Early application of negative pressure wound therapy to acute wounds contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus: An effective approach to preventing biofilm formation

The efficacy of antimicrobial solutions against multispecies bacterial biofilm with or without negative pressure wound therapy in an in vitro wound model

OBJECTIVES

Biofilm is the major challenge in chronic wound management. Instilling a wound cleansing solution aids in wound bed cleaning and infectious pathogen elimination. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) improves the wound-healing process. This study investigated the efficacy of two antimicrobials (Vashe Wound Cleanser and Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution) against a multispecies bacterial biofilm with or without NPWT in an in vitro wound model.

METHODS

A mixed multispecies biofilm containing Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Acinetobacter baumannii was developed and verified by scanning electron microscopy and fluorescent in situ hybridization. The efficacy of Vashe and Prontosan against multispecies biofilm with or without NPWT was evaluated by colony-forming unit (cfu) of each species and total bacterial number, and visually confirmed by live/dead stain and confocal microscopy.

RESULTS

Prontosan reduced biofilm cell numbers significantly: 6 instils over 24 h resulting in 3.86 ± 0.14 cfu log10 reduction without NPWT and 4.75 ± 0.13 cfu log10 reduction combined with NPWT (P < 0.01) and 12 instils over 48 h resulting in 5.24 ± 0.11 cfu log10 reduction without NPWT and biofilm eradication with NPWT (P < 0.001). NPWT alone or combined with Vashe failed to reduce multispecies biofilm numbers significantly over 24 or 48 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Prontosan significantly reduced biofilm cell numbers, with better efficacy over 48 than 24 h, emphasizing the necessity for persistent and robust treatment. NPWT enhanced the effectiveness of Prontosan instillation. However, NPWT alone or combined with Vashe showed limited efficacy and difficulty when combating the multispecies biofilm in vitro.

Development, characterization, and evaluation of a simple polymicrobial colony biofilm model for testing of antimicrobial wound dressings

Chronic wound infections are generally of polymicrobial nature with aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, as well as fungi frequently observed in them. Wound treatment involves a series of steps, including debridement of the wound, flushing, and often the use of multiple wound dressings many of which are antimicrobial. Yet, many wound dressings are tested versus single species of planktonic microbes, which fails to mirror the real-life presence of biofilms.

AIMS

Simple biofilm models are the first step to testing of any antimicrobial and wound dressing; therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and validate a simple polymicrobial colony biofilm wound model comprised of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans on RPMI-1640 agar. The model was then used to evaluate the topical disinfectant chlorohexidine and four commercially available wound dressings using the polymicrobial model. The model used was as a starting point to mimic debridement in clinical care of wounds and the effectiveness of wound dressings evaluated afterwards.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Planktonic assessment using AATCC100-2004 demonstrated that all antimicrobial wound dressings reduced the planktonic microbial burden below the limit of detection; however, when challenged with polymicrobial colony biofilms, silver wound dressings showed limited effectiveness (1-2 log CFU reductions). In contrast, a single iodine releasing wound dressing showed potent antibiofilm activity reducing all species CFUs below the limit of detection (>6-10 log) depending on the species. A disrupted biofilm model challenge was performed to represent the debridement of a wound and wound silver-based wound dressings were found to be marginally more effective than in whole colony biofilm challenges while the iodine containing wound dressing reduced microbial recovery below the limit of detection.

CONCLUSIONS

In this model, silver dressings were ineffective versus the whole colony biofilms but showed some recovery of activity versus the disrupted colony biofilm. The iodine wound dressing reduced the viability of all species below the level of detection. This suggests that mode of action of wound dressing should be considered for the type of biofilm challenge as should the clinical use, e.g. debridement.

Biofilm therapy for chronic wounds

Chronic wounds have been a major factor of serious harm to global public health. At present, it is known that almost all chronic wounds contain biofilms, which seriously hinder the healing process. Removal of biofilms can effectively promote the healing of chronic wounds. As the study of wound biofilms deepens, many new treatment methods have emerged, thus bringing revolutionary means for the treatment of chronic wound biofilm. This review summarizes various methods for the treatment of chronic wound biofilm worldwide to provide a theoretical summary and practical basis for the selection of suitable wound biofilm treatment methods in clinical practice.

