Comparison between preoperative and postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: an institutional analysis

PTEN and P-4E-BP1 might be associated with postoperative recurrence of rectal cancer patients undergoing concurrent radiochemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Local recurrence after surgery and radiochemotherapy seriously affects the prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. Studies on molecular markers related to the radiochemotherapy sensitivity of cancers have been widely carried out, which might provide valued information for clinicians to carry out individual treatment.

AIM

To find potential biomarkers of tumors for predicting postoperative recurrence.

METHODS

In this study, LARC patients undergoing surgery and concurrent radiochemotherapy were enrolled. We focused on clinicopathological factors and PTEN, SIRT1, p-4E-BP1, and pS6 protein expression assessed by immunohistochemistry in 73 rectal cancer patients with local recurrence and 76 patients without local recurrence.

RESULTS

The expression of PTEN was higher, while the expression of p-4E-BP1 was lower in patients without local recurrence than in patients with local recurrence. Moreover, TNM stage, lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI), PTEN and p-4E-BP1 might be independent risk factors for local recurrence after LARC surgery combined with concurrent radiochemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that PTEN and p-4E-BP1 might be potential biomarkers for prognostic prediction and therapeutic targets for LARC.

Association of cancer diagnosis with disability status among older survivors of colorectal cancer: a population-based retrospective cohort study

Background

Older cancer survivors likely experience physical function limitations due to cancer and its treatments, leading to disability and early mortality. Existing studies have focused on factors associated with surgical complications and mortality risk rather than factors associated with the development of poor disability status (DS), a proxy measure of poor performance status, in cancer survivors. We aimed to identify factors associated with the development of poor DS among older survivors of colorectal cancer (CRC) and compare poor DS rates to an age-sex-matched, non-cancer cohort.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study utilized administrative data from the Texas Cancer Registry Medicare-linked database. The study cohort consisted of 13,229 survivors of CRC diagnosed between 2005 and 2013 and an age-sex-matched, non-cancer cohort of 13,225 beneficiaries. The primary outcome was poor DS, determined by Davidoff's method, using predictors from 12 months of Medicare claims after cancer diagnosis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify risk factors associated with the development of poor DS.

Results

Among the survivors of CRC, 97% were 65 years or older. After a 9-year follow-up, 54% of survivors of CRC developed poor DS. Significant factors associated with future poor DS included: age at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.50 for >80 years old), female sex (HR = 1.50), race/ethnicity (HR = 1.34 for Hispanic and 1.21 for Black), stage at diagnosis (HR = 2.26 for distant metastasis), comorbidity index (HR = 2.18 for >1), and radiation therapy (HR = 1.21). Having cancer (HR = 1.07) was significantly associated with developing poor DS in the pooled cohorts; age and race/ethnicity were also significant factors.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that a CRC diagnosis is independently associated with a small increase in the risk of developing poor DS after accounting for other known factors. The study identified risk factors for developing poor DS in CRC survivors, including Hispanic and Black race/ethnicity, age, sex, histologic stage, and comorbidities. These findings underscore the importance of consistent physical function assessments, particularly among subsets of older survivors of CRC who are at higher risk of disability, to prevent developing poor DS.

Evaluation of the pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. Experience at the Instituto de Cancerología de Medellín (Colombia, 2011-2017)

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

Neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer is associated with a decrease in tumor size and is the therapeutic indication for patients with T3 or T4 tumors or lymph node involvement. Our aim was to describe the frequency of pathologic response and the survival rate in patients that underwent neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective follow-up study with a survival analysis was conducted. Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer that received neoadjuvant treatment and were operated on at the Instituto de Cancerología Las Américas (Medellín, Colombia) were analyzed. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 152 patients were included. Mean patient age was 59 years (12.8 SD), 53.9% were men, and 58.6% of the patients were diagnosed with stage IIIB disease. The pathologic complete response (pCR) was achieved in 17% of the patients. A total of 146 (96.1%) patients received the chemoradiotherapy protocol. Fifty-two (34.2%) patients developed metastasis and/or relapse, and one (3.8%) of those patients had presented with pCR. The median follow-up period was 33 months (Q1-Q3: 20-45), with an overall survival rate of 79.5% (95% CI 70.9-85.8). The 5-year survival rate for the patients that had pCR was 80% (95% CI 20.3-96.9).

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of pCR was similar to that in other published studies and disease recurrence was lower, compared with patients with no response. The 5-year survival rate in patients with pCR was high, albeit lower than that reported in other studies.

