Early-stage node negative cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma show similar survival outcomes after hysterectomy: a population-based study

Disparities in Survival Outcomes Between Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma Treated with Chemoradiotherapy

Purpose

To determine the disparities in survival outcomes between stage IIB-IVA cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Methods

Patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were retrospectively included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results databases. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used in this study. The primary endpoints were cervical cancer-specific survival (CCSS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 2752 patients were identified, including 87.5% (n=2408) were SCC and 12.5% (n=344) were AC. Patients with AC had inferior 5-year CCSS (67.5% vs 54.8%, P<0.001) and OS (58.4% vs 47.2%, P<0.001) compared to those with the SCC subtype. The hazard curve of cervical cancer-related death in AC peaked at 2 years (19%) and still small peaks in the 7 and 11 years of follow-up. Regarding SCC, cervical cancer-related deaths peaked at 2 years (15%) and the hazard rate was 2.0% during the six years of follow-up. The multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that histology was an independent prognostic factor associated with survival outcomes. Patients with AC had significantly poor CCSS (P<0.001) and OS (P<0.001). Similar results were found after PSM.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates a significantly better prognosis for cervical SCC patients compared to those with cervical AC undergoing chemoradiotherapy. These results highlight the importance of histological subtyping in predicting treatment outcomes and tailoring therapeutic strategies.

Local treatment strategies in Stage IVB cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of different local treatment strategies on survival outcomes in patients with Stage IVB cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with Stage IVB cervical SCC and adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2015 were included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Subgroup analysis was performed in those diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 and available for the sites of distant metastases.

RESULTS

In total, 706 patients were identified in this study, including 378 (53.5%) and 328 (46.5%) diagnosed in 2004-2009 and 2010-2015, respectively. There were 525 (74.4%) and 181 (25.6%) patients with SCC and adenocarcinoma, respectively. Moreover, 274 (38.8%) and 432 (61.2%) patients received hysterectomy and primary radiotherapy, respectively. The results of the multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that histology and local treatment strategies were not related to cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival. In the SCC patients, patients who received primary radiotherapy had similar CSS (P = 0.312) and overall survival (P = 0.390) compared with those treated with surgery. In the adenocarcinoma patients, those who received primary radiotherapy had inferior CSS (P = 0.003) and overall survival (P < 0.001) compared with those treated with surgery. Similar results were found in those diagnosed 2004-2015 and 2010-2015 after propensity score matching.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with Stage IVB cervical cancer who received local therapy, surgery, and primary radiotherapy had similar survival in cervical SCC, whereas surgery had better survival outcomes compared with primary radiotherapy in those with cervical adenocarcinoma.

Immune landscape and heterogeneity of cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma

Despite the differences in disease outcomes and pathological features between cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC), the molecular characteristics in immune heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment remain unclear. Here, we explored the immune landscape and heterogeneity between CSCC and ADC. Gene expression and clinical characteristics of cervical carcinoma from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were downloaded. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs), immune cell infiltration, and pathway enrichment analyses were used to explore the immune landscape and heterogeneity between CSCC and ADC. Furthermore, distinct immune signatures between CSCC and ADC were validated based on clinical samples. In total, 4,132 upregulated DEGs and 2,307 down-regulated DEGs were identified between CSCC and ADC, with enrichments in immune related-pathways in CSCC. In addition, 54 hub DEGs correlated with patients' prognosis and immunocytes infiltration were identified. The CSCC patients had a higher ImmuneScore and more abundant immunocytes infiltration compared to ADC patients, as validated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and multicolor immunofluorescence (mIF) analyses of collected samples. Furthermore, CSCC displayed higher inhibitory immune checkpoints expression, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) compared to ADC, which indicated CSCC patients were more likely to benefit from immunotherapy. In summary, our results revealed the huge immune heterogeneity between CSCC and ADC, and provided guidance for immunotherapy selection for different pathological types of cervical cancer.

