Effect of a paclitaxel-eluting metallic stent on rabbit esophagus

A Functional Stent Encapsulating Radionuclide in Temperature-Memory Spiral Tubes for Malignant Stenosis of Esophageal Cancer

Stent implantation is a commonly used palliative treatment for alleviating stenosis in advanced esophageal cancer. However, tissue proliferation induced by stent implantation and continuous tumor growth can easily lead to restenosis. Therefore, functional stents are required to relieve stenosis while inhibiting tissue proliferation and tumor growth, thereby extending the patency. Currently, no ideal functional stents are available. Here, iodine-125 (125 I) nuclides are encapsulated into a nickel-titanium alloy (NiTi) tube to develop a novel temperature-memory spiral radionuclide stent (TSRS). It has the characteristics of temperature-memory, no cold regions at the end of the stent, and a uniform spatial dose distribution. Cell-viability experiments reveal that the TSRS can reduce the proliferation of fibroblasts and tumor cells. TSRS implantation is feasible and safe, has no significant systemic radiotoxicity, and can inhibit in-stent and edge stenosis caused by stent-induced tissue proliferation in healthy rabbits. Moreover, TSRS can improve malignant stenosis and luminal patency resulting from continuous tumor growth in a VX2 esophageal cancer model. As a functional stent, the TSRS combines the excellent properties of NiTi with brachytherapy of the 125 I nuclide and will make significant contributions to the treatment of malignant esophageal stenosis.

A Review of Self-Expanding Esophageal Stents for the Palliation Therapy of Inoperable Esophageal Malignancies

Esophageal cancer is a very deadly disease, killing more than 15,000 people in the United States annually. Almost 400,000 new cases happen in the worldwide every year. More than 50% esophageal cancer patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage when they need an esophageal stent to open the blocked esophagus for feeding and drinking. Esophageal stents have evolved in stages over the years. Current clinically used stents commonly include stainless steel or nitinol self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) and self-expandable plastic stent (SEPS). There are many choices of different types of stents and sizes, with fierce competition among manufacturers. However, current stent technology, whether uncovered, partially covered, fully covered SEMS or SEPS, has their own advantages to solve the dysphagia, stricture, and fistula problems, but they also cause some clinical complications. The ideal stent remains elusive. New 3D printing technique may bring new promising potential to manufacturing personalized esophageal stents. Drug-eluting stents could be the new avenue to do more than just pry open a stricture or cover a defect in the esophageal lumen, a possibility of proving local anticancer therapy simultaneously. Additionally, the lack of esophageal cancer animal models also hinders the progress of stent development. This paper reviews these topics for a comprehensive understanding of this field. In a conclusion, the ultimate goal of the future esophageal stent would have multifunction to treat the underlying conditions and restore esophageal function to near normal.

3D-printed flexible polymer stents for potential applications in inoperable esophageal malignancies

Palliation therapy for dysphagia using esophageal stents is the current treatment of choice for those patients with inoperable esophageal malignancies. However, the metallic and plastic stents currently used in the clinical setting may cause complications, such as tumor ingrowth and stent migration into the stomach. To effectively reduce/overcome these complications, we designed a tubular, flexible polymer stent with spirals. The parameters of the spirals were computationally optimized by using a finite element analysis. The designed polymer stents with optimized spirals were then printed by a 3D printing technique. 3D-printed tubular polymer stents without spirals served as controls. The self-expansion and anti-migration properties of the printed stent were characterized in an ex vivo normal porcine esophagus. The biodegradability test of the stent was performed in a neutral buffer and acidic gastric buffer. The cytotoxicity of the new stent was examined through the viability test of human esophagus epithelial cells. Results showed the self-expansion force of the 3D-printed polymer stent with spirals was higher than the stent without spirals. The anti-migration force of the 3D-printed stent with spirals was significantly higher than that of the stent without spirals. Furthermore, the stent with spirals significantly decreased the migration distance compared to the non-spiral 3D-printed polymer stent. Degradation study showed that the polymer materials started to degrade after six weeks and the compressive strength of the stent was not significantly decreased with time. In vitro cell viability results further indicated that the polymer stent does not have any cytotoxicity. Together, these results showed that the 3D-printed stent with spirals has potential applications in the treatment of inoperable esophageal malignancies. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: In this study, we developed a new 3D-printed flexible tubular polymeric stent with spirals. The mechanical properties of the 3D-printed polymer stent are modulated by changing the ratios of PLA to TPU. The stent is flexible enough to be compressed in a clinically available stent delivery system, and can self-expand after it is released. The self-expansion force of the stent with spirals is higher than that of non-spiral stents. The spirals on the outside of the stent significantly increased the anti-migration force compared to non-spiral stents in an ex vivo normal pig esophagus. Together, the 3D-printed stent with spirals will bring promising potential in the treatment of inoperable esophagus malignancies or benign strictures.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of paclitaxel-loaded metal stents in patients with malignant biliary obstructions