Sarcopenia is poor prognostic factor in older patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received preoperative or postoperative chemoradiotherapy

Sarcopenia is associated with low muscle mass and low physical performance. Here, we performed to evaluate the sarcopenia as prognostic factor and treatment outcomes in older patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who received preoperative or postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT).LARC patients aged ≥65 years who received either preoperative or postoperative CRT were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative or postoperative CRT consisted of 50.4 Gy and fluoropyrimidine. Surgery was performed at 6 weeks after CRT completion. Postoperative CRT was performed at 4 weeks after surgery. One month after surgery or CRT, adjuvant chemotherapy was given. Overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS), local recurrence (LR), and prognostic factor were evaluated.Thirty patients received preoperative CRT and 35 patients received postoperative CRT. Five-year OS rate, 5-year DFS rate, or 5-year LR rate was not significantly different between preoperative and postoperative CRT groups (69.0%, 58.5%, and 3.4% vs 73.6%, 67.9%, and 6.9%, P = .56, P = .37, and P = .77, respectively). Age, sex, stage, CEA level, or timing of CRT did not affect OS. However, 5-year OS rate of patients with sarcopenia was significantly lower than those without sarcopenia (38.0% vs 92.5%, P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that sarcopenia was the only independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.08, P = .001).There was no difference in survival between preoperative CRT and postoperative CRT in older patients with LARC. Sarcopenia is a poor prognostic factor in older patients with LARC who received preoperative or postoperative CRT.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for stage II-III resectable rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Purpose

Whether preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is better than postoperative CRT in oncologic outcome and toxicity is contentious in prospective randomized clinical trials. We systematically analyze and compare the treatment result, toxicity, and sphincter preservation rate between preoperative CRT and postoperative CRT in stage II–III rectal cancer.

Materials and Methods

We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from 1990 to 2014 for relevant trials. Only phase III randomized studies performing CRT and curative surgery were selected and the data were extracted. Meta-analysis was used to pool oncologic outcome and toxicity data across studies.

Results

Three randomized phase III trials were finally identified. The meta-analysis results showed significantly lower 5-year locoregional recurrence rate in the preoperative-CRT group than in the postoperative-CRT group (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.41–0.84; p = 0.004). The 5-year distant recurrence rate (p = 0.55), relapse-free survival (p = 0.14), and overall survival (p = 0.22) showed no significant difference between two groups. Acute toxicity was significantly lower in the preoperativeCRT group than in the postoperative-CRT group (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between two groups in perioperative and chronic complications (p = 0.53). The sphincter-saving rate was not significantly different between two groups (p = 0.24). The conversion rate from abdominoperineal resection to low anterior resection in low rectal cancer was significantly higher in the preoperative-CRT group than in the postoperative-CRT group (p < 0.001).

conclusions

As compared to postoperative CRT, preoperative CRT improves only locoregional control, not distant control and survival, with similar chronic toxicity and sphincter preservation rate in rectal cancer patients.

Is lateral pelvic node dissection necessary after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer patients with initially suspected lateral pelvic node?

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the effect of lateral pelvic node dissection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy on rectal cancer patients with initially suspected lateral pelvic nodes. The purpose of this study was to identify a subgroup of patients receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy who can benefit from lateral pelvic node dissection.

METHODS

The study included 580 patients who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision. The lateral pelvic node responses to preoperative chemoradiotherapy were divided: group I (no suspected lateral pelvic node), lateral pelvic node <5 mm pre- and post-chemoradiotherapy; group II (responsive lateral pelvic node), lateral pelvic node ≥5 mm pre-chemoradiotherapy but <5 mm post-chemoradiotherapy; and group III (persistent lateral pelvic node), lateral pelvic node ≥5 mm pre- and post-chemoradiotherapy. Prognostic factors for lateral pelvic node recurrence-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, relapse-free survival, and overall survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

In a multivariate analysis, lateral pelvic node response was an independent factor associated with lateral pelvic node recurrence-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, relapse-free survival, and overall survival (P < .05). Group III had significantly poorer lateral pelvic node recurrence-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, relapse-free survival, and overall survival than groups II and I (74.1%, 93.4%, and 98.6%; 71.7%, 89.4%, and 97%; 56.9%, 76.6%, and 81.7%; 74.9%, 85.7%, and 89.1%, respectively; P < .05). Group II tended to have poorer lateral pelvic node recurrence-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, relapse-free survival, and overall survival than group I, and the differences in relapse-free survival and overall survival between the 2 groups were not significant (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the subgroup with lateral pelvic nodes responsive to preoperative chemoradiotherapy may not benefit from lateral pelvic node dissection, and the subgroup with persistent lateral pelvic node may benefit from lateral pelvic node dissection.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by transanal local excision for T3 distal rectal cancer: A case report

