Quantification of ascites based on abdomino-pelvic computed tomography scans for predicting the in-hospital mortality of liver cirrhosis

Amount of ascites impacts survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization advocating for volumetric assessment

Preliminary work has shown that portal hypertension plays a key role for the prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Specifically, the presence of ascites appears to be a strong negative predictor for these patients. However, it remains unclear whether different ascites volumes influence prognosis. Therefore, the aim of this work was to investigate the influence of different ascites volumes on survival for patients with HCC undergoing TACE. A total of 327 treatment-naïve patients with HCC undergoing initial TACE at our tertiary care center between 2010 and 2020 were included. In patients with ascites, the fluid was segmented, and the volume quantified by slice-wise addition using contrast-enhanced CT imaging. Median overall survival (OS) was calculated and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis has been performed. Ascites was present in 102 (31.9%) patients. Ascites volume as continuous variable was significantly associated with an increased hazard ratio in univariate analysis (p < 0.001) and remained an independent predictor of impaired median OS in multivariate analysis (p < 0.001). Median OS without ascites was 17.1 months, and therefore significantly longer than in patients with ascites (6.4 months, p < 0.001). When subdivided into groups of low and high ascites volume in relation to the median ascites volume, patients with low ascites volume had a significantly longer median OS (8.6 vs 3.6 months, p < 0.001). Ascites in patients with HCC undergoing TACE is strongly associated with a poor prognosis. Our results show that not only the presence but also the amount of ascites is highly relevant. Therefore, true ascites volume as opportunistic quantitative biomarker is likely to impact clinical decision-making once automated solutions become available.

Lymphatic drainage dysfunction via narrowing of the lumen of cisterna chyli and thoracic duct after luminal dilation

BACKGROUND

The chronological pattern of extrahepatic lymphatic vessel progression in the course of chronic liver disease has not been clarified. This study aimed to clarify the chronological changes in lymphatic vessels with liver disease progression.

METHODS

This was a prospective cross-sectional study that enrolled a total of 199 patients. The maximum diameter of the cisterna chyli (CC) or terminal thoracic duct (tTD) was measured using computed tomography or ultrasonography, respectively. Changes in the maximum diameters of the CC and tTD were evaluated with patients with chronic liver disease as the pilot set (n = 138). Subsequently, we examined whether CC/tTD could be used to re-allocate unclassified patients by the Baveno-VII criteria to appropriately diagnose clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in the pilot and validation sets.

RESULTS

In the pilot set, a scatter-plot showed that both CC and tTD were narrowed as terminal features in chronic liver disease after dilation. Because there was a significant correlation between the CC diameter and hepatic venous pressure gradient (r = 0.724) in unclassified patients, the diagnostic value of CC and tTD for CSPH was good (AUC: 0.961 and 0.913, respectively). After re-allocation, 68 and 27 unclassified patients were reduced to 4 and 5 in the pilot and validation sets, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both the CC and tTD narrow in the course of liver disease after dilation. Moreover, the maximum diameter of the CC and tTD can be used to re-allocate patients who are unclassified according to the Baveno-VII criteria.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

UMIN trial no. 000044857.

Current approaches to the management of patients with cirrhotic ascites

This review describes current approaches to the management of patients with cirrhotic ascites in relation to the severity of its clinical manifestations. The PubMed database, the Google Scholar retrieval system, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the reference lists from related articles were used to search for relevant publications. Articles corresponding to the aim of the review were selected for 1991-2018 using the keywords: "liver cirrhosis," "portal hypertension," "ascites," "pathogenesis," "diagnostics," and "treatment." Uncomplicated and refractory ascites in patients with cirrhosis were the inclusion criteria. The literature analysis has shown that despite the achievements of modern hepatology, the presence of ascites is associated with poor prognosis and high mortality. The key to successful management of patients with ascites may be the stratification of the risk of an adverse outcome and personalized therapy. Pathogenetically based approach to the choice of pharmacotherapy and optimization of minimally invasive methods of treatment may improve the quality of life and increase the survival rate of this category of patients.

Prognostic significance of the pretreatment prognostic nutritional index in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

Objective

We retrospectively investigated the prognostic significance of the pretreatment prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) according to the clinical stage.

Methods

The baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of 308 EOC patients were collected and retrospectively reviewed. PNI was defined as 10 × serum albumin (g/L) + 0.005 × lymphocyte count (per mm³) in the peripheral blood. The cut-off value of PNI was defined by time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. Univariate or multivariate analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between pretreatment PNI, progression-free survival (PFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) according to the clinical stage.

Results

The cut-off value of PNI was defined as 44.7 in early-stage patients and 42.9 in advanced-stage patient by ROC analysis, respectively. Although decreased PNI was not associated with short PFS or DSS in early-stage patients, it was significantly correlated with short PFS (p<0.0001) and DSS (p<0.0001) in advanced-stage patients. In multivariate analysis, decreased PNI was an independent prognostic predictor of recurrence and short survival in advanced-stage patients.

Conclusion

A decreased pretreatment PNI was an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with advanced EOC.

Contrast-Enhanced CT May Be a Diagnostic Alternative for Gastroesophageal Varices in Cirrhosis with and without Previous Endoscopic Variceal Therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Liver fibrosis blood tests, platelet count/spleen diameter ratio (PSR), and contrast-enhanced CT are diagnostic alternatives for gastroesophageal varices, but they have heterogeneous diagnostic performance among different study populations. Our study is aimed at evaluating their diagnostic accuracy for esophageal varices (EVs) and gastric varices (GVs) in cirrhotic patients with and without previous endoscopic variceal therapy.

METHODS

Patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent blood tests and contrast-enhanced CT scans as well as endoscopic surveillance should be potentially eligible. EVs needing treatment (EVNTs) and GVs needing treatment (GVNTs) were recorded according to the endoscopic results. Area under the curves (AUCs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, 279 patients were included. In 175 patients without previous endoscopic variceal therapy, including primary prophylaxis population (n = 70), acute bleeding population (n = 38), and previous bleeding population (n = 67), the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT for EVNTs was higher (AUCs = 0.816-0.876) as compared to blood tests and PSR; by comparison, the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT for GVNTs was statistically significant among primary prophylaxis population (AUC = 0.731, P = 0.0316), but not acute or previous bleeding population. In 104 patients with previous endoscopic variceal therapy (i.e., secondary prophylaxis population), contrast-enhanced CT was the only statistically significant alternative for diagnosing EVNTs and GVNTs but with modest accuracy (AUCs = 0.673 and 0.661, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced CT might be a diagnostic alternative for EVNTs in cirrhotic patients, but its diagnostic performance was slightly weakened in secondary prophylaxis population. Additionally, contrast-enhanced CT may be considered for diagnosis of GVNTs in primary prophylaxis population without previous endoscopic variceal therapy and secondary prophylaxis population.