in chemotherapy utilization did not impact pattern of relapse, specifically peritoneal spread (7% vs. 6%, respectively; p = 0.92) or other distant sites (0% vs. 9%, respectively; p = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Oncologic outcomes and recurrence patterns of women with stage I-II uterine clear cell carcinoma compared favorably with those of women with serous carcinoma, despite significantly less adjuvant chemotherapy use. Potential reduction in adjuvant therapy in women with clear cell carcinoma should be studied prospectively.

Outcomes of Adjuvant Therapy for Stage IA Serous Endometrial Cancer

PURPOSE

Serous adenocarcinoma is a rare, aggressive histologic subtype of endometrial cancer with a high rate of recurrence and a poor prognosis. The optimal adjuvant treatment for early-stage patients is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the outcomes of stage IA serous endometrial cancers only treated at a single institution and determine whether our current approach of chemotherapy plus vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) is sufficient.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of our institution's pathology database, including all cases of stage IA serous endometrial carcinoma from 2000-2014 was completed. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for Overall and Recurrence-Free Survival (OS and RFS); hazard ratios were calculated using Cox proportional hazards modeling for independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

There were 63 patients with stage IA serous endometrial cancer of whom 79.4% were surgically staged. Percent RFS was 76.5% at five years while OS was 84.7% for the whole cohort. One of the 23 patients receiving VBT and chemotherapy recurred at the vagina versus four of 32 patients who were observed. Two patients in the observation group recurred in the pelvis while there were no first pelvic recurrences in the VBT and chemotherapy group (non- significant). Overall survival was 95% in the brachytherapy and chemotherapy group versus 79.6% in the observation group (non-significant). Post-operative management included observation (n=33), combination VBT and chemotherapy (n=21), or chemotherapy with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (n=9).

DISCUSSION

We report one of the largest cohorts of serous endometrial cancer stage IA patients. Our results emphasize the inferior RFS and OS of stage IA serous versus endometrioid endometrial cancer patients. While some centers continue to use EBRT for these patients, our results demonstrate low pelvic recurrence rates with radiotherapy limited to VBT, as well as the high systemic risk regardless of treatment. We advocate for combination chemotherapy and brachytherapy given the poor outcomes in these patients.

Clinical Significance of Positive Pelvic Washings in Uterine Papillary Serous Carcinoma Confined to an Endometrial Polyp

Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) represents 10% of endometrial carcinomas. Significant number of patients initially present with extrauterine disease. The role of adjuvant treatment in low stage, especially polyp-confined UPSC is controversial. This multi-institutional study evaluated the significance of positive pelvic washing (PW) and adjuvant treatment on disease recurrence in a setting of endometrial polyp-confined UPSC. Surgical pathology files from 3 institutions were searched for cases of endometrial polyp-confined UPSC. Following histologic review, cases were clinically staged as Stage I, without myoinvasion or lymphovascular invasion. Clinicopathologic characteristics, results of PW, and type of adjuvant therapy were recorded. Statistical analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method for survival and Fisher exact test were performed. Thirty-three patients were included in the study. All patients were diagnosed with polyp-confined UPSC. The size of the polyp ranged from 0.3 to 4.3 cm. PW was positive for tumor cells in 8/33 (24%) patients. Twenty-two patients (66.6%) received some type of adjuvant treatment. Six patients (18%) developed recurrent disease. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival in the patients receiving adjuvant treatment versus not (P=0.375). However, there was significant association (P=0.0013) between positive PW and disease recurrence. Data are conflicting whether positive PW affects prognosis in low-stage endometrial carcinomas. Our study showed that in UPSC, malignant cells can be present in PW without lymphovascular invasion or myoinvasion and may have negative prognostic implication. Our data also reflect the controversies in the role of adjuvant treatment in endometrium-confined UPSC.

External pelvic and vaginal irradiation vs. vaginal irradiation alone as postoperative therapy in women with early stage uterine serous carcinoma: Results of a National Cancer Database analysis

PURPOSE

Adjuvant treatment in early stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC) usually consists of chemotherapy with vaginal brachytherapy (VB), pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), or combination. We compared survival outcomes across these various radiation treatment modalities using the National Cancer Database.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The National Cancer Database was queried for adult females with histologically confirmed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1988 Stage I-II USC diagnosed from 2003 to 2013 treated definitively with hysterectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. χ² tests were used to assess differences by radiation type (VB, pelvic EBRT, and EBRT + VB) and various clinical variables. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test methods were used to evaluate survival outcomes. Risk factors related to overall survival were identified by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 1336 patients with USC who met our inclusion criteria. Most patients were treated with VB (66%) compared with EBRT (21%) or combination EBRT + VB (13%). The proportion of patients who received EBRT (including EBRT + VB) was higher for those who did not have a lymph node dissection or with fewer dissected lymph nodes. Patients treated with VB alone had longer 5-year survival rates (84% [95% confidence interval: 80, 90]) than those treated with EBRT (75% [95% confidence interval: 69, 80]) (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, the presence of lymphovascular space invasion (hazard ratio, 2.48; p < 0.001) and the absence of a lymph node dissection (hazard ratio, 2.24; p = 0.047) were independent predictors of overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This large hospital-based study suggests that VB alone may be sufficient for adjuvant radiation treatment in women with USC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and who underwent an adequate surgical staging.

