The AWAKEN survey: knowledge of narcolepsy among physicians and the general population

Connecting clinicians and patients: The language of narcolepsy

Narcolepsy is a rare lifelong sleep disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness with variable expression of cataplexy, sleep paralysis, sleep-related hallucinations and disrupted nocturnal sleep. Affected individuals also experience additional impairing symptoms, including (but not limited to) difficulties with attention, memory and concentration, brain fog, mood instability and fatigue, with a substantial impact on everyday life. Diagnostic delays of up to 10 years are common, primarily due to the substantial heterogeneity in clinical presentation of narcolepsy symptoms and presence of significant comorbidities. The disconnect in language used by clinicians and patients could be a factor contributing to diagnostic delays, but it has not been much studied. We followed a two-part approach to investigate the impact of this possible mismatch in language use. Firstly, a comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify publications reporting discrepancies in language relating to narcolepsy symptoms used by clinicians and patients. As a gap in the literature was anticipated, we supplemented the search results with practical strategies based on our clinical experience to facilitate dialog between clinicians and people living with narcolepsy, as well as proposing future research ideas. The findings of the narrative review, complemented by expert clinical opinion, are intended to help clinicians recognize narcolepsy symptoms and to refer patients with suspected narcolepsy, when appropriate. Although it is unknown to what extent a disconnect in language may contribute to diagnostic delays, we hope that better recognition of the varied clinical presentations of narcolepsy will lead to timelier diagnosis and help improve patient outcomes.

Knowledge of Narcolepsy Among Physicians in Makkah Region, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background Narcolepsy is a chronic sleep disorder that is characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy. It has been increasingly diagnosed over the years, impacting productivity and employment rates. Awareness of healthcare providers is crucial for the early identification and management of this condition. Objectives This study assessed physicians' knowledge of narcolepsy in the Makkah region of Saudi Arabia. Method This cross-sectional study was conducted from February to November 2023. An online self-administered questionnaire has been used to target physicians working in the Makkah region of Saudi Arabia. The utilized questionnaire assessed demographic and professional data as well as the participants' knowledge of narcolepsy. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio (R version 4.3.1.). Statistical differences in knowledge were assessed using Pearson's chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. Factors associated with knowledge of narcolepsy were investigated through univariable and multivariable regression analyses expressed using beta coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05. Results A total of 226 physicians participated in this study. Male physicians (54.4%, n = 123), practicing in governmental hospitals (77.9%, n = 176) and residing in Makkah City (43.4%, n = 98) were predominant. Non-surgical specialties represented 73.5% (n = 166) of the sample. Around 81% (n = 184) of the participants were aware of narcolepsy, with a significant difference according to professional status (p = 0.045). The majority of physicians have correctly identified narcolepsy as a sleep disorder (78.3%, n = 177), but only 32.3% (n = 73) have identified its typical onset age group and recognized that there are two types of narcolepsy. Almost half of the respondents indicated a lack of knowledge about the diagnostic criteria for narcolepsy in the DSM-5 (52.2%, n = 118). Only 27.4% (n = 62) recognized the correct diagnostic criteria. Half of the sample (51.3%, n = 116) recognized the use of multiple sleep latency tests for the diagnosis. For factors associated with higher participants' knowledge, non-surgical specialties showed significantly higher knowledge scores compared to surgical specialties (beta = 0.91, 95% CI, 0.13 to 1.7, p = 0.024). Conclusion This study has revealed a significant lack of knowledge about narcolepsy among physicians in Makkah region. This raises concerns about the timely identification, proper understanding, and accurate diagnosis of patients with narcolepsy. Adequate understanding of narcolepsy is crucial to avoid its misdiagnosis or delays in receiving appropriate treatment and support, ultimately impacting their quality of life.

A qualitative exploration of the lived experience of mothers caring for a child with narcolepsy

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Parents/carers of a child with narcolepsy are often required to become experts in narcolepsy and navigate health care, education, and welfare systems on behalf of their child. Managing pediatric narcolepsy is complex and challenges the child and the entire family, yet few studies have explored carers' experiences.

