Effects of dexmedetomidine on immune function, renal function and inflammatory factors of patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia

Effects of dexmedetomidine on renal function, inflammatory markers, and cognitive functioning in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of dexmedetomidine on renal function, inflammatory markers, and cognitive outcome, and to identify factors influencing early postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 162 elderly patients who underwent hip replacement surgery at Cangzhou Central Hospital from March 2022 to May 2023. Patients were divided into a control group (without dexmedetomidine) and an experimental group (with dexmedetomidine). Measurements included creatinine (Cr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), interleukin 1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score, and the incidence of POCD seven days postoperatively. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were employed to investigate the predictors of early POCD.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of renal function, inflammatory markers, and cognitive outcome (Cr, BUN, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6 and MoCA scores) (all P<0.05). The experimental group showed a significantly lower incidence of POCD at seven days post-surgery (P<0.05). Logistic regression identified having a neuron-specific enolase (NSE) level seven days post-surgery ≥7.0 pg/ml as a risk factor for early POCD (P=0.001, OR=3.987, 95% CI: 1.789-8.886), whereas intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine was a protective factor (P=0.041, OR=0.424, 95% CI: 0.187-0.964).

CONCLUSION

The use of dexmedetomidine in hip replacement surgery can mitigate postoperative renal injury and inflammatory response, enhance cognitive outcome, and significantly reduce the incidence and risk of early POCD in elderly patients.

Dexmedetomidine and acute kidney injury after non-cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication after surgery and is associated with detrimental outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated perioperative dexmedetomidine on AKI and renal function after non-cardiac surgery.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched until August 2023 for randomised trials comparing dexmedetomidine with normal saline on AKI and renal function in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI (according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes or Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria). Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effect model. We conducted sensitivity analysis, trial sequential analysis (TSA), and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation level of evidence.

RESULTS

Twenty-three trials involving 2440 patients were included. Dexmedetomidine administration, as compared to normal saline, significantly reduced the incidence of AKI (7.4% vs. 13.2%; risk ratio = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.40-0.83, P =  0.003, I2 = 0%; a high level of evidence); TSA and sensitivity analyses suggested the robustness of this outcome. For the renal function and inflammation parameters, dexmedetomidine decreased serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, cystatin C, tumour necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-6, and increased urine output and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Additionally, dexmedetomidine reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting and length of hospital stay. Dexmedetomidine was associated with an increased rate of bradycardia, but not hypotension.

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine administration reduced the incidence of AKI and improved renal function after non-cardiac surgery. Based on a high level of evidence, dexmedetomidine is recommended as a component of perioperative renoprotection.

REGISTRATION

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; Registration number: CRD42022299252.

Effects of Subcostal Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block with and without Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Rehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Renal Surgery: A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study

Background

The combination of different anesthesia techniques or adjuvant drugs can relieve the stress response to surgery, reduce adverse reactions and improve the clinical outcome. We investigated the effects of subcostal anterior quadratus lumborum block (SQLB) with and without dexmedetomidine (DEX) on postoperative rehabilitation for laparoscopic renal surgery (LRS).

Methods

We included 90 patients in this single-center study. All were scheduled for elective laparoscopic radical or partial nephrectomy under general anesthesia (GA). We randomly and evenly assigned them to three groups: Group GA (GA alone), Group QG (SQLB with 30 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine and GA), and Group DQG (SQLB with 30 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine plus 1 μg/kg DEX and GA). The primary outcomes were serum creatinine (Cr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels; the secondary outcomes included the average numeric rating scale (NRS) scores at rest and during activity within 48 h postoperatively; perioperative opioid consumption; the time to first ambulation, exhaust, and fluid intake, and postoperative adverse reactions.

