Prophylactic extended-field irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy for pelvic lymph node-positive cervical cancer

Prognostic analysis of stage IIIC1p cervical cancer patients

Background

Stage IIIC1p cervical cancer is characterized by marked heterogeneity and considerable variability in the postoperative prognosis. This study aimed to identify the clinical and pathological characteristics affecting the survival of patients diagnosed with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and lymph node dissection between March 2012 and March 2022. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate prognostic factors for OS and forest plots were used to visualize these findings. Nomogram charts were created to forecast survival rates at 3 and 5 years, and the accuracy of predictions was evaluated using Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves.

Results

The study cohort comprised 186 women diagnosed with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer. The median follow-up duration was 51.1 months (range, 30-91 months), and the estimated 5-year OS rate was 71.5%. Multivariate analysis revealed that concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy (CCRT + AC), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), ratio of lymph node metastasis (LNM), and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) levels independently predicted OS.

Conclusions

Significant prognostic disparities exist among patients diagnosed with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer. MLR, ratio of LNM, and SCCA were associated with poor OS. In contrast, the CCRT + AC treatment regimen appeared to confer a survival advantage.

Prophylactic Extended-Field Irradiation Versus Pelvic Irradiation in Patients With Cervical Cancer With 2018 FIGO Stage IIIC1 Disease

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the survival rates and toxicities of prophylactic extended-field radiation therapy (EFRT) and pelvic radiation therapy (PRT) among patients with cervical cancer with 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC1 disease.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with 2018 FIGO stage IIIC1 disease who were treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy at our institute between 2011 and 2015. A dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions was delivered to the pelvic region (by PRT) or the pelvic plus para-aortic lymph node region (by EFRT) with intensity modulated radiation therapy. The first-line regimen of concurrent chemotherapy was weekly cisplatin.

RESULTS

A total of 280 patients were included, with 161 patients treated with PRT and 119 patients treated with EFRT. After propensity score matching (1:1), 71 pairs of patients were selected. The respective 5-year rates of the patients treated with PRT and EFRT were 61.9% and 85.0% for overall survival (P = .025) and 53.0% and 77.9% for disease-free survival (DFS) (P = .004), respectively, after matching. In the subgroup analysis, patients were grouped into a high-risk group (122 patients) and a low-risk group (158 patients) based on 3 factors: positive common iliac lymph nodes, ≥3 pelvic lymph nodes, and 2014 FIGO stage IIIB disease. In both the high-risk and low-risk groups, EFRT significantly improved DFS compared with PRT. The rates of grade ≥3 chronic toxicities were 1.2% and 5.9% in the PRT and EFRT groups, respectively (P = .067).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to PRT, prophylactic EFRT was associated with improved overall survival, DFS, and para-aortic lymph node control in patients with cervical cancer with FIGO stage IIIC1 disease. The incidence of grade ≥3 toxicities was higher in the EFRT group than in the PRT group, although the difference was not significant.

Clinical analysis of prophylactic para-aortic intensity-modulated radiation in cervical cancer

AIM

This study aimed to compare the survival and toxicity of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IB1-IIIC cervical cancer without common iliac node metastasis treated with extended-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (EF-IMRT) or pelvic IMRT (P-IMRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients treated with EF-IMRT and 37 patients who underwent P-IMRT were analysed retrospectively. Both groups were treated with high-dose-rate ¹⁹²Ir two-dimensional brachytherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. The chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier method were used to compare toxicity and survival between the two groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time of EF-IMRT group and P-IMRT group was 22 and 30 months, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and para-aortic lymph node metastasis-free survival (PAMFS) in the EF-IMRT group and P-IMRT group were 87% versus 74.6%, 83.6% versus 61.7%, and 96% versus 80.5%, respectively. Treatment regimens, tumour size, and radiation time were independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS. Treatment regimens, tumour size, and total equivalent dose in 2 Gy/f (EQD2) of point A were independent prognostic factors of PAMFS. Five patients in the EF-IMRT group and 14 patients in P-IMET group experienced treatment failure. The cumulative incidence of grade 3 and 4 acute leukopenia in the EF-IMRT group was 51.6%, in comparison with 27.03% in the pelvic group. No difference was found in thrombocytopenia between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with FIGO 2009 stage IB1-IIIC cervical cancer without common iliac node metastases may be benefit from EF-IMRT. Notably, EF-IMRT exhibits increased toxicity incidence; however, this remains within an acceptable range.

