Endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy: A novel and effective treatment for gynecomastia

The Scar-Hidden Surgery on Gynecomastia: Experiences from a Single-Institutional Large Case Series

BACKGROUND

To summarize the experiences on the mastoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy for gynecomastia by "nine-step method" based on the "5S" goal and standardize this operation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1, 2002, and October 31, 2021, a total of 2035 breasts of 1082 male patients with gynecomastia, of which 129 patients with one side, were underwent mastoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy. The follow-up endpoint was 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

All patients were successfully completed the operation, and none of them was transferred to open operation. The operation time for unilateral breast was 12-28 min, and the average time was 17.7 ± 6.2 min. The amount of bleeding during unilateral operation was very small, about 5-10 ml. The total drainage volume was 5-50 ml after the operation, and the drainage tube was removed in 3-5 days. The epidermal necrosis occurred in 0.3% nipple. 0.2% chest wall had a little ecchymosis in the supero-medial region of the breast. All patients had the normal feeling of nipples and areola, the smoothing and symmetrical chest wall, and the natural contour. There was no recurrence during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The mastoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy for gynecomastia by "nine-step method" based on the "5S" goal has a short operation time, few surgical complications and good esthetics. It achieves the "5S" goals on the complete removal of glandular tissue (sweeping), small and scar-hidden incision are small (scarless), good symmetry of bilateral chest wall (symmetry), normal chest shape (shape), and smoothing chest wall (smoothing).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

The journal asks authors to assign a level of evidence to each article. For a complete description of Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, see the Table of Contents or the online Instructions for Authors at www.springer.com/00266 .

Liposuction and port site nipple sparing mastectomy: an alternative method for the operative treatment of gynecomastia at Alexandria main university hospital

BACKGROUND

Gynecomastia is characterized by unusually large masses that radiate concentrically from the base of the nipple and is caused by abnormal growth of the glandular tissue of the male breast. An alternative strategy for the surgical treatment of gynecomastia was used in this experimental study, which aims to use liposuction and port site nipple sparing mastectomy.

METHODS

The study was conducted in the surgical oncology unit at Alexandria Main University Hospital included 103 patients with a mean age of 27 and no medical history. 100 patients had bilateral gynecomastia, and three patients had unilateral gynecomastia,with two having it on the right side and one on the left.

RESULTS

Among the 103 participants, 83 had grade II gynecomastia and 20 had grade I. Only one of the three patients who participated in the study had an expanding hematoma on one side that needed to be surgically evacuated in the operating room. None of our patients experienced an infection or seroma following surgery. Furthermore, only three of our patients experienced nipple areolar complicated superficial epidermolysis, which need regular dressings until recovery. Of the 103 patients, 97 (94.17%) were pleased with the outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Liposuction and port site nipple sparing mastectomy are viable options for treating grade I to II gynecomastia, particularly if the patient prefers a more aesthetically pleasing chest contour; no scars equals better patient satisfaction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

retrospectively registered.

Pediatric endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy (pesma) with liposuction in adolescents with gynecomastia

BACKGROUND

Surgical techniques for treatment of gynecomastia are increasingly less invasive. We described technical standardization of pediatric endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy (PESMA) with liposuction.

METHODS

All adolescents with primary gynecomastia, operated using PESMA with liposuction over the period June 2014-July 2021, were included. The video recording of procedures was analyzed to standardize the operative technique. After patient installation, 3 trocars were placed on the mid-axillary line. The technique included 5 steps: (1) subcutaneous injection of lipolysis solution and liposuction; (2) creation of working space using an inflated balloon; (3) gland dissection using 5-mm sealing device; (4) specimen extraction through the largest trocar orifice; and (5) placement of suction drainage tube.

RESULTS

Twenty-four male adolescents, operated for Simon's grade 2B and 3 gynecomastia using PESMA with liposuction over the study period, were included. Mean patient age was 16 years (range 15-18). Gynecomastia was bilateral in 19/24 (79.2%) and unilateral in 5/24 (20.8%). One (4.1%) conversion to open was reported. The mean operative time was 87 min (range 98-160) for unilateral and 160 min (range 140-250) for bilateral procedure. The mean length of stay was 2.2 days (range 1-4). Patients wore a thoracic belt for 15 up to 30 days postoperatively. Post-operative complications occurred in 5/24 (20.8%): 2- or 3 mm second-degree burns in 4 (16.7%) and subcutaneous seroma in 1 (4.1%). All complications were Clavien 2 grade and did not require further treatment. Aesthetic outcomes were very good in 21/24 (87.5%). Three (12.5%) boys had persistent minimal breast asymmetry but did never perceive it negatively.

