Potential Predictive Value of Bcl-2 for Response to Tamoxifen in the Adjuvant Setting of Node-Positive Breast Cancer

Berberine enhances the anti‑tumor activity of tamoxifen in drug‑sensitive MCF‑7 and drug‑resistant MCF‑7/TAM cells

Berberine, an isoquinoline alkaloid, has been previously demonstrated to possess anti‑breast cancer properties. Tamoxifen is widely used in the prevention and treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Thus, the aim of the present study was to assess whether berberine enhanced the anticancer effect of tamoxifen, and the underlying mechanism involved in this combined effect in tamoxifen-sensitive (MCF-7) and tamoxifen-resistant (MCF-7/TAM) cells using MTS, flow cytometry and western blot assays. The results indicated that berberine demonstrated dose‑ and time‑dependent anti‑proliferative activity in MCF‑7 and MCF‑7/TAM cells. Furthermore, the combination of berberine and tamoxifen induced cell growth inhibition more effectively than tamoxifen alone. The present study also demonstrated that combinational treatment is more effective in inducing G1 phase arrest and activating apoptosis compared tamoxifen alone, which may be due to upregulation of P21 expression and downregulation of the B‑cell CLL/lymphoma 2(Bcl‑2)/Bcl‑2 associated X protein ratio. The results of the present study suggested that berberine may potentially be useful as an adjuvant agent in cancer chemotherapy to enhance the effect of tamoxifen, which will be useful for anti‑tumor therapy and further research.

Prognostic value of Bcl-2 in two independent populations of estrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy

INTRODUCTION

Estrogen receptor (ER) status is not an optimal marker for response to adjuvant endocrine therapy since approximately 30% of patients with ER-positive tumors eventually relapse. Bcl-2 is regulated by ER and may thus be considered as an indicator of ER activity and a candidate supplementary marker to ER status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Tumor tissue from 257 patients with ER-positive breast cancer treated with tamoxifen was used for determination of the best threshold for immunohistochemical Bcl-2 assessment as prognostic marker. Subsequently, samples from the Danish patients of the randomized clinical trial BIG 1-98 comprising 1191 ER-positive patients treated with tamoxifen, letrozole or a sequence of the two were immunohistochemically stained for Bcl-2 to further explore the prognostic value of Bcl-2.

RESULTS

Two Bcl-2 levels were found to divide the population of the primary study into significantly different groups according to disease-free survival (DFS). Multivariate analysis confirmed the significance of the lowest level, and showed Bcl-2 to be an independent prognostic marker. Analysis of the Danish cohort of the BIG 1-98 confirmed that Bcl-2 was a significant predictor of DFS, independent of known prognostic markers. However, in an additional analysis of a subset of the Danish cohort of BIG 1-98 including only HER-2 normal patients, the effect of Bcl-2 was not statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

Low Bcl-2 can predict poor outcome of patients with ER-positive tumors treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy, whereas the use of Bcl-2 for determination of addition of chemotherapy was not supported by this study.

miRNA-34a is associated with docetaxel resistance in human breast cancer cells

Docetaxel is a chemotherapy drug to treat breast cancer, however as with many chemotherapeutic drugs resistance to docetaxel occurs in 50% of patients, and the underlying molecular mechanisms of drug resistance are not fully understood. Gene regulation through microRNAs (miRNA) has been shown to play an important role in cancer drug resistance. By directly targeting mRNA, miRNAs are able to inhibit genes that are necessary for signalling pathways or drug induced apoptosis rendering cells drug resistant. This study investigated the role of differential miRNA expression in two in vitro breast cancer cell line models (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231) of acquired docetaxel resistance. MiRNA microarray analysis identified 299 and 226 miRNAs altered in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 docetaxel-resistant cells, respectively. Docetaxel resistance was associated with increased expression of miR-34a and miR-141 and decreased expression of miR-7, miR-16, miR-30a, miR-125a-5p, miR-126. Computational target prediction revealed eight candidate genes targeted by these miRNAs. Quantitative PCR and western analysis confirmed decreased expression of two genes, BCL-2 and CCND1, in docetaxel-resistant cells, which are both targeted by miR-34a. Modulation of miR-34a expression was correlated with BCL-2 and cyclin D1 protein expression changes and a direct interaction of miR-34a with BCL-2 was shown by luciferase assay. Inhibition of miR-34a enhanced response to docetaxel in MCF-7 docetaxel-resistant cells, whereas overexpression of miR-34a conferred resistance in MCF-7 docetaxel-sensitive cells. This study is the first to show differences in miRNA expression, in particular, increased expression of miR-34a in an acquired model of docetaxel resistance in breast cancer. This serves as a mechanism of acquired docetaxel resistance in these cells, possibly through direct interactions with BCL-2 and CCND1, therefore presenting a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of docetaxel-resistant breast cancer.

Molecular profile of breast versus ovarian cancer cells in response to treatment with the anticancer drugs cisplatin, carboplatin, doxorubicin, etoposide and taxol

We assessed changes in the apoptosis-related genes BCL2, BAX, BCL2L12, FAS and CASPASE-3 in OVCAR-3 human ovarian cancer cells and BT-20 human breast cancer cells to provide an insight into the molecular mechanisms involved in the response of these cells to treatment with anticancer drugs and to assess their value as potential biomarkers of chemotherapy response in breast and ovarian cancer. Cells were treated with different chemotherapeutic drugs (cisplatin, carboplatin, doxorubicin, etoposide and taxol) and assessed for changes in the expression of apoptosis-related genes at the mRNA level. Total RNA was extracted, reverse-transcribed into cDNA and amplified by PCR using gene-specific primers. GAPDH was used as a housekeeping gene. Cytotoxicity was assessed by MTT assay. Both cancer cell lines responded differentially at the molecular level to the drug treatments. OVCAR-3 cells showed more pronounced sensitivity and changes compared to BT-20 cells at the mRNA level for different apoptosis-related genes, leading to cell and cancer type dependence in conjunction with drug dependence.

