1
|
Guo Y, Song Q, Pan Q. Correlation analysis between rim enhancement features of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. Am J Transl Res 2021; 13:7193-7199. [PMID: 34306481 PMCID: PMC8290713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the correlation between rim enhancement features of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and lymphatic metastasis, and to provide theoretical support for clinical treatment of breast cancer. METHODS 387 breast cancer patients (748 axillary lymph nodes in total) treated in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2020 were selected and analyzed by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Pathological examination showed that 540 axillary lymph nodes showed metastasis whereas 208 axillary lymph nodes did not show metastasis. Univariate analysis and Logistic stepwise regression were used to analyze the correlation between rim enhancement features of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and axillary lymph node metastasis of breast cancer. RESULTS Peripheral halo, peripheral convergence, rim enhancement, enhancement mode, enhancement amplitude, enhancement sequence, expansion after enhancement, peak intensity, time to peak, area under curve, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction, perfusion sequence, aspect ratio, and maximum cortical thickness were all related to lymph node metastasis of breast cancer by univariate analysis, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that enhancement mode, enhancement amplitude, extension after enhancement, maximum cortical thickness, peak intensity and time to peak were all related to lymph node metastasis of breast cancer. CONCLUSION Rim enhancement features of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of breast cancer are related to lymph node metastasis, which will provide a guidance for clinical treatment of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanling Guo
- Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College Changzhi, Shanxi, China
| | - Qingfei Song
- Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College Changzhi, Shanxi, China
| | - Qiaohong Pan
- Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College Changzhi, Shanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Y, Tang L, Du Z, Zhong Z, Luo J, Yang L, Shen R, Cheng Y, Zhang Z, Han E, Lv Z, Yuan L, Yang Y, Cheng Y, Yang L, Wang S, Bai B, Chen Q. Factors influencing the performance of a diagnostic model including contrast-enhanced ultrasound in 1023 breast lesions: comparison with histopathology. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2019; 7:647. [PMID: 31930048 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.10.83] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background We aimed to investigate the influence of patient and lesion characteristics on our diagnostic model for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of the breast, comparing its accuracy with that of histopathology. Methods Conducting a study with eight medical centers, we compared 1,023 breast lesions categorized as BI-RADS 4 or 5 with the score from our newly-established CEUS-based diagnostic model, comparing the results with pathological outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the influence of clinicopathological characteristics on the performance of this CEUS model. Results Logistic regression analysis showed that patients' age, maximum lesion diameter, and distance from the lesion's deep edge to the pectoralis major were significant independent influencing factors. The model's diagnostic accuracy was greater for patients >35 y (P=0.005), for maximum lesion diameter >20 mm, and for distance from the lesion's deep edge to the pectoralis major ≤3.05 mm. There was no significant difference in accuracy between lesions with maximum lesion diameter 10-20 and <10 mm (P=0.393). Conclusions The diagnostic performance of the proposed CEUS model for breast lesions is influenced by patients' age, maximum lesion diameter, and distance from the lesion's deep edge to the pectoralis major. Consideration of influencing factors is required to optimize clinical use of the CEUS model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yijie Chen
- Department of Ultrasound, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, China
| | - Lina Tang
- Department of Ultrasound, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, China
| | - Zhongshi Du
- Department of Ultrasound, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, China
| | - Zhaoming Zhong
- Department of Ultrasound, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, China
| | - Jun Luo
- Department of Ultrasound, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China
| | - Lichun Yang
- Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University & Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Kunming 650118, China
| | - Ruoxia Shen
- Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University & Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Kunming 650118, China
| | - Yan Cheng
- Department of Ultrasound, Qujing City First People's Hospital, Qujing 655000, China
| | - Zizhen Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, Qujing City First People's Hospital, Qujing 655000, China
| | - Ehui Han
- Department of Ultrasound, Huangshi Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei Polytechnic University, Edong Healthcare Group, Huangshi 435000, China
| | - Zhihong Lv
- Department of Ultrasound, Huangshi Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei Polytechnic University, Edong Healthcare Group, Huangshi 435000, China
| | - Lijun Yuan
- Departments of Ultrasound, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China
| | - Yong Yang
- Departments of Ultrasound, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China
| | - Yinrong Cheng
- Department of Ultrasound, Chengdu First People's Hospital, Chengdu 610000, China
| | - Lei Yang
- Department of Ultrasound, Chengdu First People's Hospital, Chengdu 610000, China
| | - Shengli Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Yanan University Affiliated Hospital, Yan'an 716000, China
| | - Baoyan Bai
- Department of Ultrasound, Yanan University Affiliated Hospital, Yan'an 716000, China
| | - Qin Chen
- Department of Ultrasound, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China
| |
Collapse
|