CONCLUSION

PESMA combined with liposuction was feasible and safe for surgical treatment of gynecomastia in this selected cohort of patients. Although challenging, this procedure provided good aesthetic results, with no scars on the anterior thoracic wall. Standardization of the operative technique was a key point for successful outcome.

Endoscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Glandular Gynecomastia

BACKGROUND

Gynecomastia (GYN) is the most common benign disease in males. A vacuum-assisted biopsy is a minimally invasive surgical technique for GYN treatment that achieves satisfactory aesthetic results. However, due to the operation under non-direct vision, it is difficult to localize the bleeding points and assess the residual glandular tissue. Endoscopy was applied to observe the operative field after subcutaneous mastectomy. The present study aimed to recommend our initial experience in glandular GYN with endoscope-assisted minimally invasive subcutaneous mastectomy.

METHODS

A total of 34 patients diagnosed with glandular GYN (50 breasts), treated with endoscope-assisted minimally invasive surgery at The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University between June 2018 and June 2020, were enrolled in this study. According to Simon's classification of the breast, 10 was grade I, 25 was grade IIA, and 15 was grade IIB. The characteristics of patients, operative data, postoperative complications, cosmetic outcome, and patient satisfaction were recorded.

RESULTS

Endoscope-assisted minimally invasive mastectomy was performed successfully in all cases. The operative duration of the operation was 55-120 min/side. The total weight of the resected tissue of the 50 breasts was 55-350 g, and the blood loss was 10-105 mL/breast. Endoscopy detected five breasts with bleeding and three with residual glandular during the operation. Postoperative bleeding occurred in 1 breast, subcutaneous seroma in 3 breasts, dysesthesia of the nipple-areolar complex in 2 breasts, and skin redundancy in a bilateral patient. None of the patients experienced severe pain, infection, nipple necrosis, and nipple retraction, a saucer-like deformity. With a median follow-up of 21 months, all patients were satisfied with their cosmetic outcome (100%), and no recurrence occurred.

CONCLUSION

Endoscope-assisted minimally invasive mastectomy could be used as a feasible technique for the treatment of glandular GYN.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online. Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Incidence of Complications for Different Approaches in Gynecomastia Correction: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background

Gynecomastia is nowadays a very common disease, affecting a large cohort of patients with different ages. The aim of this literature review is to assess the incidence of complications with all proposed techniques and for combined procedures versus single approach procedures in gynecomastia correction.

Materials and Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all reported techniques for gynecomastia correction covering a period from January 1, 1987 to November 1, 2020. For all selected papers, demographic data, proposed technique, and complications’ incidence have been recorded.

Results

A total number of 3970 results was obtained from database analysis. A final total number of 94 articles was obtained for 7294 patients analyzed. Patients have been divided into three groups: aspiration techniques, consisting in 874 patients (11,98%), surgical excision techniques, consisting in 2764 patients (37,90%), and combined techniques, consisting in 3656 patients (50,12%). Complications have been recorded for all groups, for a total number of 1407, of which 130 among “Aspiration techniques” group (14,87%), 847 among “Surgical excision techniques” group (30,64%), and 430 in “Combined techniques” group (11,76%).

Conclusions

Several techniques have been proposed in the literature to address gynecomastia, with the potential to greatly improve self-confidence and overall appearance of affected patients. The combined use of surgical excision and aspiration techniques seems to reduce the rate of complications compared to surgical excision alone, but the lack of unique classification and the presence of several surgical techniques still represents a bias in the literature review.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Minimal Incision Technique for Gynecomastia

Background:

Gynecomastia or enlargement of the male breasts affects a large proportion of males, with most patients requiring surgical intervention as only a few lesions are actually resolved with medical management alone. Surgery cures the patients of their problems, albeit, at the cost of scarring and other cosmetic problems in some patients. Therefore, refinements in the surgical process are still ongoing so as to provide the best results with minimal scarring.

Aims and Objectives:

To find out the feasibility of a minimal incision technique for glandular excision after liposuction in patients with gynecomastia so as to decrease the final visible scars in these patients.

Materials and Methods:

From July 2018 to September 2018, eight patients were subjected to gynecomastia surgery employing liposuction and gland removal through a single transverse 5–7 mm incision in the nipple. All the patients subjected to this technique had Grade IIa gynecomastia as per Simon’s scale. The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, comprising a 5-point Likert scale, was employed to find out the satisfaction level of the patients 12 months after surgery; this level was compared with that of a similar population of patients being operated on by employing liposuction and subcutaneous mastectomy by the periareolar technique.

Results:

The mean operating time was 110 min, and there was minimal bleeding during the procedure. Complications were also negligible, and all patients achieved an excellent chest contour with restoration of protective nipple sensation when evaluated 12 months after surgery. The difference in mean between the 2 patient groups was 0.125 with a p-value of 0.64.

