Impact on survival with adjuvant radiotherapy for clear cell, mucinous, and endometriod ovarian cancer: the SEER experience from 2004 to 2011

Role of radiotherapy in the management of rare gynaecological cancers

There are a large number of gynaecological cancers with rare histologies, for which the available data are limited and usually retrospective. Because of their rarity and poor prognosis, the management of these cancers must be centralized in expert centres, for both histological diagnosis and treatment. With the exception of sarcomas, most endometrial or cervical cancers with rare histologies respond to the same radiation treatment modalities than cancers with more common histologies, although there are some specificities regarding treatments such as neuroendocrine carcinomas (chemotherapy with platinum and etoposide, major role of surgery). For localized or locally advanced ovarian cancer, external beam radiotherapy has a role in the management of hypercalcaemic small cell carcinoma of the ovary. This article summarizes the current role of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy in the management of cancers of the uterine cervix, uterine corpus and ovaries, with rare or very rare histologies, and with localized or locally advanced stages.

The Significance of Radiotherapy in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the response rate and survival effect of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) during ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC).

METHODS

We searched Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane library electronic databases, Clinical Trials, WanFang Data and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) up to October 2022. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings and reference lists of included studies.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 4259 patients from 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled response rate of residual tumors for RT/CRT was 80.0%, the pooled 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) ratio during RT/CRT group was 61.0%, and the pooled 5-year overall survival (OS) ratio during RT/CRT group was 68.0%; heterogeneity tests demonstrated significant difference between studies (I² >50%). Cumulative results suggested adjuvant RT/CRT improved 5-year PFS ratio of OCCC patients (OR: 0.51 (95% CI: 0.42-.88), I² = 22%, P = .009), had no impact on 5-year OS ratio (OR: 0.52 (95% CI: 0.19-1.44), I² = 87%, P = .21); meta-regression of studies before and after 2000 found consistent results. Sub-analysis observed that adjuvant RT/CRT had no impact on 5-year OS ratio of early-stage (stage I + II) OCCC patients (OR: 0.67 (95% CI: 0.25-1.83), I² = 85%, P = .44), but might improve 5-year OS ratio of advanced and recurrent OCCC patients (OR: 0.13(95% CI: 0.04-.44), P = .001).

CONCLUSION

This analysis suggested that adjuvant RT/CRT might improve oncologic outcomes of OCCC, especially for advanced and recurrent cases. Due to the inherent selective biases of retrospective studies enrolled in the meta-analysis, more convincing evidences based on prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are urgently needed.

Gamma Knife radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors from ovarian cancer: histopathological analysis of survival and local control. A Japanese multi-institutional cooperative and retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Brain metastasis is rare in ovarian cancer patients. The results of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for the treatment of patients with brain metastases from ovarian cancer were retrospectively analyzed to derive the efficacy and prognostic factors for survival and local tumor control. Further histopathological analysis was also performed.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 118 patients with 566 tumors who had undergone GKRS at the 10 GKRS institutions in Japan.

RESULTS

After the initial GKRS, the median overall survival time was 18.1 months. Multivariate analysis showed that uncontrolled primary cancer (p = 0.003) and multiple intracranial metastases (p = 0.034) were significant unfavorable factors. Ten patients died of uncontrolled brain metastases at a median of 17.1 months. The 6-, 12-, and 24-month neurological death rates were 3.2%, 4.6%, and 11.9%, respectively. The 6-, 12-, and 24-month neurological deterioration rates were 7.2%, 13.5%, and 31.4%, respectively. The 6-, 12-, and 24-month distant brain control failure rates were 20.6%, 40.2%, and 42.3%, respectively. Median tumor volume was 1.6 cm3 and marginal dose was 20 Gy. The 6-, 12-, and 24-month local tumor control rates were 97.6%, 95.2%, and 88.0%, respectively. Peritumoral edema (p = 0.043), more than 7-cm3 volume (p = 0.021), and prescription dose less than 18 Gy (p = 0.014) were factors that were significantly correlated in local tumor control failure. Eight patients had symptomatic radiation injury. The 6-, 12-, and 24-month GKRS-related complication rates were 3.3%, 7.8%, and 12.2%, respectively. Primary ovarian cancer was histopathologically diagnosed for 313 tumors in 69 patients. Serous adenocarcinoma was found in 37 patients and other types in 32 patients. Median survival times were 32.3 months for the serous type and 17.4 months for other types after initial GKRS. Patients with serous-type tumors survived significantly longer than patients with other types (p = 0.039). The 6-, 12-, and 24-month local tumor control rates were 100%, 98.8%, and 98.8%, respectively. Serous-type tumors were a significantly good prognosis factor for local tumor control after GKRS (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

This study established a relationship between the efficacy of GKRS treatment for brain metastases and the histological type of primary ovarian cancer. GKRS for ovarian cancer brain metastasis can provide satisfactory survival and local control, especially in cases of serous adenocarcinoma.

