Ventricular tachycardia and heart failure in a patient of mid-ventricular obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with apical aneurysm: A case report

Pacemaker Treatment for Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in the Setting of an Apical Ventricular Aneurysm

We describe the case of a patient with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with concomitant apical aneurysm. We measured the aneurysmal cavity pressure using the pressure guidewire system. The patient underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator treatment successfully to reduce the pressure gradient between the aneurysmal cavity and the true left ventricle. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

Mid-ventricular obstruction is associated with non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

Background

Mid‐ventricular obstruction (MVO) is a rare subtype of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) but it is associated with ventricular arrhythmia. The relationship between MVO and non‐sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) in HCM patients is unknown.

Hypothesis

The severity of MVO increases the incidence of NSVT in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM).

Methods

Five hundred and seventy‐two consecutive patients diagnosed with HOCM in Fuwai Hospital between January 2015 and December 2017 were enrolled in this study. Holter electrocardiographic and clinical parameters were compared between HOCM patients with and without MVO.

Results

Seventy‐six (13.3%) of 572 patients were diagnosed with MVO. Compared to patients without MVO, those with MVO were much younger, and had a higher incidence of syncope, greater left ventricular (LV) posterior wall thickness, a higher percentage of LV late gadolinium enhancement, and higher prevalence of NSVT. Furthermore, the prevalence of NSVT increased with the severity of MVO (without, mild, moderate or severe: 11.1%, 18.2%, 25.6%, respectively, p for trend < .01). Similarly, the prevalence of NSVT differed among patients with isolated LV outflow tract (LVOTO), both MVO and LVOTO, and isolated MVO (11.1%, 21.3%, 26.6%, respectively, p for trend = .018). In addition to age, diabetes, left atrial diameter, and maximal wall thickness, multivariate analysis revealed the presence of MVO as an independent risk factor for NSVT (Odds ratio 2.69; 95% confidence interval 1.41 to 5.13, p = .003).

Conclusions

The presence and severity of MVO was associated with higher incidence of NSVT in HOCM patients.