METHODS

Twenty mothers (50% had a child with narcolepsy < 18 years at the time of interview; 85% narcolepsy with cataplexy) participated in a 1:1 semistructured interview. Participation from fathers was sought; however, none were recruited. A multidisciplinary team of researchers/clinicians analyzed interview transcripts using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Mothers perceived that most people misunderstood the whole-person impact of narcolepsy, including their child's peers, teachers, and support networks. Narcolepsy had a substantial psychological impact on both the child and the whole family yet was largely unaddressed by health care professionals, leaving mothers unsure of where to turn for help. Most parents described negative experiences with their child's specialist, often perceiving the specialists to lack knowledge specific to narcolepsy. Information about illness trajectory and support services was limited or inaccessible, fueling many mothers' hopes and fears for their child's future. Mothers also frequently described feelings of abandonment by the health care system.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results contextualize the whole-person impact of narcolepsy from the perspective of parents and carers, highlighting the need for proactive inclusion of parents/carers in developing health care policy and practice. It calls for developing tools and resources to capture "well-managed" narcolepsy from the perspective of parents/carers for use in research and clinical practice.

CITATION

Schokman A, Cheung J, Klinner C, et al. A qualitative exploration of the lived experience of mothers caring for a child with narcolepsy. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(5):699-707.

Challenges in the Management of Narcolepsy in a Resource Limited Setting: A Case Report

The management of Narcolepsy, from the initial presentation to the long-term management and follow-up, remains a challenging endeavor, especially in developing climes. Worldwide, it has been recognized as a medical condition that is frequently associated with initial misdiagnoses, and delays in definitive management, further highlighted, in resource-limited settings like Nigeria where issues are further compounded by social, cultural, and political factors. In this report, we aim to shed some light on the peculiar challenges encountered by clinicians in Nigeria, and in other similar settings, in the process of diagnosis and management of narcolepsy. We present a case of a 17-year-old male teenager with Narcolepsy Type 1 (NT1) who had been previously managed as a case of Juvenile Absence Epilepsy in various centers prior to presentation at our facility. The symptoms began two years prior to presentation at our outpatient clinic, and they were excessive daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, and sleep paralysis. The symptoms were corroborated by laboratory parameters - reduced mean sleep latency (conducted in an improvised sleep laboratory), and a low cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) hypocretin level. The patient was initially placed on Modafinil for excessive daytime sleepiness and a trial of Fluoxetine for the Cataplexy. However, due to the scarcity of Modafinil, behavioral modifications - scheduled sleep naps and sleep hygiene - were eventually employed. Narcolepsy is a debilitating illness, and consequently, the far-reaching effects of these challenges must be understood. It is important that concerted efforts be made towards improving the overall quality of care received by patients from the early identification to the treatment of narcolepsy in the Nigerian healthcare system.

Retrospective cohort study of hypersomnias of central origin from two Australian tertiary sleep disorders services

BACKGROUND

Hypersomnias of central origin (HOCO) are diverse in origin and symptomatology and remain poorly described in an Australian population. We hypothesised that the rate of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DQB1*0602 positivity in the Australian cohort would be comparable to international registries.

AIMS

The current study aims to evaluate epidemiological and clinical characteristics of Australian patients with HOCO, including prevalence of HLA DQB1*0602 positivity, the most specific HLA marker associated with narcolepsy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study. Patients ≥ 16 years of age presenting with symptoms of hypersomnolence who attended one of two Australian sleep centres (New South Wales and Queensland) in the preceding 24 months and had undergone both HLA serology and multiple sleep latency tests (MSLTs) were included. Main outcome measures included demographics, HLA DQB1*0602 positivity, MSLT, and clinical parameters (presence of auxiliary narcolepsy symptoms, laboratory tests, relevant prescribed medications).

