Primary high-grade urothelial carcinoma of prostate with prostatic hyperplasia: a rare case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Primary urothelial carcinoma in the prostate (UCP) is extremely rare and occurs most frequently in the bladder. There are only dozens of primary cases reported in the literature. Here, we describe a rare case of primary UCP and review the literature.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 67-year-old widowed male, was referred to our hospital due to the frequency, and urgency of dysuria. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination revealed prostate size was about 57 mm × 50 mm × 54 mm, increased prostatic transitional zone, and surrounding of prostatic duct indicate bar isointense T1, short T2, hyperintense DWI, and hyposignal ADC (PI-RADS 3); posterior of peripheral zone indicate patchy isointense T1, short T2, hyperintense DWI, and hyposignal ADC (PI-RADS 5). Subsequently, the patient underwent a transrectal prostate biopsy. Histopathological and immunohistochemical (IHC) assessments showed prostatic high-grade urothelial carcinoma with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Finally, the patient underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Four months after surgery, CT plain and enhanced scan revealed thickening of the bladder wall. On further workup, cystoscopy revealed lymphoid follicular changes in the cut edge of the radical prostatectomy, and cystoscopic biopsies showed the malignant tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostatic urothelial carcinoma should always be considered if the patient with severe lower urinary tract symptoms or hematuria, PSA, and digital rectal examination without abnormalities, without a personal history of urothelial cancer, but contrast-enhanced MRI showed the lesion located in the prostate. As of right now, radical surgical resections remain the most effective treatment. The effectiveness of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy is still controversial.

Current Perspectives on the Diagnosis and Management of Primary Urethral Cancer: A Systematic Review

Primary urethral cancer (PUC) is a rare but highly aggressive malignancy that causes malignant urethral obstruction. We conducted a literature review using PubMed to identify original research studies that assessed the diagnosis and management of primary urethral cancer. PUC affects men more than women, is more common in African Americans than Caucasians, and is associated with history of chronic inflammation and irritation of the urinary tract. Patients suspected of PUC should undergo a complete work-up including cystoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, and biopsy. In men and women, surgical monotherapy ranging from organ-sparing to more radical reconstructive procedures has adequate survival rates for early stage PUC and has been shown to be similarly as effective as radiation monotherapy, while multimodal therapy has become the standard of treatment for advanced stage PUC. Salvage surgery or radiation therapy has been linked with increased survival rates. Nodal involvement at the time of diagnosis is a negative prognosticator and should be treated with multimodal therapy. Further prospective studies with greater sample sizes and standardized clinical trials would allow for greater consistency in evaluating the different treatment modalities for PUC.

Systematic Review of the Role of BCG in the Treatment of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Prostatic Urethra

BACKGROUND

In patients with non-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the prostatic urethra (PUC), treatment with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) could be beneficial.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the response rates to BCG in the different tumor stages, to describe the clinical impact of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) before BCG treatment, and to review the side effects of BCG treatment for PUC.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using the PubMed database to identify original studies between 1977 and 2019 reporting on PUC and BCG.

RESULTS

Of a total of 865 studies, ten were considered for evidence synthesis. An indication for BCG treatment was found in non-stromal invasive stages (Tis pu, Tis pd) and in stromal infiltrating cases (T1) of primary and secondary PUC when transitional cell carcinoma was the histology of origin. Studies including patients treated with TURP before BCG showed a better local response in the prostatic urethra with a higher disease free survival (DFS) (80-100% vs. 63-89%) and progression free survival (PFS) (90-100% vs. 75-94%) than patients in studies in which no TURP was performed. However, this difference in recurrence and progression in the prostate neither affected the total PFS (57-75% vs. 58-93%), nor the disease specific survival (70-100% vs. 66-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of resection loop biopsies of the prostatic urethra in appropriate cases during the primary work-up for suspected PUC, as well as the use of the current TNM classification for PUC, need to be improved. BCG therapy for non-stromal invasive stages of PUC show a good local response. Local response is further improved by a TURP before BCG therapy, although the overall prognosis does not seem to be affected. Further evidence for BCG treatment in the rare cases of stromal invasive PUC is needed. Specific side effects of BCG treatment for PUC are not reported.

Revisiting an Old Conundrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intravesical Therapy for Treatment of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Prostate

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of non-invasive (mucosal and/or ductal) urothelial carcinoma of the prostate remains elusive and there is a paucity of data to guide treatment.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to systematically review and synthesize treatment responses to conservative management of non-invasive prostatic urothelial carcinoma using intravesical therapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases from inception to November 2019 was performed. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-randomised studies. Pooled estimates of complete response in the bladder and prostate and prostate only were performed using a random effects model. Pre-specified subgroup analyses were generated to assess differences in complete responses for: BCG therapy vs other agents, ductal vs mucosal involvement, CIS vs papillary tumors and TURP vs no TURP.