The impact of para-aortic lymph node irradiation on disease-free survival in patients with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

•

Standard of care of locally advanced cervical cancer is based on concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

•

Para-aortic radiotherapy (PAO-RT) has become controversial in the chemotherapy era.

•

Systematic review on impact of PAO-RT on disease-free survival yielded 11 studies.

•

Meta-analysis of 3 studies showed pooled adjusted HR of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79–0.97).

•

Findings support further investigation in prospective controlled trials.

Background

Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer without para-aortic lymph node metastases (PAO-LNM) at diagnosis who undergo concurrent chemoradiotherapy are at 4–11% risk of developing PAO-LNM during follow-up. Some studies suggest a beneficial influence of elective para-aortic radiotherapy (PAO-RT) on disease-free survival (DFS) in these patients. The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyse literature on the impact of PAO-RT on DFS in cervical cancer patients.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed. The analysis included intervention studies that reported on DFS in patients with cervical cancer who received chemotherapy and pelvic radiotherapy with or without PAO-RT. From each included study, relevant study characteristics and outcome data including the hazard ratio (HR) adjusted for potential confounders were extracted. An overall pooled adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for DFS after PAO-RT versus no PAO-RT was calculated using a random-effects model.

Results

A total of 2,016 articles were evaluated. Eleven articles were included in the systematic review, of which 3 were appropriate for quantitative meta-analysis. Pooling of these 3 cohorts (including 1,113 patients) demonstrated a statistically significant association between PAO-RT and DFS (pooled aHR 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.79–0.97). No significant heterogeneity among reported aHRs was observed (I² = 0.0%).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggests a modest but significant beneficial impact of elective para-aortic radiotherapy on DFS in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who undergo concurrent chemoradiotherapy. This finding based on non-randomized studies provides an imperative for further investigation in prospective controlled trials.

The best postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients with early stage cervical adenosquamous carcinoma

Background

Cervical adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) was previously thought to be a subtype of cervical adenocarcinoma, but recent studies have found that the clinical features of the two diseases are different. Moreover, the pathological characteristics, survival, prognosis, and optimal ASC therapy remain unknown. This study aims to retrospectively analyze the postoperative survival of patients with early-stage ASC and to evaluate their condition after treatment with postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and prophylactic irradiation of the para-aortic lymphatic drainage area.

Methods

This study enrolled 131 patients with pathologically confirmed ASC screened from 3502 patients with confirmed stage I–II cervical cancer diagnosis who had completed surgical treatments in our hospital. Among the 131 enrolled patients, 75 patients received CCRT, 33 patients received chemotherapy (CT), and 23 patients did not receive adjuvant treatment (named surgery alone (S alone). Of the 75 patients CCRT, 43 patients received prophylactic irradiation of the para-aortic lymphatic drainage area. The efficacy of the postoperative treatments of patients among groups (CCRT, CT, and S alone) was compared.

Results

The median follow-up time, age, and overall survival (OS) were 76 months, 43 years, and 74 months, respectively. The 3- and 5-year survival rates were 82% and 71.4%, respectively. The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 64 months. Cox regression analysis showed that postoperative adjuvant treatment modalities and positive lymph node metastases were associated with OS and DFS. Patients who received CCRT treatment had higher OS and DFS than those with CT and S alone. Prophylactic irradiation of the para-aortic lymphatic drainage area did not improve the OS and DFS of patients with CCRT treatment. However, further subgroup analysis suggested that it might improve survival rates in patients who had positive pelvic lymph nodes as confirmed by postoperative pathology.

Conclusion

Postoperative CCRT improved the survival rates in patients with early-stage ASC. The value of prophylactic irradiation of the para-aortic lymphatic drainage area remains debatable, but it may benefit patients with pelvic lymph node involvement.

Is the pathologic tumor size associated with survival in early cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy?

OBJECTIVE

In 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system of uterine cervix cancer, size criteria of primary tumor has been revised. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of this new size criteria (<2, 2-4, and ≧4 cm) in patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for early cervical cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined 312 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and adjuvant RT for early cervical cancer (IB-IIA) from 2001 to 2014. The effects of clinical and pathological factors on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 71.5 months, the 5-year DFS and OS rates were 89.5% and 94.7%, respectively. The primary tumor size was not a significant factor for DFS (p = 0.382) or OS (p = 0.725) in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Primary tumor size was not a significant factor for survival in patients who received hysterectomy and adjuvant RT for early cervical cancer. Adequacy of new tumor size criteria (<2, 2-4, and ≧4 cm) in new 2018 FIGO stage needs to be validated in further studies.

