Multicenter phase II study of fixed sequences of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin or irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer

Alternating irinotecan with oxaliplatin combined with UFT plus leucovorin (SCOUT) in metastatic colorectal cancer

Tegafur-uracil (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV, folinic acid) with alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin were effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a phase I study. This study expanded the maximum tolerated dose group. Patients aged >or=18 years had histologically confirmed, inoperable, previously untreated, measurable mCRC. Patients received irinotecan 180 mg m(-2) on day 1, oxaliplatin 100 mg m(-2) on day 15 and UFT 250 mg m(-2) plus LV 90 mg on days 1-21 every 28 days. The phase I/II study comprised 45 patients, 29 at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The response rate in 38 evaluable patients was 63% (95% confidence interval (CI): 49-80). Median time to progression and overall survival were 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.9-10.4) and 16.8 months (95% CI: 9.6-25.3), respectively. In the MTD group, one patient had grade 3 leucopenia; one had grade 3 neutropaenia; three had grade 3 diarrhoea; and one had grade 3 neurotoxicity. No hand-foot syndrome grade >1 was seen. In total, 67% of eligible patients received second-line therapy. UFT plus LV with alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin is an efficacious first-line treatment for mCRC, with minimal neurotoxicity and hand-foot syndrome.

Second-line chemotherapy use in metastatic colon cancer varies by disease responsiveness

BACKGROUND

Improved survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has been shown to correlate with increased utilization of the 3 active cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan, and oxaliplatin, usually administered in 2 lines of therapy. However, it is unclear which patient, disease, and treatment characteristics are associated with the utilization of a second-line regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review. Patients with metastatic CRC treated with bevacizumab outside of a clinical trial and any infusional 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) regimen off-protocol (ie, 5-FU/LV/irinotecan [FOLFIRI]/bevacizumab or 5-FU/LV/oxaliplatin [FOLFOX]/bevacizumab) at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between February 2004 and September 2005 were included. Prespecified characteristics of age, tumor burden, severe toxicity, and front-line regimen efficacy were compared with exploratory analyses of additional patient, disease, and treatment characteristics.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven sequential patients treated with the specified front-line regimens were identified. Seventy-six percent of the eligible patients were treated with a second-line regimen. Despite equal treatment durations, patients with a better response of stable disease were significantly less likely to receive a third cytotoxic agent than patients with a partial response (68% vs. 95%; odds ratio, 8.2; P = .02) due to declining performance status (86%) or patient preference (14%). This was associated with a decreased 2-year overall survival (86% vs. 55%). Neither age, tumor burden, nor development of toxicities were associated with a different utilization of a second-line regimen.

CONCLUSION

Failure to obtain a response to initial chemotherapy for metastatic disease appears to be associated with decreased utilization of a second-line regimen.