Predictive Modelling of Overall Survival in Adult Patients with Primary Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma of the Breast Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify critical clinical features to develop an accurate webbased prediction model for estimating the overall survival (OS) of primary breast diffuse large Bcell lymphoma (PB-DLBCL) adult patients.

METHODS

We first included all PB-DLBCL cases with available covariates retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. We sequentially performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression approaches to identify the predictors independently associated with prognosis, and all the predictors that passed these tests were then constructed to build a nomogram for predicting 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates of patients. The C-index and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) were used to evaluate the prediction discrimination, and the calibration curve was applied to estimate the calibration.

RESULTS

A total of PB-DLBCL adult patients were included (median age was 69 with the interquartile range [IQR] of 57-79 years), of which 466 (70%) were randomly allocated to the development cohort, and the remaining cases were collected for validation. Using three identified independent predictors (i.e., age, stage, and radiation), an accurate nomogram for predicting OS was developed and validated. The C-indices of our nomogram were both relatively acceptable, with 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71-0.78) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.70-0.75) for the development and validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration curves also accurately predicted the prognosis of PB-DLBCL in all cases. In addition, ROC curves showed our nomogram to possess superior predictive ability compared to any single variable. To visually present this prediction model, a convenient webbased tool was implemented based on our prognostic nomogram.

CONCLUSION

For patients with PB-DLBCL, a more convenient and accurate web-based prediction model was developed and validated, which showed relatively good performances in both discrimination and calibration during model development and validation. External evaluation and validation are warranted by further independent studies.

Primary breast double-hit lymphoma management and outcomes: a real-world multicentre experience

Background

Primary breast double-hit lymphoma (PB-DHL) is a rare, highly aggressive malignancy that poses challenges regarding accurate diagnosis and selecting optimal treatment regimens.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 48 cases of patients diagnosed with PB-DHL in six academic centres between June 2014 and June 2020 in China. Study-specific data were recorded, including treatment options, therapeutic evaluation, prognostic factors and relapse patterns, and the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated.

Results

In total, 48 patients were enrolled, with 14 patients treated with DA-EPOCH-R/MA (rituximab, dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, alternating with high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine), 18 patients treated with DA-EPOCH-R (rituximab, dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin), and 16 patients treated with R-HyperCVAD (rituximab, hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone, alternating with cytarabine plus methotrexate). The overall 5-year OS and PFS rates were 41.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.6–56.8%) and 37.5% (95% CI, 24.0–52.6%), respectively. Of the three treatment regimens, the 5-year OS was higher in DA-EPOCH-R/MA group than in the DA-EPOCH-R or R-HyperCVAD subgroups (57.1% vs. 38.9% vs. 31.3%; P = 0.016), as was the 5-year PFS (50.0% vs. 38.9% vs. 25.0%; P = 0.035). Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) prolonged the OS and PFS compared with non-ASCT patients (5-year OS: 72.2% vs. 23.3%; P < 0.001; 5-year PFS: 72.2% vs. 16.7 %, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified tumour size, risk stratification, treatment with DA-EPOCH-R/MA, breast irradiation, and ASCT as significant prognostic factors.

Conclusions

DA-EPOCH-R/MA is a promising regimen for PB-DHL, and breast irradiation yields complementary benefits for prognosis. ASCT significantly decreased disease relapse, providing a potential curative PB-DHL intervention and justifying ASCT as first-line therapy for young patients. More effective treatment strategies for PB-DHL patients remain encouraging.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-021-02198-y.

A multicentre retrospective study of primary breast diffuse large B-cell and high-grade B-cell lymphoma treatment strategies and survival

Objectives: Primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PB-DLBCL) and primary breast high-grade B-cell lymphoma (PB-HGBCL) are rare extranodal aggressive B-cell lymphomas with distinct characteristics. Reliable data regarding appropriate treatment of these specific entities are lacking due to their rarity.Methods: We reviewed 36 patients diagnosed at four Chinese medical centres between January 2008 and December 2018. Data regarding clinicopathological features, therapeutic evaluation and central nervous system (CNS) relapse were collected, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated.Results: Among the 36 patients, there were 29 PB-DLBCL patients and 7 PB-HGBCL patients. The 5-year OS for PB-DLBCL and PB-HGBCL was 75.9% and 28.6%, respectively. The 5-year PFS for PB-DLBCL and PB-HGBCL was 69.0% and 14.3%, respectively. The R-DAEPOCH regimen was significantly more effective in PB-DLBCL patients than the R-CHOP regimen (5-year OS: 78.9% vs 62.5%, P=0.024; 5-year PFS: 73.7% vs 50.0%, P=0.037) but resulted in more severe myelosuppression (P=0.025). The rate of CNS relapse was 17.2% in PB-DLBCL patients and 28.6% in PB-HGBCL patients; the difference was not significant (P=0.602). The R-DAEPOCH regimen did not predominantly reduce CNS recurrence as expected (P=0.616). The Cox proportional hazards model revealed that risk stratification and triple expression were independent prognostic factors.Conclusion: Current treatments, including more intensive chemotherapy regimens, achieve good control of the disease. Novel drugs combined with cellular immunotherapy initially show promising therapeutic effects, and more clinical trials are required to confirm these effects further.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Primary Breast Lymphoma: The Cleveland Clinic Experience

