Optimal cutoff age for predicting prognosis associated with serous epithelial ovarian cancer: what is the best age cutoff?

A novel clinical nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in patients with non-serous epithelial ovarian cancer: A real-world analysis based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and external validation in a tertiary center

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is a lack of prognostic evaluation methods for non-serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHOD

We collected patients with non-serous EOC diagnosed between 2010 and 2017 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database into a training cohort (n = 2078) and an internal validation cohort (n = 891). Meanwhile, patients meeting the criteria were screened from the Fujian Provincial Maternal and Child Health Hospital from 2013 to 2022 as an external validation cohort (n = 56). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to determine the independent prognostic factors of cancer-specific survival (CSS) to construct the nomogram. The nomogram was validated by the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and calibration curves.

RESULT

Age, laterality, preoperative CA125 status, histologic type, tumor grade, AJCC stage, surgery lesion, number of lymph nodes examined, residual lesion size, and bone metastasis were identified as independent prognostic factors to construct the nomogram. The nomogram showed better predictive ability than FIGO stage through internal and external cohorts validation. The C-index of the nomogram in the training cohort, validation cohort, and external validation cohort were 0.831, 0.835 and 0.944 higher than those of the Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetric (FIGO) stage, P<0.05. The Area Under Curve (AUC) values results indicated great clinical usefulness of the nomogram. The calibration curve indicated good agreement between the nomogram prediction and actual survival.

CONCLUSION

We developed a nomogram with high predictive accuracy to predict survival in patients with non-serous EOC.

LAMA5 promotes cell proliferation and migration in ovarian cancer by activating Notch signaling pathway

LAMA5 (laminin α5) is a member of the laminin family. Despite the recent research implicating LAMA5 in cancer, the function of LAMA5 has remained uncertain in the progression of ovarian cancer (OC). Here, we investigated the functional influences of LAMA5 knockdown on OC in vitro and in vivo. In this study, we used immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis to detect the relative expression of LAMA5 in OC and non-cancer tissues, and we analyzed its connection with the overall survival (OS) of OC patients. To prove the role of LAMA5 in cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, LAMA5 expression in OC cell lines was inhibited by lentivirus. Compared with normal fallopian tube tissue, epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) tissue showed critically higher LAMA5 expression levels; additionally, high LAMA5 levels were a poor predictor of OS. We found that cell progression was restrained in LAMA5-knockdown OC cell lines in vivo and in vitro. Finally, LAMA5 might be a commanding inducer of the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and Notch signaling pathway-related markers. Together, our research indicates that LAMA5 is highly connected to OC progression as it may play a role in the EMT process through the Notch signaling pathway.

Efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown to be effective as maintenance treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Although most ovarian cancers develop after age 65, older patients are often under-represented in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors versus placebo as maintenance therapy in older patients with ovarian cancer.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane databases, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) meeting abstracts, for randomized clinical trials using maintenance with PARP inhibitors in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, up to June 30, 2021. The measured outcomes were progression-free survival and safety (number and grade of adverse events), stratified by age (cut-off point: 65 years).

RESULTS

A total of eight phase III trials were selected. Among the 4364 patients, 1435 (32.9%) were aged ≥65 (919 receiving PARP inhibitors, 516 receiving placebo). Compared with placebo, maintenance with PARP inhibitors improved progression-free survival in older patients (HR=0.54; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.65; p<0.00001). No differences were found in progression-free survival in comparison with a younger population (HR=0.47; p=0.13). Only hematologic adverse events were available for the age subgroups, and no differences emerged for all-grade hematologic adverse events (risk ratio (RR)=1.22, p=0.33 for anemia; RR=0.97, p=0.74 for neutropenia) and severe neutropenia (RR=0.97, p=0.86); old women were at lower risk of severe anemia (RR=0.79, p=0.04) but had a higher risk of severe thrombocytopenia (RR=1.27, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance with PARP inhibitors prolongs progression-free survival compared with placebo, both as monotherapy and combined with chemotherapy or bevacizumab, in older patients with advanced ovarian cancer (high-quality evidence). Hematologic safety is similar to that seen in younger patients. No overall survival data are available at this time.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021261039.

