A Randomized Phase III Study of Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone, and Cisplatin Versus Dexamethasone, Cytarabine, and Cisplatin as Salvage Chemotherapy Followed by Posttransplantation Rituximab Maintenance Therapy Versus Observation for Treatment of Aggressive B-Cell and T-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: the many-faced lymphoma

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is an uncommon subtype of mature peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). The history of AITL is much longer and deeper than the literature would suggest given the many names that have preceded it. Advanced-stage disease is common with uncharacteristic laboratory and autoimmune findings that often slow or mask the diagnosis. Significant strides in the immunohistochemical and molecular signature of AITL have brought increased ability to diagnose this uncommon type of PTCL. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms recently acknowledged the complexity of this diagnosis with the addition of other AITL-like subsets. AITL now resides under the umbrella of nodal T-cell lymphomas with follicular T helper phenotype. Induction strategies continue to focus on increasing complete remission rates that allow more transplant-eligible patients to proceed toward consolidative high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell rescue with improving long-term survival. There are several clinical trials in which recently approved drugs with known activity in AITL are paired with induction regimens with the hope of demonstrating long-term progression-free survival over cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone. The treatment of relapsed or refractory AITL remains an unmet need. The spectrum of AITL from diagnosis to treatment is reviewed subsequently in a fashion that may one day lead to personalized treatment approaches in a many-faced disease.

Role of Maintenance Therapy after High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Aggressive Lymphomas: A Systematic Review

Significant uncertainty exists in regard to the efficacy of maintenance therapy after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) as well as autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for the treatment of patients with aggressive lymphoma. A systematic review was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of post-ASCT maintenance therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma. A comprehensive literature search yielded 4476 studies and a total of 42 studies (11 randomized controlled trials [RCT], 9 retrospective comparative studies, and 22 single-arm studies) were included in the systematic review. There was significant heterogeneity in study design, chemotherapeutic regimens, post-ASCT maintenance strategies, patient enrollment criteria, and study endpoints. Our findings suggest that post-ASCT maintenance immune-targeting strategies, including PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies, rituximab, and brentuximab, may improve progression-free survival but not overall survival. Collectively, the results indicate a need for testing new strategies with well-designed and adequately powered RCTs to better address the role of post-ASCT maintenance in relapsed/refractory lymphomas.

Salvage therapy with mitoxantrone, etoposide, bleomycin and dexamethasone for refractory or relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients with a poor performance status or comorbidity

The treatment of refractory or relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in patients in a state of poor health is difficult due to their ineligibility to receive intensive salvage chemotherapy. In the present study, 16 refractory or relapsed aggressive NHL patients with a poor performance status or comorbidities were treated with mitoxantrone, etoposide, bleomycin and dexamethasone (MEBD) therapy. The treatment consisted of 10 mg/m² intravenous (IV) mitoxantrone on day 1, 75 mg/m² IV etoposide on days 1-3, 20 mg IV dexamethasone on days 1-4 and 15 mg intramuscular bleomycin on days 1, 4, 8 and 12, every 21 days. The efficacy and toxicity of the regimen were evaluated. The overall response rate was 68.8%, with a complete response rate of 18.8% and a partial response rate of 50.0%. The efficacy of the treatment for B-cell lymphoma was greater than that for T-cell lymphoma. The median progression-free survival time for the patients was 16.7 months and the median overall survival time was 22.4 months. The one-year overall survival rate was 62.5% and the two-year overall survival rate was 43.8%. The most common toxicity symptom was myelosuppression. In conclusion, refractory or relapsed aggressive NHL patients with a poor performance status or comorbidity are eligible for chemotherapy. MEBD therapy is an effective and feasible salvage regimen for NHL patients in a state of poor health.

Strategies for relapsed peripheral T-cell lymphoma: the tail that wags the curve

A 69-year-old woman was referred for further evaluation and management of relapsed angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. At diagnosis, she received six cycles of dose-adjusted EPOCH (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin) and achieved a complete response (CR). Her first surveillance computed tomography scan 3 months later demonstrated enlarging cervical lymphadenopathy. A lymph node excision confirmed relapsed angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma with atypical lymphocytes expressing CD3, CD4, CD10, PD-1, and EBER, with loss of CD5 (Fig 1). A clonal T-cell receptor beta and gamma rearrangement by polymerase chain reaction was identical to that in her initial diagnostic biopsy. At our initial consultation, options for standard as well as investigational therapies were discussed, and HLA typing was initiated. The patient was enrolled onto an investigational phase II study; however, she developed progressive disease after two cycles. She was then treated with romidepsin 14 mg/m(2) administered intravenously for 3 consecutive weeks with 1 week off. After two cycles, she achieved a partial response, and after four additional cycles, she maintained her response without further improvement. We discussed additional treatment options.

Phase 2 trial of combined cisplatin, etoposide, gemcitabine, and methylprednisolone (PEGS) in peripheral T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Southwest Oncology Group Study S0350

BACKGROUND

Patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) have inferior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with patients who have aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Because PTCLs over express multidrug resistance gene 1/P-glycoprotein (MDR-1/P-gp), we devised platinum, etoposide, gemcitabine, and methylprednisolone (PEGS) with agents that are not substrates of the efflux pump. Gemcitabine was included because of its excellent single-agent activity in PTCL.

METHODS

Patients who had PTCL with stage II bulky disease, stage III or IV disease with extra-nodal, nodal, and transformed cutaneous presentations were eligible. Patients received intravenous cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 through 4, etoposide 40 mg/m(2) on days 1 through 4, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on day 1, and methylprednisolone 250 mg on days 1 through 4 of a 21-day cycle for 6 cycles.