The role of radiotherapy in ovarian cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer accounts for around 1.9% of all malignancies and often presents late at an advanced stage. Prognosis is therefore poor. Currently the mainstay of treatment is radical cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy but, in the past, the standard of care also included adjuvant whole abdominal radiotherapy. This is no longer standard practice, largely due to high toxicity rates and the effectiveness of platinum-based chemotherapy. Presently, a role is emerging for modern radiotherapy techniques in both the salvage and palliative settings. This review aims to examine the historical use of radiotherapy in ovarian cancer before looking forward to its potential future role.

Options for the Treatment of Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Complete surgical resection is the gold-standard treatment for all mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) cases. Advanced-stage disease is often additionally treated with adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy; however, these were developed largely against the more common high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and have low efficacy in treating MOC. More effective therapeutics are needed to treat late-stage and platinum-resistant tumors; however, traditional drug development and clinical trial paradigms are a major challenge for such a rare disease. New approaches to support evidence-based treatment decisions are required, such as registry trials. Recently, a number of targeted therapies have emerged as viable treatment options in other cancer types, and for some of these, the actionable tumor mutations are also seen in MOC. Thus, a promising alternative approach to provide benefit to current MOC patients involves DNA sequencing to identify a tumor's unique mutational profile and allow matching to available targeted agents. Such a pipeline can involve special approval to administer a drug already approved for clinical use in other cancer types to a given MOC patient, or their inclusion in existing ongoing clinical trials, such as basket trials encompassing patients with tumors from a range of anatomical sites. Implementation of such personalized medicine can be boosted using improved pre-clinical models, where through a clinical research collaboration a patient's own tumor cells can be used to a test a range of putative therapies prior to administration in the clinic, enabling selection of the available pharmaceutical/s that give any given patient the best possible chance of cancer remission.

Development of a nomogram to predict prognosis in ovarian cancer: a SEER-based study

Background

Ovarian cancer remains the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. In this study, we aimed to identify the specific risk factors affecting overall survival (OS) and develop a nomogram for prognostic prediction of ovarian cancer patients based on data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Methods

Information from the SEER database on ovarian cancer between 2004 and 2016 was screened and retrieved. Cases were randomly divided into the training cohort hand the validation cohort at a 7:3 ratio. The prognostic effects of individual variables on survival were evaluated via Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model using data from the training cohort. A nomogram was formulated to predict the 3- and 5-year OS rates of patients with ovarian cancer, and then validated both in the training cohort and the validation cohort.

Results

A total of 28,375 patients were selected from 75,921 samples (19,862 in training cohort and 8,513 in validation cohort). Cox regression analysis identified race, age laterality, histology, stage, grade, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and marital status as independent risk factors for ovarian cancer prognosis. A nomogram was developed based on the results of multivariate analysis and validated using an internal bootstrap resampling approach, which demonstrated a sufficient level of discrimination according to the C-index (0.752, 95% CI: 0.746–0.758 in the training cohort, 0.755, 95% CI: 0.746–0.764).

Conclusions

We developed a nomogram valuable for accurate prediction of 3- and 5-year OS rates of ovarian cancer patients based on individual characteristics.