Healing Peristomal Wounds Around Retracted Stomas with Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy: A Case Series

ABSTRACT

One method for treating a retracted stoma is a vacuum dressing that cleans the wound and protects against intestinal leakage. This case series describes the use of an integrated, single-use negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) dressing to treat retracted stomas as an alternative to other noninvasive remedies. The report includes seven patients who were hospitalized in the authors' surgical department from 2019 to 2020. All patients developed severe peristomal infection that failed to respond to local treatment with proper ostomy appliances or specialist dressings. After cleaning each wound and removing necrotic lesions, the authors applied a single-use hydrofiber NPWT dressing to each patient. The dressing was changed every 2 to 5 days, depending on the effects of the therapy. The stoma orifice was covered with a bag with two-piece ostomy systems. The peristomal wound healed in all cases, and leakage was eliminated. The mean time of treatment was 14 days (range, 10-21 days), and the vacuum dressings were changed an average of four times (range, 3-7 times). None of the patients required a stoma translocation or other additional surgery. Three patients received systemic IV antibiotic therapy to treat general infection. Single-use NPWT dressings protect peristomal wounds from bowel leakage and do not hinder the application of stoma bags. This system, similar to standard NPWT devices, effectively protects infected stomas from retraction.

Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy is not effective for preventing driveline infection following left ventricular assist device implantation

BACKGROUND

Driveline infection (DLI) following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains an unresolved problem. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) promotes wound healing by applying negative pressure on the surface of the wound. Recently, the prophylactic application of NPWT to closed surgical incisions has decreased surgical site infections in various postsurgical settings. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of prophylactic NPWT for preventing DLI in patients with LVAD implantation.

METHODS

Prophylactic NPWT was provided to 50 patients who received continuous-flow LVADs as bridge-to-transplant therapy at our institution between May 2018 and October 2020 (NPWT group). The negative pressure dressing was applied immediately after surgery and retained on the driveline exit site for 7 days with a continuous application of -125 mm Hg negative pressure. The primary outcome was DLI within 1 year of LVAD implantation. We compared the rate of DLI incidence in the NPWT group with that in the historical control cohort (50 patients) treated with the standard dressing (SD) who received LVAD implantation between July 2015 and April 2018 (SD group).

RESULTS

No severe complications were associated with the NPWT. During the follow-up period, DLI was diagnosed in 16 participants (32%) in the NPWT group and 21 participants (42%) in the SD group. The rates of DLI incidence and freedom from DLI did not differ between groups (p = 0.30 and p = 0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic NPWT at the driveline exit site was safe following LVAD implantation. However, it did not significantly reduce the risk of DLI.

Comparison of the effects of negative pressure wound therapy and negative pressure wound therapy with instillation on wound healing in a porcine model

Background

Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation (NPWTi) is a novel method based on standard negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). This study aimed to compare the effects of standard NPWT and NPWTi on bioburden and wound healing in a Staphylococcus aureus (S.aureus) infected porcine model.

Methods

Green fluorescent protein-labeled S.aureus infected wounds were created on the back of porcine. Wounds were treated with NPWT or NPWT with instillation (saline). The tissue specimens were harvested on days 0 (12 h after bacterial inoculation), 2, 4, 6, and 8 at the center of wound beds. Viable bacterial counts, laser scanning confocal microscopy, PCR, western blot, and histological analysis were performed to assess virulence and wound healing.

