Current Development of Adjuvant Treatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Risk Factors for the Development of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Pulmonary Disease during Long-Term Follow-Up after Lung Cancer Surgery

The aim of this study is to determine the cumulative incidence of, and the risk factors for, the development of nontuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) following lung cancer surgery. We retrospectively analyzed patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent surgical resection between 2010 and 2016. Patients who met all the diagnostic criteria in the NTM guidelines were defined as having NTM-PD. Additionally, we classified participants as NTM-positive when NTM were cultured in respiratory specimens, regardless of the diagnostic criteria. We followed 6503 patients for a median of 4.89 years, and NTM-PD and NTM-positive diagnoses occurred in 59 and 156 patients, respectively. The cumulative incidence rates of NTM-PD and NTM-positive were 2.8% and 5.9% at 10 years, respectively. Mycobacterium avium complex was the most commonly identified pathogen, and half of the NTM-PD patients had cavitary lesions. Several host-related factors (age > 65 years, body mass index ≤ 18.5 kg/m2, interstitial lung disease, bronchiectasis, and bronchiolitis) and treatment-related factors (postoperative pulmonary complications and neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatments) were identified as risk factors for developing NTM-PD and/or being NTM-positive after lung cancer surgery. The incidences of NTM-PD and NTM-positive diagnoses after lung cancer surgery were not low, and half of the NTM-PD patients had cavitary lesions, which are known to progress rapidly and often require treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to raise awareness of NTM-PD development after lung cancer surgery.

Proteomics and cancer epidemiology

Profiling of differentially expressed proteins is perhaps the most important and useful approach in developing tools for risk assessment in a population, diagnostic screening, and therapeutics. Proteomic markers have potential for identifying individuals at high risk of developing cancer; however, these markers have not been extensively used in cancer epidemiologic studies. Several markers have to be clinically validated. In this chapter, methods used in proteomic analysis of clinical samples, challenges in the proteomics and cancer epidemiology, and their potential solutions are discussed.

Complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy: the core component of the multidisciplinary therapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer

There is a great deal of concern about metastasis of lung cancer to regional lymph nodes, due partly to the work of groups of thoracic surgeons in Japan and North America beginning in the 1970s. The classification of regional lymph node stations for lung cancer staging published by Mountain and Dresler has been widely adopted for more than ten years. Anatomic landmarks for 14 levels of intrapulmonary, hilar, and mediastinal lymph nodes stations are designated. Skip transfer and occult lymph node metastasis, confirmed by studies regarding the mode of spread of intrathoracic lymphatic metastasis, are two theoretical bases for complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy of lung cancer. However, whether or not the degree of the dissection influences prognosis, the role of systematic nodal dissection (SND) vs mediastinal lymph node sampling (MLD) in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. A systematic literature search was performed to identify relevant reports, making full use of the 'Cited by,' 'Related Records,' 'References,' and 'Author Index' functions in the PubMed and ISI Web of Science databases. This paper presents a review of the role of mediastinal lymph node distribution and methods of determining suitability for hilar and mediastinal lymphadenectomy based on the four subsets of stage IIIA-N2, balancing the cost vs effect of mediastinal lymph node dissection in resectable NSCLC, focusing on the stage migration bias in clinical trials comparing SND and MLS, recommending a reasonable node dissection sequence, improving the prospects for the perioperative anti-tumor therapy based on mediastinal lymphadenectomy, and evaluating the various preoperative staging techniques. Finally, we believe that, besides the role of complete resection and accurate staging, the complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy is the core component of the lung cancer multidisciplinary therapy, and suggest that the values of lymphadenectomy should be further assessed using decision-tree analysis based on large-scale prospective randomized trials and pooled analysis to evaluate the costs vs effects.