Introduction Primary breast lymphoma (PBL) is a rare malignancy that accounts for less than 0.5% of all breast malignancies. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 36 PBL patients to report the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with indolent and aggressive histologic subtypes. Results Thirteen (36%) patients had aggressive and 23 (64%) had indolent PBL. Marginal zone lymphoma was the most common histologic subtype (33%). Stage IE, IIE, and IV disease were seen in 27 (75%), six (17%), and three (8%) patients, respectively. Patients with aggressive PBL more often presented with a breast lump and/or B symptoms (unexplained weight loss, fever, night sweats) (78% vs. 31%, p = 0.005). Commonly used treatment modalities for aggressive vs. indolent PBL were chemotherapy alone (23% vs. 26%, p = 0.8), chemoradiotherapy (46% vs. 9%, p = 0.009), radiotherapy alone (15% vs. 22%, p = 0.6), and observation (0% vs. 26%, p = 0.07), respectively. The five-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of PBL patients were 82% (95% CI: 67 - 100) and 63% (95% CI: 45 - 89), respectively. The five-year OS of patients with aggressive vs. indolent PBL were 92% (95% CI: 77 - 100) vs. 80% (95% CI: 63 - 100), respectively (p = 0.6). The five-year OS of patients who received > 1, 1, and 0 treatment modalities were 92% (95% CI: 77 - 100), 86% (95% CI: 63 - 100), and 53% (95% CI: 21 - 100), respectively. Conclusion In our cohort, the higher utilization of chemoradiotherapy in aggressive PBL was able to overcome the worse prognosis of these patients. At least one treatment modality should be considered in patients with indolent PBL, given that observation alone was associated with a poor prognosis.

Primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era: Therapeutic strategies and patterns of failure

Primary breast diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (PB‐DLBCL) is a rare subtype of DLBCL with limited data on patterns of failure. This multicenter study aimed to define the optimum treatment strategy and patterns of failure for PB‐DLBCL patients. We retrospectively reviewed data on 108 PB‐DLBCL patients from 21 Chinese medical centers. Only patients with localized disease (involvement of breast and localized lymph nodes) were included. After a median follow‐up of 3.2 years, 32% of patients developed progression or relapse. A continuous pattern of relapse was observed, characterized by frequent late relapses in the contralateral breast and central nervous system (CNS). Although rituximab significantly reduced the overall cumulative risk of progression or relapse (5‐year cumulative risk 57% vs 24%, P = .029), it had limited effect on the reduction of breast relapse (P = .46). Consolidative radiotherapy significantly decreased the risk of breast relapse, even in the subgroup of patients treated with rituximab (5‐year cumulative risk 21.2% vs 0%, P = .012). A continuous risk of CNS progression or relapse up to 8.2 years from diagnosis was observed (10‐year cumulative risk 28.3%), with a median time to CNS relapse of 3.1 years. Neither rituximab nor prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy significantly decreased the risk of CNS relapse. In summary, our study indicates that PB‐DLBCL has a continuous pattern of relapse, especially with frequent late relapses in the CNS and contralateral breast. Rituximab and RT confer complementary benefit in the reduction of relapse. However, neither the addition of rituximab nor prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy could effectively prevent CNS relapse for PB‐DLBCL patients.

Role of radiation therapy in primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the Rituximab era: a SEER database analysis

Primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PB-DLBCL) is an uncommon extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), which was traditionally treated with anthracycline-containing regimens followed by consolidative radiation therapy (RT) to add therapeutic benefits. The introduction of anti-CD20 antibody rituximab for the treatment of B-cell NHLs has significantly improved the clinical outcome of these malignant diseases. It is unclear, however, whether consolidative RT could still add therapeutic benefits for PB-DLBCL patients treated with rituximab. To answer this important question, we used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to evaluate the impact of RT on the clinical outcomes of PB-DLBCL patients in the rituximab era. Information on patient age, year of diagnosis, stage, race, laterality, and RT status for PB-DLBCL patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2014 were extracted. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted, and log-rank test was used to compare the potential survival difference. Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model was employed to determine the impact of RT and other factors such as age, race, tumor laterality, stage, and year of diagnosis on survival. Among the 386 patients identified, the median follow-up time was 45 months (range, 0-167 months); the median age was 64 years (range, 19-93 years); 33.9% of the patients were younger than 60 years of age; 69.9% of the patients were stage I; 79.0% were white; 51.8% received RT. The 5-year OS and cause-specific survival (CSS) for the whole cohort were 72.3% and 82.5%, respectively. The 5-year OS was significantly superior for patients who received RT compared to those who did not receive RT (78.1% vs. 66.0%, P = 0.031). In multivariable analysis, RT remained significantly associated with improved OS (P = 0.026). In summary, our study suggests that RT still adds significant therapeutic benefits for patients with PB-DLCBL in the rituximab era.

An unexpected diagnosis of breast malignancy

Inflammatory breast cancer constitutes 5% of all breast cancer diagnoses. Diagnosis is based on clinical signs including skin changes, erythema and oedema, together with rapid progression and involvement of more than one-third of the affected breast. It is an aggressive tumour with great metastatic potential, metastases being present in 30% of patients at first presentation. Primary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the breast is rare but is well reported. It accounts for 0.5% of all breast malignancies and 1% of all non-Hodgkin's diagnoses. Prognosis of primary breast lymphoma varies depending on the stage of disease with stage IE having a 5-year survival rate of 78-83% and stage IIE having a 5-year survival rate of 20-57%. We present a rare case of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma mimicking an inflammatory breast cancer. The aim of this case report is to highlight an unusual presentation of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and the diagnostic difficulties that arise.

Primary Breast Lymphoma: Analysis of 55 Cases of the Spanish Lymphoma Oncology Group

INTRODUCTION

Primary breast lymphoma is a rare form of localized extranodal lymphoma, which affects the mammary glands unilaterally or bilaterally, and can also affect the regional lymph nodes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed 55 patients, with disease stages IE and IIE, diagnosed in 16 Spanish institutions between 1989 and 2016. A serial of clinical variables and treatment were collected, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 55 patients, 96.4% were women with an average age of 69 years. A total of 53 patients corresponded to non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), of whom 36.3% had lymph node involvement upon diagnosis. Of the patients, 58.2% were stage IE, and 41.8% were stage IIE. Treatments received included radiotherapy (36.3%), chemotherapy (85.5%), and rituximab (in 38 of the 45 patients with NHL treated with chemotherapy). In all, 82.2% of complete responses were achieved. OS and progression-free survival at 5 years in NHL patients was 76% and 73%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Current treatments (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy) achieve good control of the disease, with an OS of 5 years in 80% of the patients, although there is no consensus in treatment, given the scarce incidence of these lymphomas.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the breast: prognostic factors and treatment outcomes

Background

The breast is a rare site of extranodal involvement of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We aimed to assess the clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment outcomes of breast DLBCL.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed 113 patients (from our institution and the literature) between 1973 and 2014. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier OS curves were compared with the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was applied to determine the prognostic factors for OS, progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), and cause-specific survival (CSS).

Results

A total of 113 patients were included in the study: 42 cases from our hospital and 71 cases from 12 publications. The median age at diagnosis was 58 years. With a median follow-up time of 39.2 months, the estimated 5-year OS, PFS, LC, and CSS were 71.4%, 58.8%, 75.6%, and 74.9%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, more than four cycles of chemotherapy, having localized cancer, lumpectomy with or without axillary lymph node (ALN) dissection, and low to low-to-intermediate International Prognostic Index were favorable factors for OS. For PFS, significant prognostic factors were rituximab use, B symptoms, and tumor size. As for the local group, lumpectomy with or without ALN dissection and more than four cycles of chemotherapy were favorable factors for OS. Tumor size >4 cm and nonuse of rituximab were adverse factors for PFS. Twenty-one patients (18.6%) developed local relapse and 33 (29.2%) developed systemic relapse. Eight patients had central nervous system relapse (7.3%).

Conclusion

Our results reveal that local and extended staging criteria can reflect the different prognosis and treatment outcomes of breast DLBCL. Rituximab use, lumpectomy, and more than four cycles of chemotherapy are recommended as a treatment regimen. However, further study is warranted to validate our data.