Results

The bacterial count in the NPWTi group was lower than that of the NPWT group and the difference was statistically significant on day 2, day 4, day 6, and day 8 (P < 0.05). The expression levels of agrA, Eap, Spa, and Hla genes of the NPWTi group were significantly lower than that of the NPWT group on day 8 (P < 0.05). The bacterial invasion depth of the NPWTi group was significantly lower than that of the NPWT group on day 2, day 4, day 6, and day 8 (P < 0.05). Though the NPWTi group showed a significantly increased expression of bFGF and VEGF than that of the NPWT group in the early time (P < 0.05), NPWTi cannot lead to better histologic parameters than the NPWT group (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Our results demonstrated that NPWTi induced a better decrease in bacterial burden and virulence compared with standard NPWT. These advantages did not result in better histologic parameters on the porcine wound model.

Robbing Peter to Pay Paul: Chlorhexidine gluconate demonstrates short-term efficacy and long-term cytotoxicity

Wound cleansing agents are routine in wound care and preoperative preparation. Antiseptic activity intends to prevent contaminating microbes from establishing an infection while also raising concerns of cytotoxicity and delayed wound healing. We evaluated the cytotoxicity of five clinically used wound cleaning agents (saline, povidone iodine, Dove® and Dial® soaps, and chlorhexidine gluconate [CHG]) using both an ex vivo and in vivo human skin xenograft mouse model, in contrast to classical in vitro models that lack the structural and compositional heterogeneity of human skin. We further established an ex vivo wound contamination model inoculated with ~100 cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Staphylococcus aureus to evaluate antimicrobial efficacy. Scanning electron microscopy and confocal microscopy were used to evaluate phenotypic and spatial characteristics of bacterial cells in wound tissue. CHG significantly reduced metabolic activity of the skin explants, while all treatments except saline affected local cellular viability. CHG cytotoxicity persisted and progressed over 14 days, impairing wound healing in vivo. Within the contamination model, CHG treatment resulted in a significant reduction of P. aeruginosa wound surface counts at 24 h post-treatment. However, this effect was transient and serial application of CHG had no effect on both P. aeruginosa or S. aureus microbial growth. Microscopy revealed that viable cells of P. aeruginosa reside deep within wound tissue post-CHG application, likely serving as a reservoir to re-populate the tissue to a high bioburden. We reveal concerning cytotoxicity and limited antimicrobial activity of CHG in human skin using clinically relevant models, with the ability to resolve spatial localization and temporal dynamics of tissue viability and microbial growth.

Biofilm and Equine Limb Wounds

In chronic wounds in humans, biofilm formation and wound chronicity are linked, as biofilms contribute to chronic inflammation and delayed healing. Biofilms are aggregates of bacteria, and living as biofilms is the default mode of bacterial life; within these aggregates, the bacteria are protected from both antimicrobial substances and the immune response of the host. In horses, delayed healing is more commonly seen in limb wounds than body wounds. Chronic inflammation and hypoxia are the main characteristics of delayed wound healing in equine limbs, and biofilms might also contribute to this healing pattern in horses. However, biofilm formation in equine wounds has been studied to a very limited degree. Biofilms have been detected in equine traumatic wounds, and recent experimental models have shown that biofilms protract the healing of equine limb wounds. Detection of biofilms within wounds necessitates advanced techniques that are not available in routine diagnostic yet. However, infections with biofilm should be suspected in equine limb wounds not healing as expected, as they are in human wounds. Treatment should be based on repeated debridement and application of topical antimicrobial therapy.

Shapable bulk agarose-gelatine-hydroxyapatite-minocycline nanocomposite fabricated using a mineralising system aided with electrophoresis for bone tissue regeneration

To develop a shapable bulk antibacterial nanocomposite biomaterial for bone regeneration. A bulk agarose-gelatine hydrogel was through mineralised using a hydrogel mineralising system aided with electrophoresis, and the mineralised hydrogel was loaded with minocycline to obtain the agarose-gelatine-hydroxyapatite-minocycline nanocomposite. The nanocomposite had a large BET surface area of 44.4518m2/g and a high porosity of 76.9%. Hydroxyapatite crystals were well developed in the hydrogel matrix and exhibited a hybrid structure of microscale and nanoscale motifs. The addition of minocycline resulted in a continuous antibiotic release, inhibiting the growth of Staphylococcus aureus over two weeks in vitro. Exposed to rabbit bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, the nanocomposite revealed good cytocompatibility in vitro. Furthermore, the biomaterial could effectively enhance the bone regeneration in a critical-size rabbit cranial defect model in vivo. These findings depicted that the nanocomposite, with good biocompatibility and good antibacterial property, is a promising candidate for future clinical application in bone tissue engineering or as a prospective bone replacement biomaterial.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Assisted Closure: An Effective Mode of Management for Infected and Contaminated Wound With Non-Union Fracture Femur