Meta-analysis confirms BCL2 is an independent prognostic marker in breast cancer

Background

A number of protein markers have been investigated as prognostic adjuncts in breast cancer but their translation into clinical practice has been impeded by a lack of appropriate validation. Recently, we showed that BCL2 protein expression had prognostic power independent of current used standards. Here, we present the results of a meta-analysis of the association between BCL2 expression and both disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in female breast cancer.

Methods

Reports published in 1994–2006 were selected for the meta-analysis using a search of PubMed. Studies that investigated the role of BCL2 expression by immunohistochemistry with a sample size greater than 100 were included. Seventeen papers reported the results of 18 different series including 5,892 cases with an average median follow-up of 92.1 months.

Results

Eight studies investigated DFS unadjusted for other variables in 2,285 cases. The relative hazard estimates ranged from 0.85 – 3.03 with a combined random effects estimate of 1.66 (95%CI 1.25 – 2.22). The effect of BCL2 on DFS adjusted for other prognostic factors was reported in 11 studies and the pooled random effects hazard ratio estimate was 1.58 (95%CI 1.29–1.94). OS was investigated unadjusted for other variables in eight studies incorporating 3,910 cases. The hazard estimates ranged from 0.99–4.31 with a pooled estimate of risk of 1.64 (95%CI 1.36–2.0). OS adjusted for other parameters was evaluated in nine series comprising 3,624 cases and the estimates for these studies ranged from 1.10 to 2.49 with a pooled estimate of 1.37 (95%CI 1.19–1.58).

Conclusion

The meta-analysis strongly supports the prognostic role of BCL2 as assessed by immunohistochemistry in breast cancer and shows that this effect is independent of lymph node status, tumour size and tumour grade as well as a range of other biological variables on multi-variate analysis. Large prospective studies are now needed to establish the clinical utility of BCL2 as an independent prognostic marker.

What clinicians need to know about antioestrogen resistance in breast cancer therapy

Tamoxifen is the drug most used for early breast cancer treatment in oestrogen receptor (ER) positive patients. Unfortunately, despite high ER tumour levels in a tumour, resistance to endocrine therapy, either de novo or acquired after prolonged treatment, can occur. In this review, we will try to summarise the postulated mechanisms of hormonal-resistance, namely, the role of co-regulators and the crosstalk between the HER-2, IGF-IR, Cox-2 and ER pathways. Other predictive markers of tamoxifen-resistance/response, such as cyclin E and UPA/PAI-1, are also discussed.

Overexpression of c-Myc and Bcl-2 during progression and distant metastasis of hormone-treated breast cancer

The aim of this study was to identify molecules involved in the proliferation and survival of recurrent estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer at the site of metastasis. Most studies of biomarkers are done using the initial primary breast tumor whereas pathological studies of breast cancer lesions after distant recurrence are scarce. Here we evaluated the expression of the oncogenes c-Myc and Bcl-2, mediators of estrogen-dependent proliferation and survival, during breast cancer progression and relapse after adjuvant hormonal therapy. Using a preclinical model of tamoxifen-resistant growth, we found overexpression of c-Myc in all (3/3) and of Bcl-2 in most (2/3) tamoxifen resistant-breast cancer variants. To determine whether c-Myc and Bcl-2 are expressed during breast cancer progression in the clinics we identified breast cancer patients who had received adjuvant hormonal therapy for the treatment of their localized disease and had later experienced relapse. From 583 patients who had received adjuvant hormonal therapy a total of 82 experienced recurrence. Nevertheless, only 22 patients had had a biopsy of their metastatic lesion done after relapse. Twenty-one biopsies were useful for this biomarker study. These biopsies were obtained mostly (20) from breast cancer patients who had received tamoxifen as their adjuvant hormonal therapy. One patient had received an aromatase inhibitor instead. Our results showed that almost all (20) metastatic recurrences expressed ER. Expression of c-Myc was observed in 18 out of 19 metastatic lesions scored while expression of Bcl-2 was detected in 17 out of 21 metastatic tumors. A correlation between ER expression and Bcl-2, but not with c-Myc, was found in these recurrent metastatic lesions. In addition, c-Myc expression was correlated with the nuclear grade of the metastatic lesion. Thus, the frequent expression of c-Myc and Bcl-2 in metastatic breast cancer recurrences suggests that combining hormonal therapy with strategies to block c-Myc and Bcl-2 may prevent growth of ER-positive breast cancer at the site of metastasis.

Bringing Molecular Prognosis and Prediction to the Clinic

In the past 30 years, important advances have been made in the knowledge of breast cancer biology and in the treatment of the disease. However, the translation of these advances into clinical practice has been slow. With the advent of molecular-based medicine, it is hoped that the bridge between the bench and the bedside will continue to be shortened. Because breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with wide-ranging subsets of patients who have different prognoses and who respond differently to treatments, the identification of patients who need treatment and the definition of the best therapy for an individual have become the priorities in breast cancer care. This article will review the crucial role of prognostic and predictive factors in achieving these goals. A critical review of classical and newer individual molecular markers, such as hormone receptors, HER2, urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, cyclin E, topoisomerase II, and p53, was performed, and the preliminary results obtained using the new gene expression profiling technology are described along with their potential clinical implications.