1
|
Bian DJ, Lazaratos AM, Maritan SM, Quaiattini A, Zeng Z, Zhu Z, Sener U, Malani R, Kim YJ, Ichihara E, Cohen V, Rose AA, Bouganim N, Dankner M. Osimertinib is associated with improved outcomes in pre-treated non-small cell lung cancer leptomeningeal metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysiss. Heliyon 2024; 10:e29668. [PMID: 38698967 PMCID: PMC11064091 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a severe complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In patients with NSCLC LM harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, osimertinib is favored over alternative EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the efficacy of osimertinib relative to other EGFR-TKIs is not well established for patients with LM. We aimed to compare the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC LM. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis performed according to PRISMA guidelines included studies of adult patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and a diagnosis of LM who received an EGFR-TKI for the treatment of LM. We searched Medline ALL, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. The evaluation of biases was done by using the Ottawa-Newscastle scale. The hazard ratio was used as the parameter of interest for overall survival (OS) and central nervous system-specific progression-free survival (PFS). Results 128 publications were included with 243 patients and 282 lines of EGFR-TKI for NSCLC LM that met inclusion criteria. The median PFS in patients receiving any EGFR-TKI was 9.1 months, and the median OS was 14.5 months. In univariate analyses of the entire cohort, osimertinib treatment demonstrated significantly prolonged PFS, but not OS, compared to other EGFR-TKIs. Osimertinib demonstrated significantly prolonged PFS and OS in the subset of patients who were previously treated with EGFR-TKIs, but not in EGFR-TKI naïve patients. Conclusion Osimertinib is associated with improved outcomes compared to other EGFR-TKIs, particularly in patients previously treated with EGFR-TKIs. An important limitation is that most patients were derived from retrospective reports. These results highlight the need for prospective studies for this difficult-to-treat patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J.H. Bian
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anna-Maria Lazaratos
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sarah M. Maritan
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andrea Quaiattini
- Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Zhimin Zeng
- Department of Oncology, the Second affiliated hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Zhengfei Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Ugur Sener
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Rachna Malani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Yu Jung Kim
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Eiki Ichihara
- Department of Allergy and Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Shikata-cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama City, Okayama, Japan
| | - Victor Cohen
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Lady Davis Institute, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - April A.N. Rose
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Lady Davis Institute, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nathaniel Bouganim
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Matthew Dankner
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Lady Davis Institute, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kanbour A, Salih F, Abualainin W, Abdelrazek M, Szabados L, Al-Bozom I, Omar NE. Leptomeningeal Metastatic L858R EGFR-mutant Lung Cancer: Prompt Response to Osimertinib in the Absence of T790M-mutation and Effective Subsequent Pulsed Erlotinib. Onco Targets Ther 2022; 15:659-667. [PMID: 35733652 PMCID: PMC9207126 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s336012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) is a known sequel of metastatic lung cancer and its treatment is challenging. Nevertheless, treatment options for LMC due to metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant (EGFR-mutant) lung adenocarcinoma are expanding. We present a 52-year-old male patient with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The patient was found to have L858R mutation in exon 21 of the EGFR gene. He was initially treated with erlotinib, followed by afatinib/cetuximab, followed by chemotherapy. Thereafter, his disease progressed to LMC. Although tissue biopsy did not show T790M-mutation, osimertinib (160 mg once daily) promptly induced clinical and radiological response that continued for five months. High dose pulsed erlotinib (1500 mg weekly) improved his quality of life and extended his survival for a further four months. ![]()
Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use: https://youtu.be/hB2KtcuyWz4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aladdin Kanbour
- Medical Oncology Department, National Center for Cancer Care and Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Faroug Salih
- Medical Oncology Department, National Center for Cancer Care and Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Wafa Abualainin
- Solid Tumor Section, Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Diagnostic Genomic Division, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Mohamed Abdelrazek
- Clinical Imaging Department, National Center for Cancer Care and Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Lajos Szabados
- Clinical Imaging Department, National Center for Cancer Care and Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Issam Al-Bozom
- Precision Medicine Section, Anatomical Pathology Department, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Nabil E Omar
- Pharmacy Department, National Center for Cancer Care and Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
El Shafie RA, Böhm K, Weber D, Lang K, Schlaich F, Adeberg S, Paul A, Haefner MF, Katayama S, Hörner-Rieber J, Hoegen P, Löw S, Debus J, Rieken S, Bernhardt D. Palliative Radiotherapy for Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis-Analysis of Outcome, Prognostic Factors, and Symptom Response. Front Oncol 2019; 8:641. [PMID: 30671384 PMCID: PMC6331444 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this article is to report our institution's 10-year experience on palliative radiotherapy for the treatment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC), assessing survival, neurologic outcome, and prognostic factors. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 110 patients who received palliative radiotherapy for LC between 2008 and 2018. The most common histologies were breast cancer (n = 43, 39.1%) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n = 31, 28.2%). Radiotherapy was administered as whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) (n = 51, 46.4%), focal spinal RT (n = 11, 10.0%) or both (n = 47, 42.7%). Twenty-five patients (22.7%) were selected for craniospinal irradiation. Clinical performance and neurologic function were quantified on the neurologic function scale (NFS) before and in response to therapy. A Cox Proportional Hazards model with univariate and multivariate analysis was fitted for survival. Results: Ninety-eight patients (89.1%) died and 12 (10.9%) were alive at the time of analysis. Median OS from LC diagnosis and from the beginning of RT was 13.9 weeks (IQR: 7.1-34.0) and 9.9 weeks (IQR: 5.3-26.3), respectively. In univariate analysis, prognostic of longer OS were a Karnofsky performance scale index (KPI) of ≥70% (HR 0.20, 95%-CI: [0.13; 0.32], p < 0.001), initially moderate neurological deficits (NFS ≤2) (HR 0.32, 95% CI: [0.19; 0.52], p < 0.001), symptom response to RT (HR 0.41, 95%-CI: [0.26; 0.67], p < 0.001) and the administration of systemic therapy (HR 0.51, 95%-CI: [0.33; 0.78], p = 0.002). Prognostic of inferior OS were high-grade myelosuppression (HR 1.78, 95% CI: [1.06; 3.00], p = 0.03) and serum LDH levels >500 U/l (HR 3.62, 95% CI: [1.76; 7.44], p < 0.001). Clinical performance, symptom response and serum LDH stayed independently prognostic for survival in multivariate analysis. RT was well-tolerated and except for grade III myelosuppression in 19 cases (17.3%), no high-grade acute toxicities were observed. Neurologic symptom stabilization was achieved in 83 cases (75.5%) and a sizeable improvement in 39 cases (35.5%). Conclusion: Radiotherapy is a well-tolerated and efficacious means of providing symptom palliation for patients with LC, delaying neurologic deterioration while probably not directly influencing survival. Prognostic factors such as clinical performance, neurologic response and serum LDH can be used for patient stratification to facilitate treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rami A. El Shafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karina Böhm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dorothea Weber
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Schlaich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Angela Paul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias F. Haefner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sonja Katayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Löw
- Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology (E050), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|