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients were included. HLA DQB1*0602 positivity was highest in those with type 1 narcolepsy (NT1) (95.7%) and lowest in those without a classifiable disorder (9.1%). Mean sleep latency was lowest and number of sleep-onset rapid eye movement periods (SOREMPs) highest in the NT1 group. Comorbid disorders, particularly depression and overweight/obesity, were prevalent in all cohorts. Across all diagnostic groups, dexamphetamine was the most commonly prescribed agent for excessive daytime sleepiness.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HOCO assessed in two specialised Australian clinics demonstrate comparable clinical characteristics to other published cohorts internationally; however, available pharmacological agents in Australia do not reflect international standards of care.

Pharmacological options for narcolepsy: are they the way forward?

INTRODUCTION

Narcolepsy is an under-recognized, rare neurologic disorder of hypersomnolence that is associated with increased mortality and medical and psychiatric co-morbidities. Narcolepsy exerts a substantial economic burden on patients and society. There is currently no cure, and life-long symptomatic therapy is needed. Available drugs do not modify the disease course.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript provides an overview of narcolepsy symptoms, diagnosis, pathophysiology, current pharmacotherapies, and emerging treatments. Gaps and unresolved issues in diagnosis and management of narcolepsy are discussed to answer whether pharmacological options are the way forward.

EXPERT OPINION

Diagnostic criteria for narcolepsy (ICSD-3) need revision and greater clarity. Improved recognition of cataplexy and other symptoms through educational outreach, new biomarkers, improved test scoring through artificial intelligence algorithms, and use of machine learning may facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment. Pharmacological options need improved symptomatic therapy in addition to targeted therapies that address the loss of hypocretin signaling. Optimal narcolepsy care also needs a better understanding of the pathophysiology, recognition of the different phenotypes in narcolepsy, identification of at-risk individuals and early recognition of symptoms, better diagnostic tools, and a database for research and disease monitoring of treatment, side-effects, and comorbidities.

Development and Validation of the Pediatric Hypersomnolence Survey

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia usually begin in early adolescence, but diagnostic delays ranging from 5 to 10 years are common, affecting disease burden. To improve early identification of these treatable conditions, we developed and validated the Pediatric Hypersomnolence Survey (PHS).

METHODS

Content was developed through literature review, patient focus groups, interviews with experts in the field, and field testing. We then validated the 14-item self-reported survey across 3 hospitals and web recruitment from patient groups. In the validation phase, we recruited a total of 331 participants (patients with narcolepsy type 1 [n = 64], narcolepsy type 2 [n = 34], idiopathic hypersomnia [n = 36], and other sleep disorders [n = 97] and healthy controls [n = 100], ages 8-18 years) to complete the survey. We assessed a range of psychometric properties, including discriminant diagnostic validity for CNS disorders of hypersomnolence using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and reliability across a 1-week period.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a 4-domain solution with good reliability expressed by satisfactory omega values. Across groups, the PHS total score showed appropriate positive correlations with other validated surveys of sleepiness (r = 0.65-0.78, p < 0.001) and negative correlations with multiple sleep latency test measures (mean sleep latency: r = -0.27, p = 0.006; number of sleep-onset REM periods: r = 0.26, p = 0.007). Compared to controls and patients with other sleep disorders, the area under the curve for participants with narcolepsy or idiopathic hypersomnia was 0.87 (standard error 0.02, 95% CI 0.83-0.91) with high sensitivity (81.3, 95% CI 73.7%-87.5%) and specificity (81.2%, 95 CI 75.1%-86.4%). Test-retest reliability was r = 0.87.

DISCUSSION

The PHS is a valid and reliable tool for clinicians to identify pediatric patients with narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia. Implemented in clinical practice, the PHS will potentially decrease diagnostic delays and time to treatment, ultimately reducing disease burden for these debilitating conditions.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that the PHS accurately identifies patients with central disorders of hypersomnolence.