Clinical outcomes and the role of adjuvant therapy sequencing in Type II uterine cancer following definitive surgical treatment

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION

Because of rarity, consensus on adjuvant therapies for Type II endometrial cancers (BC) remains undefined. Reporting their institutional outcomes, the present authors assessed the impact of adjuvant therapies on recurrence and overall survival in women with 2009 FIGO Stage I-III Type II BC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The authors identified 108 women, treated with definitive surgery between 2000-2013, with pathologically-confirmed Type II EC (non-endometrioid [NEM, n=801 and high grade endometrioid [G3EEC, n=28]) Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the effect of prognostic variables on disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess survival.

RESULTS

Of the 108 women, 83 (77%) were African American (AA). Fifty-nine (55%), 12 (11%), and 37 (34%) were Stage I, II, and III, respectively. Ninety-seven patients received adjuvant therapy: 52 (radiation only), four (chemotherapy only), and 40 (combined). During follow-up (median 41 months), 44 patients (41%) recurred. Five-year DFS was 53% overall (48% [NEM], 80% [G3EEC]). Five-year OS was 75% overall (68% [NEM], 95% [G3EEC]). On multivariate analysis, lower stage and adjuvant radiation improved DFS. Higher stage, NEM, and increasing age were poor prognostic indicators of OS.

CONCLUSION

Representing a large single institutional cohort for Type II BC, the present study's observed sur- vival rates are consistent with previous studies, despite the relatively high frequency of carcinosarcoma and Stage III/nodal disease. The protective effect on recurrence was not lost when radiation was delayed for chemotherapy. The present results support a multimodal adjuvant approach for treating all stages of invasive NEM EC.

Optimal cytoreduction, depth of myometrial invasion, and age are independent prognostic factors for survival in women with uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, treatment methods, and prognostic factors in women with uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) and uterine clear-cell carcinoma (UCCC).

STUDY DESIGN

All patients who had undergone surgery for UPCS and UCCC between January 1995 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with missing data, who did not undergo surgical staging and patients with mixed tumor histology were excluded. Multivariate regression models were used to identify the risk factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 49 UPSC and 22 UCCC women were included. The majority of the patients were at stage I [IA, 22 (31%) and IB, 18 (25.4%)]. Stages II, III, and IV were identified in 9 (12.7%), 13 (18.3%), and 9 (12.7%) of cases, respectively. Optimal cytoreduction was achieved in 71.8% of cases. Recurrences occurred in 16 patients (22.5%). The 5-year OS rates were 67% for UPSC; 76% for UCCC; 68% for both histology, respectively. Multivariate analysis pointed out that age>67 years (odds ratio (OR): 3.85, p = 0.009 and OR: 3.35, p = 0.014), >50% myometrial invasion (MI) (OR: 2.87, p = 0.037 and OR: 2.46, p = 0.046) and optimal cytoreduction (OR: 3.26, p = 0.006 and OR: 2.77, p = 0.015) were the independent prognostic factors for both PFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that optimal cytoreduction, >50% MI, and age >67 years are the most significant factors affecting survival in women with UPSC and UCCC.

Early-stage Uterine Pure and Mixed Clear Cell Carcinoma: Outcomes and Recurrence With and Without Adjuvant Therapy

OBJECTIVE

Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) of the uterus is a rare but aggressive histology for which the role of adjuvant therapy for stage I-II disease is unclear. Our study investigated outcomes and patterns of failure in these patients.

METHODS

We found 64 cases of CCC, including 26 of pure CCC, 22 mixed with endometrioid adenocarcinoma, and 16 mixed with uterine papillary serous carcinoma. Adjuvant treatment was given to 55%.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 51.9 months. By Kaplan-Meier estimate, 5-year vaginal recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 91.3%, pelvic RFS was 92.6%, distant metastasis RFS was 81.6%, disease-free survival was 79.6%, and overall survival was 79.7%. Median time to recurrence was 20.7 months (range, 2 to 40.5 mo). Patients treated adjuvantly had higher proportion of stage II disease (40% vs. 6.9% observed, P=0.0031) and 20% (7/35) recurred. There were no significant differences in outcomes by histologic subtypes but numerically more recurrences with uterine papillary serous involvement. By univariate analysis, higher stage, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and lack of lymph node dissection were predictive of worse overall survival. Age 65 years and above was predictive of worse cancer-specific survival. Of 12 who progressed, only 1 was salvaged and 11 died of disease. Of progressors, 10 had documented distant metastasis. Median time from recurrence to death was 4.5 months (range, 0.2 to 21.2 mo).

CONCLUSIONS

Given aggressive and often unsalvageable nature of recurrence, consideration of adjuvant treatment (including chemotherapy and radiation) is warranted for early-stage CCC, particularly for stage II or those with poor prognostic factors.