Myers R, Hutter J, Matthew J, Zhang T, Uus A, Lloyd D, Egloff A, Deprez M, Nanda S, Rutherford M, Story L. Assessment of the fetal thymus gland: Comparing MRI-acquired thymus volumes with 2D ultrasound measurements.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021;
264:1-7. [PMID:
34246829 DOI:
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.06.026]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
The fetal thymus gland has been shown to involute in response to intrauterine infection, and therefore could be used as a non-invasive marker of fetal compartment infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate how accurately 2D ultrasound-derived measurements of the fetal thymus reflect the 3D volume of the gland derived from motion corrected MRI images.
STUDY DESIGN
A retrospective study was performed using paired ultrasound and MRI datasets from the iFIND project (http://www.ifindproject.com). To obtain 3D volumetry of the thymus gland, T2-weighted single shot turbo spin echo (ssTSE) sequences of the fetal thorax were acquired. Thymus volumes were manually segmented from deformable slice-to-volume reconstructed images. To obtain 2D ultrasound measurements, previously stored fetal cine loops were used and measurements obtained at the 3-vessel-view (3VV) and 3-vessel-trachea view (3VT): anterior-posterior diameter (APD), intrathoracic diameter (ITD), transverse diameter (TD), perimeter and 3-vessel-edge (3VE). Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability (ICC) was calculated for both MRI and ultrasound measurements. Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) were used to compare 2D-parameters with acceptable ICC to TV.
RESULTS
38 participants were identified. Adequate visualisation was possible on 37 MRI scans and 31 ultrasound scans. Of the 30 datasets where both MRI and ultrasound data were available, MRI had good interobserver reliability (ICC 0.964) and all ultrasound 3VV 2D-parameters and 3VT 3VE had acceptable ICC (>0.75). Four 2D parameters were reflective of the 3D thymus volume: 3VV TD r = 0.540 (P = 0.002); 3VV perimeter r = 0.446 (P = 0.013); 3VV APD r = 0.435 (P = 0.110) and 3VT TD r = 0.544 (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS
MRI appeared superior to ultrasound for visualization of the thymus gland and reproducibility of measurements. Three 2D US parameters, 3VV TD, perimeter and 3VT APD, correlated well with TV. Therefore, these represent a more accurate reflection of the true size of the gland than other 2D measurements, where MRI is not available.
Collapse