How patient centric is health policy development? The case of the Parliamentary Inquiry into Sleep Health Awareness in Australia

Objective Parliamentary inquiries into health-related issues empower everyday Australians to contribute to the development and reform of health policy. We explored how patient and family/carers concerns are translated by this process, using a less well-known disease, narcolepsy, as an example. Methods Written submissions made to the Parliamentary Inquiry into Sleep Health Awareness in Australia 2018 by self-identified patients or family/carers with narcolepsy (n  = 13) were extracted and thematically analysed using the Framework Approach. Each submission was systematically coded and abstracted into emergent themes before being evaluated against the final policy recommendations. Results Although patients and their family/carers prioritised issues that affected their daily lives (i.e. mental health sequela, workplace accommodations), the policy recommendations in the report focused mainly on issues of healthcare infrastructure, funding and engagement. Our analysis highlighted several barriers that patients and their family/carers face when contributing to this part of healthcare policy formation. Conclusions Our findings suggest that the parliamentary inquiry process in its current form is not an ideal vehicle by which patients and family/carers can contribute or influence healthcare policy. Despite calling for submissions from patients and their family/carers, the final report and subsequent health policy recommendations made by the inquiry do not appear to be patient-centric or reflective of the submissions written by these stakeholders. Increased transparency, development of processes to balance stakeholder priorities and improved accessibility for stakeholders to participate are needed if health-related parliamentary inquiries are to produce healthcare policy that ultimately meets the needs of patients and family/carers.

Prevalence, incidence, and health care utilization of patients with narcolepsy: a population-representative study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Previous estimated prevalence of narcolepsy in Europe was 47 patients per 100,000 persons, with a yearly incidence of 0.64-1.37 per 100,000. However, analyses of representative datasets from large cohorts are limited. This study aimed to estimate the population-based diagnostic prevalence and incidence of narcolepsy in Germany, and to describe these patients and their health care resource utilization.

METHODS

This study used the InGef research database, an anonymized representative dataset of 4 million persons covered by statutory health insurance in Germany. Patients with confirmed narcolepsy diagnoses in 2018 were included. Mid-p exact tests were used to calculate 95%-confidence intervals. Patients with narcolepsy diagnoses and narcolepsy-targeting therapy in 2014-2018 were included to describe health care resource utilization in the year prior to diagnosis.

RESULTS

In 2018 diagnostic prevalence was estimated as 17.88 (95%-CI 16.45-19.40), and 12-month incidence as 0.79 (0.52-1.15) per 100,000 persons. 46% patients were in psycho-behavioral therapeutic treatment and 61% of employees had sick-leave days. One in three patients was hospitalized for any cause. 28% received antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic prevalence was lower, but incidence was consistent with previous reports, though previous estimates may diverge in terms of age/gender-distributions. Patients showed a substantial utilization of health care resources, including sick leave and hospitalization. Almost half the patients underwent psycho-behavioral treatment in the year prior to diagnosis, which might indicate high burden of psychiatric symptoms. The increased use of antibiotics could indicate more frequent infections than in the general population.

Recognizing the Symptom Spectrum of Narcolepsy to Improve Timely Diagnosis: A Narrative Review

Narcolepsy is a chronic sleep disorder with a strong negative impact on quality of life, especially when untreated. Diagnostic delay is a persistent problem, with obvious detrimental effects on patients. A diagnosis of narcolepsy may be delayed because of its broad symptom presentation which is much more encompassing than the classical "tetrad" of sleepiness, cataplexy, hallucinations, and sleep paralysis. Furthermore, symptoms can vary over time. Presentation of symptoms can also be markedly different between children and adults. Finally, common sleep-related comorbidities increase the risk of narcolepsy being masked by overlapping symptoms or treatment. In this review, we provide a detailed description of the broad and dynamic symptom spectrum of narcolepsy, with specific attention to the different manifestations in both adults and children. The overarching goal is to help not only sleep specialists, but general practitioners, pediatricians, and other caregivers with early recognition and prompt diagnosis of this severe but treatable disorder.

