Addition of dexmedetomidine to epidural morphine to improve anesthesia and analgesia for cesarean section

Adding Ketamine to Epidural Morphine Does Not Prolong Postoperative Analgesia After Lumbar Laminectomy or Discectomy

BACKGROUND

Epidural opioids provide effective postoperative analgesia after lumbar spine surgery. Ketamine has been shown to reduce opioid-induced central sensitization and hyperalgesia. We hypothesized that adding ketamine to epidural opioids would prolong the duration of analgesia and enhance analgesic efficacy after lumbar spine surgery.

METHODS

American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I to II patients aged between 18 and 70 years with normal renal function undergoing lumbar laminectomy were recruited into this single-center randomized trial. Patients were randomized to receive either single-dose epidural morphine (group A) or epidural morphine and ketamine (group B) for postoperative analgesia. The primary objective was to compare the duration of analgesia as measured by time to the first postoperative analgesic request. Secondary objectives were the comparison of pain scores at rest and movement, systemic hemodynamics, and the incidence of side effects during the first 24 hours after surgery.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were recruited (25 in each group), of which data from 48 were available for analysis. The mean±SD duration of analgesia was 20±6 and 23±3 hours in group A and group B, respectively ( P =0.07). There were 12/24 (50%) patients in group A and 17/24 (71%) patients in group B who did not receive rescue analgesia during the first 24-hour postoperative period ( P =0.07). Pain scores at rest and movement, systemic hemodynamics, and postoperative complications were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of ketamine to epidural morphine did not prolong the duration of analgesia after lumbar laminectomy.

Effect of epidural dexmedetomidine in single-dose combined with ropivacaine for cesarean section

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine has arousal sedation and analgesic effects. We hypothesize that epidural dexmedetomidine in single-dose combined with ropivacaine improves the experience of parturient undergoing cesarean section under epidural anesthesia. This study is to investigate the effect of 0.5 µg/kg epidural dexmedetomidine combined with epidural anesthesia (EA) in parturients undergoing cesarean section.

METHODS

A total of 92 parturients were randomly divided into Group R (receiveing epidural ropivacaine alone) Group RD (receiveing epidural ropivacaine with 0.5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine). The primary outcome and second outcome will be intraoperative NRS pain scores and Ramsay Sedation Scale.

RESULTS

All 92 parturients were included in the analysis. The NRS were significantly lower in Group RD compared to Group R at all observation timepoint (P > 0.05). Higher Ramsay Sedation Scale was found in Group RD compared to Group R (P < 0.001). No parturient has experienced sedation score of 4 and above. No significant difference regarding the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia and nausea or vomiting, Apgar scores and the overall satisfaction with anesthesia was found between Group R and Group RD (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Epidural dexmedetomidine of 0.5 µg/kg added slightly extra analgesic effect to ropivacaine in EA for cesarean section. The sedation of 0.5 µg/kg epidural dexmedetomidine did not cause mother-baby bonding deficit. Satisfaction with anesthesia wasn't significantly improved by epidural dexmedetomidine of 0.5 µg/kg. No additional side effect allows larger dose of epidural dexmedetomidine attempt.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2000038853).

Whole-course application of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: A randomized, controlled trial

Background

Dexmedetomidine is known to prolong the analgesic duration of spinal anesthesia, but it can be challenging to achieve further extension without opioids. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate a novel analgesic strategy using dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to spinal-epidural anesthesia for elective cesarean surgery.

Methods

The study was a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial conducted at a single center. Sixty parturients who underwent elective cesarean were randomly assigned to either group C or group D. Group D received an intrathecal injection of 12.5 mg ropivacaine and 5 μg dexmedetomidine followed by continuous epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) infusion with a total volume of 100 ml, containing 0.2 % ropivacaine and 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine. Group C received an intrathecal injection of 12.5 mg ropivacaine with an equivalent saline placebo followed by a similar PCA infusion, containing 0.2 % ropivacaine and an equivalent saline placebo.

Results

The primary outcome was visual analog scale score on movement at 24 h after surgery. The results showed that the rest and motion pain scores in group D were significantly lower than those in group C at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05), with the differences at 24 h were 5.0 (5.0, 5.0)in group D versus 5.0 (5.0, 6.0) in group C (P = 0.04). Additionally, the time to the first PCA in group D was significantly longer than that in group C (P < 0.05), as well as the time of sensory and motor recovery.

Conclusions

Whole-course application of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to spinal-epidural anesthesia could effectively extend the analgesic duration of ropivacaine to 24 h following elective cesarean surgery.

Effect of different doses of epidural dexmedetomidine on reducing visceral traction reaction for cesarean section: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different doses of epidural dexmedetomidine on reducing visceral traction reaction for cesarean section under epidural anesthesia.

