Lamivudine-resistant rtL180M and rtM204I/V are persistently dominant during combination rescue therapy with entecavir and adefovir for hepatitis B

Susceptibility of Drug Resistant Hepatitis B Virus Mutants to Besifovir

Currently, interferon alpha and nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) are clinically available to treat hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Several NAs, including lamivudine (LMV), adefovir (ADV), entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir (TDF or TAF) have been approved and administered to chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. NAs inhibit HBV DNA synthesis by targeting the reverse transcriptase (RT) domain of HBV polymerase. Several mutations in the RT domain which lead to drug resistance against NAs have been reported, even for TDF and TAF which are highly potent with very low resistance rate. Besifovir (BFV) is a new antiviral dGMP analogue able to be used as a new NA drug for the control of CHB infection. Drug resistance to BFV is not well known due to its shorter duration of clinical use. Recently, we reported that rtL180M (M) and rtM204V (V) mutations, already resistant to LMV, are associated with BFV resistance. However, the susceptibility to BFV of previously known HBV mutants resistant to various drugs has not been studied. To investigate this, we performed in vitro drug susceptibility assays using natural and artificial mutants that are associated with resistance to LMV, ADV, ETV or TDF. As a result, LMV-resistant mutants were not susceptible to BFV and ETV-resistant clones showed partial resistance against BFV as well. However, ADV-resistant mutants were highly sensitive to BFV. In case of tenofovir-resistant mutations, the HBV mutants harboring primary mutations to tenofovir resistance were susceptible to BFV. Therefore, our study revealed that BSV may serve as an alternative drug for patients with ADV-, ETV-, TDF- or TAF-resistance.

Identification and Characterization of Besifovir-Resistant Hepatitis B Virus Isolated from a Chronic Hepatitis B Patient

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is known to cause severe liver diseases such as acute or chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection is a major health problem with nearly 300 million individuals infected worldwide. Currently, nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) and interferon alpha are clinically approved treatments for HBV infection. NAs are potent antiviral agents that bind to HBV polymerase and block viral reverse transcription and replication. Besifovir dipivoxil maleate (BSV) is a newly developed NA against HBV in the form of acyclic nucleotide phosphonate that is available for oral administration similar to adefovir and tenofovir. Until now, resistance to BSV treatment has not been reported. In this study, we found a CHB patient who showed viral breakthrough after long-term treatment with BSV. The isolated HBV DNA from patient’s serum were cloned into the replication-competent HBV 1.2 mer and the sequence of reverse transcriptase (RT) domain of HBV polymerase were analyzed. We also examined the drug susceptibility of generated clones in vitro. Several mutations were identified in HBV RT domain. A particular mutant harboring ten RT mutations showed resistance to BSV treatment in vitro. The ten mutations include rtV23I (I), rtH55R (R), rtY124H (H), rtD134E (E), rtN139K (K), rtL180M (M), rtM204V (V), rtQ267L (L), rtL269I (I) and rtL336M (M). To further identify the responsible mutations for BSV resistance, we performed in vitro drug susceptibility assay on several artificial clones. As a result, our study revealed that rtL180M (M) and rtM204V (V) mutations, already known as lamivudine-resistant mutations, confer resistance to BSV in the CHB patient.

Hepatocellular carcinoma progression in hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis patients receiving nucleoside (acid) analogs therapy: A retrospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Antiviral therapy cannot completely block the progression of hepatitis B to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Furthermore, there are few predictors of early HCC progression and limited strategies to prevent progression in patients with HBV-related cirrhosis who receive nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) therapy.

AIM

The study aim was to clarify risk factors and the diagnostic value of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) for HCC progression in NA-treated hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we analyzed the clinical data of 266 patients with HBV-related cirrhosis who received NA treatment between February 2014 and April 2020 at Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups, 145 who did not progress to HCC (No-HCC group), and 121 who progressed to HCC during NA treatment (HCC group). The logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of HCC progression. The diagnostic value of AFP for HCC was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that age ≥ 60 years (P = 0.001), hepatitis B and alcoholic etiology (P = 0.007), smoking history (P < 0.001), family history of HBV-related HCC (P = 0.002), lamivudine resistance (P = 0.011), HBV DNA negative (P = 0.023), aspartate aminotransferase > 80 U/L (P = 0.002), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase > 120 U/L (P = 0.001), alkaline phosphatase > 250 U/L (P = 0.001), fasting blood glucose (FBG) ≥ 6.16 (mmol/L) (P = 0.001) and Child-Pugh class C (P = 0.005) were correlated with HCC progression. In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 60 years [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.089, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.437-6.631, P = 0.004], smoking history (HR = 4.001, 95%CI: 1.836-8.716, P < 0.01), family history of HBV-related HCC (HR = 6.763, 95%CI: 1.253-36.499, P < 0.05), lamivudine resistance (HR = 2.949, 95%CI: 1.207-7.208, P = 0.018), HBV DNA negative (HR = 0.026, 95%CI: 0.007-0.139, P < 0.01), FBG ≥ 6.16 mmol/L (HR = 7.219, 95%CI: 3.716-14.024, P < 0.01) were independent risk factors of HCC progression. ROC of AFP for diagnosis of HCC was 0.746 (95%CI: 0.674-0.818). A cutoff value of AFP of 9.00 ug/L had a sensitivity of 0.609, and specificity of 0.818 for diagnosing HCC.

CONCLUSION

Age ≥ 60 years, smoking history, family history of HCC, lamivudine resistance, HBV DNA negative, FBG ≥ 6.16 mmol/L were risk factors of HCC progression. Serum AFP had limited diagnostic value for HCC.

Impacts of HBV rtH55R polymerase substitution on viral replication and rtM204I/V resistance to nucleoside/nucleotide antiviral drugs

BACKGROUND

High genetic variability at the reverse transcriptase (RT) region of HBV could confer resistance to nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NUCs). The aim of this study was to identify new RT amino acid (AA) substitutions related to NUC resistance.

METHODS

HBV RT sequences of genotype C from 501 chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients were analysed to identify potential RT substitutions related to NUC resistance. In vitro studies without and with NUCs were performed in a HepG2 cell line transfected by clones with RT harbouring wild-type or substituted AA(s) of interest.

RESULTS

Among 261 NUC-treated CHB patients, we found a high detection rate of rtM204I/V substitution (30.7% [80/261]). We identified a new substitution of rtH55R, and its detection rate had a significantly increasing trend from 3.8% (9/240) in the untreated group to 7.2% (13/181) or 33.8% (27/80) in the treated group with rtM204 or with rtM204I/V substitutions (P<0.0001). In vitro studies showed that rtH55R had a similar HBV DNA level compared to wild type. The rtH55R+rtM204I clone had a significantly better replication capacity than the rtM204I clone without NUCs (P<0.05). The replication capacity of the rtM204I clone was found to significantly decrease under lamivudine treatment, but this was not found in the rtH55R+rtM204I clone.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a new HBV RT substitution of rtH55R in genotype-C-infected CHB patients. It is frequently found in combination with rtM204I/V substitution under NUC treatment. In vitro studies suggest that it might play some replication compensatory role in rtM204I mutants under lamivudine treatment.