Treatment outcomes of the posterolateral approach of plate fixation for posterior pilon fractures

Treatment outcomes of posterior pilon fractures using a simple single lateral approach via stretching fibular fracture line

Purpose

The aim of this study was to explore the treatment outcomes of a novel single lateral approach via fibular fracture line for patients with posterior pilon fractures.

Patients and methods

From January 2020 to December 2021, a total of 41 patients with posterior pilon fractures who received surgical treatment in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty patients (Group A) were treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) via posterolateral approach. Twenty-one patients (Group B) were treated with ORIF using a simple single lateral approach via stretching fibular fracture line. Clinical assessments, including operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, visual analogue scale (VAS), and the active range of motion (ROM) of the ankle at the final follow-up visit after surgery, were performed in all patients. Radiographic outcome was evaluated by using the criteria proposed by Burwell and Charnley.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 21 months (range 12-35). The average operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the Group B were significantly less than those in the Group A. Moreover, the AOFAS score and ankle ROM in the Group B were significantly higher than those in the Group A at the final follow-up visit. Eighteen cases (90%) in Group A and 19 cases (90.5%) in Group B achieved anatomical reduction of the fracture.

Conclusion

The single lateral approach via stretching fibular fracture line is a simple and effective technique for reduction and fixation of posterior pilon fractures.

Posterior pilon fracture treated by opening the fibula fracture gap

Background

Posterior pilon fracture is a relatively common clinical fracture involving the posterior articular surface of the distal tibia. Currently, this form of fracture is receiving increasing attention. The surgical approach and technique for the treatment of posterior pilon fractures are still controversial. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical and imaging outcomes of pilon fractures after treatment with the open fibula fracture line (OFFL) surgical technique versus the traditional posterolateral approach (TPL).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients with posterior pilon fractures treated using the open fibula fracture line technique and the traditional posterolateral approach between January 2015 and March 2020. Thirty-one cases were included in the open fibula fracture line technique group and twenty-eight cases were included in the traditional posterolateral approach group. We used the Burwell-Charnley scale to assess the effectiveness of surgical repositioning. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hind foot score (AOFAS) and visual analog score (VAS).

Results

The overall anatomic reduction rate was slightly better in the open fibula fracture line group than in the conventional posterolateral group (81% vs. 71%, p = 0.406), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of fracture healing time and time to full weight bearing (p > 0.05). At the final follow-up, the AOFAS functional score of the open fibula fracture line group was statistically superior to that of the conventional posterolateral group (p < 0.05). However, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in VAS pain scores at rest, during activity, and under weight bearing (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The trans-fibular fracture approach provides a better surgical option for specific types of posterior pilon fractures with a high rate of anatomic repositioning and a good near-term outcome.

Trial registration: Retrospective registration.