Local excision (LE) for rectal cancer is currently indicated for selected T1 stage tumors. However, preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer not only improves local disease control, but also leads to a decrease in the stage and size of the primary mural tumor, along with a decrease in the risk of regional lymphadenopathy. The present study reports the outcome of a patient with T3N0M0 rectal cancer who was treated with LE following preoperative CRT. The distal pole of the tumor was located 2 cm from the anal verge. Preoperative pelvic radiotherapy of 50.4 Gy was administered in 28 fractions. Chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin was administered during the first and last weeks of radiotherapy. The tumor response to CRT, was found to be marked at 7 weeks after CRT completion, and a complete response was presumed clinically. Transanal full-thickness LE was performed, and pathological examination revealed the absence of residual cancer cells. After 30 months of close follow-up, the patient was alive with no evidence of disease, and treatment-associated severe toxicities were not observed. Although a longer follow-up period is required, this case report suggests that LE may also be a feasible alternative treatment for T3 rectal cancer, which exhibits a marked response to preoperative CRT, particularly in elderly and comorbid patients contraindicated for radical surgery, or patients who are reluctant to undergo sphincter-ablation surgery.

Association of pretreatment serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels with chemoradiation-induced downstaging and downsizing of rectal cancer

The aim of this study was to identify pretreatment clinical parameters associated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT)-induced downstaging and downsizing of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC T3-4 or N+). Data from 51 LARC patients, who received preoperative CRT and radical surgery between 2010 and 2013, were retrospectively analyzed. Rectal adenocarcinoma was histologically confirmed in all patients, who ranged in age between 41 and 81 years (median, 64 years). CRT consisted of 50.4 Gy pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. After a median interval of 7 weeks post-CRT, the patients underwent total mesorectal excision. Downstaging was defined as the transition from cStage II-III to ypStage 0-I. The longest tumor diameter was measured pre- and post-CRT using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, and based on the surgical specimen, respectively. Downstaging was observed in 16 (31.4%) patients, including 5 (9.8%) with a pathological complete response. The median downsizing rate was 60%. The serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were 0.8-153.9 ng/ml (median, 4.4 ng/ml). The maximum standardized uptake value was 4.7-33.9 (median, 10.8). On univariate analysis, cT stage, tumor size and CEA level were associated with downstaging. On multivariate analysis, only CEA level (≤5 ng/ml) was a significant predictor of downstaging (odds ratio = 16.0; 95% confidence interval: 1.8-146.7; P=0.014). CEA level was the only factor significantly associated with downsizing (>60%) in the univariate analysis. These results demonstrated that pretreatment serum CEA levels are significantly associated with downstaging as well as downsizing of LARC following preoperative CRT. Therefore, this parameter may be useful in personalizing the management of LARC patients.

Significance of histologic tumor grade in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by curative surgery: A multi-institutional retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the pre-treatment clinical factors affecting recurrence and survival in rectal cancer patients who receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and curative surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The clinical data of 1782 patients from 8 institutions in Korea were analyzed. The potential prognostic factors that could be acquired before radical surgery were patient age, gender, clinical T and N stages, tumor size and location, tumor grade, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, and the concurrent chemotherapy regimen. The relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of locoregional and distant recurrence were analyzed according to the clinical factors.

RESULTS

Among the pre-treatment clinical factors, tumor grade, pre-CRT CEA level, tumor location, and clinical N stage were significant prognostic factors affecting the RFS. The high-grade tumor was the hazardous factor for RFS on the multivariate analysis [Hazard ratio (HR), 1.83; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.29-2.58; p=0.001]. The 5-year RFS rate for high-grade tumors was significantly lower than that for low-grade tumors (63.8% vs. 78.8%, p<0.001). The tumor grade was a significant prognostic factor for distant recurrence (HR, 1.83, 95% CI, 1.29-2.58; p<0.001), but not for locoregional recurrence (HR, 1.49, 95% CI, 0.68-3.26; p=0.320) on the multivariate analysis. The 5-year OS rate for high-grade tumors was significantly lower than that for low-grade tumors (70.6% vs. 85.5%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The tumor grade is the significant pre-treatment clinical factor for recurrence and survival in rectal cancer patients who receive preoperative CRT and curative surgery.

Carcinoembryonic antigen has prognostic value for tumor downstaging and recurrence in rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery: A multi-institutional and case-matched control study of KROG 14-12

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Korean Radiation Oncology Group evaluated the significance of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels both as a predictor of tumor response after CRT and as a prognosticator for recurrence-free survival.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

1804 rectal cancer patients, staged cT3-4N0-2M0, participated in a multicenter study. The patients were administered preoperative radiation of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with 5-FU or capecitabine, followed by total mesorectal excision. Patients with elevated CEA levels (>5 ng/mL) were matched at a 1 (n=595):1 (n=595) ratio with patients with normal CEA (⩽5 ng/mL). The tumor response after CRT and the recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were evaluated and compared between two arms.