Knowledge Gaps in the Perioperative Management of Adults With Narcolepsy: A Call for Further Research

There is increasing awareness that sleep disorders may be associated with increased perioperative risk. The Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine created the Narcolepsy Perioperative Task Force: (1) to investigate the current state of knowledge of the perioperative risk for patients with narcolepsy, (2) to determine the viability of developing perioperative guidelines for the management of patients with narcolepsy, and (3) to delineate future research goals and clinically relevant outcomes. The Narcolepsy Perioperative Task Force established that there is evidence for increased perioperative risk in patients with narcolepsy; however, this evidence is sparse and based on case reviews, case series, and retrospective reviews. Mechanistically, there are a number of potential mechanisms by which patients with narcolepsy could be at increased risk for perioperative complications. These include aggravation of the disease itself, dysautonomia, narcolepsy-related medications, anesthesia interactions, and withdrawal of narcolepsy-related medications. At this time, there is inadequate research to develop an expert consensus or guidelines for the perioperative management of patients with narcolepsy. The paucity of available literature highlights the critical need to determine if patients with narcolepsy are at an increased perioperative risk and to establish appropriate research protocols and clearly delineated patient-centered outcomes. There is a real need for collaborative research among sleep medicine specialists, surgeons, anesthesiologists, and perioperative providers. This future research will become the foundation for the development of guidelines, or at a minimum, a better understanding how to optimize the perioperative care of patients with narcolepsy.

Narcolepsy in Children and Adults: A Guide to Improved Recognition, Diagnosis and Management

Narcolepsy is a rare condition that affects children and adults, and commonly has an onset in childhood. Time to appropriate diagnosis frequently is at least a decade. Unrecognized or misdiagnosed symptoms of narcolepsy contribute to increased morbidity, disability and socioeconomic liability in these patients. Delays in diagnosis may be related to variability in presentation in childhood, lack of familiarity with symptoms or appropriate diagnostic testing or misdiagnosis with accidental introduction of treatment that may modify or mask narcolepsy features. Improved awareness about the diagnosis and tailored therapies improve clinical and socioeconomic outcomes by reducing time to effective treatment. Application of effective treatment results in long-term benefits by improving clinical outcomes, potentially enabling improved education, increased employment opportunity, and improved work productivity and quality of life. This review provides a comprehensive stepwise approach to improve knowledge and comfort for recognition of symptoms, diagnostic strategies and management considerations of narcolepsy in children and adults.

Medical specialty visits and diagnoses received by Saudi patients prior to a diagnosis of narcolepsy

PURPOSE

Narcolepsy is an uncommon neurological disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and multiple other symptoms. Due to the under-recognition of narcolepsy symptoms, patients are often misdiagnosed. This study aimed to assess the types of specialties visited and the diagnoses received by Saudi patients prior to their narcolepsy diagnosis.

METHODS

The study included 55 consecutive patients with type-1 and type-2 narcolepsy who attended the narcolepsy clinic between August 2017 and December 2017. Narcolepsy was diagnosed according to the International Classification of Sleep Disorders-third edition criteria. We evaluated sociodemographic data, the specialties visited, and diagnoses and treatments received prior to visiting a sleep specialist.

RESULTS

The mean diagnostic delay was 9.1 ± 8.4 years (1-43 years). Multiple linear regression analysis identified early onset as the only predictor of a delayed diagnosis (β coefficient = - 0.262, p = 0.03). EDS was the main symptom that prompted patients to seek medical consultation, and only one patient had been (1.8%) referred with the diagnosis of narcolepsy. In the study group, 82% of the patients were misdiagnosed with a mental or neurological disorder or were thought to be afflicted by "envy," "evil eye," or "black magic" before receiving a correct diagnosis. No significant differences were detected between patients with narcolepsy type-1 and narcolepsy type-2.

CONCLUSIONS

Delays in diagnosing narcolepsy remain a major problem for Saudi patients with this disorder. We found that Saudi patients with narcolepsy had visited several medical specialists and faith healers and were misdiagnosed prior to visiting a sleep specialist.

