|
1
|
Kamel MES, Alsayed AAE, ElKhashab MA, Nader N, Radi IA. Passive fit and time efficiency for prefabricated versus conventionally constructed cobalt chromium CAD\CAM 3-unit implant supported frameworks in free end saddle models: a pilot invitro study. BMC Oral Health 2024; 24:1225. [PMID: 39407141 PMCID: PMC11481720 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04950-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/23/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The passive fit of 3-unit implant supported prefabricated metal screw-retained prosthesis before implant placement might be difficult. Hence, we aim to evaluate the passive fit and time efficiency of CAD/CAM 3-unit implant supported fixed prostheses that were constructed based on virtual versus those based on actual implant positions in Kennedy Class I models. METHODS A sample of 5 Kennedy class I models with thin wiry ridges were restored by 20 frameworks bilaterally, 10 based on actual (group A) and 10 based on virtual (group V) implant positions. The models were imaged using cone beam computed tomography and scanned using an intraoral scanner. The STL (Standard Tessellation Language files) and the DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) files were registered on a 3D planning software. A CAD/CAM surgical guide was planned, resin printed and used for installing 6 implants bilaterally. In group V, the framework was designed based on the virtual scan bodies and virtual multi-unit abutments, while in group A intra-oral scanning of the model after attaching the scan bodies was necessary. Frameworks of both groups were milled and tested for passive fit using 8 clinical tests. McNemar and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to study the effect of the group on passive fit and time efficiency, respectively. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS No statistically significant difference was found between group V and group A frameworks regarding passive fit (p-value = 1, OR = 0.5) and time efficiency (P = 0.179, Effect size = 0.948). CONCLUSION Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that in free end saddle cases, prefabricated CAD\CAM 3-unit implant-supported cobalt chromium screw retained prostheses can achieve an adequate passive fit. However, their fit might be negatively affected in thin ridges and they might require some adjustments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed El-Sayed Kamel
- Master Degree Candidate of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo Univeristy, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | | | - Nancy Nader
- Professor of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University , Cairo, Egypt
| | - Iman AbdelWahab Radi
- Professor of Prosthodontics and Member of Evidence Based Dentistry Centre, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Vice Dean of School of Dentistry, Badya University, 11 Al Saraya, Al Manial, Giza Governorate, Cairo, Egypt.
- Vice Dean of School of Dentistry, Badya University, Cairo, Egypt.
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Nham TT, Koudougou C, Piot B, Corre P, Bertin H, Longis J. Prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with jaw reconstruction by fibula free flap: A systematic review. JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY, ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY 2024; 125:101735. [PMID: 38072231 DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the dental prosthetic rehabilitation (DPR) in patients after jaw reconstruction with fibula free flap. Four databases were searched from January 2000 to January 2023. Of the 2507 studies identified, 36 observational studies were included. Cancer was the most common surgical indications for jawbone resection with 58.3 % of cases followed by benign tumours which representing 24 %. The DPR rate was estimated at 51.6 % across the studies (ranging from 38 % to 55 % depending on the benign or malignant nature of the tumors). Implant-supported prostheses represented 58.9 % of cases of which 66.9 % were fixed and 33.1 % were implant-stabilized overdentures. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) was used in 20 % of studies and aimed to improve the position of the grafted fibula, quality, and aesthetics of DPR and to decrease ischemia and the operating time. One in two authors performed DPR 12 months after jaw reconstruction. If implant survival rate reached 93 % in non-irradiated fibula, it fell to 38 %, 55 %, and 77 % if implantation occurred in the 12, 17, and 24 months after radiotherapy, respectively. Various parameters should be better investigated in further studies including the typology of the prostheses (implant-supported vs removable), the use of VSP, and the optimal time for DPR taking into account the characteristics of the tumor, the size of bone defect, and the need for external irradiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thanh-Thuy Nham
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatologie, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | - Carine Koudougou
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatologie, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | - Benoit Piot
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatologie, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | - Pierre Corre
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatologie, F-44000 Nantes, France; Nantes Université, Oniris, UnivAngers, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton, RMeS, UMR 1229, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | - Hélios Bertin
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatologie, F-44000 Nantes, France; Nantes Université, UnivAngers, CHU Nantes, INSERM, CNRS, CRCI2NA, F-44000 Nantes, France.
| | - Julie Longis
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatologie, F-44000 Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Dorj O, Lin CK, Salamanca E, Pan YH, Wu YF, Hsu YS, Lin JCY, Lin HK, Chang WJ. Marginal Bone Loss around Implant-Retaining Overdentures versus Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses 12-Month Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19031750. [PMID: 35162773 PMCID: PMC8835213 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Few studies have compared marginal bone loss (MBL) around implant-retaining overdentures (IODs) vs. implant-supported fixed prostheses (FPs). This study evaluated the mean MBL and radiographic bone-implant interface contact (r-BIIC) around IODs and implant-supported FPs. We also investigated osseointegration and MBL around non-submerged dental implants. We measured the changes between the MBL in the mesial and distal sites immediately after prosthetic delivery and after one year. The mean MBL and its changes in the IOD group were significantly higher. The mean percentage of r-BIIC was significantly higher in the FP group. MBL and its changes in males were significantly higher in the IOD group. The percentage of r-BIIC was significantly higher in the FP group. MBL in the lower site in the IOD group was significantly higher. Regarding MBL, the location of the implant was the only significant factor in the IOD group, while gender was the only significant predictor in the FP group. Regarding the r-BIIC percentage, gender was a significant factor in the FP group. We concluded that non-submerged dental implants restored with FPs and IODs maintained stable bone remodeling one year after prosthetic delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Odontuya Dorj
- School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan; (O.D.); (C.-K.L.); (E.S.); (Y.-H.P.); (Y.-F.W.); (Y.-S.H.); (J.C.-Y.L.)
