Impact of Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus on Survival and Cardiovascular Events in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Computed tomography-based intermuscular adipose tissue analysis and its predicting role in post-kidney transplantation diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

While body mass index (BMI) is the most widely used indicator as a measure of obesity factors in post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM), body composition is a more accurate measure of obesity. This study aims to investigate the effects of Computed tomography (CT)--based morphemic factors on PTDM and establish a prediction model for PTDM after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

The pre-transplant data and glycemic levels of kidney transplant recipients (June 2021 to July 2023) were retrospectively and prospectively collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to analyze the relationship between morphemic factors and PTDM at one month, six months, and one year after hospital discharge. Subsequently, a one-year risk prediction model based on morphemic factors was developed.

RESULTS

The study consisted of 131 participants in the one-month group, where Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (p = 0.02) was identified as the risk factor for PTDM. In the six-month group, 129 participants were included, and the intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) area (p = 0.02) was identified as the risk factor for PTDM. The one-year group had 128 participants, and the risk factors for PTDM were identified as body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.02), HbA1c (p = 0.01), and IMAT area (p = 0.007). HbA1c (%) and IMAT area were included in the risk prediction Model for PTDM in the one-year group with AUC = 0.716 (95 % CI 0.591-0.841, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to BMI and other morphemic factors, this study demonstrated that the IMAT area was the most potential predictor of PTDM.

CLINICAL TRIAL NOTATION

Chictr.org (ChiCTR2300078639).

Prevalence of new-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Post-transplant diabetes is a prevalent and consequential complication following kidney transplantation, which significantly augments the risk of cardiovascular disease, graft loss, infection, and mortality, thereby profoundly impacting both graft and patient survival. However, the early stages of post-transplant diabetes often go unnoticed or receive inadequate management. Consequently, this study systematically assesses the incidence of new-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation with the aim to enhance medical staff awareness regarding post-transplantation diabetes and provide clinical management guidance.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed until September 21, 2023. Data extraction was performed using standardized tables and meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 16.0 software. A random effects model was employed to estimate the combined prevalence along with its corresponding 95% confidence interval. The source of heterogeneity was explored using subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis, while publication bias was assessed through funnel plot and Egger's test. This study has been registered with PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42023465768.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis comprised 39 studies with a total sample size of 16,584 patients. The prevalence of new-onset diabetes after transplantation was found to be 20% [95% CI (18.0, 22.0)]. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on age, gender, body mass index, family history of diabetes, type of kidney donor, immunosuppressive regimen, acute rejection episodes, hepatitis C infection status and cytomegalovirus infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of post-kidney transplantation diabetes is substantial, necessitating early implementation of preventive and control measures to mitigate its occurrence, enhance prognosis, and optimize patients' quality of life.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42023465768.

Safety and efficacy of semaglutide in post kidney transplant patients with type 2 diabetes or Post-Transplant diabetes

Objective

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) are common in renal transplant recipients. Semaglutide has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with T2DM. To date, only a limited number of studies have investigated its use in renal transplant patients. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of semaglutide in post-renal transplant patients.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted at king Abdulaziz Medical City-Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The subjects of the study were adults and adolescents (>14 years) who had undergone a kidney transplant and had pre-existing T2DM or PTDM. The study subjects were given semaglutide during the study period, from January 2018 to July 2022. The data were collected over a period of 18 months.

Results

A total of 39 patients were included, 29 (74 %) of whom were male. A significant decrease in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was observed during the follow-up period when compared to baseline (8.4 %±1.3 % at baseline vs. 7.4 %±1.0 % at 13-18 months (p < 0.001). A significant reduction in weight was also noted at follow-up as compared to baseline (99.5 kg ± 17.7 vs 90.7 kg ± 16.8 at 13-18 months (p < 0.001). No significant changes were found in renal graft function markers.

Conclusion

Semaglutide was found to significantly reduce HbA1c levels and weight in post renal transplant patients with diabetes. No significant changes in markers of renal graft function were observed.

Effect of post-transplant diabetes mellitus on cardiovascular events and mortality: a single-center retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate the impact of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) on cardiovascular events, graft survival, and mortality and to determine the risk factors involved in developing PTDM.

METHODS

A total of 703 patients who underwent kidney transplantation were included in the study. The total sample was subdivided into three groups: (i) patients with PTDM; (ii) patients who had diabetes before the transplantation (DM); and (iii) patients without diabetes (NoDM). The data on graft failure, cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, and the potential risk factors that play a role in developing PTDM were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients were followed for a median of 80 (6-300) months after transplantation. Out of all patients, 41 (5.8%) had DM before transplantation, and 101 (14.4%) developed PTDM. Recipient BMI, post-transplant fasting plasma glucose, and hepatitis C seropositivity were independent risk factors for PTDM development. The incidence of cardiovascular events was 6.1% in the NoDM group, 14.9% in the PTDM group, and 29.3% in the DM group (p < 0.001). In PTDM patients, hepatitis C seropositivity and the recipient's age at transplant were independent predictors of a cardiovascular event. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the risk of graft loss. PTDM had no significant effect on all-cause mortality. However, the survival rates of DM patients were significantly reduced compared to those with NoDM or PTDM.

CONCLUSIONS

PTDM had no impact on patient survival. Hepatitis C seropositivity and recipient age at transplant predicted cardiovascular events in PTDM patients.