Comparison of Dual RAAS Blockade and Higher-Dose RAAS Inhibition on Nephropathy Progression

Aliskiren and the Kidney: Beyond Hypertension

Aliskiren is a novel drug with the ability to lower plasma renin activity, reducing proteinuria in hypertension and in diabetic nephropathy. In primary and secondary glomerular diseases, important causes of endstage kidney disease, proteinuria is a hallmark. Moreover, urinary protein is a marker of renal disease progression. The renin angiotensin-aldosterone system is generally activated in these patients. A complete blockade with the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers with or without aldosterone receptor blockers is not easy to achieve, and side effects are not uncommon. Plasma renin activity is even increased in patients with this approach. Aliskiren should be considered as a new therapeutic option to be assessed in glomerular diseases, as plasma renin activity can be reduced and a better control of the renin-angiotensin system could be achieved with the consequent reduction in the amount of urinary protein excretion.

Valsartan slows the progression of diabetic nephropathy in db/db mice via a reduction in podocyte injury, and renal oxidative stress and inflammation

Higher doses of AngII (angiotensin II) blockers are intended to optimize albuminuria reduction rather than for blood pressure control in chronic kidney disease. However, the long-term renoprotection of high-dose AngII blockers has yet to be defined. The present study sought to determine whether doses of ARB (AngII receptor blocker) that maximally reduce proteinuria could slow the progression of glomerulosclerosis in the uninephrectomized db/db mouse, a model of Type 2 diabetes. Untreated uninephrectomized db/db mice had normal blood pressure, but developed progressive albuminuria and mesangial matrix expansion between 18 and 22 weeks of age, which was associated with increased renal expression of TGFβ1 (transforming growth factor β1), PAI-1 (plasminogen-activator inhibitor-1), type IV collagen and FN (fibronectin). Treatment with valsartan in the drinking water of db/db mice from 18 to 22 weeks of age, at a dose that was determined previously to maximally reduce proteinuria, prevented the increases in albuminuria and the markers of renal fibrosis seen in untreated db/db mice. In addition, WT-1 (Wilms tumour protein-1)-immunopositive podocyte numbers were found to be lower in the untreated glomeruli of mice with diabetes. The expression of podocin and nephrin were continually decreased in mice with diabetes between 18 and 22 weeks of age. These changes are indicative of podocyte injury and the administration of valsartan ameliorated them substantially. Renal expression of TNFα (tumour necrosis factor α), MCP-1 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1), Nox2 (NADPH oxidase 2), p22phox and p47phox and urine TBARS (thiobarbituric acid-reacting substance) levels, the markers of renal inflammation and oxidative stress, were increased during disease progression in mice with diabetes. Valsartan treatment was shown to reduce these markers. Thus high doses of valsartan not only reduce albuminuria maximally, but also halt the progression of the glomerulosclerosis resulting from Type 2 diabetes via a reduction in podocyte injury and renal oxidative stress and inflammation.

Beyond ONTARGET: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockade in combination, a lesser evil in some?

AIM

Following the recent Ongoing Telmistartan Alone and in Combination With Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) finding of adverse renal outcomes, dual renin-angiotensin blockade has fallen out of favour, despite antihypertensive and antiproteinuric efficacy. However, in high-risk severe hypertension, not studied in ONTARGET, whether combination treatment should be withheld or withdrawn is not clear. We examine the renal effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) and angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) monotherapy versus combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and varying degrees of hypertension.

METHODS

Subjects attending a hospital diabetes centre were selected as case (combination therapy, n = 120) and control (monotherapy, n = 480). Subjects were matched for age, gender, ethnicity, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood pressure (BP) and study duration. Patients were stratified by BP, hypertension stage 1 (BP < 160/100, n = 506) and stage 2 (≥160/100, n = 94), and by treatment group. Data were analysed for the primary renal outcome of eGFR decline ≥20 ml/min, over a median of 3.7 years.

RESULTS

In keeping with the ONTARGET study, for stage 1 hypertension, combination treatment is significantly worse than monotherapy for the primary outcome of eGFR decline ≥20 ml/min (20 vs. 10.7%, p = 0.01). In contrast, for stage 2 hypertension, this endpoint was reached less often for combination versus monotherapy (12.0 vs. 23.2%, p = 0.2). Combination treatment was also not detrimental in patients with proteinuria or eGFR < 60 ml/min and was associated with fewer macrovascular events.

CONCLUSION

Given that hypertension control is paramount and in the spirit of primum non nocere, these data are reassuring should clinicians choose to use ACE-I and ARB combination therapy in the very hypertensive diabetic patient.

Evolving pandemic diabetic nephropathy

The expanding impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to pandemic diabetes mellitus is recounted emphasizing its epidemiology that has induced global socioeconomic stress on health care systems in industrialized nations now attempting to proffer optimal therapy for end stage renal disease (ESRD). Strategies to delay and perhaps prevent progression of diabetic nephropathy from minimal proteinuria through nephrotic range proteinuria and azotemia to ESRD appear to have decreased the rate of persons with diabetes who develop ESRD. For those with ESRD attributed to diabetes, kidney transplantation affords better survival and rehabilitation than either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. It is likely that advances in genetics and molecular biology will suggest early interventions that will preempt diabetic complications including renal failure.

Clinical evidence from ONTARGET: the value of an angiotensin II receptor blocker and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor

The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study established the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril, versus placebo, for prevention of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) was later conducted in similar high-risk patients using multifactorial treatment to control hypertension, platelet aggregation, and dyslipidemia, while comparing ramipril, telmisartan, or their combination, without placebo. In ONTARGET, the first angiotensin II receptor blocker-based study to be performed in a broader population of patients without congestive heart failure and/or left ventricular hypertrophy/dysfunction, telmisartan provided cardiovascular protection that was noninferior to ramipril. However, greater blockade of the renin-angiotensin system, using their combination, was not superior to ramipril alone. Telmisartan was better tolerated than ramipril in this high-risk population: notably, the incidence of cough and angioedema was significantly lower with telmisartan alone. Thus, telmisartan provides comparable efficacy to ramipril with less adverse events, which may encourage patient compliance.

Reno-prevention vs. reno-protection: a critical re-appraisal of the evidence-base from the large RAAS blockade trials after ONTARGET--a call for more circumspection

The ACEI, captopril was introduced into clinical medicine in the early 1970s for hypertension. Other ACEIs and the ARBs were introduced subsequently. Following several RAAS blockade trials, we now have an expanded set of clinical indications for these agents. Despite the escalated use of these agents, we continue to experience an unexplained epidemic of ESRD/CKD/ARF. There are concerns regarding potential iatrogenic renal failure arising from these agents. A case, it would appear, of unintended consequences. Our publication of several reports on the previously unrecognized syndrome of late onset renal failure from angiotensin blockade (LORFFAB) in 2008 adds to this evolving literature. At the same time, some recent reports have questioned the veracity of claims of superior reno-protection with these agents beyond BP lowering. A post hoc analysis of a subset of patients in the MICRO-HOPE cohort suggested that a previously unrecognized greater 24-h BP lowering achieved in the ramipril arm vs placebo could explain the reported benefits of the ACEI. These doubts and concerns became heightened by the results of the ONTARGET study. Our critical re-appraisal of the large RAAS blockade trials revealed design flaws and protocol contradictions that further these doubts and concerns. We conclude that these agents be used more judiciously, with better monitoring of kidney function. Treating physicians must consider drug discontinuation in selected patients. We also support temporary withdrawal of these agents before major surgical procedures, contrast media administration and during acute illness. Such preventative measures (reno-prevention) would enhance the benefits of reno-protection with RAAS blockade.