Gemcitabine and Taxanes as a New Standard of Care in Breast Cancer

Endoplasmic reticulum stress in breast cancer: a predictive model for prognosis and therapy selection

Background

Breast cancer (BC) is a leading cause of mortality among women, underscoring the urgent need for improved therapeutic predictio. Developing a precise prognostic model is crucial. The role of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress (ERS) in cancer suggests its potential as a critical factor in BC development and progression, highlighting the importance of precise prognostic models for tailored treatment strategies.

Methods

Through comprehensive analysis of ERS-related gene expression in BC, utilizing both single-cell and bulk sequencing data from varied BC subtypes, we identified eight key ERS-related genes. LASSO regression and machine learning techniques were employed to construct a prognostic model, validated across multiple datasets and compared with existing models for its predictive accuracy.

Results

The developed ERS-model categorizes BC patients into distinct risk groups with significant differences in clinical prognosis, confirmed by robust ROC, DCA, and KM analyses. The model forecasts survival rates with high precision, revealing distinct immune infiltration patterns and treatment responsiveness between risk groups. Notably, we discovered six druggable targets and validated Methotrexate and Gemcitabine as effective agents for high-risk BC treatment, based on their sensitivity profiles and potential for addressing the lack of active targets in BC.

Conclusion

Our study advances BC research by establishing a significant link between ERS and BC prognosis at both the molecular and cellular levels. By stratifying patients into risk-defined groups, we unveil disparities in immune cell infiltration and drug response, guiding personalized treatment. The identification of potential drug targets and therapeutic agents opens new avenues for targeted interventions, promising to enhance outcomes for high-risk BC patients and paving the way for personalized cancer therapy.

Potential role of CMPK1, SLC29A1, and TLE4 polymorphisms in gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients: pharmacogenetic study results from the prospective randomized phase II study of eribulin plus gemcitabine versus paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (KCSG-BR-13-11)

Background

In this study, we evaluated the association between genetic polymorphisms of 23 genes associated with gemcitabine metabolism and the clinical efficacy of gemcitabine in breast cancer patients.

Patients and methods

This prospective, pharmacogenetic study was conducted in cooperation with a phase II clinical trial. A total of 103 genetic polymorphisms of the 23 genes involved in gemcitabine transport and metabolism were selected for genotyping. The associations of genetic polymorphisms with overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and 6-month PFS were analyzed.

Results

A total of 91 breast cancer patients were enrolled in this study. In terms of 6-month PFS, rs1044457 in CMPK1 was the most significant genetic polymorphism [55.9% for CT and TT and 78.9% for CC, P < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR): 4.444, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.905-10.363]. For the rs693955 in SLC29A1, the median duration of PFS was 5.4 months for AA and 10.5 months for CA and CC (P = 0.002, HR: 3.704, 95% CI: 1.615-8.497). For the rs2807312 in TLE4, the median duration of PFS was 5.7 months for TT and 10.4 months for CT and CC (P = 0.005, HR: 4.948, 95% CI: 1.612-15.190). In survival analysis with a multi-gene model, the TT genotype of rs2807312 had the worst PFS regardless of other genetic polymorphisms, whereas the CA genotype of rs693955 or the CT genotype of rs2807312 without the AA genotype of rs693955 had the best PFS compared with those of other genetic groups (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Genetic polymorphisms of rs1044457 in CMPK1, rs693955 in SLC29A1, and rs2807312 in TLE4 were significantly associated with the 6-month PFS rate and/or the duration of PFS. Further studies with a larger sample size and expression study would be helpful to validate the association of genetic polymorphisms and clinical efficacy of gemcitabine.

•

This is the largest pharmacogenetic study of gemcitabine-based breast cancer treatment in a prospective clinical trial.

•

Several genetic polymorphisms in CMPK1, SLC29A1, and TLE4 were associated with 6-month PFS rate and the duration of PFS.

•

The result of this study may contribute to the personalized treatment of breast cancer.

Role of cytidine deaminase in toxicity and efficacy of nucleosidic analogs

INTRODUCTION

Nucleosidic analogs such as pyrimidine and purine derivatives are mainstay in the field of treating cancers, both in adults and in children. All these drugs act as antimetabolite compounds, that is, they interfere with the ability of cancer cells to synthesize the nucleosides or the nucleotides necessary for proliferation and progression. As with most cytotoxics, maintaining patients in their therapeutic window is challenging, and predicting changes in drug exposure is critical to ensure an optimal efficacy/toxicity balance.

