Clinical observation of the therapeutic effects of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with concurrent chemoradiotherapy-induced grade IV neutropenia

Study of PEG-rhG-CSF for the prevention of neutropenia in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To study the efficacy and safety of Polyethylene glycolated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in the prevention of neutropenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

This is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study conducted from June 1, 2021, to October 31, 2022 on patients diagnosed with locally advanced NPC. Participants were divided into an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group received PEG-rhG-CSF injections post-chemotherapy cycles, whereas the control group received standard care without additional intervention. Outcomes assessed included grade 3/4 neutropenia incidence, blood cell count changes, febrile neutropenia rates, delays or interruptions in chemotherapy/radiotherapy due to hematological toxicity, oral mucositis incidents, and bone pain occurrences, comparing these between both groups.

RESULTS

1. 88 patients with locally advanced NPC were included, the incidence of grade 3 neutropenia in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P = 0.026); 2. The white blood cell count and neutrophil count in D7, D10, D14, and D21 in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.01); 3. The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. The incidence of bone pain in the experimental group was 34.1%, of which most were mild bone pain, and no severe bone pain occurred. The leukocyte and neutrophil counts of the patients in the bone pain group were significantly higher than those of the patients in the no bone pain group, P(WBC) = 0.001, P(ANC) = 0.002.

CONCLUSIONS

The preventive use of PEG-rhG-CSF decreases the incidence of neutropenia in patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy for NPC, thereby reducing rates of chemotherapy delays and radiotherapy interruptions, with mild adverse reactions that are tolerable by patients.

The efficacy and safety of the prophylactic application of PEG-rhG-CSF in radiotherapy with weekly concurrent chemotherapy for cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in preventing neutropenia during concurrent radiotherapy combined with weekly chemotherapy in patients with cervical cancer.

METHODS

From September 2019 to November 2020, 180 patients with cervical cancer who required concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into the following three groups at a ratio of 1:1:1: Group A (PEG-rhG-CSF), Group B (PEG-rhG-CSF + rhG-CSF) and the control group (rhG-CSF). Cisplatin or carboplatin was administered weekly. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), delay of radiotherapy, chemotherapy dose reduction, rate of PFS at 2 years and 3 years, and incidence of adverse reactions.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were randomly assigned to each group. Two patients in Group B withdrew from the trial for personal reasons. The incidence of grade 1/2 neutropenia in the Control group was significantly lower than that in Group A and Group B (P < 0.001). However, the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia in the Control group was significantly greater than that in Group A and Group B (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of FN among the three groups (P = 0.771). The rate of platinum dose reduction in Group A (6.7%) and Group B (5.2%) was significantly lower than that in the Control group (30.0%) (P < 0.001). The delay rate of radiotherapy in Group A (10%) and Group B (13.8%) was obviously inferior to that in the Control group (31.7%) (P = 0.006). The 2-year PFS rates of Group A, Group B, and the Control group were 93.3%, 98.3%, and 91.7%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.270). The 3-year PFS rates were 89.8%, 94.1%, and 84.9%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.178). No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

In Group A and Group B, The prophylactic application of PEG-rhG-CSF during conventional chemoradiotherapy combined with weekly chemotherapy for patients with cervical cancer can reduce the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia and does not increase the incidence of adverse reactions when compared to Control group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1900026309, registered 29 September 2019-prospectively registered.

A prospective, randomized clinical trial of emergency treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia by pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF)

AIMS

As one of the mainstays of breast cancer therapy, chemotherapy inevitably induces neutropenia. In this study, we explored the role of PEG-rhG-CSF (pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) in the emergency treatment of chemotherapy-induced grades 3-4 neutropenia.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients with breast cancer were randomized (1:1) into the study. Fifty patients randomized to the experimental group were treated with PEG-rhG-CSF after grades 3-4 neutropenia following the first cycle of chemotherapy, while 50 patients randomized to the control group received a daily injection of rhG-CSF (recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor). The primary endpoint was the recovery time of grades 3-4 neutropenia.

RESULTS

Compared with patients in the control group, the mean ± SD recovery time of grades 3-4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN) was significantly shorter for patients in the experimental group (grades 3-4, P = .000; grade 4, P = .000; FN, P = .038). There is no significant difference in the incidence of FN for the two groups. In the experimental group, the duration of grades 3-4 neutropenia in patients aged <60 years and ≥60 years was 2.15 and 3.20 days, respectively (P = .037). Adverse events (AEs) of any grade were reported in 37 (75.5%) and 28 (59.6%) patients from the two groups, respectively. No grade ≥3 AEs were reported.

CONCLUSION

This study supported that the PEG-rhG-CSF was more effective and convenient than rhG-CSF for treating grades 3-4 neutropenia and FN in patients with breast cancer and had manageable toxicity.

Anaphylaxis caused by pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

INTRODUCTION

Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF), is commonly used to prevent and/or treat neutropenia caused by tumor chemotherapy and radiotherapy with reduced clearance, increased plasma half-life, sustained biologic activity, and good safety. PEG-rhG-CSF anaphylaxis was rare.