RESULTS

Nine studies including 175 patients were identified for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis. All were retrospective case series and most evaluated response to BCG therapy. The pooled global complete response rate for intravesical therapy was 60%(95%CI: 0.48, 0.72), and for prostate 88%(95%CI: 0.81, 0.96). Pre-specified analyses did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between subgroups of interest.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of non-invasive prostatic urothelial carcinoma using intravesical therapy yields satisfactory results. Caution should be taken in treating patients with papillary tumors and ductal involvement, as data for these populations is limited. TURP may not improve efficacy, but is required for staging. Current recommendations are based on low quality evidence, and further research is warranted.

Advanced primary urethral cancer: a case report

Background

Primary urethral cancer is exceedingly rare, resulting in a limitation in clinicians’ experience, and an accurate diagnosis is often delayed due to the non-specific clinical presentation. Here, we present this case report to show the treatment of a patient with primary urethral cancer. Our patient was diagnosed as having primary urethral cancer in the First Clinical Hospital of Yichang by cystoscopy and biopsy. Due to her age, poor physical tolerance, and economic condition, she refused radical operation. Since there is no definite guideline for the treatment process of primary urethral cancer in clinics, operation methods and postoperative adjuvant treatments vary in different hospitals, leading to diverse prognostic effects.

Case presentation

An 88-year-old Asian woman had difficulty in urinating for more than 6 months and the syndrome was aggravated for 1 month. She chose a relatively conservative treatment plan: primary tumor resection combined with bladder perfusion chemotherapy. Postoperative pathology revealed “urethra” high-grade urothelial carcinoma (sarcoma-like variants) with extensive necrosis. After treatment with intravesical chemotherapeutic drug (hydroxycamptothecin 40 mg), she was eventually released from our hospital in a stable condition. Postoperation follow-up was performed to observe to what extent this conservative treatment plan improved the quality of life and overall survival time of our patient.

Conclusions

She needed radical resection according to the actual situation. However, her age restricted her tolerance to general anesthesia; relatively conservative treatment options are available to ensure a high quality of life. The treatment of primary tumor resection combined with bladder perfusion chemotherapy is feasible. This case highlights the importance of the dissemination of new cases and optimizing primary urethral cancer diagnosis to obtain an effective treatment.

Organ-sparing procedures in GU cancer: part 3-organ-sparing procedures in urothelial cancer of upper tract, bladder and urethra

PURPOSE

The impact of radical surgery for urothelial carcinoma is significant on patient's quality of life. Organ-sparing surgery (OSS) can provide comparable oncological outcomes and with improved quality of life. In this review, we summarize the indications, techniques and outcomes of OSS for these tumors.

METHODS

PubMed^® was searched for relevant articles. Keywords used were: for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC): endoscopic, ureteroscopic/percutaneous management, laser ablation; for urothelial bladder cancer: bladder preservation, trimodal therapy, muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC); for urethral cancer: urethra/penile-sparing, urethral carcinoma.

RESULTS

Kidney-sparing surgery is an option in patients with low-risk UTUC with better renal function preservation and comparable oncological control to radical nephroureterectomy. In select patients with MIBC, trimodal therapy has better quality of life and comparable oncological control to radical cystectomy. In distal male urethral cancer, penile conserving surgery is feasible and offers acceptable survival outcomes. In female urethral cancer, organ preservation can be achieved, in addition to OSS, through radiation.

CONCLUSIONS

In the appropriately selected patient, OSS in upper tract, bladder and urethral carcinoma has comparable oncological outcomes to radical surgery and with the additional benefit of improved quality of life.

ICUD-SIU International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2017: management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

PURPOSE

To provide a summary of the Third International Consultation on Bladder Cancer recommendations for the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

METHODS

A detailed review of the literature was performed focusing on original articles for the management of NMIBC. An international committee assessed and graded the articles based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine system. The entire spectrum of NMIBC was covered such as prognostic factors of recurrence and progression, risk stratification, staging, management of positive urine cytology with negative white light cystoscopy, indications of bladder and prostatic urethral biopsies, management of Ta low grade (LG) and high risk tumors (Ta high grade [HG], T1, carcinoma in situ [CIS]), impact of BCG strain and host on outcomes, management of complications of intravesical therapy, role of alternative therapies, indications for early cystectomy, surveillance strategies, and new treatments. The working group provides several recommendations on the management of NMIBC.

RESULTS

Recommendations were summarized with regard to staging; management of primary and recurrent LG Ta and high risk disease, positive urine cytology with negative white light cystoscopy and prostatic urethral involvement; indications for timely cystectomy; and surveillance strategies.

CONCLUSION

NMIBC remains a common and challenging malignancy to manage. Accurate staging, grading, and risk stratification are critical determinants of the management and outcomes of these patients. Current tools for risk stratification are limited but informative, and should be used in clinical practice when determining diagnosis, surveillance, and treatment of NMIBC.

EAU guidelines on primary urethral carcinoma

CONTEXT

The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Group on Muscle-Invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer prepared these guidelines to deliver current evidence-based information on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with primary urethral carcinoma (UC).

