Impact of body mass index on clinicopathological outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma without anorexia-cachexia syndrome

Nurses' Knowledge in Relation to the Anorexia-Cachexia Syndrome in Cancer Patients: A Cross-National Comparison in Two European Countries

INTRODUCTION

The Anorexia-Cachexia Syndrome (ACS) is a severe complication of cancer and is considered to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality affecting up to two-thirds of cancer patients and one that needs specialized nursing care. Studies showed that the ACS has been relatively under-researched and under-resourced whist the nurses' knowledge has not been systematically explored.

OBJECTIVE

Τo explores nurses' knowledge, understanding, and management of ACS in clinical practice in two European countries.

METHODS

Descriptive-comparative study with 197 cancer nurses recruited during two National Conferences in Greece and Cyprus. Data were retrieved with the "Investigation of anorexia-cachexia syndrome in Practice" questionnaire.

RESULTS

In terms of nurses' perceptions on ACS, the prevailing characteristic reported in both countries was anorexia (p = .65) followed by weight loss (p = .04). 189 nurses (95.9%, p = .176) do not currently use a tool to assess patients' nutritional status as part of their standard clinical practice. Statistically significant differences were found in relation to the routine assessment of nutritional-related symptoms including early satiety (Cyprus 64% vs. Greece 37%, p = .001), hiccough (66% vs. 36%, p < .001), alteration of the taste/odor sensation (77% vs. 45%, p < .001), problems in the oral cavity (84% vs. 68%, p = .032) and daily activities (85% vs. 69%, p = .032). The priority level for the ACS management differed significantly in the two countries (p = .006), with higher priority being reported in Cyprus.

CONCLUSION

The study showed that more education is needed for cancer nurses to better understand the ACS which can facilitate the better management of the syndrome in clinical practice.

Sarcopenia predicts prognosis of patients with renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sarcopenia, a concept reflecting the loss of skeletal muscle mass, was reported to be associated with the prognosis of several tumors. However, the prognostic value of sarcopenia in patients with renal cancer remains unclear. We carried out this metaanalysis and systematic review to evaluate the prognostic value of sarcopenia in patients with renal cell carcinomas. We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2018. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled together. A total of 5 studies consisting of 771 patients were enrolled in this quantitative analysis, 347 (45.0%) of which had sarcopenia. Patients with sarcopenia had a worse OS compared with those without sarcopenia (HR=1.76; 95%CI, 1.35-2.31; P <0.001). In the subgroup of patients with localized and advanced/metastatic diseases, sarcopenia was also associated with poor OS (HR=1.48, P=0.039; HR=2.14, P <0.001; respectively). With a limited sample size, we did not observe difference of PFS between two groups (HR=1.56, 95% CI, 0.69-3.50, P=0.282). In the present meta-analysis, we observed that patients with sarcopenia had a worse OS compared with those without sarcopenia in RCC. Larger, preferably prospective studies, are needed to confirm and update our findings.

The Prognostic Value of Body Fat Components in Metastasis Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with TKIs

Purpose

To assess the association between body fat components and survival status and tumor response for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Patients and Methods

Patients with pathologically diagnosed and radiologically indicated mRCC were enrolled into the retrospective study. Three body fat components: total fat accumulation (TFA), visceral fat accumulation (VFA) and subcutaneous fat accumulation (SFA) were measured using standard CT scans. The clinical outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and tumor response rates. Univariate analysis and multivariate Cox proportion hazard regression models were used to find associated parameters and to calculate the adjusted hazard ratio (HR).

Results

A total of 146 patients were enrolled and the average age of patients was 56.5 years old. According to the univariate analysis, patients with an increased SFA and TFA had a longer PFS and OS. A similar phenomenon was observed among patients with ≥2 increasing body fat components about PFS and OS. As for multivariate analysis, SFA change (p=0.014) or the number of increasing body fat components (p=0.040) were independent indicators to predict PFS. In addition, SFA change (p=0.022) or the number of increasing body fat components (p=0.008) could independently predict OS. Moreover, a better disease control rate (p=0.028) was founded in patients with ≥2 increasing components. In the subgroup of patients with ≥2 metastasis sites, improved OS (p=0.017) and PFS (p=0.027) were found compared to those with <2 increasing components. Further multivariate analysis identified the number of increasing body fat components was an independent factor in predicting PFS (p=0.018) and OS (p=0.029).

Conclusion

Body fat accumulation, such as high SFA or TFA at progression, could improve the survival of patients with mRCC treated with TKIs, especially patients with higher tumor burden. It should be considered as an important parameter to predict the survival status of patients with mRCC.

Prognostic biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma: is there a relationship with obesity?

Obesity is a recognized risk factor for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) the commonest form of kidney cancer. Both obesity and RCC are serious diseases with increasing incidence yearly. This review examined certain obesity associated measurements and adipokines as detection/prognostic indicators for RCC. The obesity related measurements such as body mass index (BMI), waist circumstance (WC), waist-hip ratio (WHR) in predicting RCC are valid when used in conjunction with other risk factors such as age and sex or with histological findings. The adipokine adiponectin holds promising outcomes as a predictive marker in assessing the risk of developing RCC. In addition, tissue leptin/leptin receptor may be a distinguishing marker for RCC subtypes. However, circulating leptin may not be a suitable detection or prognostic biomarker for RCC. The other less investigated adipokines; omentin, visfatin, apelin and resistin are also expressed in RCC but their prognostic capabilities are still inconclusive. BMI, WC and adipokines may be useful additions in a nomogram which includes TNM staging and pathological grading system to detect, confirm and follow-up RCC cases.