Conclusions:

Glandular excision through a single transverse incision made through the nipple is a safe approach in selected patients and it produces excellent cosmetic outcomes. However, it requires patience on the part of the surgeon to achieve the desired goals of the surgery.

Gynecomastia and Chest Masculinization: An Updated Comprehensive Reconstructive Algorithm

BACKGROUND

Gynecomastia is a common finding in males. Clinical aspect varies widely in world populations showing peculiar hallmarks according to different body shapes reflecting personal expectations; therefore, a surgical plan must be tailored on individual basis to all type of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A total of 522 patients, treated for bilateral gynecomastia from January 2007 to January 2019, were included and reviewed in this retrospective study. Considering physical status BMI, muscular trophism, hypertrophy of the mammary region, nipple-areola disorder, gland and skin cover consistency, a four-tier classification system has been used to classify the deformity and to assess a surgical plan. In all cases, a subcutaneous mastectomy was performed under direct vision.

RESULTS

No recurrence of the deformity was observed as well as major complications such as necrosis, and high level of satisfaction was observed in all groups. No breast cancer was found at the histological examinations Operative time ranged from 25 minutes up to 120 minutes and hospitalization time ranged from 1 to 3 days.

CONCLUSION

Since the physical status is strictly related to the clinical features of the disorder, a comprehensive classification system and a reconstructive algorithm are proposed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

The Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy System is an Effective Strategy for the Treatment of Gynecomastia

BACKGROUND

Gynecomastia is the most common benign disease in males with an increasing prevalence in recent years. It may cause local pain and psychological disorders. The vacuum-assisted breast biopsy system has been reported to be a novel surgical approach for the treatment of gynecomastia. However, there are little detailed reports comparing the curative effect between traditional surgery and vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for gynecomastia. Besides, there was little study which compared the application of two different systems for the treatment of gynecomastia. Our study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy systems for patients with gynecomastia.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 83 patients with gynecomastia between January 2015 and December 2019. Open surgery was performed in 56 patients, and vacuum-assisted breast biopsy was performed in 27 patients. The characteristics of patients as well as the curative effects between the two groups were analyzed. The two vacuum-assisted breast biopsy systems (Mammotome and Encor) were performed for the patients with gynecomastia. The efficacy, safety, complications, and patient satisfactions were recorded during postoperative follow-up periods.

RESULTS

Compared with the open surgery group, the vacuum-assisted breast biopsy group had significantly smaller scar sizes left after the operation (5.5 ± 1.3 cm vs 0.8 ± 0.2 cm, p < 0.001), and shorter hospital stay time (5.5 ± 2.4 ds vs 3.1 ± 1.6 ds, p < 0.001). Patients in vacuum-assisted breast biopsy group had a better cosmetic outcome than those in open surgery group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two vacuum-assisted breast biopsy systems according to the mean age, the mean operation time, sites, or grade. In addition, no serious complications were observed in vacuum-assisted breast biopsy group. All the patients recovered well and were satisfied with the cosmetic outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The vacuum-assisted breast biopsy system can be used as a feasible and minimally invasive approach for the treatment of gynecomastia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy plus liposuction via a single axillary incision for gynecomastia in Asian patients: A report of 45 cases

BACKGROUND

Most techniques for surgical correction of gynecomastia are performed by anterior and/or lateral chest incisions, showing an "operated" appearance. Our initial experience was introduced in gynecomastia with a combination of endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy and liposuction via an axillary single incision.

METHODS

Between September 2018 and July 2019, a series of 45 male patients who had Simon grade I or II gynecomastia were enrolled in this study. The demographics, operative data, and postoperative complications were recorded in detail. Four independent observers gave their ratings by assigning scores of 1 to 5 for 6 main aesthetic aspects based on pre and postoperative photographs.

RESULTS

Endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy combined with liposuction via an axillary single incision was performed successfully in all cases. Mean operative duration was 82.6 minutes for each side (37.5-132.5 minutes). The weight of the resected glandular tissue of the 89 breasts was 26 to 130 g and the aspiration volume was 60 to 700 mL. Three unilateral subcutaneous seromas (3.3%), 5 unilateral hematomas (5.6%), and 1 bilateral minimal skin redundancy (2.2%) were encountered. Observer-reported outcomes indicated that patients with grade Ⅰ gynecomastia had significantly better aesthetic results than those with grade Ⅱb in the aspects of symmetry, shape of nipple, shape of areola, contour regularity, and overall appearance (P < .001). Patients with grade Ⅱa gynecomastia also witnessed better improvement than grade Ⅱb in shape of nipple, contour regularity, and overall appearance (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy combined with liposuction via an axillary single incision is a feasible minimally invasive technique for the treatment of gynecomastia. The combined method is effective in achieving satisfied aesthetic results for Simon grades I and Ⅱa gynecomastia, and it can also be an alternative choice for grade Ⅱb.

