1
|
Fu S, Duan L, Zhong Y, Zeng Y. Comparison of surgical excision followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and laser combined with steroids for the treatment of keloids: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Wound J 2024; 21:e14449. [PMID: 37967571 PMCID: PMC10895202 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
This meta-analysis aims to evaluate and compare the effect of surgical excision followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and laser combined with steroids on keloids. Relevant studies reporting the recurrence rate or incidence of adverse events (AEs) were retrieved from the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases through August 2023. The quality of noncomparative single-arm clinical trials was evaluated using the methodological index for nonrandomised studies (MINORS) Methodological items. This meta-analysis was conducted utilizing Stata 12.0 statistical software. 26 studies involving 989 patients were included in the analysis. The recurrence rate in the laser combined with steroids therapy group (12.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.9%-18.5%) was lower than that of the surgical excision combined with radiotherapy group (13.5%, 95% CI: 6.6%-22.2%). For the incidence of AEs, relatively low incidence of atrophy (0.0%, 95% CI: 0.0%-1.2%), telangiectasia (3.2%, 95% CI: 0.4%-7.6%), erythema (2.3%, 95% CI: 0.0%-10.6%), infection (0.2%, 95% CI: 0.0%-1.6%) and high hyperpigmentation rate (8.3%, 95% CI: 4.2%-13.4%) were obtained in the surgical excision combined with radiotherapy group. Compared with surgical resection followed by radiotherapy, the combination of laser and steroids for keloids showed a lower hyperpigmentation rate (6.5%), as well as a higher incidence of atrophy (22.7%), telangiectasia (6.4%), erythema (3.3%) and infection (3.3%). Only a hypopigmentation rate of 2.9% was obtained in patients treated with surgical excision plus radiotherapy. Current evidence revealed that surgical excision followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and laser combined with steroids therapy were effective and safe treatments for keloids, with relatively low recurrence rate and complication rate. Comparative studies are needed to further compare the effects of these two combination therapies on keloids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siqi Fu
- Department of DermatologySecond Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityChangshaChina
| | - Liu Duan
- Department of DermatologyThe Third Hospital of ChangshaChangshaChina
| | - Yan Zhong
- Department of Preventive MedicineSchool of Medicine, Hunan Normal UniversityChangshaChina
| | - Yu Zeng
- Hunan Provincial University Key Laboratory of the Fundamental and Clinical Research on Neurodegenerative DiseasesChangsha Medical UniversityChangshaChina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Razmjoo S, Shahbazian H, Hosseini SM, Feli M, Mohammadian F, Bagheri A. Therapeutic and prophylactic effects of radiation therapy in the management of recurrent granulation tissue induced tracheal stenosis: a review on the role of Endobronchial brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:389-399. [PMID: 36922243 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Granulation tissue-induced tracheal stenosis (mainly secondary to intubation or lung transplantation) is one of the most common etiologies of benign airway obstructions. Recurrence rates after standard treatment options (surgical resection and/or endobronchial interventions) can inadvertently worsen the stricture through the stimulation of more granulation tissue generation (via increased fibroblast activity and roliferation). Low-dose radiotherapy could be a promising tool to prevent granulation tissue formation after surgery and/or endobronchial interventions regarding its established role in the treatment of keloids or hypertrophic scars, two benign diseases with similar a pathophysiology to tracheal stenosis. This study reviews case reports and small series that used endobronchial brachytherapy (EBBT) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for the management of refractory granulation tissue-induced tracheal stenosis after surgery and/or endobronchial interventions. METHODS AND MATERIALS Case reports and series (published up to October 2022) that reported outcomes of patients with recurrent granulation tissue-induced tracheal stenosis (after surgery and/or endobronchial interventions) treated by EBBT or EBRT (in definitive or prophylactic settings) were eligible. RESULTS Sixteen studies (EBBT: nine studies including 69 patients, EBRT: seven studies including 32 patients) were reviewed. The pooled success rate across all studies was 74% and 97% for EBBT and EBRT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Radiation therapy appears to be effective in the management of selected patients with recurrent/refractory tracheal stenosis. Response to this treatment is usually good, but further studies with a larger number of patients and long-term followup are necessary to determine the optimal technique, dose, and timing of radiation therapy, late complications, the durability of response, and criteria for patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sasan Razmjoo
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Clinical Research Development Center, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Hodjatollah Shahbazian
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Clinical Research Development Center, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Seyed-Mohammad Hosseini
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Clinical Research Development Center, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Maryam Feli
- Interventional Radiotherapy Ward, Department of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Mohammadian
- Interventional Radiotherapy Ward, Department of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Ali Bagheri
