Limited expression of cancer-testis antigens in renal cell carcinoma patients

Immunohistochemical Detection of 5T4 in Renal Cell Carcinoma

5T4 (trophoblast glycoprotein encoded by TPBG ) is a cancer/testis antigen highly expressed in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and many other cancers but rarely in normal tissues. Interest in developing 5T4 as a prognostic biomarker and direct targeting of 5T4 by emerging receptor-engineered cellular immunotherapies has been hampered by the lack of validated 5T4-specific reagents for immunohistochemistry (IHC). We tested 4 commercially available monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for the detection of 5T4 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded RCC and normal tissues. Using parental and TPBG -edited A498 cells, 3 mAbs showed 5T4 specificity. Further analyses focused on 2 mAbs with the most robust staining (MBS1750093, Ab134162). IHC on tissue microarrays incorporating 263 renal tumors showed high staining concordance of these 2 mAbs ranging from 0.80 in chromophobe RCC to 0.89 in advanced clear cell RCC (ccRCC). MBS1750093, the most sensitive, exhibited 2+/3+ staining in papillary RCC (92.2%) > advanced ccRCC (60.0%) > chromophobe RCC (43.6%) > localized ccRCC (39.6%) > oncocytoma (22.7%). RNA in situ hybridization also revealed high levels of TPBG RNA were present most frequently in papillary and advanced ccRCC. In advanced ccRCC, there was a trend towards higher 5T4 expression and regional or distant metastases. Normal organ controls showed no or weak staining with the exception of focal moderate staining in kidney glomeruli and distal tubules by IHC. These data identify mAbs suitable for detecting 5T4 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues and demonstrate both interpatient and histologic subtype heterogeneity. Our validated 5T4 IHC protocol will facilitate biomarker studies and support the therapeutic targeting of 5T4.

Beyond conventional immune-checkpoint inhibition - novel immunotherapies for renal cell carcinoma

The management of advanced-stage renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been transformed by the development of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Nonetheless, most patients do not derive durable clinical benefit from these agents. Importantly, unlike other immunotherapy-responsive solid tumours, most RCCs have only a moderate mutational burden, and paradoxically, high levels of tumour CD8+ T cell infiltration are associated with a worse prognosis in patients with this disease. Building on the successes of antibodies targeting the PD-1 and CTLA4 immune checkpoints, multiple innovative immunotherapies are now in clinical development for the treatment of patients with RCC, including ICIs with novel targets, co-stimulatory pathway agonists, modified cytokines, metabolic pathway modulators, cell therapies and therapeutic vaccines. However, the successful development of such novel immune-based treatments and of immunotherapy-based combinations will require a disease-specific framework that incorporates a deep understanding of RCC immunobiology. In this Review, using the structure provided by the well-described cancer-immunity cycle, we outline the key steps required for a successful antitumour immune response in the context of RCC, and describe the development of promising new immunotherapies within the context of this framework. With this approach, we summarize and analyse the most encouraging targets of novel immune-based therapies within the RCC microenvironment, and review the landscape of emerging antigen-directed therapies for this disease.

Safety and antibody immune response of CHP-NY-ESO-1 vaccine combined with poly-ICLC in advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer patients

The nanoparticle complex of cholesteryl pullulan (CHP) and NY-ESO-1 antigen protein (CHP-NY-ESO-1) presents multiple epitope peptides to MHC class I and II pathways, leading to CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cell responses. Poly-ICLC is a synthetic, double-stranded RNA, an agonist of toll-like receptor (TLR)-3, and a cytoplasmic receptor of melanoma differentiation-associated gene (MDA)-5. It should be a suitable immune adjuvant of cancer vaccine to overcome the inhibitory tumor microenvironment. We conducted a phase 1 clinical trial of CHP-NY-ESO-1 with poly-ICLC in patients with advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer. CHP-NY-ESO-1/poly-ICLC (μg/mg) was administered at a dose of 200/0.5 or 200/1.0 (cohorts 1 and 2, respectively) every 2 weeks for a total of six doses. The primary endpoints were safety and immune response. The secondary endpoint was tumor response. In total, 16 patients were enrolled, and six patients in each cohort completed the trial. The most common adverse event (AE) was injection site skin reaction (86.7%). No grade 3 or higher drug-related AEs were observed. No tumor responses were observed, and three patients (30%) had stable disease. The immune response was comparable between the two cohorts, and all patients (100%) achieved antibody responses with a median of 2.5 vaccinations. Comparing CHP-NY-ESO-1 alone to the poly-ICLC combination, all patients in both groups exhibited antibody responses, but the titers were higher in the combination group. In a mouse model, adding anti-PD-1 antibody to the combination of CHP-NY-ESO-1/poly-ICLC suppressed the growth of NY-ESO-1-expressing tumors. Combining the vaccine with PD-1 blockade holds promise in human trials.