Para-aortic lymph node involvement in cervical cancer: Implications for staging, outcome and treatment

Locally advanced cervical cancer with the involvement of para-aortic lymph nodes (PALN) is a common occurrence in low-income and low-middle-income countries. With the incorporation of PALN in the recent FIGO staging, therapeutic management becomes crucial. There are varied presentations of this group which may range from microscopic involvement to extensive lymphadenopathy. Various imaging modalities have been studied to accurately diagnose PALN metastases without surgical intervention, while some investigators have studied the survival benefit of para-aortic lymph node dissection for accurate staging and guiding extent of radiation. With recent advances in radiation therapy, its application to treat bulky nodal metastases and the role of prophylactic irradiation have been reported. In this review, the available evidence and the scope of further interventions is presented.

Para-Aortic Nodal Radiation in the Definitive Management of Node-Positive Cervical Cancer

Objectives

To investigate the safety and outcomes of elective para-aortic (PA) nodal irradiation utilizing modern treatment techniques for patients with node positive cervical cancer.

Methods

Patients with pelvic lymph node positive cervical cancer who received radiation were included. All patients received radiation therapy (RT) to either a traditional pelvic field or an extended field to electively cover the PA nodes. Factors associated with survival were identified using a Cox proportional hazards model, and toxicities between groups were compared with a chi-square test.

Results

96 patients were identified with a mean follow up of 40 months. The incidence of acute grade ≥ 2 toxicity was 31% in the elective PA nodal RT group and 15% in the pelvic field group (Chi-square p = 0.067. There was no significant difference in rates of grade ≥ 3 acute or late toxicities between the two groups (p>0.05). The KM estimated 5-year OS was not statistically different for those receiving elective PA nodal irradiation compared to a pelvic only field, 54% vs. 73% respectively (log-rank p = 0.11).

Conclusions

Elective PA nodal RT can safely be delivered utilizing modern planning techniques without a significant increase in severe (grade ≥ 3) acute or late toxicities, at the cost of a possible small increase in non-severe (grade 2) acute toxicities. In this series there was no survival benefit observed with the receipt of elective PA nodal RT, however, this benefit may have been obscured by the higher risk features of this population. While prospective randomized trials utilizing a risk adapted approach to elective PA nodal coverage are the only way to fully evaluate the benefit of elective PA nodal coverage, these trials are unlikely to be performed and instead we must rely on interpretation of results of risk adapted approaches like those used in ongoing clinical trials and retrospective data.

Patterns of definitive radiotherapy practice for cervical cancer in South Korea: a survey endorsed by the Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KROG 20-06)

Objective

The Korean Radiation Oncology Group conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey to evaluate the patterns of clinical practice for patients with cervical cancer receiving definitive radiation therapy (RT) in South Korea.

Methods

Practicing radiation oncologists from 93 centers in South Korea were administered a questionnaire survey via e-mail. The survey focused on demographic characteristics, diagnostic evaluation, indications for definitive RT, RT techniques, RT field and dose prescription, lymph node (LN) boost RT, brachytherapy, and chemotherapy.

Results

The response rate was 62.4% (58/93 institutions). Of the 2,134 patients treated at the radiation oncology department in 2019, 48.8% underwent definitive RT. The selection of patients for definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy and RT field, and RT dose prescription varied greatly. The upper border of the pelvis was commonly used as the bony landmark for external beam RT (81%–88% of respondents). Most (96.6%) centers performed LN boost RT with median total doses of 59 Gy and 59.2 Gy for pelvic and retroperitoneal LN, respectively. With 50% of the centers offering brachytherapy, image-guided brachytherapy and volume-based prescription were applied in 48.3% and 37.9%, respectively. Upfront concurrent chemoradiation therapy with varying prescription doses was considered by 60.4% respondents in cases of supraclavicular LN metastasis.

Conclusion

Most differences were noted in the indications for treatment, RT field, and prescription dose. This finding can serve as a reference for establishing practical RT guidelines for the management of locally advanced cervical cancer.

