Histone deacetylase inhibitors alter the expression of molecular markers in breast cancer cells via microRNAs

Anticancer Therapy with HDAC Inhibitors: Mechanism-Based Combination Strategies and Future Perspectives

The increasing knowledge of molecular drivers of tumorigenesis has fueled targeted cancer therapies based on specific inhibitors. Beyond "classic" oncogene inhibitors, epigenetic therapy is an emerging field. Epigenetic alterations can occur at any time during cancer progression, altering the structure of the chromatin, the accessibility for transcription factors and thus the transcription of genes. They rely on post-translational histone modifications, particularly the acetylation of histone lysine residues, and are determined by the inverse action of histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs). Importantly, HDACs are often aberrantly overexpressed, predominantly leading to the transcriptional repression of tumor suppressor genes. Thus, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) are powerful drugs, with some already approved for certain hematological cancers. Albeit HDACis show activity in solid tumors as well, further refinement and the development of novel drugs are needed. This review describes the capability of HDACis to influence various pathways and, based on this knowledge, gives a comprehensive overview of various preclinical and clinical studies on solid tumors. A particular focus is placed on strategies for achieving higher efficacy by combination therapies, including phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-EGFR inhibitors and hormone- or immunotherapy. This also includes new bifunctional inhibitors as well as novel approaches for HDAC degradation via PROteolysis-TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs).

A putative competing endogenous RNA network in cisplatin-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cells identifying potentially rewarding research targets

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common type of non-small cell lung cancer and has a poor 5 year survival rate (<10%). Cisplatin is one of the most effective chemotherapeutic treatments for LUAD, even though it is of limited overall utility due to acquired drug resistance. To identify possible genetic targets for the mitigation of cisplatin resistance, gene expression data from cisplatin-resistant cell lines were integrated with patient information. Expression data for cisplatin-resistant and cisplatin-sensitive A549 cell lines were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, while LUAD patient data was obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Differentially expressed mRNAs (DEmRNAs), microRNAs (DEmiRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (DElncRNAs) were identified between the cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin-resistant cells. Using the TCGA patient data, 33 DEmRNAs associated with survival were identified. A total of 74 DElncRNAs co-expressed with the survival-associated DEmRNAs, and 11 DEmiRNAs that regulated the survival-associated DEmRNAs, were also identified. A competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network was constructed based on the aforementioned results, which included 17 survival-associated DEmRNAs, 9 DEmiRNAs and 16 DElncRNAs. This network revealed 8 ceRNA pathway axes possibly associated with cisplatin resistance in A549 cells. Specifically, the network suggested that the lncRNAs HOXD-AS2, LINC01123 and FIRRE may act as ceRNAs to increase cisplatin resistance in human LUAD cells. Therefore, it was speculated that these lncRNAs represent potentially rewarding research targets.

Taenia crassiceps-Excreted/Secreted Products Induce a Defined MicroRNA Profile that Modulates Inflammatory Properties of Macrophages

Helminth parasites modulate immune responses in their host to prevent their elimination and to establish chronic infections. Our previous studies indicate that Taenia crassiceps-excreted/secreted antigens (TcES) downregulate inflammatory responses in rodent models of autoimmune diseases, by promoting the generation of alternatively activated-like macrophages (M2) in vivo. However, the molecular mechanisms triggered by TcES that modulate macrophage polarization and inflammatory response remain unclear. Here, we found that, while TcES reduced the production of inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-12, and TNFα), they increased the release of IL-10 in LPS-induced bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM). However, TcES alone or in combination with LPS or IL-4 failed to increase the production of the canonical M1 or M2 markers in BMDM. To further define the anti-inflammatory effect of TcES in the response of LPS-stimulated macrophages, we performed transcriptomic array analyses of mRNA and microRNA to evaluate their levels. Although the addition of TcES to LPS-stimulated BMDM induced modest changes in the inflammatory mRNA profile, it induced the production of mRNAs associated with the activation of different receptors, phagocytosis, and M2-like phenotype. Moreover, we found that TcES induced upregulation of specific microRNAs, including miR-125a-5p, miR-762, and miR-484, which are predicted to target canonical inflammatory molecules and pathways in LPS-induced BMDM. These results suggest that TcES can modulate proinflammatory responses in macrophages by inducing regulatory posttranscriptional mechanisms and hence reduce detrimental outcomes in hosts running with inflammatory diseases.