Endovascular treatment of vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm: A single-center experience

Stent-alone treatment of unruptured vertebral artery fusiform aneurysms: A comparison of flow diverter and conventional stents

Background

Treatment of vertebral artery fusiform aneurysms (VAFAs) is complex and controversial. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy between flow diverter and conventional stents in patients with VAFAs undergoing endovascular stent-alone treatment (SAT).

Methods

Thirty-six patients with 36 VAFAs who underwent SAT between January 2014 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, procedural details, complications, and angiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between flow diverter stent patients (n = 22) and conventional stent patients (n = 14).

Results

More branches covered with stent were found in the conventional stent group (88.9 vs. 33.3%; p = 0.008). The number of stents placed was significantly higher in the conventional stent group (1.57 ± 0.76 vs. 1.09 ± 0.29; p = 0.016). The proportion of patients with significant or moderate stasis within the aneurysm immediately after stent placement was higher in the flow diverter stent group (95.5 vs. 57.1%; p = 0.004). The proportion of patients with complete obliteration or only a residual neck on follow-up angiography was significantly higher in the flow diverter stent group (86.3 vs 50.0%; p = 0.047). However, the incidence of parent artery stenosis or occlusion was also higher in the flow diverter stent group (27.3% vs. zero; p = 0.032). The rate of complications did not significantly differ between the groups.

Conclusions

SAT was safe and effective in patients with VAFAs. Flow diverter stents are associated with a significantly better complete occlusion rate than conventional stents; however, they are also associated with an increased risk of parent artery stenosis.

Hemodynamic Comparison of Treatment Strategies for Intracranial Vertebral Artery Fusiform Aneurysms

Objective

This study comparatively analyzed the hemodynamic changes resulting from various simulated stent-assisted embolization treatments to explore an optimal treatment strategy for intracranial vertebral artery fusiform aneurysms. An actual vertebral fusiform aneurysm case treated by large coil post-stenting (PLCS) was used as a control.

Materials and Methods

A single case of an intracranial vertebral artery fusiform aneurysm underwent a preoperative and eight postoperative finite element treatment simulations: PLCS [single and dual Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS)], Jailing technique (single and dual LVIS both simulated twice, Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) with or without large coils (LCs). Qualitative and quantitative assessments were performed to analyze the most common hemodynamic risk factors for recurrence.

Results

Jailing technique and PED-only had a high residual flow volume (RFV) and wall shear stress (WSS) on the large curvature of the blood flow impingement region. Quantitative analysis determined that PLSC and PED had a lower RFV compared to preoperative than did the jailing technique [PED+LC 2.46% < PLCS 1.2 (dual LVIS) 4.75% < PLCS 1.1 (single LVIS) 6.34% < PED 6.58% < Jailing 2.2 12.45% < Jailing 1.2 12.71% < Jailing 1.1 14.28% < Jailing 2.1 16.44%]. The sac-averaged flow velocity treated by PLCS, PED and PED+LC compared to preoperatively was significantly lower than the jailing technique [PED+LC = PLCS 1.2 (dual LVIS) 17.5% < PLCS 1.1 (single LVIS) = PED 27.5% < Jailing 1.2 = Jailing 2.2 32.5% < Jailing 1.1 37.5% < Jailing 2.1 40%]. The sac-averaged WSS for the PLCS 1.2 (dual LVIS) model was lower than the PED+LC, while the high WSS area of the Jailing 1 model was larger than for Jailing 2 [PLCS 1.2 38.94% (dual LVIS) < PED+LC 41% < PLCS 1.1 43.36% (single LVIS) < PED 45.23% < Jailing 2.1 47.49% < Jailing 2.2 47.79% < Jailing 1.1 48.97% < Jailing 1.2 49.85%].

Conclusions

For fusiform aneurysms, post large coil stenting can provide a uniform coil configuration potentially reducing the hemodynamic risk factors of recurrence. Flow diverters also may reduce the recurrence risk, with long-term follow-up required, especially to monitor branch blood flow to prevent postoperative ischemia.

Differentiation of Cerebral Dissecting Aneurysm from Hemorrhagic Saccular Aneurysm by Machine-Learning Based on Vessel Wall MRI: A Multicenter Study

The differential diagnosis of a cerebral dissecting aneurysm (DA) and a hemorrhagic saccular aneurysm (SA) often depends on the intraoperative findings; thus, improved non-invasive imaging diagnosis before surgery is essential to distinguish between these two aneurysms, in order to provide the correct formulation of surgical procedure. We aimed to build a radiomic model based on high-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging (VW-MRI) and a machine-learning algorithm. In total, 851 radiomic features from 146 cases were analyzed retrospectively, and the ElasticNet algorithm was used to establish the radiomic model in a training set of 77 cases. A clinico-radiological model using clinical features and MRI features was also built. Then an integrated model was built by combining the radiomic model and clinico-radiological model. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to quantify the performance of models. The models were evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation in a training set, and further validated in an external test set of 69 cases. The diagnostic performance of experienced radiologists was also assessed for comparison. Eight features were used to establish the radiomic model, and the radiomic model performs better (AUC = 0.831) than the clinico-radiological model (AUC = 0.717), integrated model (AUC = 0.813), and even experienced radiologists (AUC = 0.801). Therefore, a radiomic model based on VW-MRI can reliably be used to distinguish DA and hemorrhagic SA, and, thus, be widely applied in clinical practice.