High-energy open fractures are often associated with significant soft tissue damage and can have contamination. Infection of a fracture can be the most detrimental factor for fracture union. Control of infection and soft tissue coverage over exposed bone plays a vital role in its overall outcome. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) assisted closure has depicted encouraging results for helping control of infection and wound closure. NPWT assisted closure promotes reduction of bacterial load in the wound, facilitates removal of secretion from the wound, promotes the formation of granulation tissue, and decreases wound size. We present a case of open fracture femur with severe infection and exposed bone. Along with infection and comminution of fracture, there was collection of necrotic tissue at the fracture site. Infection settled with debridement of wound and application of NPWT. With the application of NPWT, there was formation of granulation tissue and a decrease in wound size. The wound healed completely following application of secondary sutures. Any form of plastic procedures, such as muscle pedicle graft and split-thickness skin grafting, was not required for wound closure. NPWT-assisted closure is a promising mode of wound management in grossly infected wounds and obviates the need for further plastic procedures. The effect can be extrapolated to all open wounds with infection but must follow a thorough debridement and lavage.

Adaptive expression of biofilm regulators and adhesion factors of Staphylococcus aureus during acute wound infection under the treatment of negative pressure wound therapy in vivo

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is gaining acceptance as a physical therapy for a wide variety of infected wounds. To gain insight into the response of bacteria to NPWT in vivo, the adaptive expression of biofilm regulators and adhesion factors of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), the most frequently isolated pathogen in the clinic, during acute wound infection was investigated. A 3 cm full-thickness dermal wound was created on each side of a rabbit back and inoculated with green fluorescent protein-labeled S. aureus. NPWT was initiated at 6 h post inoculation, with the wound on the contralateral side as the untreated self-control. The wounds were subjected to a 28 day observation period. Histological analysis, laser scanning confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy revealed a transition of S. aureus to a free-living phenotype in tissues treated with NPWT, compared with microcolonies in untreated wounds. Viable bacteria counts showed a modest reduction in the bioburden of NPWT group on day 8 (P<0.001), with ~1x10⁶ colony-forming units/g tissue. Transcript analysis of biofilm- and colonization-related genes were investigated using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR on postoperative days 1, 2, 4 and 8. The poly-beta-1,6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine synthase locus and holin-like protein CidA/antiholin-like protein LrgA network were less active in the NPWT group compared with the untreated control group. Accordingly, the expression profile switched to an elevated expression of the adhesive factors UDP-phosphate N-acetylglucosaminyl 1-phosphate transferase (at days 0-4) and fibronectin-binding protein A and iron-regulated surface determinant protein A at >4 days during both stages of colonization. Meanwhile, low expression levels of the effector molecule (RNAIII) of the accessory gene regulator type I (agr) system was detected in NPWT group, suggesting that the bacterial density in NPWT-treated wounds was under the threshold for agr activation, thus not leading to an active and invasive infection. The wounds treated by NPWT healed completely on day 28, compared with an average of an 8.11% defect area in the control group (P<0.001). The results of the current study indicated that S. aureus responds to NPWT by regulating gene expression, manifesting a decrease in biofilm formation and an increase in bacterial colonization in vivo, which potentially benefits the wound repair and healing process.

Chronic wound biofilms: diagnosis and therapeutic strategies

OBJECTIVE

To review the diagnosis of chronic wound biofilms and discuss current treatment approaches.