[Clinical and prognostic analysis of 21 cases of primary breast lymphoma]

目的

探讨原发性乳腺淋巴瘤（PBL）患者临床特征及治疗方法对预后的影响。

方法

对2003年至2013年所收治的21例PBL患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。根据治疗方案的不同对患者进行分层分析，比较手术、预防性腰穿鞘注、利妥昔单抗应用对患者疗效和预后的影响。

结果

21例患者中6例行乳腺肿块穿刺活检术，2例行乳腺癌改良根治术，其余均行单纯乳腺肿块切除术后经病理学检查明确诊断。其中弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤（DLBCL) 17例，黏膜相关淋巴组织结外边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤（MALT淋巴瘤）、滤泡性淋巴瘤、Burkitt淋巴瘤、皮下脂膜炎样T细胞淋巴瘤各1例。所有患者中仅1例肿块直径>7 cm (MALT淋巴瘤患者），其余均<5 cm。治疗后完全缓解（CR)19例，部分缓解和疾病进展各1例。中位随访14(6~75)个月，21例患者中1例死亡，3年总生存（OS)率为92.3%。化疗+手术组(15例）患者的无进展生存（PFS)时间较单纯化疗组（6例）延长，差异有统计学意义（60个月对22个月，P=0.015），但两组患者的CR率和OS时间差异无统计学意义（P值均>0.05）。20例CD20阳性患者中接受利妥昔单抗治疗者17例，与未接受的3例比较，CR率和PFS、OS时间差异均无统计学意义（P值均>0.05）。8例患者接受预防性腰穿鞘注治疗，与13例未接受者比较，中枢神经系统浸润发生率差异无统计学意义(P=0.381)。

结论

PBL以DLBCL多见，治疗效果较好，手术治疗仅为明确诊断，并不延长患者OS时间。PBL患者行预防性腰穿鞘注治疗不降低中枢神经系统浸润发生率。

[Bilateral primitive non-Hodgkin Lymphoma of the breast: about a case]

Les lymphomes malins non-hodgkiniens (LMNH) primitifs du sein sont des tumeurs rares. Leur symptomatologie clinique est polymorphe. L'imagerie médicale est non-spécifique. Le diagnostic peut être évoqué à l'examen cytologique, sa confirmation est toujours histologique. Il s'agit essentiellement de lymphomes de type B, ceux de type NK/T restant rares. Les plus fréquents sont les lymphomes diffus à grandes cellules présentant la particularité de donner des rechutes sous forme d'extension au système nerveux central. Nous rapportons un cas de LMNH primitif bilatéral du sein chez une patiente âgée de 33 ans, révélé par deux nodules mammaires bilatéraux. La mammographie et l'examen extemporané ont évoqué une tumeur phyllode. Le diagnostic du LMNH n'a été fait qu'après examen histologique définitif. Sous chimiothérapie, l’évolution était favorable avec un recul de 15 mois.

Synchronous breast cancer and breast lymphoma: two case reports and literature review

Synchronous breast cancer and breast lymphoma are rare. It is of high rate of misdiagnosis in clinical practice. Here we present two cases with this presentation. They are both middle-aged women, with stage I invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. One patient happened to have primary breast lymphoma (PBL); the other was secondary breast lymphoma (SBL). Their pathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) findings supported the diagnosis of multiple primary carcinoma. Both patients had a surgery. Then they both received CHOP regime chemotherapy and subsequent endocrine therapy.

Primary breast lymphoma

Primary breast lymphoma is a rare form of extranodal lymphoma, defined by the presence of a primary lesion within the breast with or without regional nodal involvement but no other extra-mammary sites of involvement. It comprises diverse histologic subtypes, but diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is the most common. In this review, we describe in detail the clinical features, diagnosis and staging, pathogenesis, risk factors and therapy of primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. We consider choice and number of cycles of chemotherapy, the indications for radiotherapy and discuss the need for central nervous system prophylaxis. We also provide a brief overview of the less commonly encountered histologic subtypes including marginal zone, follicular, Burkitt and breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. We conclude with a suggested treatment approach and potential areas of future research.

Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the breast: looking at pathogenesis, clinical issues and therapeutic options

Primary breast lymphoma is a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with some distinct clinical features. The most common histopathological type is diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but other less frequent subtypes are also encountered. In this review, we describe the characteristics of primary breast DLBCL, with emphasis on pathogenesis, staging, risk stratification and prognosis. In addition, key issues regarding therapy and various available therapeutic modalities are addressed, as well as the role of rituximab in therapy and whether central nervous system prophylaxis is still routinely required. There are very few prospective clinical studies addressing therapy, and available data rely mostly on retrospective case series involving small numbers of patients. Our conclusions and proposed recommendations are therefore not offered as formal guidelines. This review attempts to represent an unbiased analysis of the published data and is intended as a useful aid for clinicians treating this uncommon type of extra nodal lymphoma.