- Department of Dental Technology and Dental Hygiene, School of Dentistry, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar 14210, Mongolia
| | - Chin-Kai Lin
- School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan; (O.D.); (C.-K.L.); (E.S.); (Y.-H.P.); (Y.-F.W.); (Y.-S.H.); (J.C.-Y.L.)
- Department of Dentistry, En Chu Kong Hospital, New Taipei City 237, Taiwan
| | - Eisner Salamanca
- School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan; (O.D.); (C.-K.L.); (E.S.); (Y.-H.P.); (Y.-F.W.); (Y.-S.H.); (J.C.-Y.L.)
| | - Yu-Hwa Pan
- School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan; (O.D.); (C.-K.L.); (E.S.); (Y.-H.P.); (Y.-F.W.); (Y.-S.H.); (J.C.-Y.L.)
- Department of Dentistry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei 105406, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Science, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
- School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Fan Wu
- School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan; (O.D.); (C.-K.L.); (E.S.); (Y.-H.P.); (Y.-F.W.); (Y.-S.H.); (J.C.-Y.L.)
| | - Yung-Szu Hsu
- School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan; (O.D.); (C.-K.L.); (E.S.); (Y.-H.P.); (Y.-F.W.); (Y.-S.H.); (J.C.-Y.L.)
| | - Jerry C.-Y. Lin
- School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan; (O.D.); (C.-K.L.); (E.S.); (Y.-H.P.); (Y.-F.W.); (Y.-S.H.); (J.C.-Y.L.)
- Department of Oral Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Hsi-Kuei Lin
- School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan; (O.D.); (C.-K.L.); (E.S.); (Y.-H.P.); (Y.-F.W.); (Y.-S.H.); (J.C.-Y.L.)
- School of Oral Hygiene, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
- Dental Department, Taipei Medical University, Shuang-Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (H.-K.L.); (W.-J.C.); Tel.: +886-2-2736-1661 (ext. 5148) (H.-K.L. & W.-J.C.)
| | - Wei-Jen Chang
- School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan; (O.D.); (C.-K.L.); (E.S.); (Y.-H.P.); (Y.-F.W.); (Y.-S.H.); (J.C.-Y.L.)
- Dental Department, Taipei Medical University, Shuang-Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (H.-K.L.); (W.-J.C.); Tel.: +886-2-2736-1661 (ext. 5148) (H.-K.L. & W.-J.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Shah K, Lee DJ. Fabricating a screw-retained, complete arch, fixed implant prosthesis using selective metal laser sintering: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 123:373-378. [PMID: 31307806 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2018] [Revised: 01/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
In contemporary prosthodontic practice, implant-supported therapy has consistently resulted in high success rates, with satisfactory and predictable outcomes for completely edentulous patients. Of the several options, complete-arch, fixed screw-retained solutions are generally considered to be the preferred treatment solution. Screw retention offers advantages such as predictable retrievability and potentially easy prosthodontic maintenance, as well as excess cement not being a concern. However, implant mispositioning and malalignment may often necessitate the use of cement-retained prostheses. This clinical report describes a method of fabricating a complete-arch, implant screw-retained, double framework metal-ceramic prosthesis, despite the unfavorable implant positioning, by using selective direct metal laser sintering technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karnik Shah
- Private practice, Austin, Texas; Former Resident, Advanced Prosthodontics Program, Division of Restorative Sciences and Prosthodontics, The Ohio State University College of Dentistry, Columbus, Ohio.
| | - Damian J Lee
- Director and Assistant Professor, Advanced Prosthodontics Program, Division of Restorative Sciences and Prosthodontics, The Ohio State University College of Dentistry, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Zimmermann J, Sommer M, Grize L, Stubinger S. Marginal bone loss 1 year after implantation: a systematic review for fixed and removable restorations. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2019; 11:195-218. [PMID: 31406478 PMCID: PMC6642649 DOI: 10.2147/ccide.s208076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 04/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This systematic review analyses the difference of the mean marginal bone loss (MBL) 1 year after implantation depending on the fixation of the restoration. 889 publications on controlled clinical trials were identified, and based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 22 studies were selected. Related to fixed restorations, the lowest MBL was 0.05±0.67 mm and the highest 1.37±0.5 mm. The MBL for removable restorations ranged from 0.13±0.35 mm to 1.03±0.65 mm. Three studies analyzed the MBL around implants of overdentures in the lower jaw. The estimate for this restoration type was 0.476 mm (95% CI: −0.305 to 1.258). 19 randomized controlled studies dealt with restorations which were fixed to the implants. The estimate for the mean MBL was 0.459 mm (95% CI: 0.325–0.593). There was a decrease in 1-year implant survival with an increase of 1 mm MBL (−0.083%; 95% CI: −0.179 to 0.0123; p=0.083) in fixed restorations. The difference in MBL between fixed and removable restorations was 0.363 mm (95% CI: −0.319 to 1.044; p=0.279). This systematic review indicates that implants with fixed and with removable restorations lead to comparable MBL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Zimmermann
- Hightech Research Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Melanie Sommer
- Hightech Research Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Leticia Grize
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute , Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel , Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Stubinger
- Hightech Research Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|