Prognosis of ovarian clear cell cancer compared with other epithelial cancer types: A population-based analysis

In order to compare the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) to other epithelial cancer types, a total of 27,290 patients were analyzed, including 2,424 patients with CCC (8.9%), 3,505 patients with endometrioid cancer (EC) (12.8%), 2,379 patients with mucinous cancer (MC) (8.7%) and 18,982 patients with serous cancer (SC) (69.6%). Patients with EC had the most favorable prognosis and patients with SC had the poorest prognosis among all epithelial ovarian cancers. Among patients with stage I cancer, patients with CCC had a more favorable prognosis compared with patients with SC, especially after 60 months (landmark analysis results, HR=2.079, P=0.001) and had a poorer prognosis compared with patients with MC [restricted mean survival time (RMST) difference, −3.434 months]. Among patients at stages III and IV, patients with CCC had a poorer prognosis compared with patients with SC (RMST difference in stage III, −7.588 months; RMST difference in stage IV, −15.445 months) and had a more favorable prognosis compared with patients with MC (RMST difference in stage III, 10.850 months; RMST difference in stage IV, 8.430 months). The present results suggested that most patients with CCC exhibited, high grade, an early stage, unilateral status and were of a young age. In general, patients with SC presented the poorest prognosis among all patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and no significant survival difference was found between patients with CCC and MC. However, after adjusting for stage using pairwise comparisons, the prognosis of patients with CCC was found to be more favorable compared with the patients with SC and worse compared with patients with MC at stage I; the results at stage III–IV were opposite and the prognosis of patients with CCC was worse compared with the patients with SC and more favorable compared with the patients with MC.

An international, phase III randomized trial in patients with mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (mEOC/GOG 0241) with long-term follow-up: and experience of conducting a clinical trial in a rare gynecological tumor

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated four different treatment regimens for advanced-stage mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter randomized factorial trial (UK and US). Patients were diagnosed with primary mEOC: FIGO stage II-IV or recurrence after stage I disease. Treatment arms were paclitaxel-carboplatin, oxaliplatin-capecitabine, paclitaxel-carboplatin-bevacizumab, or oxaliplatin-capecitabine-bevacizumab. Chemotherapy was given 3-weekly for 6 cycles, and bevacizumab (3-weekly) was continued as maintenance (for 12 cycles). Endpoints included overall-survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

The trial stopped after 50 patients were recruited due to slow accrual. Median follow-up was 59 months. OS hazard ratios (HR) for the two main comparisons were: 0.78 (p = 0.48) for Oxal-Cape vs. Pac-Carbo (each with/without bevacizumab), and 1.04 (p = 0.92) for bevacizumab vs. no bevacizumab. Corresponding PFS HRs were: 0.84 and 0.80. Retrospective central pathology review revealed only 45% (18/40) cases with available material had confirmed primary mEOC. Among these, OS HR for Oxal-Cape vs. Pac-Carbo was 0.36 (p = 0.14); PFS HR = 0.62 (p = 0.40). Grade 3-4 toxicity was seen in 61% Pac-Carbo, 61% Oxal-Cape, 54% Pac-Carbo-Bev, and 85% Oxal-Cape-Bev. QoL was similar between the four arms.

CONCLUSION

mEOC/GOG0241 represents an example of a randomized rare tumor trial. Logistical challenges led to early termination, including difficulties in local histopathological diagnosis and accessing drugs outside their labelled indication. There was misalignment between central funders who support clinical trials in rare cancers and the deprioritisation of such work by those managing and funding research at a local level. Rare cancer trials should include centralised pathology review before treatment. Clinical trial registry number: ISRCTN83438782.

Impact of adjuvant treatment on outcome in high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer: a retrospective three-center study

OBJECTIVE

High grade and non-endometrioid endometrial cancers carry a poor prognosis, and the lack of randomized prospective data has led to a wide range of practice regarding adjuvant therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of different treatment strategies in patients with high-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Patients with high-grade endometrioid, serous endometrial cancer and carcinosarcoma diagnosed between 2000 and 2012 were identified from databases in three gynecologic oncology divisions, in Toronto and in Israel. Adjuvant treatment practices differed across the centers, creating a heterogeneous cohort. A comparison of stage I patients stratified by adjuvant treatment was undertaken. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models were employed to compare recurrence and survival across treatment groups.

RESULTS

490patients with high risk endometrial cancer were identified, among them 213 patients with stage I disease. Israeli patients received more chemotherapy (41% vs 10% in stage I disease; P<0.001) than patients in Toronto. Chemotherapy was not associated with improved disease-free, disease-specific or overall survival, nor was it associated with fewer distant recurrences (50% vs 54%). Radiation was also not associated with improved recurrence or survival, nor did it affect the pattern of recurrence. On Cox multivariable analysis, neither radiation treatment nor chemotherapy were significantly associated with outcome (HR for recurrence, 0.72 for pelvic radiation (P=0.46) and 1.99 for chemotherapy (P=0.09); HR for death, 0.67 for pelvic radiation (P=0.29) and 1.03 for chemotherapy (P=0.94)).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis, neither adjuvant radiation nor chemotherapy were associated with improved outcome in stage I, high risk endometrial cancer.