Current status of antigen-specific T-cell immunotherapy for advanced renal-cell carcinoma

In renal-cell carcinoma (RCC), tumor-reactive T-cell responses can occur spontaneously or in response to systemic immunotherapy with cytokines and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer vaccines and engineered T-cell therapies are designed to selectively augment tumor antigen-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses with the goal to elicit tumor regression and avoid toxicities associated with nonspecific immunotherapies. In this review, we provide an overview of the central role of T-cell immunity in the treatment of advanced RCC. Clinical outcomes for antigen-targeted vaccines or other T-cell-engaging therapies for RCC are summarized and evaluated, and emerging new strategies to enhance the effectiveness of antigen-specific therapy for RCC are discussed.

MAGE-A4, NY-ESO-1 and SAGE mRNA expression rates and co-expression relationships in solid tumours

Background

Cancer testis (CT) antigens are promising targets for cancer immunotherapies such as cancer vaccines and genetically modified adoptive T cell therapy. In this study, we evaluated the expression of three CT antigens, melanoma-associated antigen A4 (MAGE-A4), New York oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma 1 (NY-ESO-1) and sarcoma antigen gene (SAGE).

Methods

MAGE-A4, NY-ESO-1 and/or SAGE antigen expression in tumour samples was evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Informed consent was obtained from individuals prior to study enrolment.

Results

In total, 585 samples in 21 tumour types were evaluated between June 2009 and March 2018. The positive expression rates of these CT antigens were as follows: MAGE-A4, 34.6% (range, 30.7–38.7); NY-ESO-1, 21.0% (range, 17.2–25.1); and SAGE, 21.8% (range, 18.5–25.4). The MAGE-A4 antigen was expressed in 54.9% of oesophageal cancers, 37.5% of head and neck cancers, 35.0% of gastric cancers and 34.2% of ovarian cancers; the NY-ESO-1 antigen was expressed in 28.6% of lung cancers, 25.3% of oesophageal cancers and 22.6% of ovarian cancers; and the SAGE antigen was expressed in 35.3% of prostate cancers, 32.9% of oesophageal cancers and 26.3% of ovarian cancers. The most common tumour type in this study was oesophageal cancer. MAGE-A4, NY-ESO-1 and SAGE antigen expression were assessed in 214 oesophageal cancer samples, among which 24 (11.2%) were triple-positive, 58 (27.1%) were positive for any two, 59 (27.6%) were positive for any one, and 73 (34.1%) were triple negative.

Conclusions

Oesophageal cancer exhibited a relatively high rate of CT antigen mRNA expression positivity.

NY-ESO-1 antigen expression and immune response are associated with poor prognosis in MAGE-A4-vaccinated patients with esophageal or head/neck squamous cell carcinoma

MAGE-A4 antigen is a cancer-testis antigen that is frequently expressed in tumor tissues. Cholesteryl pullulan (CHP) is a novel antigen delivery system for cancer vaccines. This study evaluated the safety, immune responses and clinical outcomes of patients who received a CHP-MAGE-A4 vaccine. Twenty-two patients with advanced or metastatic cancer were enrolled, and were subcutaneously vaccinated with either 100 μg or 300 μg of CHP-MAGE-A4. Seven and 15 patients, respectively, were repeatedly vaccinated with 100 μg or 300 μg of CHP-MAGE-A4; patients in both groups received a median of 7 doses. No serious adverse events related to the vaccine were observed. Of 7 patients receiving the 100 μg dose, 2 (29%) showed immune responses, compared with 3 of the 14 (21%) patients who received the 300 μg dose. In total, MAGE-A4-specific antibody responses were induced in 5 of 21 (24%) patients. No differences in survival were seen between patients receiving the 100 μg and 300 μg doses, or between immune responders and non-responders. Eleven (50%) patients had pre-existing antibodies to NY-ESO-1. In 16 patients with esophageal or head/neck squamous cell carcinoma, the survival time was significantly shorter in those who had NY-ESO-1-co-expressing tumors. Patients with high pre-existing antibody responses to NY-ESO-1 displayed worse prognosis than those with no pre-existing response. Therefore, in planning clinical trials of MAGE-A4 vaccine, enrolling NY-ESO-1-expressing tumor or not would be a critical issue to be discussed. Combination vaccines of MAGE-A4 and NY-ESO-1 antigens would be one of the strategies to overcome the poor prognosis.