- Interventional Radiotherapy Ward, Department of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keloid treatments: an evidence-based systematic review of recent advances. Syst Rev 2023; 12:42. [PMID: 36918908 PMCID: PMC10012475 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02192-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Keloids are pathologic scars that pose a significant functional and cosmetic burden. They are challenging to treat, despite the multitude of treatment modalities currently available. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to conduct an evidence-based review of all prospective data regarding keloid treatments published between 2010 and 2020. METHODS A systematic literature search of PubMed (National Library of Medicine), Embase (Elsevier), and Cochrane Library (Wiley) was performed in November of 2020. Search strategies with the keywords "keloid" and "treatment" were performed by a medical librarian. The search was limited to prospective studies that were peer-reviewed, reported on clinical outcomes of keloid therapies, and were published in the English language between January 1, 2010, and November 24, 2020. RESULTS A total of 3462 unique citations were identified, of which 108 studies met inclusion criteria. Current literature supports silicone gel or sheeting with corticosteroid injections as first-line therapy for keloids. Adjuvant intralesional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), bleomycin, or verapamil can be considered, although mixed results have been reported with each. Laser therapy can be used in combination with intralesional corticosteroids or topical steroids with occlusion to improve drug penetration. Excision of keloids with immediate post-excision radiation therapy is an effective option for recalcitrant lesions. Finally, silicone sheeting and pressure therapy have evidence for reducing keloid recurrence. CONCLUSIONS This review was limited by heterogeneity of subject characteristics and study outcome measures, small sample sizes, and inconsistent study designs. Larger and more robust controlled studies are necessary to further understand the variety of existing and emerging keloid treatments, including corticosteroids, cryotherapy, intralesional injections, lasers, photodynamic therapy, excision and radiation, pressure dressings, and others.
Collapse
|
4
|
Hwang NH, Chang JH, Lee NK, Yang KS. Effect of the biologically effective dose of electron beam radiation therapy on recurrence rate after keloid excision: A meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2022; 173:146-153. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
5
|
Radiation therapy modalities for keloid management: a critical review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75:2455-2465. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.04.099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
6
|
Bağlı İ, Ogawa R, Bakır S, Taşın C, Yıldırım A, Öcal E, Yavuz M, Bala M, Turan G. Predictors of the recurrence of surgically removed previous caesarean skin scars at caesarean section: A retrospective cohort study. Scars Burn Heal 2021; 7:20595131211023388. [PMID: 34262789 PMCID: PMC8246489 DOI: 10.1177/20595131211023388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Caesarean skin scars (CSS; hypertrophic scars and keloids) are very stressful for women and treatment strategies vary. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the outcome of surgical excision of CSS during caesarean section (CS). The study aims to determine the rate of recurrence and risk factors of recurrence for surgically removed CSS. METHOD This is a retrospective cohort study that used STROBE guidelines. Pfannenstiel incisions of 145 patients were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups: recurred (group 1, n = 19) and non-recurred group (group 2, n = 126). The groups were compared. RESULTS The rate of recurrence of CSS was 13% in the total cohort (19/145), one of the main outcomes of the study. While emergency CS was performed for 12 patients in group 1 (63%), CS was carried out in 25 patients in group 2 (20%); this difference was significant (P = 0.001). Before surgery, white blood cell and neutrophil counts were significantly higher in group 1 (P = 0.014 and P = 0.023, respectively). There were 11 dark-skinned women (26%; Fitzpatrick type 4) in group 1 and 31 (74%) in group 2. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.031). As the other main outcome, emergency CS could be accepted as a risk factor for recurrence in the multivariate regression analysis (P = 0.060; odds ratio = 5.07; 95% confidence interval = 0.93-17.51). CONCLUSION The rate of recurrence of surgically removed previous CSS at CS is promising without adjunct therapy. Emergency CS was found to be a risk factor for recurrence. LAY SUMMARY Background Caesarean skin scars (CSS; hypertrophic scars and keloids) are very stressful and are generally itchy and painful for women. Treatment strategies vary. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the outcome of only surgical excision of CSS scars during caesarean section (CS). The issue being explored There are few data in the literature for CSS in the lower abdomen. These scars can be removed during the second or third CS, but the results are not known exactly. How was the work conducted? In our clinic, 145 patients with CSS were given a CS and their scars were removed at the same time. While most of these scars were reported as hypertrophic by pathological examination, some were reported as keloid. At the earliest, one year after surgery, the rate of recurrence was found to be 13%. What we learned from the study Asymptomatic patients who are planning another pregnancy and do not want to receive any other radiotherapy or steroid injection therapy can wait to remove their CSS at the next CS, especially elective CS with or without adjunct therapy. Emergency CS was found to be a risk factor for the recurrence of these scars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- İhsan Bağlı