Red Flags for early referral of people with symptoms suggestive of narcolepsy: a report from a national multidisciplinary panel

OBJECTIVE

Narcolepsy is a lifelong disease, manifesting with excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy, arising between childhood and young adulthood. The diagnosis is typically made after a long delay that burdens the disease severity. The aim of the project, promoted by the "Associazione Italiana Narcolettici e Ipersonni" is to develop Red Flags to detect symptoms for early referral, targeting non-sleep medicine specialists, general practitioners, and pediatricians.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel, including patients, public institutions, and representatives of national scientific societies of specialties possibly involved in the diagnostic process of suspected narcolepsy, was convened. The project was accomplished in three phases. Phase 1: Sleep experts shaped clinical pictures of narcolepsy in pediatric and adult patients. On the basis of these pictures, Red Flags were drafted. Phase 2: Representatives of the scientific societies and patients filled in a form to identify barriers to the diagnosis of narcolepsy. Phase 3: The panel produced suggestions for the implementation of Red Flags.

RESULTS

Red Flags were produced representing three clinical pictures of narcolepsy in pediatric patients ((1) usual sleep symptoms, (2) unusual sleep symptoms, (3) endocrinological signs) and two in adult patients ((1) usual sleep symptoms, (2) unusual sleep symptoms). Inadequate knowledge of symptoms at onset by medical doctors turned out to be the main reported barrier to diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This report will hopefully enhance knowledge and awareness of narcolepsy among non-specialists in sleep medicine in order to reduce the diagnostic delay that burdens patients in Italy. Similar initiatives could be promoted across Europe.

Patient-Reported Measures of Narcolepsy: The Need for Better Assessment

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Narcolepsy, a chronic disorder of the central nervous system, is clinically characterized by a symptom pentad that includes excessive daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, sleep paralysis, hypnopompic/hypnagogic hallucinations, and disrupted nighttime sleep. Ideally, screening and diagnosis instruments that assist physicians in evaluating a patient for type 1 or type 2 narcolepsy would be brief, easy for patients to understand and physicians to score, and would identify or rule out the need for electrophysiological testing.

METHODS

A search of the literature was conducted to review patient-reported measures used for the assessment of narcolepsy, mainly in clinical trials, with the goal of summarizing existing scales and identifying areas that may require additional screening questions and clinical practice scales.

RESULTS

Of the seven scales reviewed, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale continues to be an important outcome measure to screen adults for excessive daytime sleepiness, which may be associated with narcolepsy. Several narcolepsy-specific scales have demonstrated utility, such as the Ullanlinna Narcolepsy Scale, Swiss Narcolepsy Scale, and Narcolepsy Symptom Assessment Questionnaire, but further validation is required.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the narcolepsy-specific scales currently in use may identify type 1 narcolepsy, there are no validated questionnaires to identify type 2 narcolepsy. Thus, there remains a need for short, easily understood, and well-validated instruments that can be readily used in clinical practice to distinguish narcolepsy subtypes, as well as other hypersomnias, and for assessing symptoms of these conditions during treatment.