Results

The serum Cr and BUN levels in Group DQG decreased significantly compared with Group GA (P < 0.05). The average NRS scores in Group DQG were significantly lower than other two groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the indexes reduced significantly in Group QG compared with Group GA (P < 0.05). Groups DQG and QG had lower consumption of opioid compared with Group GA (P < 0.05). The recovery indicators in Groups DQG and QG were higher quality than Group GA (P < 0.05). The incidences of adverse reactions in Group DQG was significantly lower than the other groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

SQLB with and without DEX could attenuate postoperative pain, reduce opioids requirement and side effects, as well as facilitate postoperative early rehabilitation. More interesting, SQLB with DEX could confer kidney protection.

Clinical Trial Registration Number

The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200061554).

Safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery among patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Enhanced recovery after surgery is widely used in the perioperative period in the field of urology; however, it lacks comprehensive and systematic evidence supporting its efficacy and safety after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Relevant databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Document Service System, and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database, will be searched from their inception to 19 September 2022. Two researchers will independently screen the literature, extract data and evaluate the included studies. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation will be used to assess the degree of certainty of the evidence. Based on the Cochrane Handbook V.5.1.0, the risk of bias assessment of the included randomised controlled trials will be assessed. Based on their randomisation method, allocation generation, concealment, blinding and follow-up, we will assess randomised controlled trials. Random-effects and fixed-effects models and subgroup analyses will be used for meta-analysis. RevMan V.5.4.1 will be used for data collection and meta-analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Due to the nature of this systematic review, ethics approval is not required for this study. We will publish the results of this review in a peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023411520.

Postoperative analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine combined with TPVB applied to open gastrectomy for gastric cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study is aimed to investigate the analgesic effect of combined dexmedetomidine and thoracic paravertebral nerve block (TPVB) on gastric cancer (GC) patients undergoing open gastrectomy.

METHODS

From May 2019 to Nov 2020, a total of 80 GC patients preparing for open gastrectomy were enrolled in our hospital and were divided into the ropivacaine (RO) group and the ropivacaine + dexmedetomidine (RD) group ad libitum. All of the patients underwent TPVB. The characteristics, usage of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), adverse events, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, inflammatory cytokines, and T cell subgroups between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Patients in the RD group showed the decreased occurrence rate of postoperative adverse events and VAS scores and improved anti-inflammation and immune function. These findings implied that the application of dexmedetomidine in combination with ropivacaine in TPVB has a good postoperative analgesic effect, as well as anti-inflammatory and immune-enhancing effects.

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct analgesic may be potentially applied in clinical practice for GC patients undergoing open gastrectomy.

Effect of Perioperative Dexmedetomidine Anesthesia on Prognosis of Elderly Patients with Gastrointestinal Tumor Surgery

It was to investigate the influence of perioperative dexmedetomidine (DEX) anesthesia on the prognosis of elderly patients with gastrointestinal tumor (GIT) surgery. 90 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for GIT were included. They were randomly divided into the experimental group (45 cases) with DEX+general anesthesia, and the control group (45 cases) with epidural anesthesia+general anesthesia. The indicators after surgery were compared between the two groups. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 74.8 ± 3.5 mmHg and the heart rate (HR) was 52.7 ± 8.2 beats/min⁻¹ in the experimental group, significantly lower than those of the control group (P < 0.05). The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores of both groups decreased greatly associated to those before surgery (P < 0.05). The levels of cortisol (COR) and immune adhesion inhibitor (FEIR) in the experimental group were significantly dissimilar from those in the control group (P < 0.05). The tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) was 96.4 ± 21.8 ng/L in the experimental group, observably lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The postoperative diamine oxidase (DAO) and D-lactate (D-lac) were 62.4 ± 9.3 μmol/mL and 33.8 ± 7.2 ng/L, respectively, in the experimental group, much lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There were also significant differences in the initial recovery of bowel sounds, defecation, and total length of hospital stay (LOHS) between the groups (P < 0.05). DEX anesthesia had ideal sedative and analgesic effects, improving the prognosis of patients during surgery, and shortening the LOHS. Thus, it deserved a clinical application value.