AREAS COVERED

Among the antimetabolites, a small but widely prescribed number of drugs (i.e., gemcitabine, capecitabine, cytarabine, azacytidine) share a same metabolic pattern driven by a liver enzyme, cytidine deaminase (CDA), coded by a gene displaying several genetic and epigenetic polymorphisms. Consequently, CDA activity is erratic, ranging from deficient to ultra-rapid deaminator patients, with subsequent impact on drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics eventually. This review provides an update on the variety of clinical studies and case-reports investigating on CDA status as a marker for clinical outcome in cancer patients treated with nucleosidic analogs.

EXPERT OPINION

Whereas sorting patients on the basis of their CDA genotype remains tricky because of unclear genotype-to-phenotype relationships, developing functional strategies (i.e., phenotype-based status determination) could help to use CDA status as a biomarker for developing adaptive dosing strategies with nucleosidic analogs.

Docetaxel and gemcitabine combination therapy in advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium: results of a phase II and pharmacologic study

Our objective was to determine the response to gemcitabine plus docetaxel in advanced urothelial transitional cell carcinoma in a phase II trial, and gemcitabine distribution between plasma and erythrocytes, following docetaxel administration. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma, following a maximum of one prior chemotherapy regimen, were given gemcitabine 800 mg/m on days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel 85 mg/m on day 8, every 21 days. Gemcitabine was measured in the plasma and erythrocytes of nine patients before and after docetaxel administration. Thirty-four patients (median 63 years; range 49-79 years), of whom seven had prior chemotherapy and 27 were chemotherapy-naive, received a median of six cycles (range 1-6). Complete and partial remissions were observed in two and 16 (including three pretreated) patients, respectively, for an overall response rate of 53%. Median response duration was 5 months (range 1-39+). Haematoxicity was manageable, despite grade 3 infections in 24% of patients, but other toxicities were mostly mild. An apparent shift of gemcitabine from plasma to erythrocytes occurred after docetaxel in five of six patients evaluable for this analysis. We conclude gemcitabine plus docetaxel is tolerable and highly active in treated and untreated patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma.

The role of the liposomal anthracyclines and other systemic therapies in the management of advanced breast cancer

For patients whose breast cancers are not responsive to endocrine therapy, there are a large number of cytotoxic drugs that will induce a response. In spite of the introduction of new, very active drugs such as the taxanes, vinorelbine, capecitabine, gemcitabine, and trastuzumab, the anthracyclines are still as active as any--and more active than most--drugs used to treat breast cancer. Their inclusion in combinations to treat early and advanced disease prolongs survival. However, they cause nausea, vomiting, alopecia, myelosuppression, mucositis, and cardiomyopathies. There is no evidence that increasing the dose of conventional anthracyclines or any other of the cytotoxics beyond standard doses will improve outcomes. Schedule may be more important than dose in determining the benefit of cytotoxics used to treat breast cancer. Weekly schedules and continuous infusions of 5-fluorouracil and doxorubicin may have some advantages over more intermittent schedules. Liposomal formations of doxorubicin reduce toxicity, including cardiotoxicity; theoretically they should also be more effective because of better targeting of tumor over normal tissues. Both pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil/Caelyx [PLD]) and liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet [NPLD]) appeared to be as effective as conventional doxorubicin and much less toxic in multiple phase II and phase III studies. PLD has been evaluated in combinations with cyclophosphamide, the taxanes, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and trastuzumab, and NPLD has been evaluated in combination with cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab. Both liposomal anthracyclines are less cardiotoxic than conventional doxorubicin. The optimal dose of PLD is lower than that of conventional doxorubicin or NPLD. Patients treated with PLD have almost no alopecia, nausea, or vomiting, but its use is associated with stomatitis and hand-foot syndrome, which can be avoided or minimized with the use of proper dose-schedules. In contrast, the optimal dose-schedule of NPLD is nearly identical to that of conventional doxorubicin. The toxicity profile of NPLD is similar to that of conventional doxorubicin, but toxicities are less severe and NPLD is better tolerated than conventional doxorubicin at higher doses.