New developments in the management of narcolepsy

Narcolepsy is a life-long, underrecognized sleep disorder that affects 0.02%-0.18% of the US and Western European populations. Genetic predisposition is suspected because of narcolepsy's strong association with HLA DQB1*06-02, and genome-wide association studies have identified polymorphisms in T-cell receptor loci. Narcolepsy pathophysiology is linked to loss of signaling by hypocretin-producing neurons; an autoimmune etiology possibly triggered by some environmental agent may precipitate hypocretin neuronal loss. Current treatment modalities alleviate the main symptoms of excessive daytime somnolence (EDS) and cataplexy and, to a lesser extent, reduce nocturnal sleep disruption, hypnagogic hallucinations, and sleep paralysis. Sodium oxybate (SXB), a sodium salt of γ hydroxybutyric acid, is a first-line agent for cataplexy and EDS and may help sleep disruption, hypnagogic hallucinations, and sleep paralysis. Various antidepressant medications including norepinephrine serotonin reuptake inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants are second-line agents for treating cataplexy. In addition to SXB, modafinil and armodafinil are first-line agents to treat EDS. Second-line agents for EDS are stimulants such as methylphenidate and extended-release amphetamines. Emerging therapies include non-hypocretin-based therapy, hypocretin-based treatments, and immunotherapy to prevent hypocretin neuronal death. Non-hypocretin-based novel treatments for narcolepsy include pitolisant (BF2.649, tiprolisant); JZP-110 (ADX-N05) for EDS in adults; JZP 13-005 for children; JZP-386, a deuterated sodium oxybate oral suspension; FT 218 an extended-release formulation of SXB; and JNJ-17216498, a new formulation of modafinil. Clinical trials are investigating efficacy and safety of SXB, modafinil, and armodafinil in children. γ-amino butyric acid (GABA) modulation with GABA_A receptor agonists clarithromycin and flumazenil may help daytime somnolence. Other drugs investigated include GABA_B agonists (baclofen), melanin-concentrating hormone antagonist, and thyrotropin-releasing hormone agonists. Hypocretin-based therapies include hypocretin peptide replacement administered either through an intracerebroventricular route or intranasal route. Hypocretin neuronal transplant and transforming stem cells into hypothalamic neurons are also discussed in this article. Immunotherapy to prevent hypocretin neuronal death is reviewed.

Current and Future Treatment Options for Narcolepsy: A Review

Narcolepsy is a chronic neurological sleep disorder with potentially disabling symptoms ranging from occupational concerns to mental health difficulties. Recent advances related to the neurobiological basis of narcolepsy have led to newer pharmacological treatment options and adjunctive behavioral techniques that support symptom management. This article outlines evidence-based pharmacologic therapies, behavioral techniques, and psychosocial costs related to narcolepsy. Psychosocial factors, although frequently acknowledged, deserve further attention and awareness from researchers and providers. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine's (AASM) Quality Measure Drivers and potential future treatment options are also discussed.

The ICSD-3 and DSM-5 guidelines for diagnosing narcolepsy: clinical relevance and practicality

Narcolepsy is a chronic neurological disease manifesting as difficulty with maintaining continuous wake and sleep. Clinical presentation varies but requires excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) occurring alone or together with features of rapid-eye movement (REM) sleep dissociation (e.g., cataplexy, hypnagogic/hypnopompic hallucinations, sleep paralysis), and disrupted nighttime sleep. Narcolepsy with cataplexy is associated with reductions of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) hypocretin due to destruction of hypocretin peptide-producing neurons in the hypothalamus in individuals with a specific genetic predisposition. Updated diagnostic criteria include the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and International Classification of Sleep Disorders Third Edition (ICSD-3). DSM-5 criteria require EDS in association with any one of the following: (1) cataplexy; (2) CSF hypocretin deficiency; (3) REM sleep latency ≤15 minutes on nocturnal polysomnography (PSG); or (4) mean sleep latency ≤8 minutes on multiple sleep latency testing (MSLT) with ≥2 sleep-onset REM-sleep periods (SOREMPs). ICSD-3 relies more upon objective data in addition to EDS, somewhat complicating the diagnostic criteria: 1) cataplexy and either positive MSLT/PSG findings or CSF hypocretin deficiency; (2) MSLT criteria similar to DSM-5 except that a SOREMP on PSG may count as one of the SOREMPs required on MSLT; and (3) distinct division of narcolepsy into type 1, which requires the presence of cataplexy or documented CSF hypocretin deficiency, and type 2, where cataplexy is absent, and CSF hypocretin levels are either normal or undocumented. We discuss limitations of these criteria such as variability in clinical presentation of cataplexy, particularly when cataplexy may be ambiguous, as well as by age; multiple and/or invasive CSF diagnostic test requirements; and lack of normative diagnostic test data (e.g., MSLT) in certain populations. While ICSD-3 criteria reflect narcolepsy pathophysiology, DSM-5 criteria have greater clinical practicality, suggesting that valid and reliable biomarkers to help standardize narcolepsy diagnosis would be welcomed.

