Nalbuphine for analgesia after fracture surgery and its effect on circulating inflammatory factors

Nalbuphine: an underrecognized battlefield analgesic and its utilization in combat care and peripheral areas

Battlefield injuries result in acute and severe uncontrolled pain, which can be reduced with the early use of analgesia. Apart from pain, battlefield injuries may also cause significant morbidity and a prolonged period of absence from active duty. Traditionally available opioids are known to cause various undesirable side effects such as respiratory depression that may worsen the condition of an already injured combatant. Nalbuphine is an opioid agonist-antagonist and has been increasingly used for postoperative analgesia over the last decade. In India, it is the only opioid analgesic that does not come under the Controlled Substances Act at the time of this publication. In today's world, where nalbuphine is being recommended for acute pain worldwide, its use in the Indian combat scenario needs to be conceptualized at the medical officer level (primary caregiver). This conceptualization will be discussed in detail in this review article.

Nalbuphine alleviates inflammation by down-regulating NF-κB in an acute inflammatory visceral pain rat model

Introduction

Nalbuphine can relieve patients’ inflammation response after surgery compared to other opioid drugs. However, its molecular mechanism has not been clear. Activation of NF-κB signaling pathway under oxidative stress and inflammation can maintain pain escalation.

Methods

We firstly investigated the effect of nalbuphine on writhing test and mechanical allodynia using a rat model of inflammatory visceral pain (acetic acid (AA) administrated). Cytokines (including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, Interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-2, and IL-6 in plasma were tested with ELISA technology. Expression levels of TNF-α, IκBα and p-NF-κB p65 at the spinal cord (L3–5) were measured by western blot or RT-qPCR.

Results

We found that the paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) values of rats were reduced in the model group, while the numbers of writhing, levels of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, and TNF-α in plasma, and p-NF-κB protein and its gene expressions in the lumbar spinal cord were up-regulated. Subcutaneously injection of nalbuphine (10 μg/kg) or PDTC (NF-κB inhibitor) attenuated acetic acid-induced inflammatory pain, and this was associated with reversal of up-regulated IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, and TNF-α in both plasma and spinal cord. Furthermore, acetic acid increased p-NF-κB and TNF-α protein levels in the white matter of the spinal cord, which was attenuated by nalbuphine. These results suggested that nalbuphine can significantly ameliorate inflammatory pain via modulating the expression of NF-κB p65 as well as inflammation factors level in the spinal cord.

Conclusion

In conclusion, nalbuphine inhibits inflammation through down-regulating NF-κB pathway at the spinal cord in a rat model of inflammatory visceral pain.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40360-022-00573-7.

Effect of Preventive Analgesia with Nalbuphine and Dexmedetomidine in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Background

The study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine combined with dexmedetomidine for preventive analgesia in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Methods

110 patients with deviation of the nasal septum were randomized into the nalbuphine group (group N), dexmedetomidine combined with nalbuphine group (group DN), and saline group (group C). Fifteen minutes before the induction of anesthesia, patients in group N were injected nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg intravenously; patients in group DN received intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg and injection of nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg; patients in group C received 0.9% saline. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), numerical rating scale (NRS) scores, quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) scores, the need for remedial analgesia, the consumption of remifentanil and propofol, and the incidence of adverse reactions were recorded.

Results

MAP, HR, and NRS scores of the DN group were significantly lower and the QoR-40 scores were higher than those of groups N and C (P < 0.001). The need for remedial analgesia, the consumption of remifentanil and propofol, and the incidence of nausea in the DN group were the lowest among the three groups (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Preventive analgesia with nalbuphine and dexmedetomidine in endoscopic sinus surgery can not only maintain hemodynamic stability but also reduce intraoperative anesthetic dosage, postoperative pain, and improve the quality of postoperative recovery without affecting the revival and extubation time.

Different Doses of Nalbuphine Combined with Dexmedetomidine in Laparoscopic Oophorocystectomy

BACKGROUND The goal of this study was to investigate different doses of nalbuphine combined with dexmedetomidine in the postoperative treatment of laparoscopic oophorocystectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective single-blinded randomized controlled study included 219 patients with benign ovarian cysts who received laparoscopic oophorocystectomy from March 2017 to October 2019. Patients were randomized into 4 groups: low (0.5 mg/kg), middle (1.0 mg/kg), and high (1.5 mg/kg) doses of nalbuphine combined with dexmedetomidine (4 μg/kg) (LND, MND, and HND groups, respectively) and a control group with sufentanil (2.5 μg/kg), with different patient-controlled intravenous analgesia pump (PCIA) strategies. Rest and active visual analog scale (VAS) scores measured postoperative pain, and Ramsay scores were used to measure sedation. RESULTS The HND group showed the lowest rest and cough VAS scores at 2 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h after surgery, the lowest PCIA pressing time within 48 h after surgery, and the highest Ramsay scores at 2 h, 8 h, 24 h and 48 h after surgery. Rest and cough VAS scores decreased with higher nalbuphine doses in a dose-dependent manner. One day after surgery, IL-1ß and IL-6 levels increased in all groups, with the lowest levels of IL-1ß and IL-6 in the HND group. Hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the HND group compared with the LND and MND groups. There were no significant differences in complications among groups. CONCLUSIONS Combined nalbuphine and dexmedetomidine improved postoperative pain and sedative conditions, reduced inflammation in a nalbuphine dose-dependent manner, and might facilitate patient recovery.