METHODS

Nulliparas were randomly allocated to receive epidural ropivacaine alone (group R) or in combination with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg (group RD0.5), 0.75 μg/kg (group RD0.75), and 1 μg/kg (group RD1) with 46 nulliparas in each group. The primary outcome was intraoperative visceral traction reaction (graded from 0 to 3, with 0 and 3, respectively, regarded as 'no discomfort in stomach or perineum; no nausea, vomiting or intestinal tympanites' and 'serious visceral pain, nausea and vomiting, intestinal tympanites').

RESULTS

Visceral traction reaction was significantly alleviated in group RD0.5, RD0.75, and RD1, respectively, compared to group R while it was comparable among RD groups. Increased Ramsay Sedation Scale and lower incidence of shivering were found in RD groups compared to group R (p < 0.001). None of the primipara has experienced Ramsay Sedation Scale above 4. Higher incidence of thirst was found in group RD0.75 and RD1 compared to group R and RD0.5 (p < 0.001). The Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min of the neonates, onset time to T6 sensory block, maximum sensory block level, the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia and nausea or vomiting were comparable among groups.

CONCLUSION

It is suggested that 0.5 μg/kg epidural dexmedetomidine can be used as adjuvant to epidural ropivacaine during cesarean section, because of its alleviating visceral traction reaction, moderate sedating, and reducing shivering without thirst increase.

Effect of dexmedetomidine on oxytocin-induced uterine contraction during optimal caesarean section anaesthesia

Numerous drugs are used during caesarean sections to provide regional and general anaesthesia. Dexmedetomidine has been used in some recent obstetric trials, but there are concerns about postpartum changes in uterine contractions. This study evaluated the effect of dexmedetomidine on oxytocin-induced uterine contractions in women undergoing caesarean section. Sixty women undergoing caesarean section in Lianyungang Second People's Hospital were randomly assigned to dexmedetomidine (group D, n = 30) or saline (group C, n = 30) groups. Equal volumes of saline or dexmedetomidine were administered intravenously (IV). During the intraoperative delivery of the foetus and placenta, oxytocin was administered to promote contractions. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were compared. The Ramsay scale was used to assess sedation, while the Tsai and Chu methods assessed shivering. Adverse intraoperative events were observed. All variables fluctuated significantly after anaesthesia onset in both groups but were most pronounced in group D. The VAS, Ramsay and shivering scores were significantly lower in group D compared to group C. During rapid IV infusion of oxytocin after foetal delivery, the incidence of nausea, vomiting, chest tightness and hypotension was significantly lower in group D than in group C.

Analysis of Anesthesia Effect of Dexmedetomidine in Clinical Operation of Replantation of Severed Finger

Brachial plexus block commonly used in finger replantation has the advantages of simple operation, small side effects, and stable circulation, but it has inherent problems such as imperfect block range, slow onset of anesthesia, and short maintenance time of anesthesia. In order to explore the reliable clinical anesthesia effect, this paper uses experimental investigation methods to study the effect of dexmedetomidine in clinical surgery of replantation of severed fingers. Moreover, this paper uses comparative test methods, uses statistical methods to process test data, and uses intuitive methods to display test results. Finally, this paper verifies the reliability of dexmedetomidine in replantation of severed finger through comparative analysis and verifies that the anesthesia method proposed in this paper has certain user satisfaction through parameter survey.

PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations

Caesarean section is associated with moderate‐to‐severe postoperative pain, which can influence postoperative recovery and patient satisfaction as well as breastfeeding success and mother‐child bonding. The aim of this systematic review was to update the available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after elective caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia. A systematic review utilising procedure‐specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology was undertaken. Randomised controlled trials published in the English language between 1 May 2014 and 22 October 2020 evaluating the effects of analgesic, anaesthetic and surgical interventions were retrieved from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases. Studies evaluating pain management for emergency or unplanned operative deliveries or caesarean section performed under general anaesthesia were excluded. A total of 145 studies met the inclusion criteria. For patients undergoing elective caesarean section performed under neuraxial anaesthesia, recommendations include intrathecal morphine 50–100 µg or diamorphine 300 µg administered pre‐operatively; paracetamol; non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs; and intravenous dexamethasone administered after delivery. If intrathecal opioid was not administered, single‐injection local anaesthetic wound infiltration; continuous wound local anaesthetic infusion; and/or fascial plane blocks such as transversus abdominis plane or quadratus lumborum blocks are recommended. The postoperative regimen should include regular paracetamol and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs with opioids used for rescue. The surgical technique should include a Joel‐Cohen incision; non‐closure of the peritoneum; and abdominal binders. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation could be used as analgesic adjunct. Some of the interventions, although effective, carry risks, and consequentially were omitted from the recommendations. Some interventions were not recommended due to insufficient, inconsistent or lack of evidence. Of note, these recommendations may not be applicable to unplanned deliveries or caesarean section performed under general anaesthesia.