DATA SOURCES

Articles included in this review were obtained from the following databases: Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, PubMed, and the Web of Science. We focused on research published before August 2019 with keywords including chronic wound, biofilm, bacterial biofilms, and chronic wound infection.

STUDY SELECTION

Relevant articles were selected by carefully reading the titles and abstracts. Further, different diagnosis and clinical treatment methods for chronic wound biofilm were compared and summarized from the selected published articles.

RESULTS

Recent guidelines on medical biofilms stated that approaches such as the use of scanning electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy are the most reliable types of diagnostic techniques. Further, therapeutic strategies include debridement, negative pressure wound therapy, ultrasound, antibiotic, silver-containing dressing, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and others.

CONCLUSION

This review provides the identification and management of biofilms, and it can be used as a tool by clinicians for a better understanding of biofilms and translating research to develop best clinical practices.

Environmental factors modulate biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus

Biofilm formation on indwelling medical devices represents an exclusive evasion mechanism for many pathogenic bacteria to establish chronic infections. Staphylococcus aureus is one of the major bacterial pathogens that are able to induce both animal and human infections. The continued emergence of multiple drug-resistant S. aureus, especially methicillin-resistant S. aureus, is problematic due to limited treatment options. Biofilm formation by S. aureus complicates the treatment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections. Therefore, elucidating the mechanisms of biofilm formation in this pathogen is important for the development of alternative therapeutic strategies. Various environmental and genetic factors contribute to biofilm formation. In this review, we address the environmental factors and discuss how they affect biofilm formation by S. aureus.

The Effect of Vacuum-Assisted Closure Therapy on Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Wound Biofilms

Biofilm-associated wound infections are a major global health issue, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is among the greatest therapeutic challenges. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy is now being revisited as an alternative treatment for both acute and chronic wounds. However, data supporting the concept of its antibiofilm effect remain limited. Using quantitative biofilm-forming assay and a range of genotypic methods (spa, SCCmec, and agr typing), study authors showed that VAC therapy can significantly prevent biofilm formation (P < .01) of a range of MRSA wound isolates differing widely in their biofilm-forming abilities and genetic background. The best effect was presented on CC5-MRSA-SCCmecI-agrII, a dominant MRSA clone among wound isolates worldwide. An assessment of effects of different protocols on dressing changes (1 or 2 times per week) demonstrated significantly greater antibiofilm activity (P < .05) of 3-day dressing changes. These findings support the use of VAC therapy as a topical antibiofilm treatment for the effective management of wound healing.

Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC®) systems and microbiological isolation of infected wounds

Background

Negative pressure wound therapy is now largely used to treat infected wounds. The prevention and reduction of healthcare-associated infections is a high priority for any Department of Health and great efforts are spent to improve infection control systems. It is assumed that vacuum-assisted closure (VAC®) dressings should be watertight and that all the secretions are gathered in a single container but there is no consistent data on air leakage and possible dispersion of bacteria from the machine.

Methods

We have conducted a prospective experimental study on 10 patients with diagnosis of wound infection to verify whether the filtration process is microbiologically efficient. We compared the bacteria population present in the wound to the one present in the air discharged by the VAC® machine.

Results

This study shows that the contamination of the VAC® machine is considerably lower than the environment or wound contamination.

Conclusions

Negative pressure wound therapy system does not represent a risk factor for healthcare-associated infections.

Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection Model

BACKGROUND

Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an effective strategy for the management of contaminated wounds, including those infected by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We hypothesized that NPWT would reduce virulence factors as well as biofilm components and inhibit virulence-regulated gene expression in a model of P. aeruginosa wound infection.

METHODS

Wounds were created in anesthetized rabbits and P. aeruginosa was inoculated to the wound surface for 24 h. Wounds were treated with either NPWT or a sterile gauze dressing. Virulence factors including exotoxin A, rhamnolipid, and elastase were quantified by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, orcinol, and elastin-Congo red methods, respectively. A biofilm component, eDNA, was quantified using a commercial kit. Virulence-regulated genes were determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Biofilms were observed in vivo by staining with concanavalin A conjugated to Alexa Fluor® 647.