Paclitaxel-eluting covered metal stents (PECMSs) and metallic stents covered with a paclitaxel-incorporated membrane (MSCPMs) have been developed to increase stent patency by preventing tumor ingrowth. However, few studies have compared their efficacy and safety compared with conventional covered metal stents (CMSs). This study aimed to compare differences in efficacy and safety between PECMS/MSCPM and CMS by meta-analysis. A search of PubMed and Embase was conducted for randomized controlled trials of PECMS/MSCPM and CMS in patients with malignant biliary obstructions published between January 1966 and August 2017. A meta-analysis was performed to compare clinical outcomes and complications between stent types. A total of 221 patients from three studies were included. There were no significant differences between PECMS/MSCPM and CMS in stent patency duration (P = 0.128) or survival time (P = 0.363). Risk did not differ between PECMS/MSCPM and CMS for stent malfunction (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-2.02, P = 0.677 for all stent malfunction; HR: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.68-2.85, P = 0.362 for stent occlusion caused by tumor ingrowth; HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.34-1.91, P = 0.617 for stent occlusion caused by distal stent migration or sludge impaction), or complications (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 0.70-3.39, P = 0.280 for all complications; HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.14-1.30, P = 0.131 for pancreatitis). The exception was cholangitis-like symptoms, the risk for which was higher in PECMS/MSCPM compared with CMS (HR: 3.93, 95% CI: 1.08-14.29, P = 0.038). Although PECMS/MSCPM may be associated with higher risk of cholangitis-like symptoms, the overall results were similar between PECMS/MSCPM and CMS. Further studies are warranted in larger populations of patients.

The effect of paclitaxel-eluting covered metal stents versus covered metal stents in a rabbit esophageal squamous carcinoma model

Background

The use of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMSs) is the current treatment of choice for malignant gastrointestinal obstructions. However, these stents can promote only drainage and have no antitumor effect. Some studies have reported that drug-eluting SEMSs may have tumor inhibition potential. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency and safety of paclitaxel-eluting SEMSs (PEMSs) in rabbit esophageal cancer models.

Materials and methods

A PEMS was covered with a paclitaxel-incorporated membrane, in which the concentration of paclitaxel was 10% (wt/vol). The rabbit models were created endoscopically. Then, a PEMS or SEMS was endoscopically inserted into the rabbit esophagus. Two weeks after stent placement, the rabbits were sacrificed, and we evaluated the tumor volume, area of the wall defect, area of the tumor under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) before and after stent placement, status of the proximal esophageal obstruction, tumor metastasis food-intake and weight loss.

Results

A total of 26 rabbits received stent insertion and survived until sacrifice, and migration occurred in 4 cases, 3 in SEMS group and 1 in PEMS group. For the remaining 22 rabbits, at the sacrificed time, the average tumor volume was 7.00±4.30 cm³ in the SEMS group and 0.94±1.51 cm³ in the PEMS group (P<0.05). The area of the esophageal wall defect was 0.70±0.63 cm² in the SEMS group and 0.17±0.16 cm² in the PEMS group (P<0.05). The tumor area under EUS was 4.40±1.47 cm² in the SEMS group and 1.30±1.06 cm² in the PEMS group (P<0.05). At the time of stent placement, tumor area under EUS was comparable in the two groups. Other indices did not significantly differ between the two groups.

Conclusions

SEMS and PEMS are both safe and effective to relieve dysphagia in rabbit esophageal cancer models. A PEMS can serve as an alternative tool for advanced esophageal cancer that may inhibit tumor growth by serving as a drug sustained-release platform. Clinical trials of the stent are warranted in the future.

History of the Use of Esophageal Stent in Management of Dysphagia and Its Improvement Over the Years

The art and science of using stents to treat dysphagia and seal fistula, leaks and perforations has been evolving. Lessons learnt from the deficiencies of previous models led to several improvements making stent deployment easier, and with some designs, it was also possible to remove the stents if needed. With these improvements, besides malignant dysphagia, newer indications for using stents emerged. Unfortunately, despite several decades of evolution, as yet, there is no perfect stent that "fits all." This article is an overview of how this evolution process happened and where we are currently with using stents to manage patients with dysphagia and with other esophageal disorders.