Effect of propofol, midazolam and dexmedetomidine on ICU patients with sepsis and on arterial blood gas

Remimazolam tosylate's long-term sedative properties in ICU patients on mechanical ventilation: effectiveness and safety

OBJECTIVE

This study compared remimazolam tosylate with propofol or midazolam to assess its safety and effectiveness for long-term sedation of intensive care unit (ICU) patients requiring mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

Adult patients in the ICU receiving sedation and mechanical ventilation for longer than 24 h were included in this single-center, prospective, observational study. Depending on the sedatives they were given, they were split into two groups (midazolam or propofol group; remimazolam group). ICU mortality was the main result. Laboratory tests, adverse events, and the length of ICU stay were considered secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients were involved (46 received propofol or midazolam versus 60 received remimazolam). Age (P = 0.182), gender (P = 0.325), and the amount of time between being admitted to the ICU and receiving medication infusion (P = 0.770) did not substantially differ between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in ICU mortality between the two groups. The remimazolam group showed less variability in heart rate (P = 0.0021), pH (P = 0.048), bicarbonate (P = 0.0133), lactate (P = 0.0002), arterial blood gas analyses, liver, and kidney function. The Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale scores, length of ICU stay, and occurrence of adverse events did not exhibit significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam tosylate did not increase the total inpatient cost, the incidence of adverse events, and ICU mortality in patients with mechanical ventilation. These findings suggest that remimazolam may represent a promising alternative for sedation in the ICU setting.

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis.

Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of dexmedetomidine versus propofol in septic patients requiring mechanical ventilation from inception to December 2021. The primary outcome was 28/30-day mortality and secondary outcomes were ventilator-free days and the length of ICU stay. Pooled relative risk (RR), mean deviation (MD), along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to express outcomes by the software of Review Manager 5.3.

Results: Seven studies with a total of 1,212 patients were eligible for meta-analysis. The results primarily showed that dexmedetomidine had no significant effects on the 28/30-day mortality (RR = 1.04 [0.85–1.26], p = 0.70, I² = 3%). As for secondary outcomes, the administration of dexmedetomidine was not associated with longer-ventilator-free days (MD = 0.50 [−2.15, 3.15], p = 0.71, I² = 24%) compared with propofol. However, our results revealed dexmedetomidine could shorten the length of ICU stay (MD = −0.76 [−1.34, −0.18], p = 0.01, I² = 33%).

Conclusion: Administration of dexmedetomidine for sedation in septic patients who required mechanical ventilation had no effect on 28/30-day mortality and ventilator-free days, but it could shorten the length of ICU stay.

Effects of Dexmedetomidine Combined with Intravenous Anesthesia on Oxidative Stress Index, Postoperative Sleep Quality, and Brain Function in HICH Patients

To investigate the effects of dexmedetomidine combined with intravenous anesthesia on oxidative emergency indicators, postoperative sleep quality, and brain function in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage (HICH), a total of 285 HICH patients admitted to our hospital from February 2020 to February 2021 were selected. The combined anesthesia group (n = 142) and the control group (n = 143) were established by the random number table method. The control group received conventional intravenous anesthesia, and the combined anesthesia group received dexmedetomidine combined intravenous anesthesia. Two groups of patients before and after operation was observed vital signs, oxidative stress index difference, comparing each time, the change of the two groups of brain function index, adverse reactions occurred between observation group, and the postoperative period of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Scale (PSQI) score as a result, the Pearson correlation coefficient analysis of oxidative stress level and the correlation of HICH patients sleep quality. After operation, the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of patients in both groups decreased significantly. The MAP level in the combined anesthesia group significantly increased compared to the control group, and the HR level decreased significantly than the control group (all P < 0.05). The levels of TNF-α, IL-6 and MDA in both groups increased significantly on day 7 after operation compared with before operation, but the indexes in the combined anesthesia group significantly decreased compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The level of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in both groups significantly decreased compared to that before operation, and the index value in combined anesthesia group significantly increased compared to that in the control group (P < 0.05). After surgery, the levels of central nerve specific protein (S100-β) and neuron specific enolase (NSE) in 2 groups increased with time, and the indexes in the combined anesthesia group significantly decreased compared to the control group (all P < 0.05). The incidence of adr in combined anesthesia group decreased significantly than that in control group (P < 0.05). After surgery, PSQI scores of the two groups showed a downward trend with time extension, and scores of the combined anesthesia group decreased significantly than those of the control group at 24 h, 48 h and 7 d after surgery (all P < 0.05). Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to analyze that TNF-α, IL-6, and MDA levels were positively correlated with PSQI score, while SOD level was negatively correlated with PSQI score (all P < 0.05). Dexmedetomidine combined with intravenous anesthesia can significantly improve the vital signs and oxidative stress response of HICH patients, effectively reduce the risk of adverse reactions, have little impact on the brain function of patients, and can improve the postoperative sleep quality of patients. This operation is worthy of clinical application. In addition, this study further analyzed the influence mechanism of postoperative sleep quality in patients with HICH and showed that TNF-α, IL-6, MDA, and SOD were all correlated with sleep quality in patients with HICH, suggesting that follow-up detection of these indicators has positive significance in improving the prognosis of patients.

Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Patients With Sepsis Requiring Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: This meta-analysis was performed to access the influence of dexmedetomidine versus propofol for adult patients with sepsis undergoing mechanical ventilation. Materials and Methods: NCBI PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), and China Biological Medicine (CBM) were searched. Revman 5.3 and Stata software (version 12.0, Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX, United States) were used for meta-analysis. Results: Fifteen studies were included, and the data from the included studies were incorporated into the meta-analysis. Also, the result shows that compared with propofol, dexmedetomidine does not reduce 28-day mortality [risk ratios (RR) =0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) =0.83-1.13, p = 0.70]. However, our analysis found that dexmedetomidine could reduce intensive care unit (ICU) stays {standard mean difference (SMD): -0.15; 95% CI: [-0.30-(-0.01)], p = 0.03}, duration of mechanical ventilation {SMD: -0.22; 95% CI: [-0.44-(-0.01)], p = 0.043}, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) {SMD: -0.41; 95% CI: [-0.73-(-0.09)], p = 0.013}, levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) at 24 h (SMD: -2.53; 95% CI: -5.30-0.24, p = 0.074), and levels of CK-MB at 72 h {SMD: -0.45; 95% CI: [-0.83-(-0.08)], p = 0.017}. Conclusions: This meta-analysis (MA) suggests that in terms of 28-day mortality, sepsis patients with the treatment of dexmedetomidine did not differ from those who received propofol. In addition, more high-quality trials are needed to confirm these findings. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42021249780.

Clinical significance of miR-19b-3p in patients with sepsis and its regulatory role in the LPS-induced inflammatory response

Background

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles in the development and progression of sepsis. This study investigated the clinical value of miR-19b-3p in sepsis patients, and explored its role in regulating inflammatory responses in HUVECs cells.

Methods

103 patients with sepsis and 98 healthy individuals were recruited. qRT-PCR was used for the measurement of miR-19b-3p level. Cell viability was evaluated using CCK-8. The protein levels of TNF-α and IL-6 were measured using ELISA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and logistic regression analysis were constructed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic values of miR-19b-3p in sepsis patients.

Results

MiR-19b-3p level was significantly reduced in the serum from patients with sepsis compared with healthy controls (P < 0.001). Sepsis patients in the survival group had significantly high miR-19b-3p levels compared with the non-survival group (P < 0.001). MiR-19b-3p was of a good value in predicting sepsis risk, and was an independent prognostic factor for 28-day survival in sepsis patients (OR = 3.226, 95% CI 1.076–9.670, P = 0.037). MiR-19b-3p level was negatively associated with serum levels of IL-6 (r = − 0.852, P < 0.001) and TNF-α (r = − 0.761, P < 0.001). Overexpression of miR-19b-3p alleviated LPS-induced inflammatory response of HUVECs, which was reflected by the decrease of the levels of IL-6 and TNF-α induced by LPS treatment (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

MiR-19b-3p might be a potential biomarker for the early diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis patients. Overexpression of miR-19b-3p alleviated sepsis-induced inflammatory responses.