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences Diyarbakir Gazi Yasargil Research and Training Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| | - Rei Ogawa
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sait Bakır
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences Diyarbakir Gazi Yasargil Research and Training Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| | - Cuma Taşın
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mersin University, School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey
| | - Ayhan Yıldırım
- Department of Pathology, University of Health Sciences Diyarbakir Gazi Yasargil Research and Training Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| | - Ece Öcal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences Diyarbakir Gazi Yasargil Research and Training Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Yavuz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences Diyarbakir Gazi Yasargil Research and Training Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| | - Mesut Bala
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences Diyarbakir Gazi Yasargil Research and Training Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| | - Gökçe Turan
- Department of Perinatology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gold MH, Nestor MS, Berman B, Goldberg D. Assessing keloid recurrence following surgical excision and radiation. BURNS & TRAUMA 2020; 8:tkaa031. [PMID: 33225004 PMCID: PMC7666880 DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkaa031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Keloids are a fibroproliferative disorder that can result from a cutaneous injury to the reticular dermis. Recurrence rates as high as 100% have been reported following surgical excision alone. Consequently, a variety of post-surgical techniques have been employed to prevent keloid recurrence, including the use of radiation. Although numerous studies have shown post-excisional X-rays, electron beam, lasers and brachytherapy can reduce the rate of keloid recurrence, numerous inconsistencies, including a wide range of definitions for keloid recurrence, make it difficult to compare study outcomes. The review aims to examine the various means for defining keloid recurrence in clinical trials involving the use of radiation therapy. Searches of the Cochrane Library and PubMed were performed to identify the available information for post-surgical keloid recurrence following radiation therapy. Each identified study was reviewed for patient follow-up and criteria used to define keloid recurrence. The search results included clinical studies with external beam radiation, brachytherapy and superficial radiation therapy. Many studies did not include a definition of keloid recurrence, or defined recurrence only as the return of scar tissue. Other studies defined keloid recurrence based on patient self-assessment questionnaires, symptoms and scar elevation and changes in Kyoto Scar Scale, Japan Scar Workshop Scale and Vancouver Scar Scale scores. The results of this review indicate keloidectomy followed by radiation therapy provide satisfactory recurrence rates; however, clinical studies evaluating these treatments do not describe treatment outcomes or use different definitions of keloid recurrence. Consequently, recurrence rates vary widely, making comparisons across studies difficult. Keloid recurrence should be clearly defined using both objective and subjective measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael H Gold
- Gold Skin Care Center, 2000 Richard Jones Road, Suite 220, Nashville, TN 37215
| | - Mark S Nestor
- Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research, 2925 NE 199th St, Suite 205, Aventura, FL 33180
| | - Brian Berman
- Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - David Goldberg
- Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists of NY/NJ, 110 E. 55th Street, 13th floor, New York, NY 10022
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Treatment of keloids with a single dose of low-energy superficial X-ray radiation to prevent recurrence after surgical excision: An in vitro and in vivo study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020; 83:1304-1314. [PMID: 32540415 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although keloids have been empirically treated with steroids and radiation, evidence-based radiation parameters for keloid therapy are lacking. OBJECTIVE To determine evidence-based radiation parameters for blocking keloid fibroblast proliferation in vitro and apply them to patients. METHODS The effects of various radiation parameters and steroids on cell proliferation, cell death, and collagen production in keloid explants and fibroblasts were evaluated with standard assays. Effective radiation parameters were then tested on patients. RESULTS No differences were observed between the effects of 50 and 320 kV radiation or between single and fractionated radiation doses on keloid fibroblasts. A 3 Gy, 50 kV dose inhibited keloid fibroblast proliferation in culture, whereas 9 Gy completely blocked their outgrowth from explants by inducing multiple cell death pathways and reducing collagen levels. Thirteen of 14 keloids treated with a single 8 Gy, 50 kV dose of radiation did not recur, although 4 patients with 6 keloids were lost to follow-up. LIMITATIONS Seventy-five percent of patients received steroids for pruritus, whereas approximately 25% of patients were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS A single 8 Gy dose of superficial 50 kV radiation delivered an average of 34 days after keloid excision maybe sufficient to minimize recurrence, including in individuals resistant to steroids. Higher radiation energies, doses, or fractions may be unnecessary for keloid therapy.