CASE REPORT

A 55-year-old male Non-Hodgkin lymphoma patient appeared with chest tightness, increased heart rate, and decreased blood pressure after taking PEG-rhG-CSF used as a primary treatment for neutropenia caused by chemoradiotherapy. The patient's anaphylaxis is likely due to PEG-rhG-CSF.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

0.9% sodium chloride 250 mL and dexamethasone sodium phosphate injection 5 mg were carried out. After close observation, the symptoms were improved. Two months later, the patient was readministered with PEG-rhG-CSF and anaphylaxis reoccurred. After the last contact with PEG-rhG-CSF, the patient was prescribed rhG-CSF for many times and did not experience any adverse reactions.

DISCUSSION

PEGylated drugs are not free of risk and immune-mediated adverse events are of concern. PEG is a substance capable of triggering an immune response. The mechanism of PEG involved IgE-mediated anaphylaxis and non-IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, and requires further research. PEGylated drugs are not free of risk and immune-mediated adverse events are of concern.

Safety and efficacy of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective, cohort-controlled trial

Objective

To investigate pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) safety and efficacy in preventing hematological toxicity during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Methods

We retrospectively assessed 80 SCLC patients treated with CCRT from January 2013 to December 2018 who received PEG-rhG-CSF within 48 hours after the end of chemotherapy, defined as prophylactic use, as the experimental group. An additional 80 patients who were not treated with PEG-rhG-CSF were matched 1:1 by the propensity score matching method and served as the control group. The main observations were differences in hematological toxicity, neutrophil changes, febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence and adverse reactions. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed with regular assessment and follow-up.

Results

The leukocyte, neutrophil, erythrocyte, and platelet counts and hemoglobin level decreased after CCRT, but the experimental group had slightly higher leukocyte and neutrophil counts than the control group (P < 0.05). The incidences of grade III-IV leukopenia (18.75% vs. 61.25%) and neutropenia (23.75% vs. 67.5%) in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The absolute neutrophil count was 4.17 ± 0.79 (× 10⁹/L) on day 1 and peaked 6.81 ± 2.37 (× 10⁹/L) on day 10 in the experimental group; the value in the control group was 2.81 ± 0.86 (× 10⁹/L) on day 1. It decreased significantly and reached the minimum 0.91 ± 0.53 (× 10⁹/L) on day 10 (P < 0.05). The experimental group had a lower FN incidence than the control group (P < 0.05). There was also no significant acute esophagitis or pulmonary toxicity. The treatment had no significant effect on PFS (11.4 months vs. 8.7 months, P = 0.958) or OS (23.9 months vs. 17.3 months, P = 0.325) over an 18.6-month median follow-up time.

Conclusion

PEG-rhG-CSF has good efficacy and safety in preventing hematological toxicity in SCLC patients during CCRT and has no significant effects on PFS or OS.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09644-8.

Long-acting versus short-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors among cancer patients after chemotherapy in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) include long-acting ones and short-acting ones. They have been mainly applied in Chinese clinical practice for years to prevent neutropenia. However, which type of G-CSF is more superior has not been conclusively determined.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, clinical trials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WAN FANG databases for related studies published till August 2021. Revman 5.3 software was used to assess the effectiveness and safety of these 2 types of G-CSFs in patients undergoing chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 1916 patients were included in our meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of long-acting G-CSFs and short-acting G-CSFs. We found that the incidence of febrile neutropenia (relative risk [RR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-1.17), the recovery time of the absolute neutrophil count (mean difference -0.23; 95% CI -0.49 to 0.03), and the fatigue rate (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.62-1.07) were similar between the long- and the short-acting G-CSFs. However, the long-acting G-CSFs significantly decreased the incidence (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.76-0.96) and shortened the duration (mean difference -0.19; 95% CI -0.38 to 0.00) of severe (grade ≥3) neutropenia, and decreased the rate of bone and/or muscle pain (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.58-0.98).

CONCLUSION

Primary prophylaxis with long-acting G-CSFs was more effective and safer than primary prophylaxis with short-acting G-CSFs in Chinese adults undergoing chemotherapy.

Ultra-structural evaluation of needles and their role for comfort during subcutaneous drug administration

Objective To evaluate the morphology of hypodermic needle bevels after drug aspiration, and the perception of comfort caused by the change or not of needles between preparation and subcutaneous drug administration. Method Experimental research carried out in two moments. Initially, hypodermic needles were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, and then a pilot trial was conducted with the participants, which indicated the level of comfort perceived at the time of needle bevel penetration during subcutaneous administration. Results Forty-one adult inpatients participated in the study. Although the needles presented a slight to significant morphological alteration when evaluated by ultramicroscopy, the participants in this study were not able to report significant sensory changes during their penetration in the two techniques used. Conclusions The standardization of fixed needle syringes, or the use of a single needle for both the preparation and the subcutaneous drug administration should be considered as strategies to reduce the production of sharp-perforating residues, to decrease the cost per procedure, and to limit the risk of contamination of critical devices.