Clinical characteristics and value in early reperfusion therapy for new onset right bundle branch block in patients with acute myocardial infarction

The Differences in Clinical Characteristic and Outcomes of New Onset Typical versus Atypical Right Branch Bundle Block in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Objective

The purpose of this study is to explore the clinical characteristics and estimate the new-onset atypical right branch bundle block (ATRBBB) predictive value in short-term and long-term mortality by comparing the typical right branch bundle block (TRBBB) subset in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients.

Methods

A total of 224 AMI patients combined with new onset RBBB who received primary coronary angiography were included, being admitted to Henan Provincial People's Hospital in China from July 2010 to June 2021. Patients were divided into typical RBBB group (n = 104) and atypical RBBB group (n = 120). The differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups were analyzed. Logistic and Cox regression analysis were performed to identify independent predictors of in-hospital Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE).

Result

The ATRBBB group had a higher proportion of smoking and alcohol consumption, higher body mass index, worse cardiac function (killip ≧ II proportion), higher peak value of CK-MB, lower LVEF%, longer total ischemia time, higher proportion of LAD (left anterior descending coronary artery) occlusion, and multivessel lesions, compared to the TRBBB group. The ATRBBB group had a higher proportion of in-hospital MACE and 1-year all-cause mortality compared to the TRBBB group. ATRBBB was an independent predictor of in-hospital MACE and 1-year mortality in patients with AMI combined with new onset RBBB.

Conclusions

ATRBBB group had more serious clinical symptoms and clinical prognosis. New ATRBBB is an independent predictor of in-hospital MACE and 1-year death in patients with AMI combined with RBBB. If the infarct-related vessel was opened immediately, the evolution of TRBBB to ATRBBB may be avoided, leading to a better prognosis.

The Relationship of Conduction Disorder and Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Conduction disorders with a widened QRS are associated with poor prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Conduction disorders include left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), and nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (NICD). Previous studies did not have conflicting results regarding the type of bundle branch block (BBB) with the worst prognosis, and few studies have focused on the prognosis of patients with NICD.

METHODS

Patients with ACS were enrolled between January 2005 and December 2019, and their medical history (International Classification of Diseases codes) was obtained from the Chang Gung Research Database. Age, sex, comorbidities, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and drug use were compared between the patients with and without conduction disorders. The following clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without conduction disorders: heart failure (HF) hospitalization, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, and all-cause mortality. After propensity score matching, the Kaplan-Meier curve analysis for HF hospitalization, CV mortality, and all-cause mortality were compared among patients with LBBB, RBBB, and NICD.

RESULTS

This study enrolled a total of 33970 participants and involved 3392 and 30578 patients with and without conduction disorders, respectively. Older age and a higher prevalence of comorbidities were noted in patients with conduction disorders. Lower mean LVEF was exhibited in the patients with conduction disorders (with vs. without; 44.64 ± 20.73% vs. 49.85 ± 20.63%; p < 0.001). During the 3-year follow-up period, higher incidences of HF hospitalization (21.55% vs. 17.51%; p < 0.001), CV mortality (17.98% vs. 12.14%; p < 0.001), and all-cause mortality (38.86% vs. 31.15%; p < 0.001) were noted in the patients with conduction disorder. After ACS events, 10.0% of patients presented with conduction disorders, with LBBB in 3.3%, RBBB in 6.0%, and NICD in 0.7%. The lowest mean of LVEF was presented in the patients with NICD (LBBB vs. RBBB vs. NICD; 41.00 ± 19.47% vs. 47.73 ± 20.82% vs. 34.57 ± 20.02%; p < 0.001). Among the three groups, the highest incidence of HF hospitalization was noted in patients with LBBB after propensity score matching. The lowest incidence of CV and all-cause mortality was observed in patients with RBBB. After adjustment of age, gender, comorbidities, medication, and mean LVEF, those with LBBB had the highest hazard ratio for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) of 1.113 (p=0.029; 95% CI = 1.013-1.266).