Differences in Treatment Modalities and Prognosis of Elderly Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Two-Center Propensity Score-Matched Study

Background: The prognosis of older patients with ovarian cancer is poor. We evaluated the effect of chronological age and different treatment characteristics on the prognosis of older patients with ovarian cancer; Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed patients aged over 60 years who underwent cytoreduction followed by platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy between January 2011 and December 2019 in two national centers in China. Propensity score matching (PSM, 1:1) was performed to stratify the comorbidity- and treatment-related factors. The Kaplan−Meier method was employed to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) in the original cohort and the cohort after PSM; Results: A total of 324 patients were evaluated. The Age ≥ 70 group often received more neoadjuvant chemotherapy (62.3% vs. 31.2%, p < 0.001), more discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy (31.2% vs. 10.8%, p < 0.001), and had more severe chemotherapy-related toxicity (45.6% vs. 34.2%, p = 0.040) than the Age < 70 group. After matching, the PFS of the Age < 70 group was not significantly different from the Age ≥ 70 group (median PFS = 12.4 and 11.9 months, respectively, p = 0.850). Furthermore, the advanced FIGO stage, non-R0 cytoreduction, and discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy were all found to be poor prognostic factors. Serum albumin level <40 g/L (HR = 2.441, p = 0.018) and age ≥ 70 years (HR = 2.639, p = 0.008) led to more severe chemotherapy-related toxicity. Additionally, poor renal function (HR = 5.128, p = 0.002) was in association with discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy; Conclusions: The chronological age of older patients cannot be seen as a poor prognostic factor. Older patients may benefit most from R0 cytoreduction followed by the completion of chemotherapy. Postoperative poor renal function and serum albumin level <40 g/L may help predict the discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Cause-specific mortality rate of ovarian cancer in the presence of competing risks of death: a nationwide population-based cohort study

Objective

This nationwide cohort study aimed to evaluate the cause-specific mortality (probability of death by ovarian cancer, probability of death by other causes) under the competing risks of death in women with ovarian cancer.

Methods

The Korea Central Cancer Registry was searched to identify women with primary ovarian cancer diagnosed between 2006 and 2016. Epithelial ovarian cancer cases were identified using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology 3rd edition. We estimated the cause-specific mortality according to age (<65 years, ≥65 years), stage (local, regional, and distant), and histology (serous, mucinous, endometrioid, clear cell, and others) under the competing risks framework; moreover, cumulative incidences were estimated.

Results

We included 21,446 cases. Cause-specific mortality continuously increased throughout 10 year follow-up. Compared with women aged <65 years, ovarian cancer-specific mortality (5-year, 28.9% vs. 61.9%; 10-year, 39.0% vs. 68.6%, p<0.001) and other cause mortality (5-year, 1.7% vs. 4.8%; 10-year, 2.8% vs. 8.2%, p<0.001) increased in women aged ≥65 years. This trend was consistent across all the stages and histological types. There was a substantial increase in competing risks from 1.1% in women aged <65 years to 8.0% in women aged ≥65 years in patients with early-stage (p<0.001) non-serous ovarian cancer (p<0.001).

Conclusion

Older age at diagnosis is associated with increasing ovarian cancer-specific mortality and competing risks. Given the substantial effect of competing risks on elderly patients, there is a need for assessment tools to balance the beneficial and harmful effects to provide optimal treatment.

This nationwide cohort study analyzed 21,446 women with primary ovarian cancer to evaluate survival and cause-specific competing mortality. Older age was associated with increasing both ovarian cancer-specific mortality and competing risks. Increased awareness of competing mortality is required for the optimal treatment decisions in the elderly.