Significance of para-aortic lymph node evaluation in patients with FIGO IIIC1 cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the effect of para-aortic lymph node sampling or dissection in recently revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IIIC1p cervical cancer treated with primary surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 343 patients with early-stage cervical cancer and pathologically proven pelvic lymph node metastasis following curative surgery from 2001 to 2014. No patient had imaging evidence of para-aortic lymph node involvement, and all patients received adjuvant concurrent chemotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy. We investigated the significance of para-aortic lymph node sampling or dissection on disease-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

After median follow-up of 58.3 months, 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival in all patients were 69.9 and 80.2%, respectively. Disease-free survival and overall survival did not differ between the para-aortic lymph node dissection group and the No para-aortic lymph node dissection group (P = 0.700 and P = 0.605). However, patients with para-aortic lymph node-positive disease had poorer disease-free survival and overall survival compared with those with para-aortic lymph node-negative disease (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no survival benefit of para-aortic lymph node evaluation among patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IIIC1p cervical cancer who were clinically para-aortic lymph node-negative. Although para-aortic lymph node metastasis is a poor prognosticator, the benefit of para-aortic lymph node dissection in terms of survival needs further investigation.

Prophylactic Extended-Field Irradiation in Patients With Cervical Cancer: A Literature Review

Currently, the standard radiation field for locally advanced cervical cancer patients without evidence of para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis is the pelvis. Due to the low accuracy of imaging in the diagnosis of PALN metastasis and the high incidence of PALN failure after pelvic radiotherapy, prophylactic pelvic and para-aortic irradiation, also called extended-field irradiation (EFI), is performed for patients with cervical cancer. In the era of concurrent chemoradiotherapy, randomized controlled trials are limited, and whether patients with cervical cancer can benefit from prophylactic EFI is still controversial. With conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy, patients tolerate prophylactic EFI very well. The severe toxicities of prophylactic EFI are not significantly higher than those of pelvic radiotherapy. We recommend delivering prophylactic EFI to cervical cancer patients with common iliac lymph nodes metastasis. Clinical trials are needed to investigate whether patients with ≥3 positive pelvic lymph nodes and FIGO stage IIIB disease can benefit from prophylactic EFI. According to the distribution of PALNs, it is reasonable to use the renal vein as the upper border of the radiation therapy field for patients treated with prophylactic EFI. The clinical target volume expansion of the node from the vessel should be smaller in the right para-caval region than in the left lateral para-aortic region. The right para-caval region above L2 or L3 may be omitted from the PALN target volume to reduce the dose to the duodenum. More clinical trials on prophylactic EFI in cervical cancer are needed.

Risk factors associated with Para-Aortic Lymph Node Failure after pelvic irradiation in patients with Cervical Cancer

Objective: Previous studies have shown that prophylactic extended-field irradiation can reduce para-aortic lymph node failure (PALNF) rates in patients with cervical cancer. As such, this type of irradiation may particularly benefit patients with a high risk of PALNF. In the present study, we analyzed the risk factors for PALNF in patients with cervical cancer treated with pelvic irradiation in order to identify potential indications of prophylactic extended-field irradiation.

Methods: We evaluated patients with 2018 FIGO stage IB3-IIIC1 cervical cancer who were treated with definitive pelvic radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy at our institution between 2011 and 2014. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for PALNF.

Results: We included 572 patients in the study. The median follow-up period was 37.9 months. Eighteen patients (3.1%) first site of tumor relapse was the para-aortic lymph nodes, and thus showed PALNF. Using multivariate Cox regression analysis, we identified two significant risk factors for PALNF: tumor extension to the pelvic wall (hazard ratio, HR 3.60, p=0.026) and ≥ 2 pelvic MLNs (HR 5.30, p=0.005). For patients with and without risk factors, the 3-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and PALNF rates were 77.3% and 90.1% (p<0.001), 56.4% and 83.1% (p<0.001), and 12.0% and 2.3% (p<0.001), respectively.

Conclusion: Tumor extension to the pelvic wall and ≥ 2 pelvic MLNs are positively associated with PALNF after pelvic irradiation in patients with cervical cancer. Further trials will be required to validate whether patients with these two risk factors may benefit from prophylactic extended-field irradiation.