Autoantibody against arrestin-1 as a potential biomarker of renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the second-most common uronephrological cancer. In the absence of specific symptoms, early diagnosis of RCC is challenging. Monitoring of the aberrant expression of tumour-associated antigens (TAAs) and related autoantibody response is considered as a novel approach of RCC diagnostics. The aim of this study was to examine the aberrant expression of arrestin-1 in renal tumours, to investigate the possible epigenetic mechanism underlying arrestin-1 expression, and to assess the frequency of anti-arrestin-1 autoantibody response. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess the presence of arrestin-1 in primary tumours and metastases of 39 patients with RCC and renal oncocytoma. Bisulfite sequencing was employed to analyse the methylation status of the promoter of the SAG gene encoding arrestin-1. Western blot analysis was performed to detect autoantibodies against arrestin-1 in serum samples of 36 RCC and oncocytoma patients. Arrestin-1 was found to be expressed in RCC (58.7% of cases) and renal oncocytoma (90% of cases) cells, while being absent in healthy kidney. The expression of arrestin-1 in RCC metastases was more prominent than in primary tumours. Hypomethylation of the SAG gene promoter is unlikely to be the mechanism for the aberrant expression of arrestin-1. Autoantibodies against arrestin-1 were detected in sera of 75% of RCC patients. Taken together, our findings suggest employment of autoantibody against arrestin-1 as biomarker of RCC.

Neoantigen Load, Antigen Presentation Machinery, and Immune Signatures Determine Prognosis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Tumors commonly harbor multiple genetic alterations, some of which initiate tumorigenesis. Among these, some tumor-specific somatic mutations resulting in mutated protein have the potential to induce antitumor immune responses. To examine the relevance of the latter to immune responses in the tumor and to patient outcomes, we used datasets of whole-exome and RNA sequencing from 97 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients to identify neoepitopes predicted to be presented by each patient's autologous HLA molecules. We found that the number of nonsilent or missense mutations did not correlate with patient prognosis. However, combining the number of HLA-restricted neoepitopes with the cell surface expression of HLA or β2-microglobulin(β2M) revealed that an A-neo(hi)/HLA-A(hi) or ABC-neo(hi)/β2M(hi) phenotype correlated with better clinical outcomes. Higher expression of immune-related genes from CD8 T cells and their effector molecules [CD8A, perforin (PRF1) and granzyme A (GZMA)], however, did not correlate with prognosis. This may have been due to the observed correlation of these genes with the expression of other genes that were associated with immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment (CTLA-4, PD-1, LAG-3, PD-L1, PD-L2, IDO1, and IL10). This suggested that abundant neoepitopes associated with greater antitumor effector immune responses were counterbalanced by a strongly immunosuppressive microenvironment. Therefore, immunosuppressive molecules should be considered high-priority targets for modulating immune responses in patients with ccRCC. Blockade of these molecular pathways could be combined with immunotherapies targeting neoantigens to achieve synergistic antitumor activity. Cancer Immunol Res; 4(5); 463-71. ©2016 AACR.

Adoptive Transfer of MAGE-A4 T-cell Receptor Gene-Transduced Lymphocytes in Patients with Recurrent Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE

Preparative lymphodepletion, the temporal ablation of the immune system, has been reported to promote persistence of transferred cells along with increased rates of tumor regression in patients treated with adoptive T-cell therapy. However, it remains unclear whether lymphodepletion is indispensable for immunotherapy with T-cell receptor (TCR) gene-engineered T cells.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We conducted a first-in-man clinical trial of TCR gene-transduced T-cell transfer in patients with recurrent MAGE-A4-expressing esophageal cancer. The patients were given sequential MAGE-A4 peptide vaccinations. The regimen included neither lymphocyte-depleting conditioning nor administration of IL2. Ten patients, divided into 3 dose cohorts, received T-cell transfer.

RESULTS

TCR-transduced cells were detected in the peripheral blood for 1 month at levels proportional to the dose administered, and in 5 patients they persisted for more than 5 months. The persisting cells maintained ex vivo antigen-specific tumor reactivity. Despite the long persistence of the transferred T cells, 7 patients exhibited tumor progression within 2 months after the treatment. Three patients who had minimal tumor lesions at baseline survived for more than 27 months.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that TCR-engineered T cells created by relatively short-duration in vitro culture of polyclonal lymphocytes in peripheral blood retained the capacity to survive in a host. The discordance between T-cell survival and tumor regression suggests that multiple mechanisms underlie the benefits of preparative lymphodepletion in adoptive T-cell therapy.