1
|
Oganesyan A, Gregory A, Malard F, Ghahramanyan N, Mohty M, Kazandjian D, Mekinian A, Hakobyan Y. Monoclonal gammopathies of clinical significance (MGCS): In pursuit of optimal treatment. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1045002. [PMID: 36505449 PMCID: PMC9728929 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1045002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance (MGCS) represents a new clinical entity referring to a myriad of pathological conditions associated with the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). The establishment of MGCS expands our current understanding of the pathophysiology of a range of diseases, in which the M protein is often found. Aside from the kidney, the three main organ systems most affected by monoclonal gammopathy include the peripheral nervous system, skin, and eye. The optimal management of these MGUS-related conditions is not known yet due to the paucity of clinical data, the rarity of some syndromes, and limited awareness among healthcare professionals. Currently, two main treatment approaches exist. The first one resembles the now-established therapeutic strategy for monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS), in which chemotherapy with anti-myeloma agents is used to target clonal lesion that is thought to be the culprit of the complex clinical presentation. The second approach includes various systemic immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive options, including intravenous immunoglobulins, corticosteroids, or biological agents. Although some conditions of the MGCS spectrum can be effectively managed with therapies aiming at the etiology or pathogenesis of the disease, evidence regarding other pathologies is severely limited to individual patient data from case reports or series. Future research should pursue filling the gap in knowledge and finding the optimal treatment for this novel clinical category.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artem Oganesyan
- Department of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, National Institute of Health, Yerevan, Armenia,Department Of Adult Hematology, Hematology Center after Prof. R. Yeolyan, Yerevan, Armenia,*Correspondence: Artem Oganesyan,
| | - Andrew Gregory
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Florent Malard
- Department of Clinical Hematology and Cellular Therapy, INSERM, Saint-Antoine Research Centre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Nerses Ghahramanyan
- Department Of Adult Hematology, Hematology Center after Prof. R. Yeolyan, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Mohamad Mohty
- Department of Clinical Hematology and Cellular Therapy, INSERM, Saint-Antoine Research Centre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Dickran Kazandjian
- Myeloma Program, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Arsène Mekinian
- Department of Internal Medicine (DMU i3), Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France,French-Armenian Clinical Research Center, National Institute of Health, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Yervand Hakobyan
- Department of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, National Institute of Health, Yerevan, Armenia,Department Of Adult Hematology, Hematology Center after Prof. R. Yeolyan, Yerevan, Armenia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Schnitzler’s syndrome is an autoinflammatory disorder characterized by the association of a monoclonal IgM (or IgG) gammopathy, a chronic urticarial rash, and signs and symptoms of systemic inflammation, including fever, arthralgias and bone pain. It was first described in 1972. This review summarizes the clinical features, efficacy of therapies, and follow-up data of the 281 cases that have been reported to date. Also, the results of skin histology, bone imaging, laboratory investigations, and studies of the pathogenesis will be discussed, including the pivotal role of interleukin-1 beta in this disorder.
Collapse
|
3
|
Coimbra S, Neves R, Lima M, Belo L, Santos-Silva A. Waldenström's macroglobulinemia - a review. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2014. [DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.60.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is a lymphoproliferative disease of B lymphocytes, characterized by a lymphoplasmocytic lymphoma in the bone marrow and by IgM monoclonal hypergammaglobulinemia. It was first described in 1944 by Jan Gösta Waldenström, reporting two patients with oronasal bleeding, lymphadenopathy, anemia, thrombocytopenia, high erythrocyte sedimentation rate and serum viscosity, normal radiography and bone marrow infiltrated by lymphoid cells. The WM is a rare disease with a typically indolent clinical course, affecting mainly individuals aged between 63 and 68 years. Most patients have clinical signs and symptoms related to hyperviscosity resulting from IgM monoclonal gammopathy, and/or cytopenias resulting from bone marrow infiltration by lymphoma. The differential diagnosis with other lymphomas is essential for the assessment of prognosis and therapeutic approach. Treatment of patients with asymptomatic WM does not improve the quality of life of patients, or increase their survival, being recommended, therefore, their follow-up. For the treatment of symptomatic patients, alkylating agents, purine analogs and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies are used. However, the disease is incurable and the response to therapy is not always favorable. Recent studies have shown promising results with bortezomib, an inhibitor of proteasomes, and some patients respond to thalidomide. In patients with relapse or refractory to therapy, autologous transplantation may be indicated. The aim of this paper is to describe in detail the current knowledge on the pathophysiology of WM, main clinical manifestations, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Luís Belo
- University of Porto, Portugal; University of Porto, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
|
5
|
Simon A, Asli B, Braun-Falco M, De Koning H, Fermand JP, Grattan C, Krause K, Lachmann H, Lenormand C, Martinez-Taboada V, Maurer M, Peters M, Rizzi R, Rongioletti F, Ruzicka T, Schnitzler L, Schubert B, Sibilia J, Lipsker D. Schnitzler's syndrome: diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Allergy 2013; 68:562-8. [PMID: 23480774 DOI: 10.1111/all.12129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 169] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/05/2013] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Schnitzler's syndrome is characterized by recurrent urticarial rash and monoclonal gammopathy, associated with clinical and biological signs of inflammation and a long-term risk of AA amyloidosis and overt lymphoproliferation. An extensive literature review was performed, and the following questions were addressed during an expert meeting: In whom should Schnitzler's syndrome be suspected? How should the diagnosis of Schnitzler's syndrome be established? How should a patient with Schnitzler's syndrome be treated? How should a patient with Schnitzler's syndrome be followed up?. A diagnosis of Schnitzler's syndrome is considered definite in any patient with two obligate criteria: a recurrent urticarial rash and a monoclonal IgM gammopathy, and two of the following minor criteria: recurrent fever, objective signs of abnormal bone remodeling, elevated CRP level or leukocytosis, and a neutrophilic infiltrate on skin biopsy. It is considered probable, if only 1 minor criterion is present. In patients with monoclonal IgG gammopathies, diagnosis is definite if three minor criteria are present and possible if two are present. First-line treatment in patients with significant alteration of quality of life or persistent elevation of markers of inflammation should be anakinra. Follow-up should include clinical evaluation, CBC and CRP every 3 months and MGUS as usually recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Simon