Endoscopic Axillary Approach Improves Patient Satisfaction of Gynecomastia Subcutaneous Mastectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the BODY-Q Chest Module

BACKGROUND

Gynecomastia is a common condition that refers to the benign enlargement of male breasts. Several minimally invasive techniques were invented to avoid visible scars in the chest area, but have limited effects on the dense fibroglandular breast tissue, and open excision remains the mainstay of treatment. Endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy has the superiority of visualization, facilitating accurate dissection and hemostasis, also enabling inconspicuous scars. This study was designed to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes of the endoscopic axillary approach in treating gynecomastia, to interpret the differences between it and the conventional periareolar open excision method, and to present our experience utilizing this technique as a reliable alternative for Simon I and II gynecomastia.

METHODS

Eighty-three participants diagnosed with Simon I or II gynecomastia were included in this cross-sectional study, among which 31 were preoperative and 52 were postoperative patients. Postoperative participants were divided into two groups according to whether endoscopic axillary subcutaneous mastectomy (axillary group, n = 25) or periareolar open excision (periareolar group, n = 27) was performed. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the BODY-Q questionnaire, including the chest, nipples, body image, social, appearance-related distress, and scar domain, with scores ranging from 0 to 100.

RESULTS

The BODY-Q score of both axillary and periareolar postoperative groups showed significant improvement on chest (p < 0.001), nipples (p < 0.001), body image (p < 0.001), and appearance-related distress (p < 0.005) scales, compared with the preoperative group. Of the scar scale, the axillary group rated higher scores than the periareolar group (p = 0.019), analysis of the individual scale items showed more positive responses in questions "Location of your scars?" (p < 0.001) and "How your scars look when they are not covered by clothes?" (p < 0.001), the item "Having to dress in a way to hide your scars?" also had a somewhat more positive responses from participants (p = 0.095).

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings indicate that compared with the periareolar excision, patients who underwent gynecomastia subcutaneous mastectomy through endoscopic axillary approach have higher scar satisfaction with postoperative outcomes, this probably because of the well-hidden scar at the axilla, which leverages the psychologic burden of the patient after surgery. Future prospective studies are needed to measure changes over the entire patient journey, to find out the predictable factors of postoperative patient satisfaction, and determine how the objective outcomes relate to changes in patient's health-related quality of life.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Vacuum-assisted minimally invasive surgery-An innovative method for the operative treatment of gynecomastia

BACKGROUND

Gynecomastia is the most common benign enlargement of the mammary gland and adipose tissue in males. Because a feminine-looking chest contour can bring severe psychologic burden to patients, subcutaneous mastectomy has become the standard treatment for this condition. Conventional open surgery causes conspicuous scarring that may affect the appearance of the breast. We provide a novel surgical operative for the treatment of gynecomastia.

METHOD

With approval from our institutional ethics committee and written informed consent, 22 patients with 33 abnormally hyperplastic breasts were enrolled at The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University between June 2016 and September 2018. Vacuum-assisted minimally invasive surgery was performed under general anesthesia. Patients were followed up with physical examination and ultrasonography.

RESULT

Vacuum-assisted minimally invasive mastectomy was performed successfully in all cases, with no residual glands or adipose tissue observed on ultrasonography. The operation had a mean duration of 73.5 minutes per side, ranging from 40 to 102 minutes. An average of 320 specimens were excised from each side with mean blood loss of 34 mL. Of these 33 operative sides, 2 complications occurred, but satisfactory chest contour was attained eventually in all patients. All patients were satisfied with their cosmetic outcome, graded as excellent by 22 patients (100%). Redundant skin was observed in 1 patient at 1 month postoperatively, whose breast, defined as graded III, was the largest before operation.

CONCLUSION

Vacuum-assisted, minimally invasive mastectomy is a feasible approach for the treatment of gynecomastia with acceptable complications.

Single-incision surgery for gynecomastia using TriPort: A case report

Gynecomastia is a common benign condition of the male breast, frequently observed in newborns, adolescents and the elderly. Surgical excision remains one of the most effective methods for the management of patients with gynecomastia, particularly those with fibrosis or a course of >1 year. The present study describes two cases of patients with gynecomastia and presents a novel method of treatment, combining endoscopic surgery and liposuction using a TriPort, which may effectively remove breast tissue and shorten hospitalization time compared with a direct excision method.