Propofol and sevoflurane combined with remifentanil on the pain index, inflammatory factors and postoperative cognitive function of spine fracture patients

Application of sevoflurane combined with remifentanil anesthesia in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effects of sevoflurane combined with remifentanil anesthesia on the physical stress and immunologic function of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

METHODS

The clinical data of 74 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the different anesthesia methods, among which 37 cases received propofol and remifentanil anesthesia were set as a control group (CG), and 37 cases received sevoflurane and remifentanil anesthesia were set as an observation group (OG).

RESULTS

The OG showed a lower heart rate, Ramsay score and bispectral index than the CG 30 min after the start of the surgery and at the end of the surgery. The levels of glucagon, angiotensin II and cortisol in the OG were lower than those in the CG upon skin incision, at the end of surgery, and at 1 h after surgery (P < 0.05). The levels of CD3⁺ and CD4⁺ of the OG were higher than those of the CG at 1 d and 3 d after surgery. In terms of Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination scores 1 d after surgery, the OG was higher than the CG.

CONCLUSION

Sevoflurane combined with remifentanil anesthesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer is superior to propofol and remifentanil, and can ensure stable hemodynamics and mitigate physical stress, so it is worthy of clinical application.

Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Besylate Combined with Alfentanil in Painless Gastroscopy: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Parallel Controlled Study

Background

The efficacy and adverse reactions of remimazolam besylate (RB) in combination with alfentanil in patients with painless gastroscopy remain unclear.

Objective

The aim of the study is to observe the efficacy and adverse reactions of RB in combination with alfentanil in patients with painless gastroscopy RB.

Methods

All patients were randomly divided into two groups: RB combined with the alfentanil group (research group) and propofol combined with the alfentanil group (control group). After full oxygen inhalation and electrocardiographic monitoring, the research group was given 10 μg/Kg alfentanil + RB 0.2 mg/kg intravenously, and the control group was given 10 μg/Kg alfentanil + propofol 1.5 mg/kg. If there is a clinical need, the research group was given 2.5 mg/additional RB, whereas the control group was treated with an additional 0.5 mg/kg propofol. Main outcome measures were as follows: The vital endpoints including diachronic changes in heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), respiratory rate (RR), blood oxygen saturation (SPO₂), end-expiratory carbon dioxide (etCO₂), IPI, modified observer's assessment of alert/sedation (MOAA/S), time-related endpoints, perioperative adverse events, endoscopy, and anesthesiologist satisfaction, and 24-hour follow-up of adverse reactions, IPI scores, and satisfaction were recorded.

Results

The HR and BP of the patients in the research group and the control group decreased, with a greater decrease in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The values of RR, PETCO₂, and IPI in the research group and the control group decreased to the lowest at 2-3 min but the decrease in the control group was more significant. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the time from the completion of administration to 4 minutes of IPI and the total examination time, but the awakening time in the research group was slightly longer than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The incidences of respiratory depression and hypotension during the operation were shown to be markedly smaller in the investigation relative to the control team, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05), whereas the occurrence of cough, movements, and singultus was more common in the investigations, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The results of the 24-hour follow-up showed that the adverse reactions such as nausea, dizziness, fatigue, abdominal pain, and abdominal distension were much less frequent in the study team, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05), and the patient satisfaction was higher than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The regression results showed that age, sedative, and total dose of analgesia had significant effects on the results, and the covariance coefficient of sedative was 1.57 of IPI score in the research group higher than that of the control group.

Conclusions

RB combined with alfentanil can provide safe and effective sedation for patients undergoing painless gastroscopy. Compared with propofol, RB and alfentanil for injection can avoid large hemodynamic fluctuations and deep sedation, and have fewer adverse reactions. However, the cases involved in this study are all from a single-center data, which requires further multicenter research and conformation.

Forkhead Box O1-p21 Mediates Macrophage Polarization in Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction Induced by Sevoflurane

PURPOSE

The current study was conducted in order to investigate the role of Forkhead box O1 and p21-mediated macrophage polarization in postoperative cognitive dysfunction induced by sevoflurane.

METHODS

There involved a total of 30 healthy mice that were randomly divided into two groups: control group (without any treatment) and anaesthesia group (treated with sevoflurane inhalation). The effects of sevoflurane on cognitive function (memory) in mice were studied by trace fear conditioned reflex, and the effects of systemic inflammation and behavior after operation were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the concentrations of CD163 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were measured. The expression of macrophage phenotype was observed by immunofluorescence staining, the expression levels of M1 and M2 markers mRNA were detected by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (RT-PCR), and the expression levels of FoxO1 and p21 were analyzed by immunoblotting (Western blot).

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the freezing time in the anesthesia group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.01), indicating that sevoflurane anesthesia led to the decrease of cognitive ability. The blood concentrations of CD163 and TNF-α increased significantly at 24 h after the operation with sevoflurane anesthesia (P<0.05). Fluorescence microscopic observation showed that M2 was the main type of macrophages in normal tissues, while M1 and M2 phenotypes were highly expressed in sevoflurane anesthetized tissues at the same time, especially in M1 phenotypes (P<0.01). The polarization of macrophages in the anesthetic group showed the high level of M1 mRNA, and the expression levels of TNF-α, monocyte chemotactic protein 1(MCP-1) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6)mRNA in the anesthetic group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The expression levels of M2 mRNA such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and IL-10 were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the expression of FoxO1 and p21 protein in the anesthesia group was significantly lower than that in the control group with a significant statistical difference (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study offers a theoretical basis and insight for further understanding of the prevention and treatment of cognitive dysfunction induced by anesthetic drugs.