A Novel Clinical Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Adult Patients After Primary Surgery for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Real-World Analysis Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database and External Validation in a Tertiary Center

Background

The present study aimed to construct and validate a nomogram that can be used to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Methods

A total of 7,129 adult patients with EOC were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2010 and 2015. Patients were randomly divided into the training and validation cohorts (7:3). Cox regression was conducted to evaluate prognostic factors of CSS. The internal validation of the nomogram was performed using concordance index (C-index), AUC, calibration curves, and decision curve analyses (DCAs). Data from 53 adult EOC patients at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from 2008 to 2012 were collected for external verification. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to compare survival outcomes among risk subgroups.

Results

Age, grade, histological types, stage, residual lesion size, number of regional lymph nodes resected, number of positive lymph nodes, and chemotherapy were independent risk factors for CSS. Based on the above factors, we constructed a nomogram. The C-indices of the training cohort, internal validation cohort, and external verification group were 0.763, 0.750, and 0.920, respectively. The calibration curve indicated good agreement between the nomogram prediction and actual survival. AUC and DCA results indicated great clinical usefulness of the nomogram. The differences in the Kaplan-Meier curves among different risk subgroups were statistically significant.

Conclusions

We constructed a nomogram to predict CSS in adult patients with EOC after primary surgery, which can assist in counseling and guiding treatment decision making.

Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer in Elderly Patients (≥70 y): Does the Age Matter?

BACKGROUND

Elderly ovarian cancer (OC) patients are more likely to be managed suboptimally, with worse clinical outcomes as a result. Strategies to decrease morbidity are lacking.Methodology: Consecutive patients with advanced stage OC (IIIC-IV) who were managed in our center between January 2016 and July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) according to our institution protocol. We divided patients into two groups: Group 1 (age ≥ 70 years) and Group 2 (age < 70 years). The primary outcome of the study was assessment of peri-operative morbidity amongst two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients were referred during the study period. 114 patients underwent IDS after NACT (74.5%), 46 in Group 1 and 68 in Group 2. Elderly patients were more likely to receive more than three cycles of NACT prior to IDS compared to younger patients (39% vs. 19%, p = 0.03). Elderly patients were more frequently subjected to Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) as pre-operative assessment (63% vs. 27%, p = 0.002). Optimal/complete resection was achieved in all patients in Group 1 (100%) and in 97% of patients in Group 2. With the exception of higher postoperative cardiac arrhythmias in Group 1 (11% vs. 1%, p = 0.04), no significant differences in 30-day morbidity were observed. No 90-day death in both groups was registered.

CONCLUSION

Older age should not preclude clinicians from offering ultra-radical resection to patients with advanced OC after NACT. In our series, elderly patients received the same treatment with similar outcomes to the younger group. Clinicians should be encouraged to use CPET for patients' selection following NACT.

ToleRability of BevacizUmab in elderly Ovarian cancer patients (TURBO study): a case-control study of a real-life experience

OBJECTIVE

Bevacizumab maintenance following platinum-based chemotherapy is an effective treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), both in primary and recurrent disease. Our aim was to identify criteria to select elderly patients who can safely benefit from bevacizumab addition.

METHODS

This is a case-control study on patients with primary or recurrent EOC who received platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, between January 2015 and December 2016. Patient characteristics, treatment details and adverse events were reviewed and analyzed in 2 settings: younger (<65 years, group 1) and elderly (≥65 years, group 2). A binary logistic model was applied to correlate clinical variables and severe (grade ≥3) toxicity risk.

RESULTS

Overall, 283 patients with EOC were included, with 72 (25.4%) older patients compared with 211 (74.6%) younger women. Bevacizumab had been administered to 234 patients (82.7%) as first-line treatment and in 49 (17.3%) with recurrent disease. At diagnosis, elderly patients presented with at least one comorbidity and were taking at least 1 medication in 84.7% and 80.6% of the cases respectively, compared with correspondingly 47.4% and 37.4% in group 1 (p<0.001). Nonetheless, the occurrence of serious (grade ≥3) adverse events did not increase among the older group. Creatinine serum levels >1.1 g/dL, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤60 mL/min, ≥3 comorbidities were independently associated with a higher severe toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients with EOC can safely be treated with bevacizumab; factors other than age, as higher creatinine serum levels, eGFR and number of comorbidities should be considered to better estimate bevacizumab-related toxicity risk.