RESULTS

An elevated CEA level (p<0.001) was determined to be a significant negative predictor of downstaging after CRT. The downstaging rate was 42.9% for normal CEA and 23.4% for elevated CEA. A multivariate analysis also revealed that cT (p=0.021) and cN classification (p=0.001), tumor size (p=0.002), and tumor location from the anal verge (p=0.006) were significant predictors for tumor downstaging. The 5-year RFS rates were significantly higher for the normal CEA arm than for the elevated CEA arm (74.2 vs. 63.5%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated CEA (>5 ng/mL) is a negative predictor of tumor downstaging after CRT and also has a negative impact on RFS in rectal cancer.

KRAS Mutation Status Is Not a Predictor for Tumor Response and Survival in Rectal Cancer Patients Who Received Preoperative Radiotherapy With 5-Fluoropyrimidine Followed by Curative Surgery

We evaluated the tumor response and survival according to the KRAS oncogene status in locally advanced rectal cancer. One hundred patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3-4N0-2M0) received preoperative radiation of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with 5-fluorouracil and total mesorectal excision. Tumor DNA from each patient was obtained from pretreatment biopsy tissues. A Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation was found in 26 (26%) of the 100 patients. Downstaging (ypT0-2N0M0) rates after preoperative chemoradiotheray were not statistically different between the wild-type and mutant-type KRAS groups (30.8% vs 27.0%, P = 0.715, respectively). After a median follow-up time of 34 months, there was no statistically significant difference in the 3-year relapse-free survival (82.2% vs 82.6%, P = 0.512) and overall survival (94.7% vs 92.3%, P = 0.249) rates between wild-type and mutant-type KRAS groups, respectively. The KRAS mutation status does not influence the tumor response to the radiotherapy and survival in locally advanced rectal cancer patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery.

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels associated with pathological responses to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate whether pretreatment serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) levels are associated with pathological responses to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 260 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3-4NanyM0) who underwent preoperative CRT and radical surgery were analyzed retrospectively. CRT consisted of 50.4 Gy pelvic radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. Radical surgery was performed at a median of 7 weeks after CRT completion. Pathological CRT response criteria included downstaging (ypStage 0-I) and ypT0-1. A discrimination threshold of CA 19-9 level was determined using a receiver operating characteristics analysis.

RESULTS

The median CA 19-9 level was 8.0 (1.0-648.0) U/mL. Downstaging occurred in 94 (36.2%) patients and ypT0-1 in 50 (19.2%). The calculated optimal threshold CA 19-9 level was 10.2 U/mL for downstaging and 9.0 U/mL for ypT0-1. On multivariate analysis, CA 19-9 (≤ 9.0 U/mL) was significantly associated with downstaging (odds ratio, 2.089; 95% confidence interval, 1.189-3.669; P=0.010) or ypT0-1 (OR, 2.207; 95%CI, 1.079-4.512; P=0.030), independent of clinical stage or carcinoembryonic antigen.

CONCLUSIONS

This study firstly showed a significant association of pretreatment serum CA 19-9 levels with pathological CRT responses of rectal cancer. The CA 19-9 level is suggested to be valuable in predicting CRT responses of rectal cancer cases before treatment.

Is elective inguinal radiotherapy necessary for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma invading anal canal?

Background

We investigated whether routine elective irradiation of a clinically negative inguinal node (IGN) is necessary for patients with locally advanced distal rectal cancer and anal canal invasion (ACI).

Methods

We reviewed retrospectively 1,246 patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma managed using preoperative or postoperative chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery between 2001 and 2011. The patients’ IGN was clinically negative at presentation and IGN irradiation was not performed. ACI was defined as the lower edge of the tumor being within 3 cm of the anal verge. Patients were divided into two groups, those with ACI (n = 189, 15.2%) and without ACI (n = 1,057, 84.8%).

Results

The follow-up period was a median of 66 months (range, 3–142 months). Among the 1,246 patients, 10 developed IGN recurrence; 7 with ACI and 3 without ACI. The actuarial IGN recurrence rate at 5 years was 0.7%; 3.5% and 0.2% in patients with and without ACI, respectively (p < 0.001). Isolated IGN recurrence occurred in three patients, all of whom had ACI tumors. These three patients received curative intent local treatments, and one was alive with no evidence of disease 10 years after IGN recurrence. Salvage treatments in the other two patients controlled successfully the IGN recurrence for >5 years, but they developed second malignancy or pelvic and distant recurrences. Seven patients with non-isolated IGN recurrence died of disease at 5–22 months after IGN recurrence.

Conclusion

The low IGN recurrence rate even with ACI and the feasibility of salvage of isolated IGN recurrence indicated that routine elective IGN irradiation is not necessary for rectal cancer with ACI.