RESULTS

In total, 34 patients were enrolled, 33 were eligible, and 79% were newly diagnosed. Histologic types were PTCL not otherwise specified (n = 15), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma (n = 4), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (n = 6), or other T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (n = 8). Adverse events included 1 grade 5 infection with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and 9 grade 4 hematologic toxicities. The overall response rate was 39% (47% in PTCL not otherwise specified, 33% in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, 25% in ALK-negative and 38% in other T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas). The PFS rate at 2 years was 12% (95% confidence interval, 0.1%-31%), and the median PFS was 7 months. The OS rate at 2 years was 30% (95% confidence interval, 8%-54%), and the median OS was 17 months. Immunohistochemical analysis of P-gp expression revealed strong positivity in a subset of lymphoma cells (n = 6) and tumor endothelium (n = 25).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, PEGS was well tolerated, but OS was not considered promising given the design-specified targets. These results may serve as a benchmark for future comparisons for non-CHOP regimens.

Salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant in primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: outcomes and prognostic factors

Patients with primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (REF DLBCL: progression on or within 3 months of completion of primary therapy) sensitive to salvage chemotherapy undergo autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). We conducted a retrospective review of 111 patients with REF DLBCL treated between 1999 and 2007. Primary treatment consisted of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP; 66%) and rituximab with CHOP (R-CHOP; 33%); 14% received involved field radiation. The response rate (RR) to first salvage chemotherapy was 23% (RR by regimen: dexamethasone, cytosine arabinoside and cisplatin [DHAP] 15%, etoposide, Solu-Medrol, cytosine arabinoside and cisplatin [ESHAP] 36%, and gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin [GDP] 45%); 25% (n = 28) of patients underwent ASCT. With a median follow-up of 5.9 months (range 1-94), the median progression-free and overall survival from primary treatment failure was 3 and 10 months, respectively. Outcomes in patients with REF DLBCL after CHOP or R-CHOP appear equally poor. Second-generation platinum-containing regimens (ESHAP, GDP) may be superior to DHAP in this setting. Novel, prospectively evaluated treatment approaches should be pursued in REF DLBCL.

Gemcitabine as single agent in pretreated T-cell lymphoma patients: evaluation of the long-term outcome

BACKGROUND

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma unspecified (PTCLU) and mycosis fungoides (MF) often show resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Gemcitabine should be considered a suitable option. We report the long-term update of 39 pretreated T-cell lymphoma patients treated with gemcitabine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From May 1997 to September 2007, 39 pretreated MF and PTCLU patients received gemcitabine. Inclusion criteria were as follows: histologic diagnosis of MF or PTCLU; relapsed/refractory disease; age > or =18 years; and World Health Organization performance status of two or less. Nineteen patients had MF and 20 PTCLU. All patients with MF had a T3-T4, N0, and M0 disease and patients with PTCLU had stage III-IV disease. Gemcitabine was given on days 1, 8, and 15 on a 28-day schedule (1200 mg/m(2)/day) for a total of three to six cycles.

RESULTS

Overall response rate was 51% (20 of 39 patients); complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates were 23% (9 of 39 patients) and 28% (11 of 39 patients), respectively. Patients with MF had a CR rate of 16% and a PR rate of 32% compared with a CR rate of 30% and a PR rate of 25% of PTCLU patients. Among the CR patients, 7 of 9 are in continuous complete response with a variable disease-free interval (15-120 months).

CONCLUSION

In our experience, gemcitabine proved to be effective in pretreated MF and PTCLU patients, even in the long term.

Incidence and risk factors for second cancers after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) for relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) results in long-term disease-free survival in 40-50% of patients. The incidence of and risk factors for second cancer development in these patients have not been well studied. We analysed 372 patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL who underwent AHCT from 1987 to 2006. Median age at AHCT was 50 years (range 19-70). Most patients (74%) received two chemotherapy regimens before transplant. High-dose chemotherapy consisted of etoposide and melphalan in 95% of patients and 16% received total body irradiation. Thirty-two patients (9%) developed a second cancer (19 hematologic, 13 solid tumors). The probability of second cancer at 3 and 10 years post-AHCT was 4.4% and 12.9%, respectively. When compared with the general population, the relative-risk of acute myeloid leukemia and new solid tumor was 13.2 (p < 0.0001) and 2.3 (p = 0.0013). Salvage therapy using mini-BEAM was significantly associated with second cancer development (p = 0.004). In conclusion, second cancers are a significant cause of late morbidity and mortality patients treated with AHCT with curative intent, and appear increased in patients exposed to mini-BEAM chemotherapy.

Use of rituximab in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the salvage setting

The addition of rituximab (R) to CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy was a milestone in the development of front-line therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). R-CHOP and equivalent rituximab-containing anthracycline-based regimens are now widely accepted as the standard of care in this setting. However, the optimal treatment for patients with DLBCL relapsing or progressing after front-line therapy is not yet established. This review explores the role of rituximab in the treatment of DLBCL in the salvage setting, as monotherapy, in combination with chemotherapy or novel agents, and in the context of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Current evidence suggests that rituximab may improve outcomes in several ways: the higher response rates achieved with rituximab-based induction in the salvage setting optimize the number of patients who are able to proceed to high-dose therapy -ASCT; rituximab may improve outcomes following ASCT when used as post-transplantation consolidation/maintenance therapy; and addition of rituximab to salvage regimens may improve outcomes for patients ineligible for transplantation. However, patients refractory to or relapsing after first-line therapy (including rituximab-based regimens) still have a poor prognosis. In conclusion, rituximab in salvage therapy for DLBCL is effective and well tolerated. Ongoing studies will further clarify the optimal use of rituximab in the salvage setting.