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
Chua SC, Gidaszewski B, Khajehei M. Efficacy of surgical excision and sub-dermal injection of triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of keloid scars after caesarean section: a single blind randomised controlled trial protocol. Trials 2019; 20:363. [PMID: 31215471 PMCID: PMC6582563 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3465-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background One of the first-line options to treat keloid scars is corticosteroid injection after excision of the existing scar. A thorough literature search has shown a lack of research on the injection of corticosteroid injection immediately after the excision of the existing caesarean section keloid scars. Therefore, in the proposed study, we aim to investigate the effect of surgical excision and corticosteroid (triamcinolone acetonide) injection immediately after surgical removal of old caesarean section keloid scars on the recurrence of the scars. This is a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Methods/design Pregnant women (n = 150), who attend antenatal clinics at Westmead Hospital in New South Wales, Australia, have a keloid scar from a previous caesarean section, meet the inclusion criteria and sign the consent form, will be randomised to either the control or the intervention group. The control group will receive surgical excision of the keloid scar at the beginning of the procedure during skin incision. The baby will be delivered according to normal procedures, and routine wound closure will be performed in accordance with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. The intervention group will receive surgical excision of the keloid scar after the delivery of the baby, and closure of the uterus layers, rectus sheath and the fat layer will be completed as explained above. Then, triamcinolone acetone will be injected sub-dermally at the time of wound closure. Two ampules of triamcinolone acetonide will be administered at a single dose; each ampule contains 10 mg/1 ml active medication. The surgeon will inject one ampule along the entire length of the upper edge of the skin incision and one ampule along the entire length of the lower edge of the skin incision, using a 25 G needle. After the procedure is completed, the surgeon will fill in the post-operation survey. The participants will be followed up post-operation, daily on the ward and then at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-partum. Main outcomes are (1) keloid formation after caesarean section and (2) changes in the appearance and specification of the keloid scar after the intervention. Discussion We anticipate that surgical excision and steroid injection will be a safe, lasting and cost-effective treatment in the management of caesarean keloid scars which will be useful for patients unable to undergo cosmetic surgery due to clinical or financial reasons. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12618000984291. Registered on 12 June 2018. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3465-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seng Chai Chua
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Beata Gidaszewski
- Department of Women's and Newborn Health, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Marjan Khajehei
- Department of Women's and Newborn Health, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia. .,The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. .,University of New South Wales, Room 3046, Research and Education Network (REN) Building, Westmead Public Hospital, Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Xu J, Yang E, Yu NZ, Long X. Radiation Therapy in Keloids Treatment: History, Strategy, Effectiveness, and Complication. Chin Med J (Engl) 2018; 130:1715-1721. [PMID: 28685723 PMCID: PMC5520560 DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.209896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Radiation therapy combined with surgical excision was considered as one of the most effective treatment plans for keloid lesions. However, there was no unanimity found over present literatures regarding the issue on optimized treatment strategy for keloids. We here provide a comprehensive review over this issue and emphasize on the influencing factors. Data Sources: The data analyzed in this review were searched from articles included in PubMed and EMBASE databases. Study Selection: The original articles and critical reviews discussing the application of radiation therapy in keloids treatment were selected for this review. Results: The application of radiation therapy has transitioned from simple superficial X-ray irradiation to brachytherapy. Furthermore, several factors including radiation type, dose, fraction, interval, and complications were reviewed, and the results revealed that these factors were significant toward clinical outcome at various levels. Conclusions: Both past and present evidence support the idea that combination therapy of radiation and surgical therapy is safe and feasible. However, the optimization of treatment strategy was based on different radiation types and should take dose, fractions, interval, and complications into consideration, which will then decrease the rate of recurrence and increase the level of satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Xu
- Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Elan Yang
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Nan-Ze Yu
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Xiao Long