Radiation Treatment in Women with Ovarian Cancer: Past, Present, and Future

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal of the gynecologic cancers, with 5-year survival rates less than 50%. Most women present with advanced stage disease as the pattern of spread is typically with dissemination of malignancy throughout the peritoneal cavity prior to development of any symptoms. Prior to the advent of platinum-based chemotherapy, radiotherapy was used as adjuvant therapy to sterilize micrometastatic disease. The evolution of radiotherapy is detailed in this review, which establishes radiotherapy as an effective therapy for women with micrometastatic disease in the peritoneal cavity after surgery, ovarian clear cell carcinoma, focal metastatic disease, and for palliation of advanced disease. However, with older techniques, the toxicity of whole abdominal radiotherapy and the advancement of systemic therapies have limited the use of radiotherapy in this disease. With newer radiotherapy techniques, including intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and low-dose hyperfractionation in combination with targeted agents, radiotherapy could be reconsidered as part of the standard management for this deadly disease.

Radiation for persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a need for reassessment

Purpose

The role of radiotherapy (RT) was largely deserted after the introduction of platinum-based chemotherapy, but still survival rates are disappointingly low. This study focuses on assessing the clinical efficacy of RT in relation to chemotherapy resistance.

Materials and Methods

From October 2002 to January 2015, 44 patients were diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and treated with palliative RT for persistent or recurrent EOC. All patients received initial treatment with optimal debulking surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. The biologically effective dose (BED) was calculated with α/β set at 10. Ninety-four sites were treated with RT with a median BED of 50.7 Gy (range 28.0 to 79.2 Gy). The primary end-point was the in-field local control (LC) interval, defined as the time interval from the date RT was completed to the date any progressive or newly recurring disease within the RT field was detected on radiographic imaging.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 52.3 months (range 7.7 to 179.0 months). The 1-year and 2-year in-field LC rates were 66.0% and 55.0%, respectively. Comparisons of percent change of in-field tumor response showed similar distribution of responses among chemoresistant and chemosensitive tumors. On multivariate analysis of predictive factors for in-field LC analyzed by sites treated, BED ≥ 50 Gy (hazard ratio, 0.4; confidence interval, 0.2–0.9; p = 0.025) showed better outcomes.

Conclusion

Regardless of resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy, RT can be a feasible treatment modality for patients with persistent of recurrent EOC. The specific role of RT using updated approaches needs to be reassessed.

Discovery and Optimization of HKT288, a Cadherin-6-Targeting ADC for the Treatment of Ovarian and Renal Cancers

Despite an improving therapeutic landscape, significant challenges remain in treating the majority of patients with advanced ovarian or renal cancer. We identified the cell-cell adhesion molecule cadherin-6 (CDH6) as a lineage gene having significant differential expression in ovarian and kidney cancers. HKT288 is an optimized CDH6-targeting DM4-based antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) developed for the treatment of these diseases. Our study provides mechanistic evidence supporting the importance of linker choice for optimal antitumor activity and highlights CDH6 as an antigen for biotherapeutic development. To more robustly predict patient benefit of targeting CDH6, we incorporate a population-based patient-derived xenograft (PDX) clinical trial (PCT) to capture the heterogeneity of response across an unselected cohort of 30 models-a novel preclinical approach in ADC development. HKT288 induces durable tumor regressions of ovarian and renal cancer models in vivo, including 40% of models on the PCT, and features a preclinical safety profile supportive of progression toward clinical evaluation.Significance: We identify CDH6 as a target for biotherapeutics development and demonstrate how an integrated pharmacology strategy that incorporates mechanistic pharmacodynamics and toxicology studies provides a rich dataset for optimizing the therapeutic format. We highlight how a population-based PDX clinical trial and retrospective biomarker analysis can provide correlates of activity and response to guide initial patient selection for first-in-human trials of HKT288. Cancer Discov; 7(9); 1030-45. ©2017 AACR.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 920.