Long-term treatment outcomes/toxicities of definite chemoradiotherapy (intensity-modulated radiation therapy) for early-stage "bulky" cervical cancer and survival impact of histological subtype

BACKGROUND

To investigate the long-term treatment outcomes of early stage bulky cervical cancer treated with definite chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) followed by intracavity brachytherapy (ICRT) and the impact of histologic subtype on survival.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2016, 126 patients with FIGO stage IB2-IIB bulky (≥4 cm) cervical cancer treated with CCRT followed by ICRT were retrospectively reviewed. Long-term treatment-related acute/late toxicities and treatment outcomes including overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were reported. Different histologic subtype between squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma (AC/ASC)) of uterine cervix were also compared.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time for alive patients was 117 months. The 5-year OS, LRRFS and DMFS were 75.3%, 87.8% and 75.6%, respectively. The most common ≥ grade 3 acute toxicity was hematologic toxicity (41.3%). The rates of ≥ grade 3 late toxicities were 4% of proctitis, 0.8% of urethral stricture and 0.8% of radiation dermatitis (peri-anal skin necrosis and gangrene). The 5-year OS/LRRFS/DMFS for SCC and AC/ASC were 81.7%/93.7%/81.5% and 51.9%/65.8%/53.5%, respectively (all log-rank p < 0.05). The AC/ASC histology was an independent prognostic factor for worse OS, LRRFS, and DMFS (All p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

After long-term follow up, definite CCRT using IMRT followed by ICRT is a feasible treatment with favorable acute and late treatment toxicities for patients with early stage bulky cervical cancer. This treatment outcomes were excellent for "bulky" FIGO stage IB2-IIB SCC of the uterine cervix but seemed insufficient for AC/ASC of uterine cervix.

Comparison of survival outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix after radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma (AC/ASC) of the cervix after radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

METHODS

Propensity score matching (1:4) was used to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in cervical cancer patients with SCC and AC/ASC in China.

RESULTS

Five thousand four hundred sixty-six patients were enrolled according to the criteria. The 5-year OS and DFS in the SCC group (n = 5251) were higher than those in the AC/ASC group (n = 215). After PSM (1:4), the 5-year OS and DFS in the SCC group were higher than those in the AC/ASC group (72.2% vs 56.9%, p < 0.001, HR = 1.895; 67.6% vs 47.8%, p < 0.001, HR = 2.056). In stage I-IIA2 patients, after PSM (1:4), there was no significant difference in 5-year OS between the SCC group (n = 143) and the AC/ASC group (n = 34) (68.5% vs 67.8%, P = 0.175). However, the 5-year DFS in the SCC group was higher than that in the AC/ASC group (71.0% vs 55.7%, P = 0.045; HR = 2.037, P = 0.033). In stage IIB-IV patients, after PSM (1:4), the 5-year OS and DFS in the SCC group (n = 690) were higher than those in the AC/ASC group (n = 173) (70.7% vs 54.3% P < 0.001 vs 1.940%, P < 0.001 vs 45.8%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For stage I-IIA2, there was no significant difference in 5-year survival time, but patients with AC/ASC were more likely to relapse. In the more advanced IIB-IV stage, the oncological outcome of radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy of cervical AC/ASC was worse than that of SCC.

Does adenocarcinoma have a worse prognosis than squamous cell carcinoma in patients with cervical cancer? A real-world study with a propensity score matching analysis

Objective

To compare survival outcomes between cervical adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) using a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with cervical cancer between 1998 and 2016 were identified from the SEER database. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to analyze survival. A subgroup analysis of overall survival (OS) between patients with ADC and SCC was performed after the 1:1 PSM analysis.

Results

Of the 33,148 patients, 24,591 (79.19%) had SCC and 8,557 (25.81%) had ADC. In the unmatched cohort, after adjustment in multivariate analysis, patients with ADC had a worse prognosis than patients with SCC (hazard ratio [HR]=1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.07–1.18; p<0.001). In the propensity matched cohort, Kaplan-Meier analysis and subgroup analysis showed that ADC was associated with a worse prognosis than SCC (p=0.001). An analysis stratified by SEER stage revealed a worse prognosis for patients with ADC patients presenting with a regional disease than patients with SCC (HR=1.24; 95% CI=1.14–1.36 p<0.001), but no statistically significant differences were observed between the localized disease (HR=0.97; 95% CI=0.86–1.10; p=0.664) and distant disease (HR=1.09; 95% CI=0.97–1.22; p=0.162) subgroups.