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Shen J, Lian X, Sun Y, Wang X, Hu K, Hou X, Sun S, Yan J, Yu L, Sun X, Li W, Wang X, Guan Q, Pang T, Zhang F. Hypofractionated electron-beam radiation therapy for keloids: retrospective study of 568 cases with 834 lesions. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2015; 56:811-817. [PMID: 26224888 PMCID: PMC4577000 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrv031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2014] [Revised: 03/08/2015] [Accepted: 04/01/2015] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to analyze the outcomes of hypofractionated high-energy electron beam radiotherapy for the treatment of keloids. From February 1998 to January 2012, 568 patients with a total of 834 keloids underwent radiotherapy: 826 lesions with postoperative radiotherapy, and 36 with skin-grafting. Lesion size was >5 cm in 335 keloids. An electron-beam of 6 or 7 MeV was used, with a total dose of 18 Gy (two fractions with a 1-week interval) covering the lesion with a 1-cm margin. The time between surgery and radiotherapy was 24-48 h. Skin-grafted patients underwent radiotherapy 10-15 days after the operation. The median follow-up was 40 months (range: 12-160 months). The local control rate was 88.25% (736/834). The relapse rate was 9.59% (80/834), and the time to relapse was 6-28 months (median: 12 months). Univariate analyses showed that gender, age, keloid size, keloid site, skin grafting, and operation-to-irradiation interval influenced the local control rate. Multivariate analysis showed that the relapse rate was correlated with gender (P = 0.048), age (P < 0.01), operation-to-irradiation interval (P < 0.01), keloid site (P < 0.01), surgical method (P = 0.04) and keloid size (P < 0.02). Adverse effects were observed in 9.83% (82/834). No radiation-induced cancers were observed. Hypofractionated high-energy electron beam radiotherapy for keloids yielded excellent outcomes, especially in cases without skin grafting. Early postoperative radiotherapy with limited hypofractionation could be a good choice for keloid treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Bei Jing, 100000, China
| | - Xin Lian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Bei Jing, 100000, China
| | - Yuliang Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Bei Jing, 100000, China
| | - Xiaojun Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Bei Jing, 100000, China
| | - Ke Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Bei Jing, 100000, China
| | - Xiaorong Hou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Bei Jing, 100000, China
| | - Shuai Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Bei Jing, 100000, China
| | - Junfang Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Bei Jing, 100000, China
| | - Lang Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Bei Jing, 100000, China
| | - Xiansong Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Bei Jing, 100000, China
| | - Wenbo Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Bei Jing, 100000, China
| | - Xinhai Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Bei Jing, 100000, China
| | - Qiu Guan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Bei Jing, 100000, China
| | - Tingtian Pang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Bei Jing, 100000, China
| | - Fuquan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Bei Jing, 100000, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Surgical Excision with Adjuvant Irradiation for Treatment of Keloid Scars: A Systematic Review. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2015; 3:e440. [PMID: 26301129 PMCID: PMC4527614 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000000357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2014] [Accepted: 03/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Background: Excision followed by adjuvant irradiation is considered safe and most efficacious for treatment of keloid scars. Recently, different authors published successful treatment protocols and recommended the following: (1) the use of high-dose-rate brachytherapy instead of low-dose-rate brachytherapy or external radiation; (2) a short-time interval between operation and irradiation; (3) single fraction instead of multifraction irradiation; and (4) a minimum of 12- to 24-month follow-up post treatment. Methods: This study evaluates the above recommendations with a systematic review of the English-language literature, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. Both PubMed and EMBASE were searched. Studies were graded according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Rating Levels of Evidence. Results: Thirty-three studies were selected. Six studies were graded as level of evidence type II studies and 27 as type III. High-dose-rate brachytherapy showed lower recurrence rates compared with low-dose-rate brachytherapy and external radiation. A short-time (<7 hours) interval between scar excision and irradiation results in a lower recurrence rate compared with long-time intervals (>24 hours). Single-fraction irradiation showed promising results in terms of recurrence rate and patient convenience. Finally, scar recurrences were seen between 2 and 36 months, with a mean of 15 months. Conclusions: Based on this systematic review of the literature, the evidence confirms the recommendations stated by authors in the recent years. However, due to the lack of high-quality randomized studies, the quality of this evidence is limited. More randomized studies will generate stronger recommendations.
Collapse
|