- Department of General Internal Medicine/Infectious Diseases; Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; Nijmegen; the Netherlands
| | - B. Asli
- Unité d'Immuno-Hématologie; Hôpital Saint-Louis; AP-HP and Univ Paris Diderot; Paris; France
| | - M. Braun-Falco
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology; Ludwig-Maximilians University; Munich; Germany
| | - H. De Koning
- Department of Dermatology; Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; Nijmegen; the Netherlands
| | - J.-P. Fermand
- Unité d'Immuno-Hématologie; Hôpital Saint-Louis; AP-HP and Univ Paris Diderot; Paris; France
| | - C. Grattan
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital; Norwich; UK
| | - K. Krause
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Berlin; Germany
| | - H. Lachmann
- Division of Medicine; National Amyloidosis Centre; University College London Medical School; London; UK
| | - C. Lenormand
- Faculté de Médecine; Université de Strasbourg, and Clinique Dermatologique; Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg; Strasbourg; France
| | - V. Martinez-Taboada
- Servicio de Reumatologia; Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla; Santander; Spain
| | - M. Maurer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Berlin; Germany
| | - M. Peters
- Departments of Dermatology and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology; Mayo Clinic; Rochester; MN; USA
| | - R. Rizzi
- Department of Haematology; University of Bari Medical School; Bari
| | - F. Rongioletti
- Department of Dermatology; University of Genova; Genova; Italy
| | - T. Ruzicka
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology; Ludwig-Maximilians University; Munich; Germany
| | | | | | - J. Sibilia
- Faculté de Médecine; Université de Strasbourg, and Service de Rhumatologie; Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg; Strasbourg; France
| | - D. Lipsker
- Faculté de Médecine; Université de Strasbourg, and Clinique Dermatologique; Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg; Strasbourg; France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
The Schnitzler syndrome is a rare and underdiagnosed entity which is considered today as being a paradigm of an acquired/late onset auto-inflammatory disease. It associates a chronic urticarial skin rash, corresponding from the clinico-pathological viewpoint to a neutrophilic urticarial dermatosis, a monoclonal IgM component and at least 2 of the following signs: fever, joint and/or bone pain, enlarged lymph nodes, spleen and/or liver, increased ESR, increased neutrophil count, abnormal bone imaging findings. It is a chronic disease with only one known case of spontaneous remission. Except of the severe alteration of quality of life related mainly to the rash, fever and pain, complications include severe inflammatory anemia and AA amyloidosis. About 20% of patients will develop a lymphoproliferative disorder, mainly Waldenström disease and lymphoma, a percentage close to other patients with IgM MGUS. It was exceedingly difficult to treat patients with this syndrome until the IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra became available. Anakinra allows a complete control of all signs within hours after the first injection, but patients need continuous treatment with daily injections. In many aspects, the Schnitzler syndrome resembles the genetically determined auto-inflammatory syndromes involving activating mutations of the NLRP3 inflammasome. This latter point and its consequences will be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Lipsker
- Clinique Dermatologique, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg and Hôpitaux Universitaires, 1, place de l'hôpital, F-67091 Strasbourg cedex, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kastritis E, Roussou M, Michael M, Gavriatopoulou M, Michalis E, Migkou M, Delimpasi S, Kyrtsonis MC, Gogos D, Liapis K, Charitaki E, Repousis P, Terpos E, Dimopoulos MA. High levels of serum angiogenic growth factors in patients with AL amyloidosis: comparisons with normal individuals and multiple myeloma patients. Br J Haematol 2010; 150:587-91. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08288.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
8
|
[Waldenström's macroglobulinemia]. Rev Med Interne 2010; 31:385-94. [PMID: 20363537 DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2009.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2009] [Revised: 07/07/2009] [Accepted: 07/13/2009] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is a B-cell disorder characterized primarily by bone marrow infiltration with lymphoplasmacytic cells, along with the presence of an IgM monoclonal gammopathy in the blood. WM remains incurable with a median of 8-year of overall survival for patients with symptomatic WM. Treatment is postponed for asymptomatic patients and progressive anemia is the most common indication for initiation of treatment. The main therapeutic options include alkylating agents, nucleoside analogues, and rituximab, either alone or in combination. Studies involving new combination chemotherapy are ongoing and preliminary results are encouraging. However, there are several limitations to these approaches. The complete response rate is low and the treatment free survival is short in many patients, no specific agent or regimen has been shown to be superior to another, and no treatment has been specifically approved for WM. As such, new therapeutic agents are needed for the treatment of WM. In ongoing efforts, we and others have sought to exploit advances made in the understanding of the biology of WM so as to better target therapeutics for this malignancy. These efforts have led to the development of proteasome inhibitors as bortezomib, several Akt/mTor inhibitors, such as perifosine and Rad001. Many other agents and monoclonal antibodies are currently being tested in clinical trials and seem promising. This article provides an update of the current preclinical studies and clinical efforts for the development of novel agents in the treatment of WM.
Collapse
|