Correlation of Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization for HER-2 Assessment in Breast Cancer Patients: Single Centre Experience

Principles of Analytic Validation of Immunohistochemical Assays: Guideline Update

CONTEXT.—

In 2014, the College of American Pathologists developed an evidence-based guideline to address analytic validation of immunohistochemical assays. Fourteen recommendations were offered. Per the National Academy of Medicine standards for developing trustworthy guidelines, guidelines should be updated when new evidence suggests modifications.

OBJECTIVE.—

To assess evidence published since the release of the original guideline and develop updated evidence-based recommendations.

DESIGN.—

The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the literature and update the original guideline recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS.—

Two strong recommendations, 1 conditional recommendation, and 12 good practice statements are offered in this updated guideline. They address analytic validation or verification of predictive and nonpredictive assays, and recommended revalidation procedures following changes in assay conditions.

CONCLUSIONS.—

While many of the original guideline statements remain similar, new recommendations address analytic validation of assays with distinct scoring systems, such as programmed death receptor-1 and analytic verification of US Food and Drug Administration approved/cleared assays; more specific guidance is offered for validating immunohistochemistry performed on cytology specimens.

HER2 immunohistochemistry staining positivity is strongly predictive of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2 positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The current recommendation is to reflex test HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) equivocal breast cancer cases with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Either IHC 3+ or FISH positive cancers are considered HER2 positive (HER2+) and treated with HER2 targeted therapy. This study examined the predictive value of HER IHC or FISH positivity in tumor response to HER2 targeted therapy.

METHODS

Biopsies of 76 HER2+ breast cancer cases were evaluated. All patients were treated with neoadjuvant HER2 targeted therapy and chemotherapy. Tumor response was evaluated on the excisional specimens. Cancers with complete pathologic response (pCR) or MD Anderson residual cancer burden-I (RCB-I) were classified as responders and cancers with RCB-II/III as non-responders. Clinicopathologic parameters were correlated with response.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, small tumor size, low nuclear grade, high Ki67, HER2 IHC 3+, homogenous strong HER2 IHC staining, high HER2/CEP17 ratio, and high HER2 copy number were significantly associated with pCR/RCB-I. In multivariate analysis, homogenous strong HER2 IHC staining pattern was significantly associated with pCR/RCB-I. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) model showed either high HER2/CEP17 ratio or HER2 copy number individually was predictive of tumor response.

CONCLUSION

HER2 IHC staining pattern is significantly associated with tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, reiterating the importance of HER2 IHC evaluation. The ROC model shows either high HER2/CEP17 ratio or high HER2 copy number individually is predictive of tumor response to neoadjuvant HER2 targeted therapy in HER2+ breast cancer.

A review on methods for diagnosis of breast cancer cells and tissues

Breast cancer has seriously been threatening physical and mental health of women in the world, and its morbidity and mortality also show clearly upward trend in China over time. Through inquiry, we find that survival rate of patients with early‐stage breast cancer is significantly higher than those with middle‐ and late‐stage breast cancer, hence, it is essential to conduct research to quickly diagnose breast cancer. Until now, many methods for diagnosing breast cancer have been developed, mainly based on imaging and molecular biotechnology examination. These methods have great contributions in screening and confirmation of breast cancer. In this review article, we introduce and elaborate the advances of these methods, and then conclude some gold standard diagnostic methods for certain breast cancer patients. We lastly discuss how to choose the most suitable diagnostic methods for breast cancer patients. In general, this article not only summarizes application and development of these diagnostic methods, but also provides the guidance for researchers who work on diagnosis of breast cancer.