RESULTS

NPWT was more effective than the control treatment in reducing virulence factors and bacteria counts in vivo. A biofilm component, eDNA, was less abundant in the NPWT group. The results of the RT-PCR indicated that the expression levels of P. aeruginosa virulence-regulated genes and quorum-sensing population density-dependent systems were significantly inhibited by NPWT treatment.

CONCLUSION

NPWT reduced bacteria counts, virulence factors, and eDNA in a P. aeruginosa wound infection model in vivo. These beneficial effects are likely to be related to the reduced expression of virulence-regulated genes and the drainage induced by NPWT treatment. These findings may help clinicians to obtain a better understanding of the mechanism of NPWT for the treatment of infected wounds.

Negative pressure wound therapy reduces the motility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enhances wound healing in a rabbit ear biofilm infection model

Pseudomonas aeruginosa motility, virulence factors and biofilms are known to be detrimental to wound healing. The efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) against P. aeruginosa has been little studied, either in vitro or in vivo. The present study evaluated the effect of negative pressure (NP) on P. aeruginosa motility in vitro, and the effect of NPWT on virulence factors and biofilms in vivo. P. aeruginosa motility was quantified under different levels of NP (atmospheric pressure, − 75, − 125, − 200 mmHg) using an in vitro model. Swimming, swarming and twitching motility were significantly inhibited by NP (− 125 and − 200 mmHg) compared with atmospheric pressure (p = 0.05). Virulence factors and biofilm components were quantified in NPWT and gauze treated groups using a rabbit ear biofilm model. Biofilm structure was studied with fluorescence microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Additionally, viable bacterial counts and histological wound healing parameters were measured. Compared with the control, NPWT treatment resulted in a significant reduction in expression of all virulence factors assayed including exotoxin A, rhamnolipid and elastase (p = 0.01). A significant reduction of biofilm components (eDNA) (p = 0.01) was also observed in the NPWT group. The reduction of biofilm matrix was verified by fluorescence- and scanning electron-microscopy. NPWT lead to better histologic parameters (p = 0.01) and decreased bacterial counts (p = 0.05) compared with the control. NPWT treatment was demonstrated to be an effective strategy to reduce virulence factors and biofilm components, which may explain the increased wound healing observed.

Ten-year analyses of the German DRG data about negative pressure wound therapy

Exact data regarding the clinical role of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for wound care in a specific country are not available. Thus, we analysed the use of NPWT in hospitalised patients in Germany. Detailed lists of all hospitalised cases treated with NPWT in Germany for each of the years from 2005 to 2014 were obtained from the Federal Statistical Office, as well as lists of the 15 most frequent principal and additional diagnoses documented with NPWT in 2014. Within the 10-year time period of the study, the number of cases treated with NPWT increased by 349%, from 37 053 in 2005 to 129 269 in 2014. The rate of all hospitalised cases treated with NPWT increased form 0·22% to 0·66% in Germany. In 2014, wounds affecting skin and subcutaneous tissue (5-916.a0) are the most frequent documented indication for NPWT followed by deep wounds involving bones and joints at the limbs (5-916.a1). Open abdomens (5-916.a3) count for higher numbers than deep wounds of the thorax, mediastinum and sternum (5-916.a2). Fifty percent of all cases hospitalised for stage IV pressure ulcers at sacrum or ischium and around one third (32.2%) of cases with pyothorax received NPWT. Every fourth to fifth case hospitalised for disruption of surgical wounds or infections following a procedure (24·1%), as well as for infections and inflammations because of internal joint prosthesis or because of an internal fixation device was treated with NPWT (22·9%). In cases with diabetic foot syndrome, it is still every tenth case (10·1%). This analysis shows a substantial increase in the use of NPWT in the last decade for hospitalised patients. NPWT has a fixed role in the treatment of stage IV pressure ulcers at sacrum or ischium, pyothorax, infection and inflammation because of internal joint prosthesis or an internal fixation device and diabetic foot syndrome.