CONCLUSIONS

In the ACS population, patients with conduction delay had a poor prognosis due to a higher prevalence of comorbidities and lower mean LVEF. Among the patients with LBBB, RBBB, and NICD, those with LBBB and NICD had a higher incidence of HF hospitalization, CV mortality, and all-cause mortality. Patients with NICD had the lowest mean LVEF compared to those with LBBB and RBBB. Patients with LBBB had a significantly highest HR of MACE.

Anti-apoptotic Effect of MiR-223-3p Suppressing PIK3C2A in Cardiomyocytes from Myocardial Infarction Rat Through Regulating PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway

We aimed to explore the regulatory mechanism of the axis of miR-223-3p-PIK3C2A-PI3K/Akt on cardiomyocyte apoptosis in rats with myocardial infarction. Thirty 8-week-old healthy male SD rats were used for establishing the sham group and the model group, with HE staining, TUNEL staining, and TTC staining performed. After the identification of the targeting relationship between PIK3C2A and miR-223-3p, experimental rats were randomly divided into seven groups by plasmid transfection, including the Blank group, negative control (NC) group, miR-223-3p mimic group, miR-223-3p inhibitor group, siRNA-PIK3C2A group, oe-PIK3C2A group, and miR-223-3p inhibitor + oe-PIK3C2A group. Four weeks after transfection, the expression levels of miR-223-3p and PIK3C2A in tissues as well as PI3K, Akt, Bax, and bcl-2 mRNA in cells were detected by qRT-PCR and western blot, in combination with the detection of apoptosis rate by flow cytometry. Compared with the sham group, the model group showed typical myocardial injury and abnormal staining, higher apoptotic index, and larger myocardial infarction area (all P < 0.05). PIK3C2A was the target gene of miR-223-3p. The expression level of miR-223-3p in model group was significantly lower than that in sham group, while the mRNA and protein expression levels of PIK3C2A increased significantly (all P < 0.05). In cell tests, the expression level of miR-223-3p increased significantly in miR-223-3p mimic group (P < 0.05), which, however, showed no significant change in siRNA-PIK3C2A group (P > 0.05). MiR-223-3p inhibitor group and siRNA-PIK3C2A group had obviously increased PI3K, Akt, mTOR and Bcl-2 mRNA, and protein expression, while decreased mRNA and protein expression of PIK3C2A and Bax (all P < 0.05); miR-223-3p mimic groups had the opposite trends (all P < 0.05). siRNA-PIK3C2A + miR-223-3p mimic showed no obvious change relative to the control groups (all P > 0.05). Low expression of miR-223-3p may downregulate PIK3C2A expression, resulting in the inhibition of myocardial cell apoptosis in rats with myocardial infarction via the activation of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.

Prognostic impact of bundle branch block after acute coronary syndrome. Does it matter if it is left of right?

BACKGROUND

In previous guidelines, acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with new or presumably new left bundle branch block (LBBB) were an indication for reperfusion treatment, preferably with primary angioplasty. Recent guidelines also included the presence of right bundle branch block (RBBB) in this recommendation. It was our objective to evaluate in a population of patients with ACS the differential impact of RBBB and LBBB in prognosis.

METHODS

Consecutive patients included prospectively in a single-centre registry of ACS were included in the study. Patients were analyzed according to baseline ECG characteristics (normal QRS, LBBB or RBBB). Primary outcome was all-cause mortality at one-year follow-up. We used Cox-proportional hazards models to assess the predictive value for the primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 3990 patients were included in, with a mean age of 64 (13) years, 72% males, 3.4% with LBBB and 4.3% with RBBB. Patients with BBB were older, with more previous history of myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization and higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (except smoking). Medical treatment was similar but they were less often submitted to angioplasty. In univariate analysis, BBB patients had worst outcome (Log-rank, p < 0.001), but similar in LBBB and RBBB (Log-rank, p = 0.597). In multivariate analysis, only RBBB (HR 1.66, 95%CI 1.14-2.40, p = 0.007) is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with BBB have worst outcome after an ACS, particularly with RBBB. For that reason, we should pay special attention and treat these patients as aggressively as patients with normal QRS duration or LBBB.