1
|
Chiang CL, Guo Q, Ng WT, Lin S, Ma TSW, Xu Z, Xiao Y, Li J, Lu T, Choi HCW, Chen W, Chau ESC, Luk PHY, Huang SH, O'Sullivan B, Pan J, Lee AWM. Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Nasopharyngeal Cancer and Implication for TNM Staging by UICC: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Front Oncol 2021; 11:703995. [PMID: 34540670 PMCID: PMC8445029 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.703995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aims to identify prognostic factors in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) to improve the current 8th edition TNM classification. A systematic review of the literature reported between 2013 and 2019 in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was conducted. Studies were included if (1) original clinical studies, (2) ≥50 NPC patients, and (3) analyses on the association between prognostic factors and overall survival. The data elements of eligible studies were abstracted and analyzed. A level of evidence was synthesized for each suggested change to the TNM staging and prognostic factors. Of 5,595 studies screened, 108 studies (44 studies on anatomical criteria and 64 on non-anatomical factors) were selected. Proposed changes/factors with strong evidence included the upstaging paranasal sinus to T4, defining parotid lymph node as N3, upstaging N-category based on presence of lymph node necrosis, as well as the incorporation of non-TNM factors including EBV-DNA level, primary gross tumor volume (GTV), nodal GTV, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, platelet count, SUVmax of the primary tumor, and total lesion glycolysis. This systematic review provides a useful summary of suggestions and prognostic factors that potentially improve the current staging system. Further validation studies are warranted to confirm their significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi Leung Chiang
- Clinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Qiaojuan Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Wai Tong Ng
- Clinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Shaojun Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Tiffany Sze Wai Ma
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- Clinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Youping Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jishi Li
- Clinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Tianzhu Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Horace Cheuk Wai Choi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Wenqi Chen
- Clinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Eric Sze Chun Chau
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Peter Ho Yin Luk
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Shao Hui Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jianji Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Anne Wing Mui Lee
- Clinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee SJ, Kim YS, Kay CS, Kim M, Kang JH, Byun JH, Hong JH. The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy and early tumor regression on the outcome of nasopharyngeal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Oral Oncol 2021; 113:105130. [PMID: 33508736 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We assessed the role of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and investigated the prognostic factors for recurrence and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between January 2008 and January 2018, 88 non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with CCRT and with or without ACT in two institutions were retrospectively reviewed. The initial tumor response evaluation was performed 1 month after CCRT completion. Survival analysis was performed for factors such as initial tumor regression, ACT and other clinical factors. Subgroup analysis was performed for the four-group categorized according to tumor regression and ACT (CR with/without ACT, non-CR with/without ACT). RESULTS Complete response (CR) 1 month after CCRT was a favorable prognosticator for progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 3.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-9.85, p = 0.046) and overall survival (OS) (HR 3.19, 95% CI 1.14-8.93, p = 0.027). Also, ACT was an independent factor for PFS (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-0.98, p = 0.047) and OS (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.13-0.99, p = 0.047). In subgroup analysis, the CR after CCRT followed by ACT group showed significantly higher locoregional recurrence-free survival (p = 0.02), OS (p = 0.003), distant-metastasis free survival (p = 0.07), and PFS (p = 0.01) than the other three groups. CONCLUSION Tumor regression 1 month after CCRT, and administration of ACT identified as an independent prognosticator for PFS and OS in this study. Even patients who show early tumor regression after CCRT may benefit from ACT. Further randomized trials should define the role of ACT in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer who achieved CR after CCRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- So Jung Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeon-Sil Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Chul Seung Kay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cheju Halla General Hospital, Jeju, Republic of Korea
| | - Myungsoo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Hyung Kang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Ho Byun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hyung Hong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|