Understanding the economic value of molecular diagnostic tests: case studies and lessons learned

Ten years after completion of the Human Genome Project, progress towards making “personalized medicine” a reality has been slower than expected. The reason is twofold. Firstly, the science is more difficult than expected. Secondly, limited progress has been made in aligning economic incentives to invest in diagnostics. This paper develops nine case studies of “success” where diagnostic tests are bringing personalized medicine into clinical practice with health and economic impact for patients, healthcare systems, and manufacturers. We focus on the availability of evidence for clinical utility, which is important not only for clinicians but also for payers and budget holders. We find that demonstrating diagnostic clinical utility and the development of economic evidence is currently feasible (i) through drug-diagnostic co-development, and (ii) when the research is sponsored by payers and public bodies. It is less clear whether the diagnostic industry can routinely undertake the work necessary to provide evidence as to the clinical utility and economic value of its products. It would be good public policy to increase the economic incentives to produce evidence of clinical utility: otherwise, opportunities to generate value from personalized medicine—in terms of both cost savings and health gains—may be lost.

International reporting scale of BCR-ABL1 fusion transcript in chronic myeloid leukemia: first report from India

Achieving a major molecular response (MMR) is an important predictor of progression-free survival in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib. This requires accurate measurement of BCR-ABL1 transcripts normalized to a control gene, as well as defining a level (BCR-ABL1/control gene ratio) that will correlate with sustained clinical response. To make these measurements comparable between laboratories, an international scale (IS) is necessary. A BCR-ABL1/control gene ratio of 0.10% represents MMR in the IS. In collaboration with an international reference laboratory in Adelaide, S.A., Australia, we have established and validated a lab-specific conversion factor for expressing BCR-ABL1 transcript levels in the IS. In this report, we explain the process and steps involved in obtaining a valid lab-specific conversion factor for expressing BCR-ABL1 transcript levels in the IS.

Chronic myeloid leukemia: cytogenetic methods and applications for diagnosis and treatment

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a clonal myeloproliferative disease caused by recombination between the BCR gene on chromosome 22 and the ABL1 gene on chromosome 9. This rearrangement generates the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene that characterizes leukemic cells in all CML cases. In about 90% of cases, the BCR-ABL1 rearrangement is manifest cytogenetically by the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome, a derivative of the reciprocal translocation t(9;22)(q34;q11.2). For the remaining cases, recombination may be more complex, involving BCR, ABL1, and genomic sites on one or more other chromosomal regions, or it may occur cryptically within an apparently normal karyotype. Detection of the Ph and associated t(9;22) translocation is a recognized clinical hallmark for CML diagnosis. The disease has a natural multistep pathogenesis, and during chronic phase CML, the t(9;22) or complex variant is usually the sole abnormality. In 60-80% of cases, additional cytogenetic changes appear and often forecast progression to an accelerated disease phase or a terminal blast crisis. Because new frontline therapies such as imatinib specifically target the abnormal protein product of the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene to eliminate BCR-ABL1 positive cells, there is a new reliance on the cytogenetic evaluation of bone marrow cells at diagnosis, then at regular posttreatment intervals. Combined with other parameters, presence or absence of Ph-positive cells in the bone marrow is a powerful early indicator for clinical risk stratification. Cytogenetic changes detected at any stage during treatment, including in the BCR-ABL1-negative cells, may also provide useful prognostic information. Laboratory methods detailed here extend from initial collection of peripheral blood or bone marrow samples through cell culture with or without synchronization, metaphase or interphase harvest, hypotonic treatment and fixation, slide preparation for G-banding or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and final interpretation.

Monitoring disease response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in CML

The remarkable progress made in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) over the past decade has been accompanied by steady improvements in our capacity to accurately and sensitively monitor response to therapy. After the initial target of therapy, complete cytogenetic response (CCR), is achieved, peripheral blood BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RQ-PCR) define the subsequent response targets, major and complete molecular response (MMR and CMR). The majority of patients on first-line imatinib therapy achieve a “safe haven” defined as a confirmed MMR, but 20% to 30% stop imatinib due to intolerance and/or resistance. Many imatinib-resistant patients can be effectively treated with second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), but the actual drug selected should be based on the resistance profile of each inhibitor, in addition to issues of tolerance and disease phase. The main purpose of monitoring response with cytogenetics and RQ-PCR is to identify patients likely to achieve better long-term outcome if they are switched early to second-line therapy, either another TKI or an allograft. Mutation screening is most valuable in cases of loss of response to imatinib or a second-line TKI, but there are other settings where a high yield of mutations may justify regular mutation screening.