OBJECTIVE

To review the current literature on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with primary UC and assess its level of scientific evidence.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies reporting urethral malignancies. Medline was searched using the controlled vocabulary of the Medical Subject Headings database, along with a free-text protocol.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Primary UC is considered a rare cancer, accounting for <1% of all malignancies. Risk factors for survival include age, tumour stage and grade, nodal stage, presence of distant metastasis, histologic type, tumour size, tumour location, and modality of treatment. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging is the preferred method to assess the local extent of urethral tumour; computed tomography of the thorax and abdomen should be used to assess distant metastasis. In localised anterior UC, urethra-sparing surgery is an alternative to primary urethrectomy in both sexes, provided negative surgical margins can be achieved. Patients with locally advanced UC should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team of urologists, radiation oncologists, and oncologists. Patients with noninvasive UC or carcinoma in situ of the prostatic urethra and prostatic ducts can be treated with a urethra-sparing approach with transurethral resection and bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). Cystoprostatectomy with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy should be reserved for patients not responding to BCG or as a primary treatment option in patients with extensive ductal or stromal involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2013 guidelines document on primary UC is the first publication on this topic by the EAU. It aims to increase awareness in the urologic community and provide scientific transparency to improve outcomes of this rare urogenital malignancy.

The conundrum of prostatic urethral involvement

The presence and depth of urothelial cancer involvement in the prostatic urethra can significantly affect the management of a patient with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. This article presents an overview of the incidence, diagnosis, management, and follow-up of urothelial cancer.

Diphtheria toxin-epidermal growth factor fusion protein DAB389EGF for the treatment of bladder cancer

PURPOSE

The novel fusion protein, DAB(389)EGF, is composed of both the catalytic and the translocation domains of diphtheria toxin that are fused to the human EGF, providing a targeting and a toxicity component. We tested DAB(389)EGF for antitumor activity in both in vitro and in vivo urinary bladder cancer models.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Human bladder cancer lines were treated with DAB(389)EGF and assessed for growth inhibition and clonogenic suppression. Using 6- to 8-week-old female athymic nude mice implanted orthotopically with HTB9 cells, DAB(389)EGF was administered intravesically twice weekly for 2 weeks. The response of the luciferase-expressing HTB9 cells was monitored via bioluminescence as the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Treatment response with DAB(389)EGF was specific and robust, with an IC(50) ranging from 0.5 to 15 ng/mL in eight tested bladder cancer cell lines, but greater than 50 ng/mL in the EGF receptor (EGFR)-negative H520 control cell line. Simulating short-duration intravesical therapy used clinically, a 2-hour treatment exposure of DAB(389)EGF (10 ng/mL) produced clonogenic suppression in three selected bladder cancer cell lines. In vivo, luciferase activity was suppressed in five of six mice treated with DAB(389)EGF [70 μL (1 ng/μL) per mouse], as compared with only one of six mice treated with a control diphtheria toxin (DT) fusion protein. Histologic assessment of tumor clearance correlated with the bioluminescent changes observed with DAB(389)EGF treatment. Immunocompetent mice treated with intravesical DAB(389)EGF did not show any nonspecific systemic toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The intravesical delivery of targeted toxin fusion proteins is a novel treatment approach for non-muscle-invasive urinary bladder cancer. With appropriate targeting, the treatments are effective and well-tolerated in vivo.

Response of bladder carcinoma cells to TRAIL and antisense oligonucleotide, Bcl-2 or clusterin treatments

PURPOSE

Bladder transitional cell carcinoma is the second most common urological malignancy, of which 80% are superficial disease limited to the bladder. Superficial bladder transitional cell carcinoma has a high propensity for recurrence and progression after initial resection, necessitating adjuvant intravesical therapy. TRAIL (tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis inducing ligand) can selectively induce apoptosis in most tumor cells while sparing normal cells. TRAIL drives not only the death receptor pathway, but also the mitochondrial pathway through Bid. Due to the anti-apoptotic functions of Bcl-2 and clusterin on the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway the effects of down-regulating these proteins were examined in partially TRAIL resistant bladder transitional cell carcinoma cell lines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Antisense oligonucleotides targeting Bcl-2 and clusterin were used alone or combined with TRAIL and cytotoxicity was examined by the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolim bromide) proliferation assay. Apoptotic pathway signals were detected by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis/Western blotting after the various combination treatments. All statistical tests were 2 sided.

RESULTS

Although no direct correlation between TRAIL sensitivity and the relative expression levels of Bcl-2 and clusterin was found in the bladder transitional cell carcinoma cell lines examined, antisense oligonucleotide mediated the down-regulation of Bcl-2 and clusterin, increasing the sensitivity of the partially resistant cells to TRAIL. This was mediated through increased apoptotic signaling of the mitochondrial pathway, as evident by the increased activation of caspase-9 and 3, and cleaved DFF45. There was no benefit of combined antisense oligonucleotide therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides proof of principle that TRAIL combined with antisense oligonucleotide-Bcl-2 may have potential as a novel future treatment strategy for bladder transitional cell carcinoma.