The utility of a 5(th) nap in multiple sleep latency test

BACKGROUND

This is the first study that aimed to look specifically at the utility of the 5(th) nap in the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT), a test used to assist in the diagnosis of narcolepsy.

METHODS

Data was retrospectively collected from the Sleep Disorders Centre of a Tertiary Hospital on patients that had a 5(th) nap during their MSLT from the 08(th) November 2011 to 12(th) November 2014.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients had a 5(th) nap performed out of 378 MSLT studies. In 16% of cases a diagnosis of narcolepsy was given directly due to the inclusion of the 5(th) nap on the MSLT. Here a 5(th) nap allowed diagnostic criteria of mean sleep latency <8 minutes and >2 SOREMPS to be met. In 53% of cases the mean sleep latency increased due to 5(th) nap inclusion; the mean sleep latency of the first four naps was 5.6 vs. 6.7 after inclusion of the 5(th) nap.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5(th) nap is not often performed within the MSLT studies. Our study shows that only a few patients may benefit from a 5(th) nap opportunity which also led to increase of the mean sleep latency at the expense of extra time, cost, labour and increased patient anxiety.

Update on hypersomnias of central origin

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the multiple clinical aspects of hypersomnias of central origin. Emphasis is given to the new pathophysiological pathways and treatment options described in the current literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

Narcolepsy is the most recognized of the hypersomnias of central origin. Hypocretin deficiency appears to underlie narcolepsy with cataplexy, and infections and vaccinations have been associated with disease onset. Targeted therapeutic approaches are currently underway. A putative naturally occurring constituent in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with non-narcoleptic primary hypersomnias, able to stimulate γ-aminobutyric acid alpha receptors and induce sleep, has recently been postulated. Neuroimaging has also provided more insight into the pathophysiology of Kleine-Levin syndrome. Sleep deprivation is currently recognized as a major differential diagnosis.

SUMMARY

Excessive daytime sleepiness is the cardinal symptom of the hypersomnias of central origin, with major impact on the quality of life. It is important that clinicians be able to recognize these conditions, so that appropriate management or onward referral is expedited.

Time to response with sodium oxybate for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy in patients with narcolepsy

STUDY OBJECTIVES

This post hoc analysis evaluated the time to response that can be expected with sodium oxybate (SXB) for treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and cataplexy in patients with narcolepsy.

METHODS

Data were from a 4-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (GHB-2; N = 136) of oral SXB 3 g, 6 g, and 9 g nightly, and its 12-month open-label extension (GHB-3). Two response definitions were utilized: ≥ 20% improvement in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score (EDS responders), and ≥ 50% reduction in weekly cataplexy attacks (cataplexy responders). These thresholds were previously determined to be clinically relevant based on analysis of the relationship of Clinical Global Impression of Change with ESS and number of cataplexy attacks. Kaplan-Meier curves and median times to first response, based on above criteria, and to maximum response were estimated.

RESULTS

Among 86 patients randomized to SXB in GHB-2 and continued into GHB-3, 77.6% and 90.7% were EDS and cataplexy responders, respectively. The median (95% CI) times to first response were 37 (31-50) days for EDS and 25 (17-29) days for cataplexy, and median times to maximum response were 106 (85-164) days for EDS and 213 (94-279) days for cataplexy. GHB-3 results among 31 patients initially randomized to placebo were consistent with those treated with SXB throughout, but with longer times to maximum response.

CONCLUSIONS

Response onset, assessed as clinically meaningful improvements in EDS and cataplexy, was observed in most patients within 2 months; a longer period is needed to achieve maximum response. Clinicians should recognize that time to initial and maximum response may take weeks to months.