Who can benefit from a lymph node boost in definitive chemoradiotherapy for node-positive cervical cancer: an evaluation of nodal failure in patients without nodal boost

This study was performed to identify risk factors for pelvic nodal failure (PNF) after definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with metastatic pelvic lymph nodes (mPLNs) from squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix. We retrospectively reviewed data on 80 patients who received definitive CCRT between 2005 and 2014 at our hospital. All patients underwent brachytherapy and whole-pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) without nodal boost. mPLNs was diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. The rate of PNF and factors affecting PNF were analysed. A total of 156 mPLNs were found. The median number of mPLNs was 2 per patient (range 1-6); the median short diameter was 1.7 cm (range 1.0-4.2 cm). After a median follow-up of 64 months, 10 (6.4%) mPLNs failed in 13 (16.3%) patients. The 5-year PNF-free survival (PNFFS), disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 83.4, 62.7 and 74.7%, respectively. The mPLN size was not associated with the risk of PNF. However, pre-radiotherapy SCC antigen (SCC-Ag) >6.8 ng/mL and number of mPLNs >2 were significant risk factors for PNF. Using the two risk factors, we categorized the patients into three risk groups. The 5-year PNFFS rates in patients with 0, 1 and 2 risk factors were 100.0, 78.3 and 44.4%, respectively (P < 0.01). SCC-Ag level and number of mPLNs were significant factors for PNF. Patients with both risk factors developed frequent PNF after WPRT without nodal boost. The two risk factors can be a guide in deciding whether to administer nodal boost radiotherapy.

A comparative dosimetric study of cervical cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy vs. 9-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy

Background

To compare the dosimetric characteristics between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 9-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (9F-IMRT) for cervical cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis.

Methods

We selected 20 patients who had received extended-field radiotherapy for cervical cancer with PALN metastasis. IMRT and VMAT plans were compared in terms of target, organs at risk (OARs), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), the number of monitor units (MUs) and treatment time (s).

Results

The CI and HI of VMAT plans were superior to those of IMRT plans (P<0.05). As for OARs, the mean maximum doses (Dmean) to the kidneys in the VMAT plans were all lower than those in IMRT plans (P<0.001). V40, V50 of the rectum, and V40 of the bladder in VMAT plans involved fewer doses than IMRT plans (P<0.001). Compared with IMRT plans, VMAT reduced the average number of MUs by 51% and the average treatment time by 31%.

Conclusions

Both VMAT and IMRT plans can satisfy clinical dosimetric demands and protect OARs. VMAT has the best performance on CI and HI and can better protect the OARs. VMAT plans have fewer MUs and improve treatment efficiency.

Prophylactic Extended-Field Irradiation for Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Objective

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of prophylactic extended-field radiation therapy (RT) for cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

Methods

Records of patients with cervical cancer without para-aortic metastatic lymph nodes who were treated with definitive RT or CCRT between January 2011 and December 2014 were reviewed. Patients were classified into the pelvic RT and extended-field RT groups. An additional dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions was delivered to para-aortic lymph node regions for patients in the extended-field RT group. Cox regression and propensity-score matching (1:1) were used to compare the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant failure, and para-aortic lymph node failure (PALNF) between the pelvic RT and extended-field RT groups.

Results

A total of 778 patients were analyzed. Of them, 624 patients were treated with pelvic RT and 154 patients received extended-field RT. The median follow-up period was 37.5 months. In multivariate analysis, extended-field RT was an independent prognostic factor of distant failure (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.26–0.90, P = 0.023) and PALNF (HR = 0.012, 95% CI = 0.00–0.49, P = 0.019). However, it was not significant in predicting OS (P = 0.546) and DFS (P = 0.187). With propensity-score matching, 108 pairs of patients were selected. The 3-year OS, DFS, local control, distant failure, and PALNF rates in the pelvic RT and extended-field RT groups were 87.1% and 85.7% (P = 0.681), 71.0% and 80.6% (P = 0.199), 86.6% and 85.0% (P = 0.695), 21.7% and 7.0% (P = 0.016), and 6.6% and 0% (P = 0.014), respectively. The incidences of grade 3 or greater chronic toxicities were 3.5% and 6.5% in the pelvic RT and extended-field RT groups, respectively (P = 0.097).

Conclusions

Prophylactic extended-field RT was associated with decreased distant failure and PALNF and showed a trend in improving DFS in patients with cervical cancer treated with CCRT.