Conclusion

The significant differences in survival outcomes between patients with cervical ADC and SCC were only observed in the regional disease subgroup, but not in the localized disease and distant disease subgroups.

Prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion in early-stage cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

Few prognostic factors likely to influence therapeutic management of early-stage cervical cancer are currently recognized. The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in overall survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients treated for early-stage cervical cancer between January 1996 and December 2013 at Toulouse University Hospital and the Cancer Center Claudius Regaud Institute. Patients were included if they had FIGO 2018 stage IA1, IA2, IB1/2, or IIA1 cervical cancer. All patients had to have had surgery (conization, radical hysterectomy, or radical trachelectomy). The presence of LVSI was evaluated in the initial anatomic pathology reports of the excised tissue. The presence of LVSI was defined by the presence of epithelial tumor cells in the lumen of vessels, lined by endothelial cells. If the data were missing, the slides were reviewed by an expert pathologist. Comparative analyses of patient populations with and without LVSI invasion were performed, as well as analyses of overall and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 158 patients were included in the analysis. Seventy-two (45.6%) patients had LVSI. More patients with LVSI received external radiotherapy in addition to standard treatment than patients without LVSI (53% vs 14%, p<0.0001). The overall survival of patients with LVSI (89.8%) was similar to that of patients without LVSI (91.5%) (p=0.39). For patients without lymph node involvement but with LVSI, disease-free survival at 5 years tended to be higher among those treated with external radiotherapy in addition to standard treatments (92.6% vs 79.8%, difference not tested due to the small number of events).

CONCLUSION

Patients with early-stage cervical cancer with LVSI received external radiotherapy more often, and therefore had an overall survival at 5 years identical to patients without LVSI.

Comparison of treatment outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of cervix after definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Background

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is effective in the treatment of locally advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). However, whether treatment outcomes of cervical adenocarcinoma are equivalent to SCC after CCRT has been a topic of debate.

Methods

Medical records of cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy or CCRT in our institute from January 2011 to December 2014 were reviewed. Patients were treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy combined with intracavitary brachytherapy. Weekly cisplatin was the first line regimen of concurrent chemotherapy. The treatment outcomes of patients with SCC and adenocarcinoma were compared with a multivariate Cox regression model, and log-rank method before and after propensity score matching (1:1).

Results

A total of 815 patients with stage IB-IVA cervical cancer were included, with 744 patients in the SCC group and 71 patients in adenocarcinoma group. The median follow-up period was 36.2 months (range, 1.0–76.2 months). The 3-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), pelvic control and distant control rates of patients in the SCC group and adenocarcinoma group were 85.2 and 75.4% (p = 0.005), 77.5 and 57.3% (p < 0.001), 89.0 and 74.0% (p = 0.001) and 86.0 and 74.4% (p = 0.011), respectively. After multivariate analysis, histology was an independent factor of OS (p = 0.003), DFS (p < 0.001), pelvic control (p = 0.002) and distant control (p = 0.003). With propensity score matching, 71 pairs of patients were selected. After matching, the OS (p = 0.017), DFS (p = 0.001), pelvic control (p = 0.015) and distant control (p = 0.009) of patients with adenocarcinoma were poorer than those of patients with SCC. In subgroup analysis, patients with adenocarcinoma had significantly worse OS and DFS compared with patients with SCC, regardless of treatment with radiotherapy alone or CCRT.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated that patients with adenocarcinoma of the cervix had poorer OS and DFS than patients with SCC, regardless of treatment with radiotherapy alone or CCRT. New treatment approaches should be considered for cervical adenocarcinoma.